Why Do Leftists Call EVERYTHING Fascist?

Summary

This video script delves into the phenomenon of labeling everything as 'fascist' by the left, particularly in the context of political discourse. It critiques the tendency of left anarchists to adopt inverse values of fascism, leading to a misguided association of strength and discipline with fascism. The script also explores the post-WWII political myth that positions fascism as the ultimate evil, influencing the left's perception of morality and politics. It discusses how the left uses the term 'fascist' to describe anything that deviates from their progressive ideology, reflecting a broader issue of ideological intolerance and the struggle for control over societal values.

Takeaways

• 😀 The video discusses the tendency of some individuals to label everything they dislike as 'fascist', highlighting the inverse values adopted by some left anarchists in response to fascist ideologies.
• 🏛️ The script challenges the notion that advocating for order is inherently fascistic, arguing that order is essential for a civil society.
• 🗣️ It critiques the idea that liberalism is a 'moderate wing of fascism', emphasizing the importance of peaceful protest and the distinction between descent and disorder.
• 📚 The video references George Orwell's observations on the concept creep of the term 'fascist', illustrating how the word has lost its specific meaning.
• 🌐 The script introduces the concept of 'political mythology', explaining how post-World War II societies have defined fascism as the ultimate evil, shaping societal values and perceptions.
• 🤔 It delves into the socialist view of liberals, suggesting that liberals are seen as potential converts to socialism due to shared moral codes.
• 🔄 The video points out that the term 'fascist' is often used to describe anything that is not explicitly socialist, reflecting a binary view of politics.
• 💬 The Italian phrase 'meno' is explored, highlighting its historical use by fascists to express indifference to societal norms and a commitment to violence as a political tool.
• 🚫 The script argues that the rejection of progressive morality by some is not indicative of fascism, but rather a response to being constantly judged and pressured to conform.
• 🤷‍♂️ Lastly, the video suggests that the left's perception of everything non-leftist as fascist stems from a need to control the narrative and protect their moral high ground.

Q & A

What is the main argument of the video script regarding the use of the term 'fascism'?

The main argument is that the left often misuses the term 'fascism' to describe anything they disagree with, rather than reserving it for its historical and accurate context. This overuse dilutes the term's meaning and reflects a broader issue with political discourse.

Why does the video script mention 'demonizing strength' in relation to political ideologies?

The script discusses how some left anarchists adopt inverse values of fascists, which includes demonizing strength. It argues that just because fascists value strength doesn't mean those values are exclusively fascist, and the left should not feel obligated to pursue the opposite.

What is the concept of 'political mythology' as it is used in the video script?

In the script, 'political mythology' refers to stories that societies tell themselves to justify their existence and shared values. It's used to explain how certain political groups, like post-World War II societies, define themselves against an ultimate evil, in this case, fascism.

How does the video script connect the concept of 'good and evil' to political ideologies?

The script suggests that while some on the left claim to reject the concept of good and evil, they still operate as if it exists, just relabeling it as 'leftist' and 'fascist'. This allows them to morally judge and categorize political positions without acknowledging the complexity.

What role does the Italian phrase 'meno' play in the video script's discussion?

The phrase 'meno' is used to illustrate the fascist rejection of socialist moral claims. It symbolizes an indifference to socialist moral judgments, which the script argues has been misinterpreted by the left as a sign of fascism whenever someone rejects their moral framework.

Why does the video script discuss the movie 'Joker' in the context of political ideologies?

The script uses 'Joker' to illustrate how the left perceives certain expressions of frustration or rejection of progressive values as fascist. It argues that the movie's themes and a specific meme from it are seen as challenging the progressive narrative, thus being labeled as fascist.

What does the video script suggest is the reason behind the left's tendency to view everything as fascism?

The script suggests that the left views everything as fascism because it is a reaction to any challenge to their moral authority. When people reject the left's moral framework, the left perceives it as a slide towards fascism, even if it's just a desire for personal freedom or different values.

How does the video script explain the term 'crypto fascist' as used by some on the left?

The script explains that 'crypto fascist' is a term used by some on the left to describe those who refuse to conform to their moral and political expectations. It's a label applied to anyone who expresses an 'I don't care' attitude towards progressive values.

What is the significance of the phrase 'I don't care' in the context of the video script?

In the script, 'I don't care' represents a rejection of the progressive moral framework. It's seen as a defiant stance against being categorized or judged by socialist or progressive values, which the left often interprets as a sign of fascism.

How does the video script connect the broader political climate to individual expressions of frustration?

The script connects the political climate to individual expressions by suggesting that widespread use of terms like 'fascism' and the push for conformity have led to a backlash. People are expressing frustration with progressive values, which is seen as a shift towards a modern 'meno' attitude.

Outlines

00:00

🔍 The Paradox of Anti-Fascism and Political Mythology

The paragraph discusses the paradoxical nature of anti-fascism, where the rejection of fascist values can lead to the inadvertent adoption of their inverse. It critiques the tendency of left anarchists to define themselves in opposition to fascism, which can result in the embrace of values that are equally problematic. The speaker also addresses the common misconception that advocating for order is inherently fascistic, arguing that a civil society requires order. The paragraph touches on the historical use of the term 'fascist' and how it has been diluted to the point of losing its original meaning, leading to its overuse and misuse by activists to label anything they disagree with as fascist.

05:01

🤔 The Strategy of Socialists and the Liberal Dilemma

This paragraph delves into the relationship between socialism and liberalism, highlighting how socialists often position themselves as the true inheritors of liberal values, promising to achieve the unfulfilled promises of liberalism. It discusses the common goals of freedom and equality that both ideologies share, despite their differences in approach. The speaker also describes how socialists use moral questioning to try to persuade liberals to adopt more left-wing positions, leveraging the shared moral ground to push for radicalization. The paragraph also touches on how this dynamic plays out in various social and political contexts, including the influence of radicals in institutions and the use of moral appeals to gain power and influence.

10:03

📚 The Evolution of 'Fascist' as a Political Insult

The paragraph explores the evolution of the term 'fascist' as a political insult, particularly within the context of socialist and progressive discourse. It discusses how anything not explicitly socialist is often labeled as fascist by these groups, reflecting a binary view of politics where there is no middle ground. The speaker connects this trend to the historical use of the term 'meno' by Italian fascists, which expressed a rejection of socialist moral judgments. The paragraph also examines how this dynamic has led to a broader perception of anyone who resists socialist moral pressure as being 'fascist', even if their motivations are not aligned with fascist ideology.

15:04

🚫 The Rejection of Progressive Morality and the Rise of 'Meno'

This paragraph discusses the growing trend of individuals and groups rejecting the progressive moral framework that has become pervasive in society. It highlights how the constant push for leftward movement and the moral browbeating by progressives have led to a backlash where people are embracing an 'I don't care' attitude, similar to the historical 'meno' stance of Italian fascists. The speaker argues that this rejection is not an embrace of fascism, but rather a cry for freedom from the oppressive nature of progressive moralizing. The paragraph concludes by suggesting that the left's inability to tolerate dissent and its tendency to label all opposition as fascist is driving normal people to assert their independence from the progressive narrative.

Keywords

💡Fascism

Fascism is a form of far-right, authoritarian ultranationalism characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and strong regimentation of society and of the economy. In the video, the term is discussed in the context of political ideologies and values, particularly in relation to how the left perceives and labels certain behaviors or ideologies as fascistic. The video argues that the term has been overused and diluted, losing its original meaning.

💡Anarchists

Anarchists are individuals who advocate for the abolition of hierarchical structures, such as the state, in favor of voluntary associations and self-governance. The video discusses how left anarchists might adopt inverse values of fascism out of a reaction against it, which the speaker argues is nonsensical, as it doesn't mean those values are inherently fascist.

💡Liberalism

Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on liberty, consent of the governed, and equality before the law. The video touches upon how some individuals might view liberalism as a 'moderate wing of fascism,' which the speaker refutes by emphasizing the importance of order in a civil society and the difference between peaceful protest and intimidation.

💡Political Mythology

Political mythology refers to stories or narratives that societies create to justify their existence and values. In the video, the concept is used to explain how the post-World War II political myth has defined fascism as the ultimate evil, shaping the perception of what is considered morally right or wrong in the liberal world order.

💡Moral Scale

The moral scale in the video refers to a conceptual framework where actions or ideologies are judged based on their perceived goodness or evilness. The speaker argues that the Nazis have been placed at the extreme end of this scale, and anything associated with them is deemed the utmost evil, which influences how people perceive and label other ideologies.

💡Socialism

Socialism is an economic and political system where the means of production are owned and controlled collectively, usually by the state. The video discusses socialism in the context of its shared values and goals with liberalism, such as freedom and equality, and how socialists often claim to be the true inheritors of the liberal project.

💡Progressive

Progressives are individuals who support or advocate for social reform and change, often aligning with left-leaning political ideologies. The video describes how progressives might view certain behaviors or values as fascistic if they deviate from their own moral and political stance.

💡Contrarian

A contrarian is someone who takes an opposing view, often for the sake of being different. The video uses the term to describe individuals who might label others as fascists simply because they advocate for order, which the speaker argues is a flawed and contrarian way of thinking.

💡Meno

Meno, derived from the Italian phrase 'min枭 frego,' translates to 'I don't give a damn' and was the motto of the Italian black shirts, a fascist paramilitary group. In the video, it's discussed as a symbol of rejecting the shared morality of socialists and progressives, with the speaker arguing that this rejection is often misinterpreted as fascism.

💡Crypto Fascist

A 'crypto fascist' is a term used to describe someone who is secretly or subtly fascist. The video discusses how the term is misused to label anyone who rejects the progressive or socialist morality, even if their reasons for doing so are unrelated to actual fascist beliefs.

Highlights

The video addresses the tendency of some to label everything as fascism, especially by those on the left.

It critiques the inverse adoption of fascist values by some left anarchists in their attempt to be anti-fascist.

The video argues that advocating for order within a civil society is not inherently fascistic.

It discusses the concept of 'concept creep' where the term 'fascist' loses its specific meaning due to overuse.

The post-World War II political myth positions fascism as the ultimate evil, influencing modern perceptions.

The video explains how socialism and liberalism share values, despite their differences in method.

It highlights the socialist tactic of moral posturing to try to convert liberals to socialism.

The concept of 'meno' from Italian fascism is explored, showing its influence on the perception of morality.

The video discusses how the rejection of progressive morality is often mislabeled as fascism.

It provides examples of how the left views certain behaviors, like not wanting to see people injecting drugs, as fascist.

The video argues that the left's view of fascism is a reaction to the rejection of their moral framework.

It explains how the term 'fascist' is used by the left as a way to control discourse and label dissent.

The video points out that the left's broad use of 'fascist' is a form of moral browbeating.

It discusses the phenomenon of 'meno' as a modern expression of frustration with progressive morality.

The video concludes by suggesting that the left's labeling of non-leftist views as fascist is a sign of their own insecurity.

It provides a critique of the left's tendency to view any deviation from their ideology as a form of fascism.

Transcripts

[Music]

I know I know I've tackled this topic

several times from a few different

angles most recently I put out a video

titled demonizing strength where I went

over a list of values that fascists

consider to be moral and showed how in

their desperate attempt to be as

anti-fascist as possible left anarchists

tend to adopt the inverse values of the

fascists this makes absolutely no sense

by the way just because fascists value

strength discipline or veril doesn't

mean that those values are exclusively

fascist but that you have a moral

obligation to pursue weakness Indulgence

or impotency whenever a Libertarian

socialist like our old buddy vosch here

makes the claim that a liberal

advocating for order is fascistic this

is exactly the kind of contrarian brain

Rod he's Clinging On to we are a civil

society and Order must Prevail

throughout our history we've often okay

you know how the most annoying people on

Twitter like to say that liberalism is

the moderate wing of fascism this is

what they mean and they're correct

threatening people intimidating people

instilling fear in people is not

peaceful protest so this is like

unironically fascistic rhetoric the um

it's no different to what the right did

with BLM descent is essential to

democracy but descent must never lead to

disorder or fascism sorry right here

clear as day we we are we are fully

doing the like uh scratch a liberal

thing right now nonetheless I'm not

fully satisfied with my previous

attempts to answer the question why does

the left view everything as Fascism and

so I'm going to put the topic to bed

once and for all there's a Twitter

account aply named everything is fascism

which outlines how well everything is

fascist at least according to these

activists it's all the usual nonsense

we've seen time and time again Cottage

core is fascist tattoos are Fascist

calling someone a [ __ ] is fascist

liberal feminism is fascist distrusting

media is fascist turfs are Fascist Harry

Potter's fascist not wanting to see

people injecting drugs on the subway is

fascist golf is fascist sargon's company

is fascist the military defending people

is fascist holding your hand up is

fascist hometowns are Fascist

superheroes are Fascist dieting is

fascist Mount Rushmore is fascist theory

of the mind is fascist not being allowed

to make baseless accusations of genocide

is fascist Cinema is fascist not

befriending giant bugs that want to kill

you is fascist Aesthetics are Fascist

sunglasses are Fascist Trad wives are

Fascist being Catholic is fascist liking

dogs is fascist moving to Florida is

fascist Thomas the Tank Engine is

fascist Disney World's fascist lect

turns are Fascist bow ties are Fascist

you know what I actually love this

account the last time I did a drive by

collage like this there was no

centralized location to grab all of the

[ __ ] proclaims random thing as fascism

takes so why does this happen so often

why are Le doids so hellbent on calling

anything they don't like fascism I mean

yeah a few rightoids have latched onto

the trend as well calling the Democrats

fascist or International organizations

fascist or Communists fascist and that

is just as stupid but it is

overwhelmingly leids who do this and

it's been happening for a while Orwell

famously commented on this exact

phenomenon back in his day where the

word fascist had become concept creeped

to the point of uselessness I think I

finally know why we've been in this

situation for a while now though it's

going to take going down a few rabbit

holes to explain in my previous video on

being indigenous I briefly discussed the

concept of political mythology a

political myth is a story that people

tell each other which serves to justify

their continued existence within a

United polity in that video I gave the

example of the Roman political myth

Romulus and Remis and the Wolf mother as

well as the American political myth

George Washington in the Revolutionary

War as two very different examples to

show that it doesn't actually matter if

the myth is true or false what matters

is that it provides a justification for

the society to exist the post World War

II political myth of the countries that

make up the liberal World Order is

defined very similarly to those left

anarchists who have simply chosen to be

the opposite of whatever fascism is no

matter how stupid that is in practice

the very fact that we call it the

post-war World means we set the starting

point for that Paradigm at World War II

in this view the Nazis are the ultimate

Evil not without good reason obviously

but we have pegged them solidly in place

in the final most evil position possible

on the moral scale this means that all

things Nazi must be the most evil that

can ever possibly exist there can never

be a greater evil than the Nazis and we

can also never admit that anything

remotely positive about them ever

existed both of these statements are

false but they're an Optics nightmare to

explore intellectually if you talk to

some progressive-minded people and

certainly most socialists you'll find

that a lot of them have a disdain for

the concept of Good and Evil they'll say

that's just the old oppressive

moralistic traditional nonsense that we

need to shake off in order to be truly

free good and evil almost sounds trit

when you look at it through a modernist

lens you know but despite this these

people absolutely behave as if good and

evil exists they've simply changed the

names for these Concepts instead of Good

and Evil they say leftist and fascist

and they use these words as if they're

speaking about morality not Politics the

more good you are the more left you are

the more evil the more Nazi fascism has

become a word to describe evil for

people who think they're too

sophisticated for the concept of evil

but they still find it very useful

additionally in my previous video on the

flaws of liberalism I pointed out that

liberalism and socialism shares values

and stated goals they're both aiming at

freedom and equality it doesn't really

matter that socialism never actually

achieves these things because we're

talking about the realm of theory here

the reason you see so many socialists

Proclaim themselves as the inheritors of

the liberal project claiming that they

will be the ones to fulfill the false

promises of liberalism is because while

liberals and socialists differ on method

quite a bit to the point that they're

often enemies they do have some common

goals this is why socialists will often

attempt to browbeat liberals and

sometimes Libertarians into compliance

with moral questioning the Socialist

will say something like you're a liberal

right you like freedom and democracy and

equality right well I like those things

too and want more of them than you so

why aren't you moving leftward into my

position every time I've personally had

a conversation with a socialist who

actually recognizes me as a liberal

they've always always used this tactic

they always say something like you

should be on my side you can't be a

Centrist why aren't you with me don't

you want to be the good guy or don't you

think you have a responsibility to push

social justice with your platform with

the assumption that because I'm a

liberal and they're a leftist they can

pipeline me down to their position using

moral posturing it's the main reason I

created this meme a few years ago to

show just how fit up with it I was yeah

that was me and this happens to everyone

who's a liberal or a Normy or a Centrist

or apolitical for example a lot of the

radicals who have moved into middle

management positions in various

government offices or private companies

or universities have done so using this

method they didn't capture these

institutions with violence and they

didn't earned their way there with Merit

they appealed to the shared morality

they said you're a racist and a sexist

look at how discriminatory your

organization is and those well-meaning

people in the organization not wanting

to be a racist or a sexist opened the

gates and allowed them in they didn't

understand how they were racist or

sexists but because they believed

themselves to be good people and they

saw that the complaints were coming from

people who historically have been the

victims of racism and sexism people who

were holding shiny new gender studies

degrees that surely gave them some level

of expertise in the subject well the

right thing to do would be to listen to

them right and that's how we got these

deih HR departments that everyone fears

so much a quick recap before we go any

further what I've just described to you

are three different points from three of

my previous videos one the post-world

War II political myth that defined

fascism as the ultimate Evil two the the

Socialist view of liberals as people who

will necessarily radicalize into

socialists as they share the same moral

code three the Socialist and sometimes

the progressive view of nearly

everything not explicitly them as

fascist what ties these three points

together is the idea that anything that

outwardly appears to be neither

socialist nor fascist is simply an

incomplete thought an unfinished

equation and in the final analysis it

will shake out to either be socialist or

fascist there is no other possible

position it's good or evil leftist or

fascist now it's true that radicals of

all Stripes kind of think this way this

isn't exactly unique to socialists

Libertarians view liberals conservatives

socialists fascists monarchists all as

different flavors of collectivism

Christian theocrats view all the various

non-christians as heathens islamists

view all the various non-muslims as

cafir it's always easier to view the

various different groups who aren't you

as if they're all the same thing

especially if you're following strict

ideological programming but there is a

bit more to it than that at least in

this specific Case C did an excellent

video years ago on the Italian phrase

meno which roughly translates to give a

damn or I don't give a [ __ ] I really do

recommend you watch cot's video as I'm

going to be covering a different aspect

of the phrase Mino than he did Mino was

the motto of the Italian black shirts

the paramilitary wing of melini's

national fascist party it's considered

far more vulgar in Italian than it is in

English even more so than I don't give a

[ __ ] it was a phrase you definitely

would not utter in polite company when

the black shirts adopted the phrase it

took on several meanings firstly it

showed that they didn't care about

vulgarity they didn't care about social

norms they quite literally did not give

a [ __ ] about what you thought of them

the word men fizmo is directly

translated as indifference secondly it

was also used to express The Bravery of

the fascist malicious black shirts would

write men a frgo on the bandages of

their injured comrades the meaning of

which was not just to promote some

necessary stoicism but rather a Devotion

to violence for its own sake it was a

statement violence was their primary

mode of politics not debate thirdly and

most importantly for our purposes today

it was used philosophically to describe

the fascist attempt to carve out their

own destiny within the enlightenment

Paradigm even back in the 1920s

political theorists were aware that

socialists positioned themselves as the

inheritors of the liberal project as the

fulfillers of the liberal promises they

knew that the two groups made the same

moral appeals the fascist solution to

this problem was to reject the entire

Pipeline and simply say I don't care if

you find me or my ideas immoral men

frego consequently various socialist

movements began to view the Liberals a

little bit differently before they were

considered inevitable converts it was

just a matter of time and education as

the moral intuitions that made a person

a liberal would eventually also make

them a socialist but after meno

socialists would come to view liberals

who reject being pushed off of their

liberal positions by virtue of their

shared moral foundations with the

Socialist instead as hidden fascists the

reason for this is that the liberal

would have to appeal to a different

morality than the Socialist in order to

remain consistent and not be pipelined

due to those inherent contradictions

within liberalism valuing this other

moral code over the assumed shared moral

code necessarily means at some point

simply saying I don't care I'm valuing

something different as a reply to the

Socialist moral judgment which marks the

liberal as a crypto fascist now that you

understand this that clip of BOS calling

Biden a fascist for appealing to order

rather than freedom and equality hits a

whole lot differently descent is

essential to democracy but descent must

never lead to disorder or fascism sorry

right here clear as day we we are we are

fully doing the like uh scratch a

liberal thing right now there is of

course a huge obvious gaping flaw in

this logic not everyone who says I don't

care I don't follow your morality and so

I don't accept your moral prescriptions

is a fascist actually Libertarians

regularly say I don't care about your

moral demand that I give up my

hard-earned wealth to the state to help

the poor leave me alone conservatives

regularly say I don't care about your

moral demand that I give up my

traditions in the name of Liberation and

equality liberals who have any sense AKA

liberals who aren't progressives

regularly say I don't care if my free

speech rights or my gun rights or my

right of free association or my property

rights or any other civil rights are

impeding your socialist Revolution

there's many good reasons normal people

would simply say I don't care but

socialist ideology is such that there is

no other explanation to them it's all

meno it's it's all fascism we are at the

point where any exclamation of I don't

care is itself considered fascist I've

seen lefties online say that

Libertarians are Fascist for rejecting

the left's call for inclusion

interconnectedness and community and

saying I don't care I want my life to be

private separate and individualistic

I've personally debated many lefties a

lot of them on Twitter but several on

stream who have used the same tactic on

me I remember specifically I was

debating a lefty on food shop stream she

asked me if I thought I was doing

anything immoral by being attracted to

or having sex with trans women as she

viewed as objectifying and demeaning and

she was making a moral judgment on me

for this she was saying well you're a

liberal don't you think you're

objectifying these poor women I simply

told her no I didn't and I don't care

about her moral Judgment of my private

life she immediately went down that

Progressive checklist first saying that

I needed to educate myself on the topic

and later saying that I lacked morality

and I was a crypto fascist simply

because I wouldn't be browbeaten into

her position through her Progressive

shaming I also had a private debate with

a lefty friend of mine in DMS where I

made the point that while something like

HD or Starship Troopers might be a

parody of what the creators think is

fascism at least from that Progressive

media literacy point of view the

right-wingers who play the game or enjoy

the movie and genuinely enjoy the

Aesthetics and values of the so-called

fascists don't care if they're being

critiqued or made fun of this Lefty

friend of mine went on to say that's

concerning then lol it's melini's men

fro and it's not just random internet

retards saying this probably the most

high-profile real life case of this was

back in 2018 where Melania Trump wore a

jacket saying I don't really care do you

print it on the back a whole bunch of

Lefty Outlets began to call Melania a

crypto fascist for using that slogan

there was even a short period of time

where the gigachad meme was considered

fascist it's way too popular now but

originally the online left would paint

gigachad as a fascist because he was the

modern embodiment of the I don't care

attitude like just imagine it there's a

soy filled leid screaming oh my God

don't you know that being racist is bad

and then there's a gigachad just staring

at him saying yes and where the

progressive expects you to agree with

his morality and then have some

wishy-washy debate where you limp

wristed justify why you should be

allowed to be racist if it's bad the

gigachad is simply saying of course I'm

racist racism is good it is the ultimate

men fro and it's [ __ ] hilarious to

their credit the leftist analysis of

this isn't exactly wrong there is

certainly a small but growing number of

legitimate fascists on the internet who

are becoming emboldened by the normies

the conservatives and even some liberals

beginning to blanket reject the shared

morality of progressives and socialists

we're beginning to see these people

resurface and claim that they don't care

if you think they're immoral for denying

the Holocaust or something but

overwhelmingly this rejection of that

shared morality is not actually coming

from real fascists it's coming from

normal people who are simply tired of

being brow beat they're tired of seeing

blatant political messaging and all of

their entertainment where what they

choose to consume for leisure is judging

them for not Towing the line they're

tired of seeing diversity and

sensitivity training at work in school

they're tired of tiptoeing around

everyone they know in real life so that

nobody can ever be offended they're

tired of vast salls of what used to be

normal interactions between men and

women being discouraged stigmatized or

even criminalized they're tired of being

told what to think and speak and feel by

people who believe they are more morally

Superior because they are more left

leaning I'll leave you with one final

example of what I mean the reason

progressives viewed the 2019 Joker movie

as a fascist ballad is not only because

of white male rage Thing movie

is is white raage white raage white rage

Joker it's also because of this scene

and the meme it became let me get this

straight you think that killing those

guys is

funny I do I I'm tired of pretending

it's not just like gigachad this is a

modern Mino from the leftist point of

view it doesn't matter that in the movie

it's an expression used out of

hopelessness and exasperation by the

victim of a decaying capitalist system a

theme that you think a socialist would

appreciate as a meme on the Internet

it's used to express that same

exasperation but directed at the

left-wing morality that we've all been

living under you can't make a racist or

a sexist or a homophobic or a

transphobic joke cuz that means you're a

bigot you can't critique migrants coming

in or taxes going up or rampant drug use

in emboldened by harm reduction policies

that means you're evil you can't

question the efficacy of diversity

initiatives or affirmative action that

means you're a Nazi and eventually the

normies just broke they began to reject

the progressive social Paradigm we've

been living under for the past 20 years

slowly pushing things leftfor over time

they simply began saying yes those

racist jokes are funny and I'm tired of

pretending they're not they simply began

saying I don't care and yes to answer

all of the cliches this is why gamergate

happened this is why brexit happened and

this is why Trump happened what unites

all of the examples that I've given you

today is the blanket rejection of that

shared Progressive socialist morality

it's normal everyday people saying no I

don't want things to move more leftward

actually and I don't care if you view me

as immoral for rejecting your political

project this new men frgo if it's even

appropriate to call it that isn't some

proud Declaration of fascism it's a

frazzled worn out sigh an exasperated

pleading saying enough leave me alone

this is why leftist will always view the

Liberals desire for privacy the

Libertarians desire for rugged

individualism and the conservatives

desire for order and familiarity as

fascist not because they actually are

but because when push comes to shove

they're all willing to be viewed as evil

from the Socialist point of view rather

than acquest to their demands if it

means that they get their privacy or

individualism or order or familiarity

basically they all view their own values

as more important than socialist ones

which is a completely normal thing to do

and so the Socialist has to view the

normal as fascist the reason the left

views everything not them as fascism is

because anything that is not them

anything that they don't control can and

will be used to critique them critiquing

the left means questioning its morality

questioning the left's morality means in

their view sliding down that leftist

fascist moral scale towards the fascist

side anytime you say I don't care if you

hate me I don't care about your moral

brow beating just leave me alone the

only part of it they hear is I don't

care the only part of it they hear is

meno