GANJIL! Review CMF Buds by NOTHING. Malah Lebih Recommended dari yang PRO?? ๐ฅ๐ฅ
Summary
TLDRThe video script reviews the Nothing ear (1) buds and compares them to the Pro version. It highlights the lack of multi-point connection support in the Pro model, which the standard version offers. The standard buds are cheaper, with a price difference of around Rp50,000 to Rp100,000. Both use Bluetooth 5.3 and support SBC and AAC codecs. The standard buds have a slightly weaker noise-canceling capability but are praised for their design and features like Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, and in-ear detection. The script includes a detailed sound test, gaming experience, and microphone quality assessment, concluding that both models are enjoyable and worth considering, with a slight preference for the standard buds for daily use.
Takeaways
- ๐ง The brand released a Pro version of their product first, which is unusual as non-Pro versions are typically released before Pro versions.
- ๐ก The Pro version does not support multi-point connections, a feature that the non-Pro version does support.
- ๐ฐ The initial price of the Pro version was significantly higher at RP799,000 compared to the non-Pro version at RP599,000, with the current price difference being only RP50,000 to RP100,000.
- ๐ Both the Pro and non-Pro versions use Bluetooth 5.3 and support SBC and AAC codecs, but they differ in their driver size and noise-canceling capabilities.
- ๐ The non-Pro version has a slightly smaller battery capacity at 45mAh compared to the Pro version, and both have a case capacity of 460mAh.
- ๐ฆ Both earphone versions share the same IP54 rating for water and dust resistance.
- ๐ The earphones support Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, and the Nothing X app, which allows for managing dual device connections, equalizer settings, touch controls, and noise-canceling modes.
- ๐ต The sound quality of the non-Pro version is described as warm and powerful, with a good balance of bass and treble, making it enjoyable to listen to.
- ๐ฎ The earphones performed well in tests, including a B Shaker test and virtualization for gaming, providing clear directionality and minimal delay.
- ๐ The microphone quality is good at noise reduction and providing clear voice pickup, although it has a slight robotic effect on the voice.
- ๐๏ธ The decision between the Pro and non-Pro versions comes down to the need for dual device connection and the value placed on design and additional features, as both options are considered worth the investment.
Q & A
What is the issue with the Pro version of the earphones mentioned in the script?
-The Pro version of the earphones does not support multi-point connections, which is a feature that the non-Pro version does support.
How much did the initial release of the Pro version of the earphones cost?
-The initial release of the Pro version of the earphones cost 799,000 Indonesian Rupiah.
What is the price difference between the Pro and non-Pro versions of the earphones now?
-The price difference between the Pro and non-Pro versions is now only about 50,000 to 100,000 Indonesian Rupiah.
What are the main features of the CMF Buds earphones?
-The CMF Buds earphones use Bluetooth 5.3, support SBC and e codecs, have a 12.4mm biofiber driver, and feature direct sound, direct opteo technology, and ultrabus technology 2.0 ANC with a noise cancellation depth of -42 decibels.
How many microphones does the CMF Buds earphones have for noise cancellation?
-The CMF Buds earphones have four microphones for noise cancellation.
What is the battery capacity of the CMF Buds earphones?
-The battery capacity of the CMF Buds earphones is 45mAh, which is 10mAh smaller than the Pro version.
What additional features does the CMF Buds Pro version have over the non-Pro version?
-The CMF Buds Pro version has a slightly better noise cancellation depth of -45 decibels and an additional microphone for a total of six.
What is the IP rating for water and dust resistance for both the Pro and non-Pro earphones?
-Both the Pro and non-Pro earphones have an IP54 rating for water and dust resistance.
Does the CMF Buds earphones support quick pairing with Google and Microsoft devices?
-Yes, the CMF Buds earphones support Google Fast Pair and Microsoft Swift Pair for quick pairing.
What is the main drawback of the CMF Buds earphones when it comes to the low latency mode?
-The main drawback is that the low latency mode must be activated from the app and cannot be designed into the touch control of the earphones.
How does the sound quality of the CMF Buds earphones compare to the Pro version?
-The sound quality of the CMF Buds is enjoyable with a warm and powerful character, but it is slightly biased towards the bass, and the clarity might not be as optimal as the Pro version.
What is the recommendation for someone who wants to use the earphones as a daily driver and doesn't have other TWS earphones?
-For someone who wants to use the earphones as a daily driver and doesn't have other TWS earphones, it is recommended to consider the non-Pro version due to its value for money and similar features, unless multi-device connection is a must-have feature.
Outlines
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowMindmap
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowKeywords
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowHighlights
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowTranscripts
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowBrowse More Related Video
Why I'm not calling these 'Pro' - OnePlus Nord Buds 3 Pro
Redmi Buds 5 vs Redmi Buds 4 Pro Comparativo! Qual dos dois vale mais a pena comprar??
Realme Buds Air 6 Pro vs Realme Buds Air 6 - Which One? ๐ฅ
Xiaomi Buds 5 Top Features, ANC, Low Latency Gaming, APTX Lossless, Audio Recording
Galaxy Buds2 PRO vs AirPods Pro 2 [Honest Comparison & Testing!]
The Best TWS I have Used | What's The Best
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)