Research into Blast Injury and the Brain

BrainLine
23 Aug 201304:54

Summary

TLDRResearchers modeled a military-style blast using a 120 mm artillery round IED, simulating conditions faced by service personnel. Surprisingly, ordinary mice exposed to a single blast developed similar neuropathology to humans, including early CTE, microvasculopathy, and axonal damage. The blast's effects on brain physiology were profound, impairing learning and memory. The 'bobble head effect' caused by the blast wind, not the shock wave, was identified as the primary damage mechanism, offering hope for potential interventions to prevent chronic brain injuries.

Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿง  The study investigates the mechanisms behind the relationship between blast exposure and brain injury.
  • ๐Ÿ’ฅ The experimental blast was modeled after a 120mm artillery round IED, which is a common and highly destructive weapon used in conflicts.
  • ๐Ÿ The researchers used ordinary laboratory mice for the study, which were exposed to a single blast and then observed for neuropathology.
  • ๐Ÿšซ Contrary to expectations, the mice developed similar neuropathology to humans, including early Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE), within two weeks of exposure.
  • ๐Ÿงฌ The study found evidence of microvasculopathy, axonal damage, and changes in the brain's electrical properties post-blast.
  • ๐Ÿคฏ The blast exposure led to severe impairments in learning and memory capabilities in the mice.
  • ๐Ÿ”Œ The electrical connections between neurons, crucial for learning and memory, were also chronically impaired.
  • ๐ŸŒช๏ธ The primary cause of injury was identified as the 'blast wind' rather than the initial shock wave, which can reach speeds of 300-350 meters per second.
  • ๐ŸŽฏ The 'bobble head effect' was described, where the head's movement caused by the blast wind is responsible for the observed damage.
  • ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ When the head movement was restricted, the long-term neurobehavioral deficits were not observed, suggesting a potential area for intervention.

Q & A

  • What was the focus of the second part of the study mentioned in the transcript?

    -The focus was to investigate the mechanisms that underlie the relationship between blast exposure and brain injury.

  • How was the experimental blast modeled in the study?

    -The experimental blast was modeled on a 120 mm artillery round IED, which is a common explosive device encountered in Iraq, packing the equivalent of 58 kg of TNT at 5 meters.

  • What unexpected finding did the researchers encounter in ordinary laboratory mice after a single blast exposure?

    -The researchers were surprised to find that ordinary laboratory mice developed the same neuropathology seen in humans after a single blast exposure.

  • What type of neuropathology was observed in the mice after the blast exposure?

    -The mice exhibited early Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE), microvasculopathy, damage to axons, and changes in the electrical properties of the brain.

  • How did the blast exposure affect the mice's cognitive abilities?

    -The blast exposure severely impaired the mice's ability to learn and remember, and also affected the electrical connections between neurons.

  • What was the researchers' initial expectation regarding the blast wave's effect on the brain?

    -The researchers initially expected the blast wave itself to cause the damage to the brain as it passes through it in microseconds.

  • What was identified as the actual cause of the brain injury in the study?

    -The actual cause of the brain injury was identified as the blast wind, which can whip around at speeds of 300-350 mph, causing a 'bobble head effect' that leads to damage.

  • What did the researchers find when they held the head still during the blast?

    -When the head was held still, the researchers did not observe the long-term neurobehavioral deficits that were seen when the head was allowed to move.

  • What does the study suggest about the progression of brain injuries caused by a single blast?

    -The study suggests that these injuries do not resolve and may progress and possibly get worse over time, at least within the time period of the study.

  • What optimism does the study provide for potential interventions?

    -The study provides optimism for potential interventions by identifying the 'bobble head effect' as the key mechanism of injury, suggesting that preventing such movement could mitigate the damage.

Outlines

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Mindmap

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Keywords

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Highlights

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now

Transcripts

plate

This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.

Upgrade Now
Rate This
โ˜…
โ˜…
โ˜…
โ˜…
โ˜…

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
Blast InjuryBrain DamageMilitary ResearchIED EffectsNeuropathologyBlast WaveBlast WindBobble Head EffectNeurological ImpactTraumatic Brain Injury