I Actually Bought 100 Scam Ads

Summary

In a humorous quest to debunk common scams, the host purchases and tests a variety of dubious products, including a watch that claims to withstand immense weight, a soda-scented humidifier, and webbed gloves for swimming. Each product is put through its paces with a mix of skepticism and hope, culminating in a series of entertaining and often disastrous results. The video concludes with a tongue-in-cheek reflection on whether any of these purchases genuinely improved the host's life.

Takeaways

• 😅 The host humorously tests a variety of 'scammy' products, challenging the notion that they might actually be life-changing.
• 🕰️ The 'Carbonox Watch' is tested for durability, claiming to withstand 10,000 lb of weight, but fails to impress in real-life testing.
• 🌬️ A 'soda humidifier' is used to make a room smell like Mountain Dew, but ends up being a sticky mess and not very effective.
• 🏊‍♂️ 'Flexi webs' are tested for swimming enhancement, showing a slight improvement in swimming speed but are ultimately deemed gimmicky.
• 🍱 A self-heating lunch box is tested, but the food doesn't heat up properly, leading to disappointment.
• 🚪 An 'auto door closer' works surprisingly well, earning high praise and a five-star rating.
• 🎵 A 'loop machine' is tested, and while the host is initially confused, it ends up being a fun and useful tool.
• 🍟 A 'pot that cooks with no Stove Top' is used for deep frying in a dorm room, resulting in a marriage-saving experience.
• 🔪 A 'peeler' is tested, and despite initial skepticism, it works well and earns a positive review.
• 🌂 'Phonebrella' is a cute but impractical phone accessory designed to protect a phone from rain, earning mixed reviews.

Q & A

What was the purpose of the video?

The purpose of the video was to test and review various products that the creator had purchased after seeing them in ads, with the premise of answering whether they could potentially change their life for the better, despite the skepticism that they might be scams.

What was the first product tested in the video?

The first product tested was the 'carbonox watch,' which was claimed to be able to withstand up to 10,000 lb of weight.

How much did the carbonox watch cost?

The carbonox watch cost $80.

What was the result of the carbonox watch test?

The carbonox watch did not withstand the weight test as expected and was deemed a failure by the reviewer, resulting in a zero-star rating.

What was the purpose of the soda humidifier?

The soda humidifier was meant to make the room smell like Mountain Dew Code Red without actually drinking it.

What was the reviewer's concern about using the soda humidifier?

The reviewer was concerned that the soda humidifier might make their room sticky, with every surface potentially covered in a sticky residue.

How did the reviewer test the flexi webs product?

The reviewer tested the flexi webs by swimming across a pool and timing their speed with and without the product to see if it improved their swimming ability.

What rating did the reviewer give to the flexi webs product?

The reviewer gave the flexi webs product a four-star rating, as it was faster by 29 seconds during the swimming test.

What was the reviewer's opinion on the self-heating lunch box?

The reviewer found the self-heating lunch box to be a cool concept but ultimately did not find it very practical, giving it a two-star rating.

What was the reviewer's experience with the auto door closer?

The reviewer found the auto door closer to be surprisingly effective and gave it a five-star rating, stating that it solved a problem of their door being left open.

What was the main issue the reviewer had with the loop machine?

The reviewer was unsure of the purpose of the loop machine and felt scared when turning it up to max speed, resulting in a four-star rating with a note of confusion.

What did the reviewer think about the peeler product?

The reviewer was skeptical about the peeler's functionality and durability, and after testing it, they gave it a three-star rating, noting that it was somewhat useful but not outstanding.

What was the outcome of the reviewer's test with the phonebrella?

The reviewer found the phonebrella to be a cute but impractical product, giving it a three-star rating and noting that it kept their phone dry but was a bit awkward to use.

What was the special offer mentioned in the video for the shop app?

The special offer mentioned was a partnership with the shop app to give away $100,000 in shop cash to users, with the app being described as a shopping and package tracking app with a new in-app currency called shop cash.

What was the reviewer's final verdict on the products tested?

The reviewer concluded that they were indeed ripped off by the products, as none of them significantly changed their life for the better, despite the initial premise of the video.