Gw Beli Concord Yang Katanya Game Terjelek 2024

Summary

The video script reviews the game 'Concord,' criticized as one of the biggest flops of 2024 due to its low player count compared to its viewership. Despite a high development cost, the game is likened to 'Overwatch' and 'Valorant,' lacking innovation. The reviewer, after purchasing the game for 600,000, faces issues finding matches due to a lack of players, suggesting the game's high price and unoriginality as its downfall. The script also touches on the game's detailed character expressions and design, which, while visually appealing, are uninspired and unoriginal, further contributing to the game's failure to attract and retain players.

Takeaways

• 😀 The game 'Concord' is considered a major flop in 2024 as it has significantly fewer players compared to the number of live stream viewers.
• 😲 The game's player base is so small that the reviewer couldn't find a match, despite trying multiple times.
• 💸 Concord was developed with a significant investment of hundreds of millions of US dollars and years of development, yet it failed to attract players.
• 🎮 The game is compared to 'Overwatch', but with no significant innovation or breakthroughs to differentiate it.
• 😐 The reviewer criticizes the game's character design as unoriginal and lacking inspiration, with some characters resembling those from other games.
• 😕 The game's price point of 600,000 (currency not specified) is seen as too high for the experience it offers, especially when compared to free alternatives.
• 🤔 The lack of player base is a critical issue, and the reviewer suggests that the game could have benefited from introducing bots to populate matches.
• 😅 The game's features are described as 'nobody asked for it', indicating that they might not align with what the gaming community desires.
• 🚫 The reviewer points out that despite the high price, the game lacks innovation and feels like a rehash of existing games like 'Valorant' and 'Overwatch'.
• 😞 The game's maps and overall design are described as boring and uninteresting, which contributes to the lack of player engagement.
• 💡 The reviewer suggests that if the game were offered for free, it might have had a better chance of attracting and retaining players.

Q & A

What is the main issue the reviewer faced with the game 'Concord'?

The main issue the reviewer faced was the lack of players, making it difficult to find matches, which is a significant problem for the game's player base.

How does the reviewer compare 'Concord' to other games in terms of player numbers?

The reviewer compares 'Concord' unfavorably to other games, stating that even games that have failed, like 'Game Golum', have more players than 'Concord'.

What was the reviewer's expectation for 'Concord' given its development cost?

The reviewer expected 'Concord' to offer a new experience and innovation in the shooting game genre, considering the game's development cost of hundreds of millions of US dollars.

Why does the reviewer believe 'Concord' is similar to 'Overwatch'?

The reviewer thinks 'Concord' is similar to 'Overwatch' because of its gameplay mechanics and the fact that it lacks significant innovation to differentiate itself.

What is the reviewer's opinion on the game's facial expressions and character design?

The reviewer praises the facial expressions in the game for being detailed and clear but criticizes the character design for being unoriginal and uninspiring.

What solution does the reviewer suggest to improve the matchmaking experience in 'Concord'?

The reviewer suggests introducing bots or creating matches against bots to improve the matchmaking experience for players who have purchased the game.

How does the reviewer feel about the game's pricing and perceived value?

The reviewer questions the value of the game at its price point of 600,000, given the lack of players and innovation, suggesting it's overpriced for the experience it offers.

What other games does the reviewer compare 'Concord' to in terms of gameplay and design?

The reviewer compares 'Concord' to 'Overwatch' and 'Valorant', noting similarities in skills and gameplay, but criticizes 'Concord' for lacking the innovation that those games have.

What is the reviewer's stance on the game's features that seem unnecessary?

The reviewer finds some features of the game unnecessary and questions their inclusion, suggesting they do not add value to the game experience.

What does the reviewer think is the critical factor leading to the game's failure?

The reviewer believes the critical factor leading to the game's failure is the lack of innovation, boring maps, and the high price for a game that doesn't offer a significantly different experience from its competitors.

What advice does the reviewer have for potential buyers of 'Concord'?

The reviewer advises potential buyers to try the game first, considering its high price and the lack of a distinguishing factor that would make it stand out from free alternatives like 'Overwatch' and 'Valorant'.