How to Disprove the Iglesia Ni Cristo in 5 Minutes [#1]

Summary

The speaker, a former member of the Restoration Branch Church, critiques its foundational belief in the complete apostasy of the first-century Church of Christ. They argue that the Church did not fully apostatize, as evidenced by biblical passages and historical context, thus challenging the necessity of their leader, Felix Waimanalo. The video refutes the Church's claims using scriptural analysis, highlighting misinterpretations and logical fallacies, ultimately aiming to demonstrate the Church's false teachings.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker, a former member of the Restoration Branch, critiques the belief system of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS), focusing on the concept of the 'great apostasy'.
• 🏛 The foundation of LDS's belief system is the idea that the early Christian church apostatized, necessitating a restoration by Joseph Smith.
• 📜 The speaker argues against the LDS interpretation of biblical texts, such as 2 Thessalonians 2 and Acts 20, which they claim are used to support the notion of a complete apostasy.
• 🔍 The video challenges the LDS view that the Catholic Church is responsible for the 'great apostasy' and counters this by discussing the historical context of biblical passages.
• 🙅‍♂️ The speaker refutes the LDS argument by emphasizing that the 'great apostasy' is not a historical event but a future one, according to mainstream Christian eschatology.
• 🌐 The video discusses the concept of 'replacement theology,' which the LDS allegedly uses to claim that the church has replaced Israel, a notion the speaker disputes.
• 📖 The speaker uses biblical verses, such as Matthew 28:19-20 and John 16, to argue that Jesus promised the presence of the Holy Spirit to guide the church, implying it could not have completely apostatized.
• 🤔 The video calls for viewers to critically examine their beliefs and encourages those within the LDS to seek truth outside of their tradition.
• 💌 The speaker extends an invitation for dialogue and provides contact information for those who wish to discuss the topics further, indicating a willingness to engage in constructive conversation.
• 🔗 The video concludes with a call to support the speaker's ministry through Patreon, reflecting a desire to dedicate more time to creating content and spreading the gospel.

Q & A

What is the main argument the speaker is trying to disprove in the video?

The speaker is trying to disprove the belief that the first-century Church of Christ was completely apostatized after the Apostles died, which is the foundational belief of the Restorationist movement, specifically the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church).

Why is disproving the apostasy of the first-century Church important to the speaker?

Disproving the apostasy of the first-century Church is crucial because it undermines the necessity for Joseph Smith as a prophet to restore the Church, thus challenging the legitimacy of the LDS Church.

What does the speaker claim about the interpretation of 2nd Thessalonians 2:3 by the LDS Church?

The speaker claims that the LDS Church misinterprets 2nd Thessalonians 2:3 by skipping verse 4 and taking the verses out of context, suggesting that the 'great apostasy' they refer to has not yet occurred and is associated with the end times, not the first century.

What is the 'great apostasy' as referred to in the script?

The 'great apostasy' refers to a significant falling away from the true faith, which the speaker argues is a future event associated with the end times and the emergence of the Antichrist, not something that happened in the first century.

Why does the speaker believe that the LDS Church's argument is flawed?

The speaker believes the LDS Church's argument is flawed because it is based on a misinterpretation of biblical texts, the use of non-credible sources like Wikipedia, and logical fallacies such as cherry-picking data and taking things out of context.

What does the speaker suggest about the持续性 of the Church established by Christ?

The speaker suggests that the Church established by Christ has not been completely apostatized and continues to this day, contrary to the LDS Church's claim that there was a complete apostasy necessitating a restoration.

What is the 'replacement theology' mentioned in the script, and why does the speaker reject it?

Replacement theology is the belief that the Church has replaced Israel in God's plan. The speaker rejects it because they believe that the Bible's promises to Israel are irrevocable and that the New Testament still refers to Israel as God's chosen people.

How does the speaker address the use of Wikipedia as a source by the LDS Church?

The speaker criticizes the use of Wikipedia as a source by the LDS Church, arguing that it is not a credible resource due to its editable nature by anyone, and points out that it represents a logical fallacy known as the Texas sharpshooter fallacy.

What does the speaker suggest is the role of the Holy Spirit in guiding the Church?

The speaker suggests that the Holy Spirit plays a crucial role in guiding the Church into all truth and preventing it from complete apostasy, as mentioned in the Bible, particularly in 1st Corinthians 3:16 and John 16:13-14.

What is the speaker's call to action for viewers who are members of the LDS Church?

The speaker calls on viewers who are members of the LDS Church to have an open mind and heart, to seek the truth, and to consider the possibility that their beliefs might be false. They also encourage viewers to share this video and its insights with others.

Outlines

00:00

🔍 Disproving the Apostasy of the First-Century Church

The speaker, a former member of the 'Church of Christ', aims to debunk the belief in the complete apostasy of the first-century Church of Christ. They argue that the foundation of the 'Church of Christ' doctrine is the belief in the total apostasy of the early Church, which they claim is necessary to validate their prophet, Felix Waimanalo. The speaker contends that if this premise is false, the entire doctrine collapses. They examine the scriptural basis for this belief, focusing on the interpretation of 1 Timothy 4:1 and other verses, and argue that the Bible does not support the idea of a complete apostasy, but rather acknowledges some degree of apostasy without totalizing it.

05:01

📚 The Great Apostasy and the Role of the Catholic Church

The speaker refutes the claim that the Catholic Church is responsible for the 'great apostasy'. They differentiate between a general apostasy and the 'great apostasy', which they assert is a future event associated with the end times. They critique the selective reading of 2 Thessalonians 2:3 and the misinterpretation of Acts 20:29-30, arguing that these verses do not support the idea of the apostasy occurring in the first century. The speaker also addresses the use of Wikipedia as an unreliable source and the logical fallacy of cherry-picking data to support their argument. They conclude by emphasizing that the 'great apostasy' is a future event and that the Catholic Church, despite its errors, is not the sole cause of apostasy.

10:03

🙏 The持续性 of the Church and the Holy Spirit's Role

The speaker discusses the持续性 of the Church and the role of the Holy Spirit in guiding and protecting it from complete apostasy. They reference Matthew 28:19-20, known as the Great Commission, and Jesus' promise to be with his followers until the end of the age. They also mention the gift of the Holy Spirit as a guide to truth, as stated in John 16:13-14, and 1 Corinthians 3:16. The speaker argues that the Holy Spirit's presence ensures the Church's continuity and truth, contradicting the idea of complete apostasy. They also address the concept of 'replacement theology', asserting that Israel's role in God's plan remains intact and that the Church is not a replacement for Israel.

15:04

📖 Biblical Interpretation and the Fallacies of the 'Church of Christ'

The speaker highlights the fallacies in the 'Church of Christ's' interpretation of the Bible, particularly their first premise regarding apostasy. They accuse the 'Church of Christ' of taking verses out of context, promoting replacement theology, and committing logical fallacies such as the Texas sharpshooter fallacy and ambiguity. The speaker emphasizes that the Bible does not support the idea of the first-century Church's complete apostasy and that the 'Church of Christ's' argument is invalid if any of its premises are false. They conclude by urging viewers to seek the truth and consider the possibility that their beliefs may be incorrect.

20:05

💌 A Call to Action for Truth and Salvation

In the final paragraph, the speaker extends a heartfelt call to those in the 'Church of Christ' to consider the truth and seek salvation. They encourage viewers to share the video with those in the 'Church of Christ' and to engage in discussions that focus on disproving the concept of complete apostasy. The speaker also provides resources, such as a PDF and contact information, for those who wish to delve deeper into the topic. They express their commitment to spreading the gospel and ministering to those in need, and they invite viewers to support their ministry through Patreon if they have been positively impacted by their videos.

Keywords

💡Apostasy

Apostasy refers to the renunciation of a religious belief or principle. In the context of the video, it is central to the argument that the Church established by Christ in the first century did not completely apostatize after the Apostles' deaths. The video script uses this term to critique the foundational belief of the 'Aggression of Cristo,' which posits that the Church was completely apostatized, necessitating the emergence of Felix Waimanalo as a prophet.

💡Felix Waimanalo

Felix Waimanalo is mentioned as a figure who, according to the 'Aggression of Cristo,' was prophesied to preach the truth after the Church's supposed apostasy. The video aims to disprove the necessity of Waimanalo's role by arguing that the Church did not completely apostatize, thus challenging his status as a prophet within this belief system.

💡Great Apostasy

The Great Apostasy is a term used in some religious contexts to describe a significant falling away from the true faith. The video disputes the occurrence of the Great Apostasy in the first century, using biblical references to argue that it is yet to happen, and is associated with end times, not the early Church period.

💡Catholic Church

The video script suggests that the 'Aggression of Cristo' blames the Catholic Church for the great apostasy. It critiques this claim by arguing that the Catholic Church's doctrines do not equate to a complete apostasy of the early Christian Church, and that the video's author believes the Great Apostasy is a future event.

💡Replacement Theology

Replacement Theology is the belief that the Christian Church has replaced Israel in God's plan. The video argues against this concept, asserting that the Bible's references to Israel are not meant to be replaced by the Church, and that the 'Aggression of Cristo' misinterprets biblical texts to support this idea.

💡Logical Fallacy

Logical fallacies are errors in reasoning that undermine the validity of arguments. The video identifies several fallacies it claims are present in the 'Aggression of Cristo' beliefs, such as taking verses out of context and the 'Texas sharpshooter' fallacy, where data is selectively chosen to support a preconceived narrative.

💡Biblical Interpretation

Biblical interpretation is the process of understanding and explaining the meaning of the Bible's text. The video emphasizes the importance of interpreting biblical verses in their full context, criticizing the 'Aggression of Cristo' for allegedly taking verses out of context to support their beliefs.

💡False Prophet

A false prophet is a figure who claims to have a divine message but is not truly speaking for God. The video argues that if the Church did not apostatize, then Felix Waimanalo would be considered a false prophet by default, as there would be no need for a new prophetic figure.

💡End Times

End times is a term used in eschatology to describe the events expected to happen at the end of the world. The video suggests that the Great Apostasy, which the 'Aggression of Cristo' claims happened in the first century, is actually a future event associated with the end times.

💡Holy Spirit

The Holy Spirit is a divine person in the Christian Trinity, who is believed to guide believers into truth. The video uses the concept of the Holy Spirit's guidance to argue against the possibility of the early Church's complete apostasy, suggesting that the Spirit's presence would prevent such a fall.

💡Rapture

Rapture is a term used in some Christian eschatological beliefs to describe the event where believers are taken up to meet the Lord in the air at his second coming. The video mentions the rapture as a concept that is not part of the 'Aggression of Cristo' teachings and is relevant to the timing of the Great Apostasy.

Highlights

The speaker aims to disprove the belief system of the Restorationist Church of Jesus Christ in five minutes.

The argument is made that the first-century Church of Christ was completely apostatized, which is foundational to the Restorationist belief.

The speaker argues that if the Church of Christ was not completely apostatized, then Felix Waimanalo is a false prophet by default.

Premise one of the Restorationist argument is that the Church established by Christ was completely apostatized after the Apostles died.

The speaker refutes the claim that the Bible supports the complete apostasy of the first-century Church.

It is argued that the term 'some' in 1 Timothy 4:1 indicates not all apostatized, contradicting the Restorationist view.

The speaker explains the difference between generic apostasy and the 'great apostasy', which is yet to occur.

The interpretation of 2nd Thessalonians 2:3 is critiqued for skipping verse 4 and misinterpreting the 'great apostasy'.

The speaker asserts that the 'great apostasy' will occur during the end times, not in the first century.

The concept of the 'man of lawlessness' or Antichrist is introduced as a sign of the 'great apostasy' yet to come.

The speaker accuses the Restorationist Church of taking verses out of context to support their argument.

Wikipedia is criticized as an unreliable source, and the speaker points out the Restorationist Church's misuse of it.

The speaker discusses the irrevocability of God's gifts and calling for Israel, contradicting the Restorationist view of replacement theology.

The speaker emphasizes that the complete apostasy of the first-century Church of Christ is a false premise.

The speaker calls for an open mind and heart for those in the Restorationist Church to consider the truth.

A challenge is issued to the Restorationist Church to prove their foundational doctrines or accept they are false.

The speaker invites viewers to support their ministry through Patreon if they have been positively impacted by their videos.

Transcripts

ljq Rangi i am a former a blush and a

crystal member born and raised for over

20 years I left when I discovered

numerous false teachings and became a

charismatic Christian in this video I'm

going to disprove the Glenda Cristo in

just five minutes the entire belief

system of the election ii cristo hinges

on the first century Church of Christ

being completely apostatized it is the

very foundation upon which the entire

belief system of the aggression of

Cristo stands why because without it the

supposed need for Felix Waimanalo is

nullified ultimately making Felix

Waimanalo a false prophet by default

therefore if I disprove that the first

century Church of Christ was completely

apostatized the foundation of the entire

aggression a crystal belief system

collapses making the aggression of

Cristo a false religion let's look at

their argument premise one the church

established by Christ in the first

century was completely apostatized after

the Apostles died premise 2 Felix

Waimanalo was the fulfillment of various

prophecies to preach the truth

conclusion therefore Felix Waimanalo is

the last messenger let's quickly

establish what a logically valid

argument is it is one that obeys the

rules of logic the premises are true

which means the conclusion is true as

well it is also important to mention

that the premises in themselves require

validation in the end an argument

succeeds or fails on the validity of its

sub arguments the question then is

whether or not premise one and two are

true let's now examine premise 1 the

church established by Christ in the

first century was completely apostatized

after the Apostles died we have the

premise a B and C are sub arguments and

1 through 4 are explanations for those

sub arguments again it cannot be

emphasized enough premise 1 is the

foundation of the entire aggression a

crystal belief system so what are the

sub arguments for premise 1 a apostasy

Bible verses

be the Catholic Church is responsible

for the great apostasy see Israel was

completely apostatized they read various

verses about the apostasy but we only

need to read one first Timothy chapter 4

verse 1 but the Spirit speaks expressly

that in latter times some shall

apostatize from the faith giving their

mind to deceiving spirits and teachings

of demons notice here it says some and

not all

the issue is not whether the apostasy

happened or not

apostasy happening is universally

accepted among Christians since the

beginning of mankind because of sin

disobeying God the emergence of false

religions is and will always be

inevitable as we can see this premise is

flawed from the beginning there is

absolutely nowhere in the Bible that

says that the first century Church of

Christ was completely apostatized the

aggression a crystal would object yes

there is which leads us into their next

sub argument sub argument B the Catholic

Church is responsible for the great

apostasy point 1 they read 2nd

Thessalonians chapter 2 verse 3 they

skip verse 4 and then read 5 to 7 number

2 the great apostasy Wikipedia reference

number 3 Catholic false doctrines and

number 4 Acts chapter 20 verse 29 to 30

it is crucial to understand that there

is a difference between a generic

apostasy or turning away from God and

the great apostasy let's go to their

first point second Thessalonians chapter

2 verse 3 a twentieth century New

Testament do not let anyone deceive you

whatever he may do for it will not come

until after the great apostasy they go

on to skip verse four and change Bible

translations when they read verse five

to verse seven don't you remember I told

you all this while I was with you yet

there is something that keeps this from

happening now and you know what it is at

the proper time then the wicked one will

appear

the mysterious wickedness is already at

war

but what is going to happen will not

happen until the one who holds it back

is taken out of the way they continue by

reading Acts chapter 20 verse 29 to 30

and claimed that the Apostles are the

ones responsible for holding the great

apostasy back and that the great

apostasy will not occur until after they

die this is incorrect and we can prove

that by understanding the true context

of 2nd Thessalonians

2nd Thessalonians chapter 2 verse 3 does

refer to the great apostasy but contrary

to what the aggression of Cristo

believes the great apostasy has not

occurred yet vast majority of

professional historians agree that the

great apostasy has not occurred yet

therefore it's definitely not believed

to have occurred during the first

century Church of Christ the great

apostasy will occur during the end times

a further falling away of an already

fallen world the context of Paul's

writing to the Thessalonians was to

correct some of the errors concerning

the end times that the believers had

heard from false teachers among the

falsehoods was that the day of the Lord

has already come because of the extreme

persecution that they were facing like

the Thessalonians the aggression

increased so believed in errors

concerning the end times they believed

that the end times began when world war

one started it's important to mention

that they only read half of 2nd

Thessalonians chapter 2 verse 3 let's

read the whole thing do not let anyone

deceive you in any way for the day will

not come until the final rebellion takes

place and the wicked one appears who is

destined to hell Paul makes it clear

that the day of the Lord a time of

worldwide judgment will not transpire

until two things happen first the

falling away or the great apostasy must

occur second the man of lawlessness must

be revealed

he who is called the son of perdition

also known as the Antichrist

once this person makes himself known the

end times will indeed have come there

have been numerous speculations about

the identity of the man of sin since the

beginning of the first century

included were Caligula Caesar Mohammed

Napoleon and any number of Roman popes

from the Catholic Church none of them

were the Antichrist cleverly skipped

verse 4 because it describes what the

Antichrist will do he will oppose every

so-called God or object of worship and

will put himself above them all he will

even go in and sit down at God's temple

and claim to be God clearly this has not

happened no one since Paul's time has

set himself up as God in the Jewish

temple 2,000 years have passed since the

Epistle was written and the day of the

Lord has not yet come Paul assures us

that it will not come until the falling

away comes first the aggression of

Christo has taken these verses out of

context to quote out of context is to

remove a passage from its surrounding

matter in such a way as to distort its

meaning the aggression of Cristo is

infamous for committing this fallacy

again in every age people will turn away

from God but the great apostasy at the

end times will be complete and worldwide

the whole planet will be in rebellion

against God and His Christ every revolt

requires a leader and into this global

apostasy will step the Antichrist we

Christians believe this takes place

after the church has been raptured from

the earth take note the concept of

rapture is not even taught in the

aggression increased oh they have

downright misinterpreted the great

apostasy already we have been able to

disprove their first premise which

nullifies the supposed need for Felix

Waimanalo and proves him to be a false

prophet remember for the argument to be

valid the premises must be true for the

conclusion to be true it only took a

little over five minutes to disprove the

aggression in Christo but if you want to

see more continue watching they cite

Wikipedia as a source to claim that the

Catholic Church is the one that's

responsible for the great apostasy and

then proceed by pointing out many of

their false doctrines the great apostasy

is a term used by some religious groups

to describe a general fallen state of

additional Christianity especially the

papacy or the authority of the Pope

first off Wikipedia is not a credible

resource this is because anybody can be

a contributor and edit the site at any

time this is also a logical fallacy

called the Texas sharpshooter you

cherry-picked a data cluster to suit

your argument or found a pattern to fit

a presumption there are numerous

teachings and interpretations of the

Catholic Church that have turned away

from the true teachings of God but the

identity of the Antichrist has yet to

come the holes in each of their sub

arguments are just staggering like sub

argument a sub argument B has thoroughly

been disproven but to drive the point

even further let's read Matthew 28 verse

19 to 20 therefore go and make disciples

of all nations baptizing them in the

name of the Father and of the Son and of

the Holy Spirit and teaching them to

obey everything I have commanded you and

surely I am with you always to the very

end of the age the end of the age refers

to the end of the world Jesus is

speaking here and Jesus never lies he

said he would be with them until the end

of the world

this is called the Great Commission

before Jesus ascended to heaven he gave

this command and expected the Apostles

and those who followed them to

accomplish in his absence this is not

merely a promise for the Apostles look

at what Jesus says John chapter 16 verse

7 verses 13 to 14 but I am telling you

the truth

it is better for you that I go away

because if I do not go the helper or the

Holy Spirit will not come to you but if

I do go away then I will send him to you

when however the Spirit comes who

reveals the truth about God he will lead

you into all the truth he will not speak

on his own authority but he will speak

of what he hears and will tell you of

things to come he will give me glory

because he will take what I say and tell

it to you what could possibly be better

than physically having Jesus they found

of the church with you the answer is the

Holy Spirit dwelling in every single

follower of Christ 1st Corinthians

chapter 3 verse 16 do you not know that

you are a temple of God and that the

Spirit of God dwells in you among the

many purposes of the Holy Spirit he the

Holy Spirit will guide you into all

truth how would it be possible then for

the first century Church of Christ to be

completely apostatized after the

Apostles died if the aggression and

crystal interpretation is correct

wouldn't that make Jesus Christ a liar

and a failure let's go to the book of

Acts chapter 1 verse 8 but you will

receive power when the Holy Spirit comes

on you and you will be my witnesses in

Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria

and to the ends of the earth by the way

according to the aggression crystal the

phrase ends of the earth refers to a

time and not a place let's read the

exact same thing but in the ICB

translation but the Holy Spirit will

come to you then you will receive power

you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem in

all of Judea in Samaria and in every

part of the world a Christian witness is

a person who calls attention to

something other than himself one who is

called upon to give or to be evidence of

something with the guidance help and

power of the Holy Spirit the church

would be witnesses in not just Judea not

just Samaria but in every part of the

world this is how the church would

continue to grow in the midst of false

teachers given all of the evidence

listen to how preposterous this claim is

now Jesus Christ knew the church he

himself established would fail but he

had a plan his work of salvation would

be completed about 2,000 years later

when another man would rise up but this

time he would not fail like Jesus did

this man Felix Waimanalo

would complete Jesus work of salvation

and finish what he started for the sake

of those precious souls in aggression in

cristo we will continue to rebut sub

arguments e in their first premise

Israel was apostatized they believe that

Israel has been replaced by the

aggression increased oh this is called

replacement theology and this is false

they read Daniel 911 all Israel has

transgressed your law and turned away

refusing to obey you

therefore the curses and sworn judgments

written in the law of Moses the servant

of God have been poured out on us

because we have sinned against you

repeatedly the aggression of Christo

continues to take verses out of context

this is Daniel admitting to God that

Israel has not kept the law but there is

no way you can conclude that this verse

is saying that Israel has been

completely apostatized without any

personal commentary of my own let's see

what the Bible's answer is to this exact

question Romans 11:1 2 - a 26 a 29 - 31

I ask then did God reject his people the

Israelites by no means I am an Israelite

myself a descendant of Abraham from the

tribe of Benjamin God did not reject his

people whom he foreknew verse 26 and in

this way all Israel will be saved

verse 29 - 31 for God's gifts and his

call are irrevocable just as you who

were at one time disobedient to God have

now received mercy as a result of their

disobedience so they too have now become

disobedient in order that they too may

now receive mercy as a result of God's

mercy to you the gifts and calling of

God specifically for Israel are

irrevocable the people of Israel theirs

is the adoption to sonship

there's the divine glory the covenants

the receiving of the law the temple

worship and the promises theirs are the

patriarchs and from them is traced the

human ancestry of the Messiah

who

is God over all forever praised amen

there are 77 references to Israel in the

New Testament and none of them refer to

the church try replacing the word to the

church where Israel is mentioned and the

passage is rendered unreadable and silly

for example Romans chapter 10 verse 1

brethren my heart's desire and prayer to

God for Israel is that they might be

saved if you put the church where Israel

is mentioned then it is redundant the

church is the body of saved believers so

how could Paul's prayer be for the

church to be saved let's summarize the

fallacies the aggression of Cristo has

committed in their first premise a they

are guilty of taking things out of

context number one they have taken

multiple verses out of context and have

irrationally confused the great apostasy

with a generic apostasy they also

skipped verse four of second

Thessalonians chapter two number two

replacement theology they have taken

Daniel 911 to claim that all of Israel

was apostatized and that the aggression

of cristo has replaced them they are

also guilty of the logical fallacy Texas

sharpshooter number one they cherry

picked a Wikipedia's source in an

attempt to back up their claim that the

Catholic Church is responsible for the

great apostasy even though the vast

majority of professional historians

agree that the great apostasy has not

occurred yet and see they're also guilty

of the logical fallacy ambiguity number

one they use the ambiguity of the phrase

ends of the earth to mean a time rather

than a place number two they use the

double meaning on the word apostasy to

specifically refer to the great apostasy

recall earlier what a logically valid

argument is it is one that obeys the

rules of logic the premises are true

which means the conclusion is true as

well does their argument obey the rules

of logic no without even addressing

their second premise if just one premise

of the argument is false the conclusion

is also false

is premise one true no premise one of

their argument has been decimated

therefore the conclusion is false it

only takes five minutes or less to

disprove the aggression of crystal if

you can disprove their foundational

doctrines such as the apostasy in

conclusion I have successfully disproved

that the first century Church of Christ

was completely apostatized therefore the

foundation of the entire aggression a

crystal belief system has collapsed

making the aggression in crystal a false

religion to all my glass and crystal

viewers this video has been made out of

love salvation is on the line not just

for you but for all those that you know

that are in the church your friends and

your family I ask you with all my heart

please have an open mind and an open

heart be hungry for the truth

be humble genuinely think of the

possibility that what you can believe

could be false to all of you who are

stubborn these are not my personal

interpretations I simply read the Bible

if you believe that I am wrong it is

your job to disprove me prove to me that

the first century Church of Christ was

completely apostatized and that Jesus

Christ himself failed proved to me that

God has completely rejected the

Israelites and that the glacially

crystal replaced them proved to me that

the great apostasy has already happened

don't bring up any other topic that is

irrelevant to this video and don't

resort to meaningless attacks and

comments such as I&C for life to all my

viewers who are in truth and are my

brothers and sisters in Christ if you

know people in aggression a crystal and

you want them to be saved it is your job

to share this video with them I will be

putting a PDF down in description so

that you can be equipped and have access

to all the points that I have made in

this video so that you can disprove the

aggression to Christo and help those who

are in that religion switching over once

again to those

the question in crystal you can even

print this document and take it to your

resident minister and have them answer

these questions and see what answers you

get whether you are sharing this with

your minister or your family and friends

be sure that you and they understand

that the complete apostasy is the

foundation of the aggression in christow

your focus will be on the fact that the

complete apostasy of the first century

Church of Christ never happened it is

imperative that you don't get

sidetracked by other topics that are

brought up to distract you from the

bigger picture they must disprove the

points that I have made proving that the

complete apostasy did not actually occur

my next video will be me disproving

premise two of their argument if you

would like to contact me my facebook

profile page will be linked down below

and there will also be an email for

those that don't have facebook I will

get to your messages as soon as I can to

all those that have messaged me I

apologize if I have not been able to

respond to you yet these videos take a

lot of time and energy and I'm also

working full time it is my desire to

work full time from home so that I can

work full-time on ministry spreading the

gospel and video production I'm an

entrepreneur but I set aside all my

business ideas to put God first and to

do what he has asked me to do if you

have been positively impacted by my

videos in any way and your family your

friends or you yourself have even been

saved as a result of my videos if you

would like to support God's calling on

my life to be able to spread the gospel

full time there is a patreon link down

below even just giving five dollars a

month will help out tremendously I thank

you guys ahead of time and I think God

above all if it's your first time on my

channel I'd love it if you subscribe

currently my channel is focused on

ministering to those in aggression

increased though but in the future my

channel will also include entertainment

money and lifestyle thank you guys for

watching

god bless