Marcus Aurelius and Christian Persecutions: Friend or Foe?
Summary
TLDRThis video explores the life and philosophy of Marcus Aurelius, the Roman emperor and Stoic philosopher. It reflects on whether Marcus Aurelius was a persecutor or a friend of Christians, referencing historical accounts, such as those from Eusebius. The discussion highlights parallels between Stoic teachings and Christian values, but also touches on the sporadic persecution of Christians during his reign. The video also covers his philosophical work, *Meditations*, and the historical context of his reign, including his son Commodus, offering a balanced look at this philosopher-kingβs legacy.
Takeaways
- π Marcus Aurelius, a Roman emperor and Stoic philosopher, is often seen as a philosopher-king, echoing Plato's ideal.
- π‘οΈ A key question about Marcus Aurelius is whether he was a persecutor or a friend of Christians, a debate that dates back to early Christian historians like Eusebius.
- π Eusebius, a church historian, provides accounts that suggest Marcus Aurelius may have overseen Christian persecutions, yet also acknowledges a miraculous event where Christian soldiers' prayers supposedly aided a Roman victory.
- π‘οΈ Although Marcus Aurelius is associated with the persecution of Christians, some early Christians admired his Stoic teachings, which often reflected Christian-like values such as love and forgiveness.
- π Despite his Stoic beliefs, Marcus Aurelius expressed critical views on the Christian doctrine of resurrection, which highlights his potential disconnect with Christian ideology.
- π€ Modern scholars continue to debate whether Marcus Aurelius was a persecutor or a friend of Christians, with some suggesting that his actions were motivated by a sense of duty rather than malice.
- π Marcus Aurelius was the last of the 'good' Roman emperors, but his legacy was marred by his son Commodus, whose rule was marked by vice and incompetence, leading to Rome's decline.
- π The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius, a key Stoic text, is widely read and admired for its philosophical insights, despite the controversies surrounding the emperor's actions.
- π Scholars and historians like Henry Chadwick and Walter Kaufmann have explored the paradox of Marcus Aurelius' wisdom and his possible role in Christian persecutions.
- π The script references various historical and philosophical sources, including works by Eusebius, Henry Chadwick, and the Meditations, offering a broad view of Marcus Aurelius' impact and legacy.
Q & A
Who is Marcus Aurelius and why is he significant?
-Marcus Aurelius was a Roman emperor and a Stoic philosopher, known for his work 'Meditations,' which reflects Stoic philosophy. He is significant because he is considered one of the 'Five Good Emperors' of Rome and his reign was marked by his philosophical approach to governance and personal life.
What is the main dilemma regarding Marcus Aurelius' relationship with Christians?
-The main dilemma is whether Marcus Aurelius was a persecutor or a friend of Christians. Despite his Stoic philosophy in 'Meditations' aligning with some Christian teachings, he is also known for possibly overseeing the brutal persecution of Christians.
What is the connection between Marcus Aurelius' Stoic philosophy and Christian teachings?
-Marcus Aurelius' Stoic philosophy in 'Meditations' shares similarities with Christian teachings, such as the emphasis on love for mankind, forgiveness, and the idea that sin is a form of ignorance. These parallels have led to discussions about his stance on Christianity.
Who was Eusebius and why is he relevant to the discussion about Marcus Aurelius?
-Eusebius was a renowned church historian during the time of the first Christian emperor, Constantine the Great. He is relevant because he questioned whether Marcus Aurelius was a persecutor or a friend of Christians, providing historical context and analysis on the issue.
What is the historical context of the Roman Empire during Marcus Aurelius' reign?
-Marcus Aurelius' reign was marked by military conflicts, particularly with the Germanic tribes. He spent more time on the battlefield than in Rome, which may have influenced his involvement in the persecution of Christians.
What was the general attitude towards Christians in the Roman Empire during Marcus Aurelius' time?
-There was no systematic persecution of Christians across the Roman Empire during Marcus Aurelius' reign. The treatment of Christians varied depending on the attitudes of local officials and governors, with some showing sympathy and others hostility.
What is the significance of the correspondence between Pliny the Younger and Emperor Trajan?
-The correspondence is significant because it provides a rare example of preserved communication between a provincial governor and the emperor regarding the treatment of Christians. It shows the legal and moral dilemmas faced by officials in dealing with Christians.
What are some examples of similarities between Marcus Aurelius' 'Meditations' and Christian teachings?
-Some similarities include the emphasis on loving mankind, forgiving those who err, and the belief that sin stems from ignorance. These concepts are found in both 'Meditations' and in the Pauline epistles and the Gospels.
What is the historical debate about Marcus Aurelius' role in the persecution of Christians?
-Historians debate whether Marcus Aurelius personally ordered the persecution of Christians. Some accounts suggest he did, while others argue that he was more focused on military campaigns and may not have been directly involved.
How did Marcus Aurelius' son, Commodus, impact the Roman Empire and the legacy of his father?
-Commodus, known for his irresponsible and cruel behavior, is believed to have led to a decline in the Roman Empire's stability after Marcus Aurelius' death. His reign marked a departure from his father's Stoic principles and contributed to a period of instability.
Outlines
π Introduction to Marcus Aurelius and Stoicism
This paragraph introduces the video's focus on Marcus Aurelius, a Roman emperor and Stoic philosopher. It raises the question of whether he was a persecutor or a friend of Christians, a dilemma that has historical and philosophical implications. The paragraph also mentions Eusebius, a church historian, who pondered the same question during the reign of Emperor Constantine the Great. The video aims to explore this through Marcus Aurelius's 'Meditations,' which contains Stoic philosophies that resonate with Christian teachings. The paragraph sets the stage for a historical and philosophical discussion by providing context on the life of Marcus Aurelius and the broader historical backdrop of Roman emperors and philosophers like Seneca, Epictetus, and Saint Paul.
ποΈ The Dilemma of Marcus Aurelius's Role in Christian Persecution
The second paragraph delves into the historical context of Christian persecution during the Roman Empire, highlighting the sporadic nature of these persecutions and the varying attitudes of provincial governors. It contrasts the brutal persecution under Nero with the more systematic approach under Emperor Diocletian. The paragraph also discusses the correspondence between Pliny the Younger and Emperor Trajan, which provides insight into the legal procedures followed during the persecution of Christians. It further explores Eusebius's account of Marcus Aurelius's reign, which includes both the persecution of Christians and a miraculous intervention by God that aided the Roman army. The paragraph concludes by emphasizing the complexity of Marcus Aurelius's relationship with Christianity, suggesting that while he may have overseen persecutions, he also demonstrated a sense of duty and possibly a reluctant involvement in such actions.
π The Paradox of Marcus Aurelius's Views on Christianity
This paragraph examines the paradoxical nature of Marcus Aurelius's views on Christianity. It discusses the emperor's critical perspective on the Christian belief in the physical resurrection of the body, as expressed in his 'Meditations.' The paragraph contrasts this with the beliefs of ancient Christians and the teachings of Saint Paul. It also mentions the account of an epistle attributed to Marcus Aurelius, which describes a miracle during a military campaign where he sought the prayers of Christian soldiers. The paragraph highlights the scholarly debate about the historical accuracy of Eusebius's accounts and the possibility that some early Christians wanted to view Marcus Aurelius as a friend, despite his role in the persecution of their faith. It concludes by noting the complexity of Marcus Aurelius's character, as seen through the eyes of modern scholars and historical figures like Henry Chadwick and Walter Kaufman.
π‘οΈ The Legacy of Marcus Aurelius and the Fall of the Roman Empire
The final paragraph discusses the legacy of Marcus Aurelius, particularly his choice of his son Commodus as his successor, which is considered a significant factor in the decline of the Roman Empire. It contrasts the virtues of Marcus Aurelius with the vices of Commodus, who is likened to the infamous Emperor Nero. The paragraph also touches on the rumors about Commodus's true parentage and the political instability that followed Marcus Aurelius's death. Additionally, it provides recommendations for further reading, including the 'Meditations' of Marcus Aurelius, lectures by Rufus Fears, and historical accounts by Eusebius and Henry Chadwick. The paragraph concludes by inviting viewers to explore related content on Greek and Roman philosophers, emphasizing the video's aim to broaden knowledge and provide a deeper understanding of Stoicism and its historical context.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘Marcus Aurelius
π‘Stoicism
π‘Christian Persecution
π‘Eusebius
π‘Meditations
π‘Resurrection
π‘Good Roman Emperors
π‘Commodus
π‘Philosopher King
π‘Cynic and Stoic Philosophers
Highlights
Marcus Aurelius was a Roman emperor and Stoic philosopher, often considered a 'philosopher king' as described by Plato.
The video explores whether Marcus Aurelius was a persecutor or a friend of Christians, a question also pondered by Eusebius, a church historian.
Marcus Aurelius's 'Meditations' contain Stoic philosophies that reflect Christian teachings, causing a dilemma for those inspired by Stoicism.
Examples of similarities between 'Meditations' and Christian teachings include quotes on loving mankind, forgiving sinners, and understanding sin as ignorance.
The video discusses the historical context of Marcus Aurelius's reign, including his admiration for Stoic philosophers like Epictetus and Seneca.
It is speculated that Marcus Aurelius may not have read the works of Saint Paul, which could explain his stance on Christians.
The video reviews the history of Christian persecutions in the Roman Empire, noting that there was no systematic persecution until Emperor Diocletian.
The persecution of Christians was sporadic and depended on the attitudes of provincial governors and local officials.
A series of letters between Pliny the Younger and Emperor Trajan provides insight into the legal procedures regarding Christians during that era.
Eusebius's 'Ecclesiastical History' is a key source for understanding Marcus Aurelius's relationship with Christians.
Eusebius recounts a miracle where Christian soldiers' prayers led to a victory for Marcus Aurelius's army.
Some early Christians wanted to view Marcus Aurelius as a friend and recognized the wisdom in his teachings.
Marcus Aurelius's own writings, however, suggest a critical view of the Christian belief in the physical resurrection of the body.
Modern scholars are divided on whether Marcus Aurelius was a friend or foe of Christians, with some suggesting he sanctioned persecution for state reasons.
The video mentions the influence of Marcus Aurelius's son, Commodus, whose reign was marked by instability and contrasted sharply with his father's.
The video concludes by discussing various sources used, including 'Meditations', 'Ecclesiastical History', and modern histories by scholars like Henry Chadwick.
Transcripts
today we will learn
and reflect on the life and history of
one of the good roman emperors and stoic
philosopher
who was perhaps a philosopher king as
described by plato
this is the emperor marcus aurelius
in particular in this video we will
reflect on the important question
of whether marcus aurelius was a
persecutor
or a friend of christians which is an
important question asked by
those of us who find inspiration and
stoicism and in the ancient world and in
particular
this was a question also asked by
eusebius
who was a renowned church historian in
the time of the
first christian emperor constancine the
great
so we have a real dilemma of this roman
emperor
who likely oversaw the brutal
persecution of christians but whose
stoic
main work his meditations offers a stoic
philosophy
that reflects many of the christian
teachings both in the pauline epistles
and the gospels
to provide some examples of this dilemma
these are some quotations from the
meditation
selected in the copleston history of
philosophy
and this is some of the quotations from
meditations love mankind
follow god which is very close to love
god and love your neighbor
it is man's special gift to love even
those who fall into blunders
that sin is ignorance and unintentional
that in a little while we shall both be
dead and above all
no injury has been done to us our inner
self is not made worse than it was
before
this last quote is quite similar to the
section of the early christian prayer of
saint ephram the syrian
yes o lord and king grant me to sing my
own faults and to not judge my brother
since you are blessed to the ages of
ages
we have another video sharing many of
the stoic things from marcus
aurelius's work the meditations and at
the end of our talk we will discuss
the sources we use for this video and my
blogs that also cover this topic
please we welcome interesting questions
in the comments sometimes these generate
short videos of their own let us learn
and reflect together
first we need to review the history and
timelines around the
time of emperor marcus aurelius
you can see that marcos aurelius
succeeded the generation that included
the previous well-known roman stoic
philosophers
seneca epictetus and rufus and also
saint paul
and also the emperor from a hundred
years previous nero
in his meditations marcus aurelius
expresses his admiration for the
philosophical works of
epictetus and it is very likely that he
read the works of seneca
we can presume that he never read the
actual epistles of paul
nor the gospels or else he may not have
been so quick to persecute the
christians
unfortunately the great uh roman
historians preceded marcus aurelius
there's really not any good first class
histories
or sources from the ancient world for
the life and reign of marcus aurelius so
we have to
piece it together from various sources
and we're uncertain of many of the
details
of his life and his reign and that
includes any role that he may have had
in persecuting the christians
going back into history we know that the
emperor hadrian one of the good emperors
wanted to guarantee a stable succession
and so he selected antonius pius to be
the next emperor
and he adopted him and his son and he
requested that
he in turn adopt marcus aurelius as his
son
to ensure this peaceful succession
to seal the succession marcus aurelius
married faustina
the daughter of antonius pius if her
name faustina seems prophetic it
certainly is prophetic
for she is indirectly responsible for
the decline
of the roman empire marcus aurelius
agreed to be emperor out of stark duty
he would have preferred to remain as a
philosopher during his reign the
germanic border
tribes were in rebellion and he was in
the field of battle more than he was in
rome during his reign which means that
he may not have been personally involved
in many of these
christian persecutions now let us fill
in some background in the history of the
persecutions themselves
there was never a thorough and
systematic
persecution of christians in the
entirety of the roman empire like there
was an orthodox russia
after the communist revolution emperor
nero briefly
and brutally persecuted the christians
we see this picture
of the christians in his garden on the
crosses lit up for his entertainment
uh nero blamed the christians for the
fire that burned down so much of rome
and but likely only the high-profile
christians were picked up
uh the brutality of nero no doubt caused
many romans to sympathize with the
christians so willing to die for their
faith and
probably provided a unwelcome precedent
that ensured at least sporadic
persecution of
christians in the following centuries
now there was not
a general persecution of christians
throughout the roman empire until
over 200 years later after nero under
emperor diocletian
but even then many provincial governors
were sympathetic to the christians they
were not
eager to execute those citizens whom
they saw as harmless
between these two emperors christians
were persecuted sporadically
the severity of the persecutions against
the christians depended on how hostile
the provincial governors and local
officials were against the christians
around the year 250 a.d we have a
remarkable series of letters
preserved between a provincial governor
plenty the younger and emperor trajan
which is doubly remarkable because we so
rarely have preserved
in antiquity both sides of any
correspondence
plenty asks trajan if he is following
the proper legal procedure
in his persecutions of the christians in
his province
he explains that he does not seek out
the christians but when there is a
complaint
he brings the christians before him and
if the christian shows reverence to the
ancestral god by sprinkling a little bit
of incense
before bust of the emperor he releases
them trajan's short reply to plenty says
that he's on the right path but he
had some caveats uh he gives four orders
don't seek out the christians for trial
but then he adds to this
a due process procedure that anonymous
accusations should not be considered at
all
also if the accused or guilty of being
christians then they must be punished
but if the accused deny they are
christians and show proof that they are
not worshiping the gods
then they must be pardoned now that we
have some general background of the
history of marcus aurelius and the roman
empire
we can further consider the question of
whether marcus aurelius is a friend
or a foe of christians by far our most
important source is the ecclesiastical
history or church history by
eusebius who was an important bishop
during the reign of the first christian
emperor constantine
like modern historians eusebius
considers that there is a strong
position
for the case that marcus aurelius did
persecute
personally the christians to some extent
but unlike
emperors like nero he would not have
enjoyed watching them perhaps he would
have watched them out of a sense of duty
susibius begins chapter 5 with a
detailed gruesome account of christians
being tortured and executed over periods
of many days during the reigns
of marcus aurelius but then eusebius
follows this with a remarkable account
of how god helped the soldiers of marcus
aurelius
defeat the enemy the germans with a
miracle
and this is a quote from eusebius while
his predecessor antonia's pious was
still on the throne
marcus aurelius faced the german tribes
in battle and his
soldiers and the melatine legion facing
the enemy
did a remarkable thing they knelt in
prayer and turned to god and
supplication
the enemy was astonished at the sight
and immediately a thunderbolt
drove the enemy to flight and
destruction while
rain fell on the army which had called
on the almighty
reviving the army when the entire force
was on the
point of perishing from thirst and he
says that they're truly in witnesses to
this miracle in his work titled apology
or
in defense of the faith but then
eusebius concludes
but everyone must make up his own mind
about such matters
in addition to these two sources there
is another ancient account
which likely refers to the same incident
appended to the first apology to the
emperor by saint justin the martyr who
was also martyred during the time of
marcus aurelius
he was a early christian philosopher he
has a curious work appended to this
an epistle the marcus aurelius to the
roman senate
in this epistle marcus aurelius recounts
a miracle
in a campaign where the roman army found
himself in desperate straits against the
germans
the emperor prayed to the pagan gods for
deliverance and when he learned that
many of his
soldiers were christians he asked that
they prayed to their god as well
this epistle tells of these christians
how when they began the battle
not by preparing weapons nor arms nor
bugles for such preparation
is hateful for them on account of their
god they bear about in their conscience
now we st justin the martyr was martyred
in rome when the pagan
cynic philosopher crescence agitated for
his execution
in this martyr account marcus aurelius
is not mentioned
there's likely no scholar today who
really thinks that marco cerrelius was
the author of this curious epistle
and many scholars can prove that some of
the history recounted by
eusebius is more myth and legends than
history
but whether or not these accounts are
historical
is not the point the main point is that
some early christians
wanted marcus aurelius to be a friend of
the christians
and they recognize the wisdom of his
stroke teachings
however unfortunately several quotes by
marcus aurelius himself
suggests that maybe he was not a friend
of the christians
and he has a critical view of the
resurrection of the body in book
four of the meditations if souls
continue to
to exist how does the air contain them
from eternity
marcus really then speculates that souls
eventually diffuse to make room for
other souls then he adds
we must not only think of the bodies
that are buried but also the animals
that are eaten by us and other animals
these animals that are consumed are also
buried in the bodies of those who feed
on them
and similarly when saint paul preaches
to the athenians in acts 17
it is a doctrine of the resurrection of
the dead that greeks have trouble
accepting and also this is referred to
in john 6 and i'd like to point out that
the modern christians have a somewhat of
a platonic sense that when we die
our spirit goes to heaven and our body
is buried in the earth
the ancient christians had a very firm
belief in the physical
resurrection of the body this
comment from the meditations suggests
that maybe marcus aurelius did
indeed witness some martyrdoms he says a
great soul is ready at any requisite
moment
to be separated from the body and then
to be extinguished or dispersed and
continue to exist
and this is a common theme in greek
philosophy
and the warrior culture in which they
existed the desire to
die the noble death but then this
readiness
must come from a man's own judgment and
not from mere obstinacy
as with the christians but considerably
in with great dignity and in a way to
persuade another without tragic show
and we would like to point out that many
bishops from the period discouraged
their flock from
volunteering for martyrdom perhaps they
agreed with marcus aurelius to some
extent
modern scholars have also puzzled about
this paradox of marcos aurelius whether
he is a friend or a foe
of the christians henry chadwick in his
history the early church
notes that marcus aurelius regarded
suicide as ethically
unobjectionable but felt that it must be
done in good style
not like the christians in the spirit of
theatricality
henry chadwick says the certainty that
marcus aurelius ordered the persecution
of christians in gaul which is today's
france
writing that the emperor marcus aurelius
directed that the christian should be
tortured to death
and that no refinement of cruelty was
spared
i personally question the possibility
that marcos really has
made it to gaul but but perhaps chad
book has read some history
that i'm not aware of walter kaufman
in his introduction writes that uh
marcus aurelius for
reasons of state possibly sanctioned the
persecution of christians
and although he personally achieved a
genuinely
christian depth of humility we have an
even more interesting quote by matthew
arnold
what an affinity for christian had this
persecutor of christians
the effusion of christianity it's
relieving tear its happy self-sacrifice
where the very element one feels for
which the soul of marcos aurelius longed
the christians were near him they
brushed him he touched them
but marcus aurelius passed them by and
we have a quote by coppelston
who's is the author of a multi-volume
history of philosophy that's used by
many catholic colleges and seminaries
marcus aurelius was punctiliously
observant of the forms of polytheistic
worship
which partially explains why he
persecuted the christians during his
reign
since he clearly viewed the pagan
religious rites of state worship
as implied in good citizenship and we
have a quote by mcguckin
marcos aurelius mentioned christians
with a distaste
reserved for secretive and maleficent
magical sects
now however wise and kind marcus
aurelius had been
as a competent and good roman emperor
all his striving and kindness would have
been
overstated by the stain left by his son
his petty vicious and lazy narcissistic
son the emperor commodus
whose character far more closely
resembled that of nero
than his father history tells us that
there were credible rumors that commodus
was not the actual son of marcos
aurelius
that rather his mother faustinas had an
affair with a gladiator
while marcus aurelius was away fighting
the germanic tribesmen
now marco cerrelis was the last of the
seven good roman emperors
and most of these good emperors were
adopted by their predecessor
but marcus aurelius instead chose
commodus
as his co-emperor although he knew that
communist was irresponsible and did not
want to
adopt the stoic virtues when marcos
aurelius died on the front
communists abandoned the war and
negotiated a quick piece with the
germans
and retreated to rome to pose as a
gladiator
and commodus was more like nero than his
father
marcus aurelius and he was eventually
assassinated after he started murdering
his closest associates
his reign began many decades of
political inaction and instability when
rome was assaulted by both roman
tribesmen and persians
now to discuss some of the sources i
used for this video
you know from amazon i picked up the
dover thrift edition of the
meditations of marcos aurelius this is
also included in the stoic six pack
however i found the translation of the
meditations in the six-pack to be
undecipherable now marcus aurelius is
quite readable you should purchase this
book and read it for yourself rufus
fears
of the teaching company has a highly
entertaining lecture on marcus aurelius
in the teaching company lecture series
he has a persuasive argument
that this philosopher king was more of a
philosopher than a king
that marcus aurelius lacked the will to
power that would have enabled the
greater roman emperor to
establish an enduring legacy of imperial
power
he also faults marcus aurelius for not
putting aside his unfaithful wife
faustina and his vicious and incompetent
son communist for the good of the empire
and that he should have followed
tradition and adopted a
qualified emperor instead like the other
good roman emperors
and i also would like to mention the
excellent video by
professor luke timothy johnson on the
greco-roman
of practical philosophers and he has a
excellent discussion of the
stoic philosophers in general and this
was a video series that really
changed my life to a certain extent and
gave me a better view and introduction
into
uh the stoic philosophers also we have
quoted in here by eusebius an early
history of the church by eusebius
and modern history by henry chadwick and
i would advise you to read both of these
histories yourself
and we also have uh by coupleson
history of philosophy and there's
probably a dozen volumes of this
and if you're very interested in
philosophy it's a little bit harder to
read but it's good
we also ran across another book
meditations
of uh marcus aurelius with commentary
and this is this is a good book we
didn't really use it for this video but
it's
a good book to look at uh please click
on the link
for our blogs on marcus aurelius and on
the links for our youtube videos on the
greek cynic and stoic philosophers
and other interesting videos that will
broaden your knowledge and improve your
soul
thank you
Browse More Related Video
Marcus Aurelius: The Philosopher & Emperor of the Roman Empire
Marcus Aurelius: The Man Who Solved the Universe
Bagaimana Isi Pemikiran Penguasa Terbaik Roma? | Marcus Aurelius | Philosopher #3
How Stoics deal with jerks, narcissists, and other difficult people
10 Stoic Teachings Of Marcus Aurelius We Desperately Need Today (Practical Stoicism)
How To Read Books Effectively (7 Stoic Tips)
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)