Bar Exam 2024: Civil Law Predictions

The Hows of Law
8 Sept 202428:15

Summary

TLDRThis video features a comprehensive review of potential 2024 Civil Law Bar exam questions in the Philippines, covering topics like the validity of wills by aliens, unjust enrichment, interference with economic relations, and issues of successional rights. It also delves into the intricacies of name changes, marriage formalities, and property rights, providing a valuable resource for law students preparing for their exams.

Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿ“œ The script discusses various legal scenarios related to the 2024 Civil Law Bar exam, covering topics such as wills, unjust enrichment, torts, and property rights.
  • ๐Ÿ› The importance of adhering to the formalities of wills under Philippine law is highlighted, especially when executed by an alien abroad.
  • ๐Ÿ’ผ A case involving the refund of disallowed benefits to officials due to lack of legal basis is mentioned, questioning whether good faith can exonerate them from liability.
  • ๐Ÿ’ก The script touches on the concept of unjust enrichment, specifically in the context of incorrect billings and the time limits for correcting them.
  • ๐Ÿค It addresses the validity of a distributorship agreement and the legal implications of interference by a third party, such as a local retailer.
  • ๐Ÿ”„ The script delves into the authority of courts to correct typographical errors in birth certificates, considering recent legislative changes.
  • ๐Ÿ’” A scenario is presented where a marriage is challenged due to the absence of a marriage license and the authority of the solemnizing officer, exploring the potential outcomes.
  • ๐Ÿก The script discusses the rights and limitations regarding the disposition of conjugal or community property without proper consent or court authority.
  • ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€๐Ÿ‘งโ€๐Ÿ‘ฆ It examines the concept of substitute parental authority, particularly in cases involving illegitimate or adopted children, and the criteria for determining custody.
  • ๐Ÿ˜๏ธ The script explores the rights of co-owners in property, including the right of legal preemption and redemption, and the time frames within which these rights must be exercised.
  • ๐Ÿฅ A medical negligence case is presented, where a patient dies due to complications from surgery, raising questions about the surgeon's liability.

Q & A

  • What is the main topic discussed in the script?

    -The script appears to be a set of predictions for the 2024 Civil Law Bar exam in the Philippines, covering various legal scenarios and questions related to civil law.

  • What is the significance of 'Lex loci celebrationis' in the context of the first question?

    -In the context of the first question, 'Lex loci celebrationis' refers to the law of the place where an act is done, which is relevant for determining the formalities required for the validity of a will executed by a foreigner abroad.

  • What legal principle is being discussed in the second question regarding unjust enrichment?

    -The second question discusses the principle of unjust enrichment under Article 22 of the Civil Code, where officials who received benefits without legal basis are ordered to refund the amounts, and the potential defense of good faith is considered.

  • What is the legal concept of 'toru interference' mentioned in the third question?

    -The concept of 'toru interference' refers to the tort of interference with contractual relations, which is discussed in the context of a local retailer inducing a termination of a distributorship agreement, leading to a lawsuit for damages.

  • How does the fourth question relate to the process of correcting errors in a birth certificate?

    -The fourth question examines the legal procedures for correcting typographical errors in a birth certificate under Rule 108 of the Rules of Court and the impact of Republic Acts 9048 and 10172, which have shifted the process to an administrative one.

  • What are the grounds for nullifying a marriage as presented in the fifth question?

    -The fifth question presents the grounds for nullifying a marriage based on the lack of a marriage license and the lack of authority of the solemnizing officer, as claimed by one of the parties after a year of separation.

  • How does the concept of prescription of actions relate to the sixth question?

    -The sixth question deals with the concept of prescription of actions, where a marriage's validity can be questioned even after the death of a party, and the legal standing of the deceased's relatives to assail the void marriage.

  • What is the legal implication of the sale of conjugal property without consent in the seventh question?

    -The seventh question explores the legal implications of the sale of conjugal property without the consent of the other spouse, as outlined in Article 96 and 124 of the Civil Code, and whether such actions can be time-barred.

  • What rights do illegitimate children have regarding parental authority as discussed in the eighth question?

    -The eighth question discusses the rights of illegitimate children in terms of parental authority, considering the situation where the child's biological parents are not married and the child's maternal grandparents seek custody.

  • How does the concept of 'presumption of legitimacy' apply to the ninth question?

    -The ninth question addresses the 'presumption of legitimacy' under Articles 164 and 167 of the Civil Code, where a child born to married parents is presumed to be legitimate, even if the biological father is not the husband.

  • What is the legal basis for claiming moral damages in the twentieth question?

    -The twentieth question discusses the legal basis for claiming moral damages under Article 2217 of the Civil Code, in the context of a dispute over disability benefits and differing medical opinions on an employee's condition.

Outlines

00:00

๐Ÿ“ Overview of the 2024 Civil Law Bar Exam Questions

This paragraph outlines the first set of questions from the 2024 Civil Law Bar Exam. Topics covered include the extrinsic validity of wills executed by aliens abroad, unjust enrichment, and the validity of certain legal formalities in various scenarios such as probate, government disallowances, and contracts. The questions examine different legal cases, testing the knowledge of candidates on civil law principles, including succession, marriage laws, and tortious interference.

05:00

โš–๏ธ Legal Dilemmas: Faith, Enrichment, and Legal Authority

This paragraph continues with additional bar exam questions, focusing on good faith in legal disallowances, unjust enrichment involving electrical billing, tortious interference in business contracts, and the correction of errors in birth certificates. These questions challenge the examinees to apply civil code articles and legal precedents to complex legal situations, such as the liability of public officials for disallowed benefits and the legal implications of erroneous government actions.

10:00

๐Ÿ” Complexities of Property and Family Law

This section introduces more bar exam questions, dealing with the disposition of conjugal property, substitute parental authority for illegitimate children, and the presumption of legitimacy in marriage. The scenarios presented involve complex legal disputes over property rights, custody of children, and the interpretation of family law provisions, particularly in cases where the formalities of legal agreements and the rights of family members are in question.

15:02

๐Ÿก Land, Contracts, and Legal Disputes

This paragraph covers questions related to land registration, succession rights of illegitimate children, the validity of oral vs. written contracts, and the enforceability of real estate mortgages. The scenarios highlight legal challenges involving land possession, the inheritance rights of non-marital children, and the interpretation of contract law, requiring examinees to navigate the nuances of civil law in determining legal outcomes.

20:03

๐Ÿฆ Mortgages, Medical Negligence, and Moral Damages

In this section, the bar exam questions delve into issues such as continuing guarantees in mortgages, the rights of buyers in good faith, medical negligence, and the grounds for claiming moral damages. Examinees are tested on their understanding of legal principles related to real estate transactions, medical malpractice, and the legal responsibilities of financial institutions, as well as the rights of individuals in cases of negligence and personal injury.

25:09

๐Ÿ“š Final Legal Scenarios and Predictions

The final section of the video script wraps up the bar exam questions, focusing on legal principles such as vested rights, the effects of psychological incapacity on marriage, and the presumption of regularity in notarized contracts. The speaker also offers words of encouragement to the examinees, wishing them success in their exams and emphasizing the importance of preparation and sacrifice in achieving their goals.

Mindmap

Keywords

๐Ÿ’กProbate

Probate refers to the legal process of validating a will and administering an estate after someone's death. In the context of the video, it is mentioned when discussing a will executed by a citizen of California who died in the Philippines, highlighting the cross-jurisdictional legal issues that can arise in probate proceedings.

๐Ÿ’กUnjust Enrichment

Unjust enrichment is a legal term referring to a situation where one party is unjustly benefited at the expense of another, often leading to a legal obligation to make restitution. The video script mentions a scenario where an electric cooperative was underbilled due to an incorrect multiplier, leading to a claim of unjust enrichment.

๐Ÿ’กInterference

Interference in contract law refers to the act of obstructing or hindering the performance of a contract without legal justification. The video discusses a case where a local retailer interfered with an existing distributorship agreement, leading to a potential claim for damages due to interference.

๐Ÿ’กChange of Name

A change of name typically involves a legal process to alter one's name on official records. The video touches on a situation where a birth certificate contains errors, and the individual seeks to correct these errors through legal means, reflecting the administrative and judicial procedures involved in name changes.

๐Ÿ’กVoid Marriage

A void marriage is one that is invalid from the outset due to certain defects, such as a lack of legal capacity or formal requirements. The video script includes a scenario where a marriage is challenged due to the absence of a marriage license and the authority of the officiant, illustrating the legal grounds for declaring a marriage void.

๐Ÿ’กPrescripti of Actions

Prescripti of actions, or the statute of limitations, refers to the time limit within which a legal action must be brought. The video discusses a case where a decision declaring a marriage void was not final, and the issue of whether an action can be brought after the death of a party, highlighting the time constraints on legal proceedings.

๐Ÿ’กAlienation of Property

Alienation of property refers to the transfer of ownership rights from one party to another. In the video, a scenario is presented where a spouse alienates property without the consent of the other, leading to a legal dispute over the validity of the transfer and the rights of the non-consenting spouse.

๐Ÿ’กSubstitute Parental Authority

Substitute parental authority is the legal authority given to someone other than the child's biological parents to make decisions and care for the child. The video script discusses a situation where the child's maternal grandparents seek to exercise this authority, reflecting the legal considerations in determining who should have custody in cases of parental unfitness.

๐Ÿ’กPresumption of Legitimacy

The presumption of legitimacy is a legal principle that assumes a child born to a married couple is the legitimate offspring of that marriage. The video presents a case where a child's birth certificate incorrectly lists a non-biological father, and the court's decision to uphold the presumption of legitimacy despite the biological facts.

๐Ÿ’กEasement

An easement is a legal right to use another person's land for a specific purpose. In the video, a property owner seeks an easement for access to their land, which is surrounded by another's property, illustrating the legal disputes that can arise over the right of way and the balance between individual property rights and the needs of neighbors.

๐Ÿ’กLand Registration

Land registration is the process of recording the ownership and other rights related to a piece of land in a public registry. The video discusses a case where a person seeks to register land they have possessed for over 20 years, touching on the legal requirements and disputes that can arise in land registration, such as proof of alienability and non-reservation by the state.

Highlights

Discussion on the validity of wills executed by an alien abroad under Article 17816 of the Civil Code.

Analysis of the formalities required for a will's probate, whether it should follow Philippine or California law.

Case study on unjust enrichment under Article 22 of the Civil Code, focusing on city officials and disallowed payments.

Examination of the liability of Benet Electric Cooperative for underbilling due to an incorrect multiplier.

Exploration of the legal consequences of interference in a distributorship agreement under Article 1314 of the Civil Code.

Debate on the courts' authority to correct typographical errors in birth certificates under Rule 108 and Republic Act 10172.

Analysis of the effects of absence, defect, or irregularity in the formal requirements of marriage under Article 4 of the Family Code.

Discussion on the legal standing to question the validity of a void marriage even after the death of a party.

Case analysis on the disposition of conjugal or community property without proper authority under Articles 96 and 124 of the Civil Code.

Exploration of substitute parental authority in cases of illegitimate and adopted children under Article 216 of the Family Code.

Discussion on the presumption of legitimacy under Articles 164 and 167 of the Civil Code in cases of children born out of wedlock.

Analysis of easement rights and the conditions under which a right of way can be demanded under Article 650 of the Civil Code.

Case study on land registration and the judicial confirmation of imperfect titles under Presidential Decree 1529.

Discussion on the successional rights of illegitimate or non-marital children under Articles 982 and 992 of the Civil Code.

Analysis of the validity, enforceability, and requirements of public instruments for contracts under Articles 1356 and 1358 of the Civil Code.

Debate on the differences between oral and written contracts, and the prescription of actions under Article 1144 of the Civil Code.

Case analysis on the implications of a continuing guarantee or dragnet clause in a real estate mortgage under Article 2219 of the Civil Code.

Discussion on the rights of a buyer and mortgagee in good faith under Section 32 of Presidential Decree 1529.

Analysis of the right of legal preemption and redemption within a specified time frame under Article 1623 of the Civil Code.

Case study on the special power of attorney in real estate mortgage under Article 1878 of the Civil Code and Act 3135.

Discussion on medical negligence and malpractice, focusing on a surgeon's liability for leaving surgical instruments inside a patient.

Analysis of moral damages under Article 2217 of the Civil Code in the context of employment and injury.

Overview of vested rights, the principle of ruling based on right and justice, and void marriages under various articles of the Civil and Family Codes.

Transcripts

play00:04

[Music]

play00:08

[Applause]

play00:15

[Music]

play00:31

[Music]

play00:53

[Music]

play00:59

[Applause]

play01:02

[Music]

play01:07

fish

play01:17

Bish fish

play01:30

n

play01:32

[Music]

play01:51

[Music]

play02:21

[Music]

play02:29

Prin

play02:30

princess hello

play02:35

[Music]

play03:11

EX

play03:32

2024 civil law bar

play03:35

exam question number

play03:41

one Lex loai celebration is extrinsic

play03:45

validity of Wills executed by an alien

play03:48

abroad article

play03:49

17816 civil code Kar versus kikito the

play03:54

situation a citizen of the State of

play03:57

California USA died in the Philipp

play04:00

before he died he executed a will back

play04:03

in California he had cash and personal

play04:06

properties in the Philippines the will

play04:08

was presented for probate what

play04:10

formalities of the will shall be

play04:12

observed formalities under Philippine

play04:14

law or California law if it is the

play04:17

latter what if the California law is not

play04:21

approved question number

play04:25

two andjust enrichment soluo in De

play04:29

article 22 2154 civil code abelia versus

play04:33

Kaa galob versus Kaa and napor versus

play04:37

Benet

play04:38

electric the situation through a local

play04:42

ordinance the city government paid

play04:44

extraordinary and miscellaneous expenses

play04:47

allowance or em to its officials which

play04:50

were later disallowed by the commission

play04:52

on audit for lack of legal basis the

play04:55

officials who receiv receiv the benefits

play04:57

were ordered to refund the amounts

play05:00

they however claim good faith can good

play05:03

faith exonerate them from liability to

play05:05

settle the disallowances what are

play05:08

allowed excuses for not returning the

play05:11

disallowed

play05:13

benefits Madame Madame May

play05:23

possible thank you princess the other

play05:27

situation the National Power Corporation

play05:30

sold electricity to Benet Electric

play05:33

Cooperative but due to an incorrect

play05:36

multiplier Benet electric was under

play05:38

build napor demanded payment of the

play05:41

deficiency claiming that Benet electric

play05:44

was unjustly enriched however Benet

play05:47

electric asserts that napocor only had

play05:49

90 days to correct erroneous Billings

play05:53

some of the billing statements were more

play05:54

than a year old is Benet electric liable

play05:58

to pay the underbill

play06:01

amounts question number

play06:06

three toru interference article 1314

play06:10

civil code the

play06:12

situation Joe Malone entered into a

play06:15

distributorship agreement with SSI for

play06:18

the sale and marketing of Joe Malone

play06:21

products in the Philippines a local

play06:23

retailer named Nana Beauty contacted Joe

play06:26

Malone's owners in New York and induced

play06:29

Joe Malone to terminate its contract

play06:31

with SSI making false claims against SSI

play06:35

upon learning about the determination of

play06:38

the distributorship agreement SSI filed

play06:41

an action for damages against Nana

play06:43

Beauty will the action

play06:46

Prosper question number

play06:51

four change of name article 376 civil

play06:55

code rule 108 rules of Court Republic

play06:58

act 904 8 Republic act

play07:01

10172 republic versus

play07:04

onuka the

play07:06

situation Annabel gave birth to a baby

play07:09

girl the child's birth certificate

play07:12

however had erroneous entries in the

play07:14

first name and middle name of Annabel

play07:17

and in the relationship of the child's

play07:19

parents it was stated that Annabel was

play07:22

married to the child's father Annabel

play07:24

filed a petition under rule 108 of the

play07:27

rules of Court the Republic moved to

play07:29

dismiss on the ground that the procedure

play07:32

for change or correction of

play07:33

typographical errors is now

play07:35

administrative pursuant to Republic act

play07:38

9048 as amended by Republic act

play07:41

10172 are the courts without power and

play07:44

authority to hear petitions for change

play07:47

or correction of typographical errors in

play07:50

the birth

play07:51

certificate question number

play07:54

[Music]

play07:56

five effects of absence defect or

play08:00

irregularity in the essential and formal

play08:02

requisites of marriage Article 4 Family

play08:06

Code the

play08:07

situation Carlos and Chloe were

play08:10

sweethearts for over a year they were

play08:12

madly in love so they got married

play08:14

through a fixer the fixer made them sign

play08:17

an affidavit stating that they had been

play08:19

cohabiting for more than 5 years as

play08:22

husband and wives then they went to a

play08:25

pastor who solemnized their marriage

play08:28

after being shown the David neither of

play08:30

them was a member of the pastor's Church

play08:33

a year later Chloe left Carlos and filed

play08:36

an action to nullify their marriage on

play08:39

the grounds of lack of a marriage

play08:40

license and lack of authority of the

play08:43

solemnizing officer will chlo petition

play08:48

Prosper question number

play08:52

six impr prescripti of actions formality

play08:56

of marriage and that void marriages can

play08:59

be question questioned even after the

play09:00

death of either party as the deceased

play09:03

may have hirs with legal standing to

play09:06

assail the void marriage Thomas versus

play09:09

trono the situation Thomas was first

play09:12

married to Jane after two years of

play09:15

marriage Thomas filed an action to

play09:17

declare the marriage void the court

play09:20

granted the petition Thomas married

play09:23

again this time to test they had a

play09:25

daughter elira Thomas later died when

play09:28

elira went to the court to get papers

play09:30

connected to the case for the nality of

play09:33

the marriage between Thomas and Jane it

play09:35

was discovered that the decision was not

play09:38

yet final because the Republic was not

play09:41

served a copy of the decision the

play09:43

Republic moved for a consideration and

play09:46

prevailed alira filed an appeal the

play09:49

Republic opposed the appeal claiming

play09:51

that she had no legal standing that only

play09:54

the parties to the marriage can question

play09:56

its validity is the Republic correct

play10:00

question number

play10:03

seven disposition alienation or

play10:06

encumbrance of conjugal or community

play10:08

property without authority of the court

play10:11

or the written consent of the other

play10:12

spouse is void article 96 124 civil code

play10:18

Alexander versus escalona strong Fort

play10:21

warehousing versus bant the situation

play10:25

George and Hillary were married in

play10:28

1966 through through the years they

play10:30

acquired real and personal properties in

play10:33

1998 George waved in favor of his

play10:36

illegitimate son Ray one of the real

play10:38

properties without Hillary's consent Ry

play10:41

later sold the property to Beatrice 5

play10:44

years later Hillary sought to recover

play10:47

the property because she did not give

play10:49

her consent to its alienation both Ry

play10:52

and beatric claimed that the action is

play10:54

time barred what is the status of the

play10:57

waiver and sale of the property can it

play10:59

still be

play11:02

recovered question number

play11:07

eight substitute parental Authority in

play11:10

case of illegitimate children and

play11:12

adopted children article 216 Family Code

play11:15

section 24K Republic act

play11:18

11642 the situation Maria and Peter

play11:22

cohabited without the benefit of

play11:24

marriage they have a l child Charles

play11:27

when Charles was three Maria and Peter

play11:30

separated due to Maria's drug addiction

play11:33

a year later Maria was arrested and

play11:36

convicted of selling illegal drugs Peter

play11:39

sought exclusive custody of Charles but

play11:42

Mar Maria's parents Charles maternal

play11:44

grandparents insisted that they should

play11:47

take custody and exercise parental

play11:49

authority over Charles who between Peter

play11:52

and Charles maternal grandparents should

play11:55

be granted substitute parental

play11:57

Authority question question number

play12:00

[Music]

play12:02

nine presumption of legitimacy article

play12:07

164 167 civil code the situation Louisa

play12:12

and Noel were married for 7 years but

play12:15

have been separated in fact for over a

play12:17

year due to irreconcilable differences

play12:20

Louisa now has a boyfriend Victor they

play12:23

have a child Gabriel in Gabriel's birth

play12:26

certificate his father is stated as

play12:28

victim

play12:29

moreover it is stated that Louisa and

play12:31

Victor are married to avoid

play12:33

embarrassment from having a child with a

play12:36

man not her husband Louisa filed a

play12:38

petition to correct the birth

play12:40

certificate to delete the details about

play12:43

Gabriel's father however the court

play12:46

denied Louisa's petition and ordered

play12:48

instead that the birth certificate

play12:50

should reflect that Gabriel's father is

play12:53

Noel because Gabriel is presumed

play12:56

legitimate is the court correct

play12:59

question number

play13:02

10 eastment of right of way article 650

play13:06

civil code the

play13:10

situation Marissa purchased a triangular

play13:13

shaped land in tanay Ral which was

play13:16

surrounded on one side by a river and on

play13:19

two sides by the property of Bernard

play13:22

Marissa's only possible access to the

play13:25

public road is through Bernard's

play13:26

property Marisa demand Ed an eastment of

play13:30

right of way through a 20 M path which

play13:33

would cut through Bernard's garage

play13:35

Bernard rejected the request and offered

play13:38

another path which was three times the

play13:40

length of the original requested pathway

play13:43

if this case goes to court who should

play13:45

the court side

play13:50

with so

play13:59

Mario lope

play14:01

message

play14:04

examin well yes CU

play14:13

basic now to

play14:16

continue question number

play14:19

[Music]

play14:20

11 land registration and judicial

play14:24

confirmation of imperfect title PD 1529

play14:27

as amended by ra1 1573 republic versus

play14:31

passi gzel company the situation junisha

play14:35

inherited a piece of land from his

play14:37

father who for over 20 years was in open

play14:41

continuous exclusive and notorious

play14:43

possession of said land to protect his

play14:46

rights to the land jisho filed an

play14:48

application for original registration he

play14:51

submitted proof that the land is

play14:53

alienable and disposable agricultural

play14:55

land the Republic opposed the

play14:57

application claiming that the length of

play15:00

possession is insufficient for

play15:01

registration of lands and that junisha

play15:04

failed to present proof that the land is

play15:07

not reserved by the state for public use

play15:10

public service and the development of

play15:12

national wealth is the Republic's

play15:14

opposition

play15:17

[Music]

play15:18

meritorious question number

play15:22

12 successional rights of illegitimate

play15:25

or non-marital children article 982 2

play15:29

and 992 civil code aino versus aino the

play15:34

situation Angela was the illegitimate

play15:37

child of aruro who died before Angela

play15:40

was born and before aruro and Angela's

play15:42

mother could marry Arturo's family

play15:45

embraced and took care of Angela and she

play15:48

was treated like family when her

play15:50

grandfather Arturo's father died Angela

play15:54

asked about her share in The Inheritance

play15:56

but her uncle Rodrigo told her that she

play15:59

was not entitled to a share because she

play16:01

was Arturo's illegitimate child who is

play16:04

barred under the law to inherit from the

play16:06

legitimate relatives of her father is

play16:09

Rodrigo correct that Angela cannot

play16:11

inherit from her grandfather now what if

play16:14

it was Rodrigo who died without issue

play16:17

will your answer be the

play16:20

same question number

play16:23

13 forms of contracts validity

play16:26

enforceability and requirement of public

play16:29

instrument article 1356 1358 and 14032

play16:34

civil code P kak versus patena Desa the

play16:39

situation Peter and Paul were the

play16:42

children of Ricky and Amalia when their

play16:44

parents died Peter and Paul asserted

play16:47

control over the forers farm in tagum

play16:50

City however they discovered that their

play16:52

parents allegedly donated the property

play16:55

to their aunt deina when they

play16:58

investigate they found that the deed of

play17:00

donation was not notorized and it does

play17:03

not bear the acceptance of their aunt

play17:05

the supposed dony they now claim that

play17:08

the donation is void are they

play17:11

correct question number

play17:15

14 oral contract versus written contract

play17:19

prescription of actions article 1144

play17:23

11:45 of the civil code Alba versus

play17:26

arado the situation Bora sold on credit

play17:30

crude oil and petroleum products to Nita

play17:34

their contract was merely verbal because

play17:36

they were friends ninita paid her first

play17:39

check in March

play17:41

2018 however it was Dishonored by the

play17:44

bank due to insufficient funds rodora

play17:47

was not able to collect due to her busy

play17:49

schedule and then the pandemic happened

play17:52

on August 5 2024 rodora filed a

play17:55

collection suit Nita moved to dismiss

play17:58

the complaint on the ground of

play18:00

prescription according to ninita an

play18:03

action based on an oral contract

play18:05

prescribed in 6 years rodora counter

play18:08

argued that the issuance of the check

play18:10

converted their agreement into a written

play18:12

contract thus the applicable

play18:14

prescriptive period should be 10 years

play18:17

who is correct between rodora and

play18:21

Anita question number

play18:25

15 continuing guarantee Blan mortgage

play18:29

Clause drug net Clause cambal versus

play18:32

China

play18:33

Bank the

play18:36

situation elenita borrowed 1 million

play18:39

pesos from XYZ Bank secured by a real

play18:42

estate mortgage which included a blanket

play18:45

mortgage clause or drug net Clause a

play18:48

stipulation that the collateral shall

play18:50

remain in effect for loans obtained in

play18:53

the future a year later elenita borrowed

play18:56

2 million pesos while the first loan was

play18:59

paid the second loan was not XYZ bank

play19:02

then foreclosed the mortgage property

play19:05

elenita protested claiming that the

play19:07

second loan agreement did not make

play19:09

reference to the real estate mortgage

play19:13

hence the second loan is an unsecured

play19:15

loan obligation did the real estate

play19:18

mortgage also secure elenita's second

play19:23

loan question number 16

play19:27

[Music]

play19:30

buyer in good faith morgage in good

play19:32

faith section 32 PD 1529 Jimenez versus

play19:37

Jimenez the situation Kad owned a parcel

play19:41

of land which he donated to Dennis after

play19:44

getting a torren title Dennis mortgaged

play19:46

the property to ABC Bank later due to

play19:49

nonpayment the bank foreclosed the

play19:52

mortgage property and acquired it during

play19:54

the auction sale meanwhile kad's airs

play19:58

filed action to annal the deed of

play20:00

donation the real estate mortgage and

play20:03

the Foreclosure sale on the ground that

play20:05

Kad signature in the deed of donation

play20:07

was forged ABC Bank opposed the Don the

play20:11

action asserting that it is a mortgage

play20:14

in good faith that it relied on Dennis's

play20:18

torrent title and upon ocular inspection

play20:21

was convinced that the property was in

play20:23

The Possession and control of Dennis who

play20:26

between kad's airs and ABC Bank has a

play20:29

better right to the

play20:31

property question number

play20:36

17 right of legal preemption and

play20:39

Redemption to be exercised within 30

play20:41

days from receipt of written notice of

play20:43

the sale article 1623 civil code Rama

play20:47

versus

play20:48

ngra the

play20:50

situation RZA and roml were co-owners of

play20:54

a 5 hectare Farmland in Amadeo Cavit in

play20:58

late Jan January 2023 RZA sold her one

play21:01

half undivided share to her sister

play21:04

marimar the latter visited the farm and

play21:07

started planting there on in October

play21:10

2023 roml then filed a complaint with

play21:14

the barangay to protest marim Mar's

play21:17

actions during the conciliation

play21:19

proceedings held in December 2023 roml

play21:23

offered to redeem the property but

play21:25

marimar argued that the time to exercise

play21:28

the right of legal Redemption had long

play21:30

expired since October 2023 roml had

play21:34

personally known that RZA had sold her

play21:37

share in the property to marimar roml

play21:40

should have redeemed Risa share not

play21:42

later than November 2023 has ROM lost

play21:46

the right to redeem risa's share in the

play21:49

co-owned

play21:50

property question number

play21:55

18 special power of attorney in real

play21:58

estate mortgage article 1878 civil code

play22:02

section 1 act 3135 commoner lending

play22:05

Corporation versus

play22:07

veva the situation julan borrowed

play22:11

500,000 from Enrico evidenced by a loone

play22:14

agreement with real estate mortgage due

play22:17

to nonpayment enrio extrajudicially

play22:20

foreclosed the mortgage property and

play22:22

acquired it during the auction sale

play22:25

Julian filed an action to annal the

play22:27

extrajudicial forclosure sale claiming

play22:29

that he did not expressly Grant enrio

play22:32

the power to sell the property according

play22:35

to julan act 3135 requires a special

play22:39

power of attorney attached to the deed

play22:42

of real estate mortgage enrio countered

play22:45

that paragraph three of their agreement

play22:47

allowed enrio to take any legal action

play22:50

as may be necessary to satisfy the

play22:52

Mortgage Debt who between julan and

play22:55

enrio is correct

play22:59

question number

play23:01

19 medical negligence and malpractice

play23:05

the

play23:05

situation natividad underwent surgery

play23:08

for assist in her lower abdomen post

play23:11

surgery it was discovered that the two

play23:14

GES were left inside her body these

play23:17

Rogue goes led to several complications

play23:20

and subsequent surgeries natividad

play23:23

consequently died her husband filed an

play23:25

action for medical negligence and

play23:27

malpractice against the surgeon who

play23:29

operated on natividad the surgeon

play23:32

countered that it was not his

play23:34

responsibility to account for the goes

play23:37

that he simply operated on the patient

play23:39

is the surgeon liable for medical

play23:43

negligence question number

play23:46

20 moral damages article 2217 civil code

play23:50

scan field Maritime versus senteno the

play23:54

situation Alvin was hired by SKT Agency

play23:58

on on behalf of its foreign principal

play24:00

Crystal shipping incorporated as a mess

play24:03

person on board MV Northern stars on

play24:06

Christmas Eve 2020 he fell from the

play24:09

ladder while working resulting in

play24:11

injuries the company designated

play24:13

physician assessed his injuries and

play24:16

issued a Certificate of Fitness for work

play24:19

Alvin sought a second opinion from

play24:21

another physician who concluded that he

play24:24

was permanently disabled and unfit for

play24:26

work he demanded this ability

play24:28

compensation plus damages due to the

play24:31

ship management agency's refusal to pay

play24:35

his disability benefits is the

play24:37

difference of opinion on the medical

play24:39

condition and refusal to pay sufficient

play24:42

ground to claim moral

play24:49

[Music]

play24:57

damages

play25:08

[Music]

play25:14

for article 47 civil code vested rights

play25:19

principle article 910 civil code courts

play25:23

to rule based on right and Justice nson

play25:27

versus to

play25:29

Flores article 36 Family Code void

play25:33

marriages due to psychological

play25:35

incapacity andal versus andal K versus

play25:40

K

play25:42

versus actions to recover ownership and

play25:45

possession of real property action

play25:48

interictal action Pana action

play25:53

ricor legal basis jurisdiction at

play25:56

prescription h article 681 civil code

play26:01

naturally falling

play26:03

fruits article 854 civil code pration

play26:07

and

play26:09

effects last presumption of regularity

play26:13

authenticity and due execution of a

play26:16

contract when notorized by a public

play26:18

notary Chinko versus

play26:21

Chinko that's all and all thank

play26:25

you oh thank you Prince

play26:38

[Music]

play26:42

that's it guys the predictions for the

play26:44

2024 C exam

play26:49

[Music]

play26:58

[Music]

play27:05

know better than the rest of

play27:09

us your preparation and sacrifices over

play27:13

more than four years will carry you to

play27:16

success now regardless of how many

play27:19

predictions come true I hope you enjoy

play27:21

this video as much as I did making it

play27:29

and with that our session is

play27:33

over goodbye M of good luck and God

play27:37

bless you

play27:39

all thank you princess and see you again

play27:42

next year huh but I'll see you again

play27:44

soon

play27:49

guys this is the house of law bye guys

play27:55

[Music]

play28:04

[Music]

play28:09

okay now okay

play28:12

[Music]

Rate This
โ˜…
โ˜…
โ˜…
โ˜…
โ˜…

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Related Tags
Civil LawBar ExamLegal PredictionsProperty RightsWills ExecutionJust EnrichmentContract FormsSuccession RightsMedical NegligenceMoral DamagesLegal Disputes