CFB DFS Picks Week 2 (Friday 9/6/24) | College Football Daily Fantasy Tips

Summary

In this stochastic Channel video, Mesi dives into college football DFS for the Friday slate, offering insights on player data, Vegas lines, and team projections. He discusses specific games, analyzing player performances and strategies for Duke vs. Northwestern and BYU vs. SMU. Mesi provides detailed breakdowns on quarterbacks, running backs, and receivers, highlighting key players like Malik Murphy, Mike Wright, and Jordan Moore. He also touches on the importance of considering team defenses and coaching strategies when making DFS picks.

Takeaways

• 🏈 The video discusses college football DFS strategies for a Friday slate, focusing on player data and game analysis.
• 📊 The presenter uses a player data, usage tool to analyze team and player statistics, including attempts per game and yards per game.
• 🤔 There's a detailed breakdown of the Duke vs. Northwestern game, with insights on the quarterbacks, running backs, and receivers.
• 🔍 The analysis highlights the potential challenges for Duke's quarterback Malik Murphy due to Northwestern's strong run defense.
• 🏃‍♂️ The running back situation at Duke is considered less promising, with a more spread-out role and a focus on pass-down work.
• 📉 The presenter is not particularly interested in Duke's running back options due to their limited rushing attempts and Northwestern's defense.
• 📈 For the Northwestern side, Mike Wright is highlighted as a key player in the run game, despite his lackluster passing performance.
• 🎯 The video identifies AJ Henning and Bryce Curtis as the top two plays for Northwestern, with a high target share and consistent involvement.
• 🤷‍♂️ There's a cautious approach to the tight end positions, with a focus on the potential value in the receiving game rather than the run game.
• 🏟️ The video concludes with a look at other games on the slate, including BYU vs. SMU, with a focus on the high implied team totals and potential player performances.

Q & A

What does the speaker suggest to do before starting the analysis?

The speaker suggests hitting the Thumbs Up Button, subscribing to the channel, and hitting the notification bell to help out the channel.

What type of data does the speaker discuss regarding college football?

The speaker discusses player data, usage tool, projections, ownership, and the Sims tool, focusing on team by team data, Vegas data, and player statistics such as attempts per game, total yards, yards per game, and yards per carry.

How does the speaker describe the performance of Malik Murphy?

The speaker describes Malik Murphy's performance as not very mobile, with 5.91 yards per carry, and suggests that his performance could be tough against a strong defense like Northwestern.

What is the speaker's opinion on the Duke running back situation?

The speaker is not particularly interested in the Duke running back situation due to the team's pass-heavy approach and Northwestern's strong run defense.

Which player does the speaker consider the locked-in receiver of choice for Duke?

The speaker considers Jordan Moore to be the locked-in receiver of choice for Duke, highlighting his high target share and yardage.

What is the speaker's view on the Northwestern quarterback, Mike Wright?

The speaker views Mike Wright as a run-heavy quarterback with a lackluster passing performance, expecting consistent but not outstanding results.

What does the speaker suggest about the Northwestern running back committee?

The speaker suggests that the Northwestern running back committee is a three-back timeshare, with Camp Porter leading the way, and Caleb KF being potentially undervalued by sportsbooks.

Which players does the speaker recommend focusing on for SMU's passing game?

The speaker recommends focusing on AJ Henning and Bryce Curtis for SMU's passing game due to their high target share and consistent involvement.

What is the speaker's strategy for the BYU vs. SMU game?

The speaker's strategy for the BYU vs. SMU game is to consider Preston Stone as a potential quarterback play and to focus on SMU's running backs and wide receivers for potential high-scoring plays.

How does the speaker evaluate the Indiana team's performance in the script?

The speaker evaluates the Indiana team's performance as having a high implied team total and suggests looking at Curtis Roor as a safe quarterback option, along with Cameron Smith as a potential value play at running back.

Outlines

00:00

🏈 College Football DFS: Duke vs Northwestern Analysis

Mesi begins by introducing a college football DFS discussion, focusing on the Duke vs Northwestern game. He emphasizes the importance of engaging with the channel through likes, subscriptions, and notifications. Mesi then transitions to discussing player data and usage tools, providing insights into team statistics, Vegas data, and player performance metrics like attempts per game and yards per carry. He scrutinizes the quarterback and running back situations for both teams, highlighting the potential challenges for Duke's offense against Northwestern's strong run defense. Mesi also touches on the receiving corps, noting the target shares and the potential for certain players to outperform their current pricing in DFS contests.

05:02

📊 In-Depth Look at Player Performance and Strategy

This paragraph delves deeper into the player performance and strategy for the Duke vs Northwestern game. Mesi discusses the running back committee, emphasizing the role distribution and potential outcomes based on each player's route participation and target shares. He also provides a detailed analysis of the quarterback situation, noting the passing tendencies and the potential for certain players to be over or under-projected by sportsbooks. The summary also includes a look at the tight end positions and the potential value in playing certain players based on their route participation and target rates.

10:03

🏟️ BYU vs SMU Matchup and Player Insights

Mesi shifts the focus to the BYU vs SMU game, providing a detailed analysis of the spread, total points, and player performances. He discusses the quarterback situation, highlighting Preston Stone's potential as a value play due to his split time with Kevin Jennings. The analysis continues with a look at the running back committee, noting injuries and potential workload distribution. Mesi also provides insights into the receiving corps, identifying key players like RJ Maryland and their target shares, and discusses the potential for certain players to see an increase in targets based on the game's dynamics.

15:04

📉 Western Illinois vs Indiana: Game Breakdown and DFS Considerations

In the final paragraph, Mesi discusses the Western Illinois vs Indiana matchup, providing a game breakdown and considerations for DFS. He covers the team's offensive pace, the quarterback situation with Nathan Lamb, and the backfield committee involving Cameron Smith, Torren Farmer, and Tyler Jordan Smith. Mesi also analyzes the wide receiver situation, identifying key players and their target shares, and discusses the potential for certain players to provide value in DFS contests. He concludes with a summary of the quarterback options, including Curtis Rooker, and provides a final assessment of the slate, highlighting the players he believes offer the most potential value.

Keywords

💡DFS (Daily Fantasy Sports)

DFS refers to the type of fantasy sports game where players draft and manage a team based on real-world athletes, with contests typically lasting just a day or week. In the context of the video, the speaker discusses college football DFS strategies for a specific Friday slate.

💡FCS (Football Championship Subdivision)

The FCS is a division of college football in the United States, a level below the FBS (Football Bowl Subdivision). The speaker references FCS games as part of the teams' schedules and mentions how data from these games might not be as useful due to the disparity in competition level.

💡Projections

Projections are estimates of how players will perform in future games, usually based on past performance, trends, and matchups. The speaker talks about using projections to guide decisions in selecting players for DFS lineups.

💡Ownership

Ownership in DFS refers to how many participants in a contest have chosen a particular player for their lineup. The video touches on how knowing the ownership percentages helps in making strategic decisions, especially in less obvious picks.

💡Target share

Target share is the percentage of passing attempts directed toward a specific player, often a wide receiver or tight end. The speaker mentions target shares when discussing players like Jordan Moore, emphasizing how much certain receivers are involved in their team’s offense.

💡Vegas data

Vegas data refers to betting lines and odds from sportsbooks in Las Vegas, which help predict game outcomes, total points, and team performance. In this video, the speaker uses Vegas data, like point spreads and totals, to evaluate matchups and guide DFS decisions.

💡Route participation

Route participation is the percentage of passing plays where a player runs a route as a potential target. The speaker explains how this stat is used to gauge how involved a player, such as a wide receiver or tight end, is in their team’s offense.

💡Committee backfield

A committee backfield refers to a team using multiple running backs in a rotation, often splitting the workload. The speaker mentions the running back committees for Duke and Northwestern, which makes it harder to predict which player will get more carries or touches.

💡Run-pass balance

Run-pass balance describes the ratio of rushing plays to passing plays a team uses in a game. The speaker discusses teams like Duke and Northwestern and how their approach to run-pass balance impacts the potential performance of their offensive players in DFS.

💡Stud

In DFS, a 'stud' refers to a high-performing, high-cost player expected to deliver strong results. The speaker refers to Jordan Moore as a 'stud' because of his central role in Duke’s offense, with a high target share and solid production.

Highlights

Introduction to college football DFS Friday slate analysis

Emphasis on subscribing and engaging with the channel for updates

Explanation of the player data usage tool for college football analysis

Discussion on team data and Vegas lines for Duke vs. Northwestern game

Analysis of quarterback Malik Murphy's performance and rushing stats

Breakdown of the running back room and their route participation

Assessment of the potential for Duke's running backs against Northwestern's run defense

Evaluation of the wide receiver situation and target shares for Duke

Projections on Northwestern's quarterback Mike Wright's passing efficiency

Insight into Northwestern's three-back committee and their route rates

Analysis of SMU's high implied team total and player projections against BYU

Discussion on Preston Stone's value as SMU's quarterback for DFS

Projections and considerations for SMU's running back situation

Analysis of SMU's wide receiver targets and efficiency

Evaluation of BYU's offensive strategy and quarterback Jake Rett's potential

Discussion on Indiana's offensive potential and player projections against Western Illinois

Final thoughts on the Slate, including key players and strategies for DFS

Transcripts

what's up everybody Mesi here back again

with the stochastic Channel and today

we're talking some college football DFS

the Friday slate before we get started

make sure to hit that Thumbs Up Button

subscribe to the channel and hit the

notification Bell it helps us out a ton

so thank you if you have done that all

right I'm GNA adjust my camera a little

bit I'm a little low and right away I'm

going to bring you behind the glass to

what we usually use our player data

usage tool talk about it briefly and

then get into the games so let me switch

off this this is an FCS game but we'll

begin here with Duke Northwestern so

this is available with our college

football package among other things

projections ownership our Sims tool more

on that stuff later but this specific

page what you're looking at week by week

this will update at the top we're going

to have our team by team data everything

highlighted in Grays from last year

that'll change to next or this year

probably next week a lot lot of these

teams played FCS opponents so the data

is not there in some cases and in other

cases highly flawed because of level of

competition so I left that alone for

last year's stuff I'll update when it

makes sense just verbally and then we

have your Vegas data so in this case

Northwestern is a three-point favorite

with a 37 total these are your implied

team totals very low for both of these

teams as far as the player-by-player

stuff quarterbacks are up here at the

top we have their attempts per game

total toal yards yards per game this

will update when there's more games how

many sacks they've taken opportunities

is sacks plus scrambles plus designed

Rush attempts than your yards per carry

you could see Malik Murphy not very

mobile conversely Mike rght he's

honestly more mobile than I I thought

5.91 yards per carry but we'll get into

that from here attempts that's for

running backs receivers quarterbacks

whoever carries the percentage of the

attempts they have they're yards and

yards per game and it's the same thing

with receivers down here only we move to

targets then we have Target share

targets per game yards yards per game

and percentage of routes that a player

participates in this will be a running

average throughout the season I will

update verbally when there are

discrepancies so hopefully that makes

enough sense enough of the background

all of the information for our tools

packages everything can be found below

while we're on this game I might as well

start here we got into some of the

specifics right away with Duke

Northwestern it's a threo spread in

favor of the wild cats 37 total this

number's coming down so probably even

lower by the time it kicks off at the

quarterback position we have Malik

Murphy at 7,300 the fact that he took

zero rushing or has zero rushing yards

and took zero sacks I think is more a

product of what this team did in week

one playing an FCS team that is neither

here nor there last year he found a way

to finish with negative rushing yards so

that was with Taxas better offensive

line better receivers better everything

I think this could be pretty tough

sedding for Malik Murphy and he is no

longer playing Elon which is also a

concern from there we have the running

back room

which in my opinion was a little more

spread than I thought it would be star

Thomas out carried Joz Mo but if you

look at stuff like route percentage jao

Moore played a lot more than star Thomas

I'll highlight that down here 42 2% of

their routes for more versus 27 a. half%

for Thomas so it's kind of like a 5050

committee with designed roles more

handling pass down stuff more than than

star Thomas and star Thomas handling

more of the early down rolls so in a

game against North Western who is an

excellent run defense not expecting that

to be anything worth writing home about

I'm not particularly interested in the

Duke running back situation especially

because you know like week one Duke

passed the ball 60% of the time they

were at 24 seconds per play which is a

Divergence from what we saw last year of

course they have the new coaching staff

but if we're not getting a lot of

rushing attempts from these players and

Northwestern as an awesome

defense I think there's better

opportunities in other situations

they're just gppb plays in my opinion at

receiver Jordan Moore the locked in

receiver of choice this makes sense they

lost his running mate from last year 12

targets immediately 31% Target share

went over 100 yards 72% rout share you

think that rises in more competitive

games then it's Eli panle and Samir

heggins I don't think we see really much

else from this team in terms of rotation

onto the field Javon Harvey John Tavis

Robertson these are players that should

be rotational pieces with Samir hains

Eli panle and Jordan Moore locked in to

your three wide receiver sets and I

think panle should be more expensive

than Heins just straight up at this

point given what we saw last week and

panle has been injured at points in his

career I think that's the only thing

that's limited him from playing ahead of

Hain titand is a rotation Nikki

dlan he was at 47% of the routes

Jeremiah Hasley 47% of the routes four

targets a piece expect this to continue

and when they run 12 personel you'll see

I think panl and Heins come off the

field more Heins than anyone else but

the Duke tight ends I guess are in play

I don't have a ton of interests not with

panle being a little bit more expensive

on the Northwestern side Mike Wright

8100 he had the 65 rushing yards right

away in his debut it's pretty good Mark

and I expect that to be pretty

consistent this team was surprisingly

pass the ball 49% of the time that was

very interesting to see considering

their new OC Lan comes from South Dakota

state where they were often passing the

ball in the 30% range 30 to 40% we did

not have that in their first game but

they were still super slow 31 seconds

per play and this team I think will be

more run heavy in the

future and rely on their defense really

but Mike Wright being a piece of this

run game I think is important because

he's very lackluster as a passer 6.0

yards per attempt for reference the

college average is 7.4 so he's well

below that and he's had a long career

he's been at multiple programs I

wouldn't expect him to light the world

on fire although Duke's defense is

rebuilding quite a bit here the biggest

surprise for me was the three back

committee that Northwestern decided to

use that their coach doubled down on in

the press conference cam Porter led the

way last year and he still carried the

ball 13

times was not involved in the pass game

honestly like they barely threw the ball

they did they just I don't think got off

enough plays but Camp Porter he's firmly

in a time share Caleb komala played more

than we thought and right now I think

we're over projecting this is sports

books over projecting Camp Porto rushing

under projecting Caleb KF even though I

think they should both be involved as

far as route rates for these running

backs because they were not targeted

really at all I think we do see some

rotation between these players but I

would still expect Camp pora to largely

lead the way right now we have Camp

Porter at 42% of the

routes komala around 20 Heyman around

seven and that is just diverging a

little bit from what we saw last week

but pretty in line so that's where we

have them in terms of the past game

Porter are still being mainly the third

down back receiver you know they didn't

throw the ball a lot or they I guess

they're they did throw the ball a fair

amount but a lot of it was off Target

and didn't register as targets

but over 60% of the targets went to AJ

Henning and Bryce Curts that is nice in

the fact that it's projectable so it's

not expensive these players were on the

field every single play their wide

receiver three Frank cvy he had just a

51 and a half% route rate and I don't

think we see much else from this team

passing the ball these are the clearly

the two best receivers there's no reason

to throw it to anybody else at tight end

Thomas Gordon he split time with

Marshall Lang neither of them received

much work in the past game but both of

them were out there for a pretty fair

amount of the routes Gordon he was up

above 70% and we have Lang above 50%

coming into this week which is

appropriate for them just don't expect a

high targets per route rate for the

Northwestern tight ends I would focus

solely on Henning and CTS if you can

unfortunately they're not expensive

they're the top two plays in this game

Wright is okay Porter is okay Kamala I

think is okay as well would rely on

Jordan more as a stud and then Thomas

and jock has more along with Eli panle

more your gpp

plays second good game on the Slate we

turn to BYU taking on SMU this spread is

moving towards 11 it's 10 and a half in

favor of SMU 56 total and it's a game I

think we should have a lot of interest

right away just from the high implied

team total of SMU up above 30 points at

30 points right now

but much better than the previous game

so when you have a 36 and a half total a

37 total sometimes you're just going to

naturally be pushed towards other games

which is the case here but in this

contest we have I think a pretty decent

spot to take SMU as a bu low after their

FCS game and before that playing Nevada

really close let's start with them so

you have Preston Stone still splitting

some time

with Kevin Jennings that's not changing

in this game but I think I think it's

going to be closer to an 8020 split

similar to what we saw in the first week

even though Jennings has been fine at

some point I think they just had to name

a starting quarterback the problem is

you pay 9500 for it there's not that

many options on this late so I think you

probably still look towards Preston

Stone as a guy you can lock in pretty

clearly I haven't built lineups yet I'm

not sure where I'll be on cash but I

anticipate playing probably r from

Indiana and then I'm not sure on the

second quarterback it largely depend on

how salaries fall but not noticing that

many expensive skill position players so

Stone might just be the guy you lock in

to get the most points running back

their second game you know playing an

FCS team they took the foot off the gas

with Rashard Smith and LJ Johnson like

their freshman Derrik McFall had 15

carries those all came in the second

half when the game was already out of

hand same thing with Zack Hernandez all

those carries in the second half Zay

miners actually touched the ball earlier

in the game but still only two and they

didn't have Jaylen knon so his absence

definitely contributed to the elevated

McFall workload right now we're

projecting brashard Smith clearly the

number one he's been hyper efficient too

on his carrier he's already at 89 and a

half yards he's also a former receiver

so he's excellent catching the ball

three Targets in their first game didn't

need him in their second game he should

be the lead back LJ Johnson is dealing

with an injury we're expecting him to

play but but he's their bigger back he

should get some goal line touches here

and there we're tentatively projecting

him as the number two right now followed

by Jaylen Knight assuming he returns

from his

injury all this should set up pretty

well for brashard Smith you got your

next two backs dealing with injuries so

make sure you keep your eye on this

McFall we are projecting back towards

his week one roll a handful of snaps

even if he gets if he even gets that

he's a four-star freshman so there's the

potential for more especially if one of

Johnson or Knight misses but those

carries just came in garbage time

annihilating an FCS team so I still have

questions receiving game RJ Maryland

goes from nine targets to two again they

did not play a real team that's going to

happen he should be faring away the

locked in Target Target leader and he

hasn't played most of the routes yet the

series at 57% but last year in

competitive games we saw that up at 80

so if this does play to the spread I

would expect a bump in routes and

targets from RJ Maryland he's your

safest pass Catcher from there you have

Jake Bailey and Jordan

Hudson I always struggle with the

expensive SMU wide receivers because

their routes are not vastly different

than romelo Brinson rodri Daniels kesan

Smith I honestly would prefer going down

and playing those guys just price

adjusted of course if you give me all

the salary in the world sure I'll play

Jordan Hudson but if salary is a thing

which it is on the Slate there's not

much difference other than efficiency

between those players romela Brinson

keesan Smith and Roger Daniels in honest

you could make a case for Daniels being

the best of these cheap players because

he gets carries in the backfield three

carries last week has zero carries in

week zero but we saw him involved in the

Run game last year as well so those

carries do give you a floor that the

other receivers do not have 4600 aside

from Maryland I would tentatively put my

flag on him if you're looking to stack

an SMU receiver only other guy that

really mentions Matthew hibner he plays

a little bit as your second tight endend

BYU we go to Jake rettl and BYU is fresh

off a dismantling win in their first

game of the year over Southern Illinois

congrats to BYU but I don't think we saw

a lot from this team they returned their

signal caller Jake

redl and I'm not sure that's a good

thing he was inefficient last year good

showing in week one he's cheap so locked

into all the snaps I think you can play

some Rett

left I'm still hesitant this is probably

you know poor judgment on my end I have

the first run of projections done I'm

going to cross reference this with red

SLA right now just to see what we have

and if I'm being a dummy which is likely

the

case we have red slap at 17 and a half

points roughly so yeah you should

probably be considering him as a cheaper

option we'll see I'm not all the way

there yet I like smu's defense even

though they showed cracks previously

against other teams but this should be

mostly red SLA not buying banan or

anyone behind him the backfield I think

the superior committee LJ Martin split

with hinley rotti Miles Davis carried a

little bit and then of course this team

uses wide receivers a lot in the Run

game so that's worth noting but I think

largely what you see is hinley Rapa LG

Martin splitting work almost 5050 that

was what we saw last week Martin did

have a camp injury so that could be

contributing but he wasn't the most

efficient back anyway so I would expect

a 50-50 committee to remain would much

get to a guy like brashard

Smith receiver only thing to really

mention is Darius lasser's expected back

I guess I forgot to mention musi Dixon's

also expected a return for SMU that

muddies the situation further but that

could happen here with BYU they already

rotated receivers a lot last year the

only time they condensed was due to

injuries you have Chase Roberts Cody EPS

Keen Marian as your top guys Darius ler

should slide in ideally over kelen Maran

but I still doubt we see many of these

receivers

north of 75% of routes and if they do

it's probably not much so I would

tentatively expect the wide receivers to

go Roberts one ler 2 EPS three Keanu

Hill is moving positions he's playing

tight end now but he still lines up wide

a lot I would put him four tentatively

followed by kelen Maran and Parker

Kingston no interest in anyone listed

below those players so it's a weird game

I think brashard Smith is your most in

play it's him and RJ Maryland from their

looking at a BYU receiver and I'm still

debating redl but I think he's going to

project pretty well price adjusted as

well as Stone on the other side just

from raw

points last game is Western Illinois

Indiana this spread is not out so I used

S&P plus 42 point spread they project

with a 48 total that gives Western

Illinois a three-point implied team

total Indiana a 45 implied team total

you're never really Xing teams but that

is somewhat debatable on this slate with

Western Illinois as far as the team goes

this team is looking at about a 50% pass

right there a slow offense we even

projected for 60 plays exactly that

might be rich it's just a low-level team

Nathan lamb is the QB he looks like he

rushes the ball a little bit but I think

you're probably making up for that with

sacks especially against really good

teams Indiana being a much better team

than Western Illinois backfield was a

complete committee we saw three backs

involved between Cameron Smith torren

farmer and Tyler Jordan Smith handled by

far most of the work and he's not

expensive he actually comes into the

stone Min tempting enough to consider

here but I'm not sure I'll be able to

pull the trigger we saw him with 15

opportunities in their week one games

just you're going to deal with zero

efficiency with that said if you need a

cheap guy Stoneman he looks to be the

one at wide receiver Tristan Duncan and

Christian annah 84% of the routes and

100% of the routes 10 and six targets

those are the guys you want to look at

no one else was above 61% of the routes

that was Elijah Aragon a wide receiver

he split time with deari Davis among

others so not too much there this team

does use four wide a fair amount they do

not use a tight end on every single play

so that's worth noting you could get

some extra really cheap receivers that

maybe pop up for a big play here and

there but I'm not super enticed by it

last Curtis roor I think he's the safest

quarterback on the Slate went for 180

yards just 25 attempts in their week one

game they didn't need him to do anything

else they also did not need him to run

he only rushed three

times but this is a guy I think you can

use in the Run game a fair amount if you

need to he does have a season ending

injury on his pass so that's worth

noting but I mean as long as he doesn't

get benched early and even if he does he

probably does enough along the way here

I think he's your safest quarterback

option in this late given their enormous

team total at running back kin black got

hurt immediately in their last game with

a hamstring injury they took him out

precautionary it was rumored to be but

you never know maybe they hold him out

just because of the opponent here when

he was out Tyson lton came in handled

most of the work Justice Ellison was his

change of pace Elijah green only carried

the ball when they were wasting away the

game so I would not play Elijah green

unless you think they're going to do

that again which is possible I suppose

and if kayn black returns I don't think

Elijah green is very involved the

receiving room we did see a little bit

of weirdness Donovan McCully was banged

up they didn't have EJ Williams still so

there's still some questions with the

Indiana pass catchers in some moving

Parts I wouldn't be surprised if they

held out McCully or EJ Williams just

because of the opponent with that they

had Omar Cooper miles price and Elijah

Sarat as the three receivers looking at

a very strong bounceback game for satat

only three targets but he led the team

in routes Cooper and price I think are

just fine and Horton is a tight end that

played on 65% of the routes just about

63% not much rotation there he would be

the other guy look at if McCully returns

I think he probably plays a larger role

but that remains to be seen and that

about does it for the Slate again I

think the receivers are pretty clear

looking at Jordan Moore for Duke RJ

Maryland for

SMU probably one of the studs for BYU or

getting to a Northwestern G I think

Curts and Henning are fine at running

back it's a fairly weak position but

Cameron Smith if you need a in price guy

makes some sense otherwise I'll be

playing a lot of brashard Smith again

and then at quarterback roor is I think

the safest Preston Stone redl and Mike

right to be guys we consider in the spot

as well that'll do it for the Slate

thank you guys for watching much

appreciated hit the thumbs up button on

the way out and we will see you guys

tomorrow for the main slate until then

good luck and have a good one