Save Your Money: My Honest Take on ChatGPT4, Claude Pro, Gemini Advanced, Perplexity Pro
Summary
TLDRThis video explores the merits of various AI chatbots, advising viewers to choose one based on daily usability rather than chasing the 'best' option. The speaker shares personal experiences with ChatGPT, Claude, Google's Gemini, and Perplexity, highlighting strengths like large contextual windows and real-time information. They also discuss limitations, such as hallucination tendencies and lack of internet access for updates. The key takeaway is that no single AI is superior in all aspects; it's about finding the right fit for your needs.
Takeaways
- π The video discusses the transition from free to premium versions of AI tools and the importance of choosing the right tool for daily use.
- π€ The speaker expresses skepticism about the concept of a 'single best AI' due to the rapidly changing AI landscape.
- πΌ The speaker's primary use case for AI tools is digital marketing and business tasks, not coding or app development.
- π ChatGPT is noted for its versatility and high usage limits, but it can hallucinate and forget details in long conversations.
- π The speaker finds ChatGPT useful for generating ideas, brainstorming, and small-scale data analysis.
- π Clockwork AI (formerly known as Moonshot AI) is praised for its human-like responses and large contextual window, making it ideal for in-depth tasks.
- π Google's LaMDA is highlighted for its creative writing and multimodal capabilities, but its performance can be unpredictable.
- π Perplexity Pro stands out for its real-time information retrieval and is recommended for research and fact-checking tasks.
- π‘ The video suggests that there is no one-size-fits-all AI tool and that the choice should be based on specific needs and use cases.
- β° The speaker advises trying free versions first and only upgrading if the premium features align with one's workflow and needs.
Q & A
What is the main advice given for choosing between free and premium AI versions?
-The main advice is to choose the AI that you will use daily instead of chasing the so-called 'best' AI, as AI is rapidly changing and it's more practical to select one that suits your daily needs without wasting money.
Why might the speaker not trust the 'single best AI' claims?
-The speaker does not trust the 'single best AI' claims because AI is evolving quickly, and there is no absolute winner. Instead, it's better to select an AI that fits your specific use case.
What is the speaker's primary use for AI tools?
-The speaker primarily uses AI tools for digital marketing and business tasks, not for coding or building apps.
How does the speaker describe their experience with ChatGPT?
-The speaker finds ChatGPT's performance still good but not as exciting as before due to the emergence of other AI models. They use it mainly for generating ideas, brainstorming, and small-scale data analysis.
What is the main limitation the speaker found with ChatGPT?
-The main limitation the speaker found with ChatGPT is 'hallucination,' where it tends to make up responses that it doesn't actually have information about.
What is the speaker's opinion on the contextual window limits of different AI models?
-The speaker notes that ChatGPT has the lowest contextual window limits, which can lead to forgetting details as the chat message gets long.
Why did the speaker become a fan of Claude from Anthropic?
-The speaker became a fan of Claude because of its large contextual window size, excellent understanding of context, and the ability to provide thoughtful, coherent, and humanized responses.
What is the main strength of Claude according to the speaker?
-The main strength of Claude is its large contextual window size, which allows it to intake about 500 pages of text, making it suitable for document analysis and summaries.
What is the speaker's view on Google's LaMDA AI?
-The speaker finds Google's LaMDA to have impressive creative writing abilities but notes its performance can be unpredictable and restrictive, which makes it less useful compared to other AI chatbots.
Why might the speaker recommend Perplexity Pro for someone?
-The speaker might recommend Perplexity Pro for someone who needs to do a lot of research, find factual up-to-date information, or learn new knowledge, as it provides fresh responses with the latest information.
What is the speaker's final thought on upgrading to premium AI versions?
-The speaker advises to first try to use free versions and see if they meet your needs, be open to using a mix of premium and free tools, and not fear missing out as the difference in outcomes is not as significant as one might think.
Outlines
π€ Exploring AI Upgrades: Finding the Right Fit
The speaker discusses the common dilemma of whether to upgrade from free to premium AI models. They express skepticism about the concept of a 'best' AI, given the rapid changes in AI technology. Instead of chasing the latest AI trends, the speaker suggests choosing an AI tool that fits daily usage needs and offers value for money. The speaker's focus is on digital marketing and business tasks, not coding or app development. They mention using both free and premium versions of AI tools, with the exception of the Advanced model of Moonshot AI's AI Studio, which they use without the PID subscription. The speaker highlights the importance of selecting an AI that is suitable for one's specific needs rather than blindly following recommendations.
π ChatGPT's Evolution and Its Competitors
The speaker reflects on their experience with ChatGPT, noting that while it was once the leading AI chatbot, the market now offers many advanced AI models. They mention that ChatGPT's performance remains good but is no longer as groundbreaking as it once was. The speaker points out that OpenAI seems to be under pressure to add features like voice recognition and web browsing, but these do not always deliver superior performance. They find web browsing particularly lacking, as the information provided is not real-time. The speaker uses ChatGPT mainly for idea generation, brainstorming, and small-scale data analysis. They appreciate the customization options and the high usage limits, but they also note the issue of 'hallucination,' where ChatGPT may provide inaccurate or fabricated information. The speaker also mentions the AI's tendency to forget details as conversations lengthen due to the contextual window limits.
π Clockwork AI: A New Favorite for Strategic Thinking
The speaker shares their enthusiasm for Clockwork AI, which has become their new favorite AI tool. They were impressed with its performance and have been using it daily for tasks like brainstorming and generating text from video titles. Clockwork AI stands out for its ability to provide thoughtful, coherent, and human-like responses. The speaker also appreciates the AI's large contextual window size, which allows for the analysis of extensive documents and data. They find the project feature particularly useful for organizing information and setting custom instructions. However, they note that Clockwork AI's responses can sometimes be outdated due to its lack of real-time internet access. The speaker also mentions the AI's limitations in terms of usage limits and transparency, as well as the lack of external plugins or extensions.
π Google's Gemini and Perplexity Pro: A Focus on Creativity and Research
The speaker discusses Google's Gemini, noting its creative writing capabilities and multimodal features. They mention the AI's ability to provide multiple versions of responses and its integration with Google's ecosystem. However, they also point out that Gemini's performance can be unpredictable and that it tends to avoid risks, which can limit its usefulness. The speaker then turns to Perplexity Pro, highlighting its strengths in research, information finding, and learning. They appreciate the AI's ability to handle complex questions and provide fresh, up-to-date responses. The speaker also notes Perplexity Pro's limitations, such as its instability and lack of support for tasks beyond search-based queries. They conclude by advising viewers to consider their specific needs when choosing an AI tool and to avoid committing to long-term subscriptions due to the rapidly changing AI landscape.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘AI Models
π‘Premium Versions
π‘Digital Marketing
π‘Customization
π‘Hallucination
π‘Contextual Window
π‘Integration
π‘Usage Limits
π‘Real-time Information
π‘Project Features
π‘Search Engines
Highlights
The importance of choosing an AI tool that suits one's daily needs rather than chasing the 'best' AI.
The rapid evolution of AI makes it unwise to solely rely on a single 'best' AI model.
Personal experience with premium versions of AI tools can guide the choice of the most suitable AI.
For digital marketing and business tasks, certain AI tools may be more suitable than others.
ChatGPT is a popular AI chatbot with a large variety of custom versions for specific tasks.
ChatGPT's performance is good for a wide range of tasks but may not be the most exciting due to new AI entrants.
ChatGPT's limitations include hallucination and forgetting details in long conversations.
ChatGPT has high usage limits, making it suitable for large data analysis without hitting limits.
Claude is the new favorite AI for its humanized responses and dynamic perspective.
Claude's strength lies in its large contextual window size and project features for document analysis.
Claude's responses are always useful and not generic, providing fresh angles for brainstorming.
Google's LaMDA (previously known as 'Geni') offers multimodal capabilities and creative writing strengths.
LaMDA's 1 million tokens contextual window allows for analysis of large documents and images.
Perplexity Pro excels in providing fresh, up-to-date responses and is outstanding as an AI search engine.
Perplexity Pro's reite function allows for rewriting responses using different AI models for better satisfaction.
AI tools should be chosen based on specific needs rather than a one-size-fits-all approach.
Subscribing to AI tools on a monthly basis allows for flexibility in a rapidly changing AI landscape.
AI is a tool to complement human input and strategic thinking, not a complete replacement.
Transcripts
CHD plus clock Pro G advin perlex Pro I
believe all of us start using the free
version and at certain point you start
wondering if you should upgrade to those
premium versions I know that lots of AI
models leader bosss lots of videos
talking about which is the single best
AI but do you really trust that's going
to be an absolute ultimate winner I
don't trust that AI is changing so fast
so instead of tily chasing the so-called
best AI what you should really do is
pick the one that you actually going to
use every day and not waste money in
this video I'm going to share my honest
take from my own experience of using
these premium versions and hopefully
help you pick not the best one but the
most suitable one disclaimer though I
use this tool mainly for digital
marketing and business Tes I don't use
them to code or building apps if you a
coder then this video is not for you
also I use mainly the desktop versions
the only app that I use is actually
perplexity for all these chatot I
personally use both free and pay
versions except for gerini and mainly
has his Advanced model using his AI
Studio but not the PID subscription the
first one cha gbt it is the earliest AI
chb that launched in the market amount
the four making it a very popular
options for most people I still remember
the time I use it when the 3.5 model was
first launched I was super excited now
with all other AI players coming and all
the advanced AI models I would say Char
gb4 performance is still good but it is
not as exciting as it used to be
sometimes I even feel that that open AI
is facing lots of pressures to add lots
of features to chat your before like
voice recognitions web browsing but not
able to promise a really Superior
performance in certain areas for example
like web browsing to me is almost
useless no one is talking about it why
because even if you turn on the response
is still outdated it's just not real
time browsing so the biggest strain that
I found is that it is suitable for any
kinds of simple or complex tases unlike
other a BS which perform really well
well in certain areas I use it mainly
for generating ideas and brainstorming
doing small scale data analysis like
getting summarized Insight from charts
data PDF reports to save my time another
big bonus is on customerization there
are thousands of gbts you can choose
from which are custom versions of gbts
for specific tasks like writing research
analysis or some big categories or you
can create your own custom gbts if you
don't find anything for specific needs
because of its high popularity that's
great integration supports with system
like Sapia notion Shopify it also has
the best support in terms of input file
formats and a surprising thing about
using char4 is that it has a super high
usage limits especially compared to
clock since I used the pay version I
have never encountered hitting the usage
limit even when I ask it to analyze a
big data sets of Excel data it never
hits the usage limit is much more
generous than other AI chaples however
it also has limitation the biggest one
of found now is hallucination this
really annoys me Char B before tends to
hallucinate more amount all the four AI
TRS I've used it it is super
conversational and sometimes it will
make up a response that it actually
doesn't have information about and you
need to verify the information yourself
although you can still twist your prom
or use custom instruction to reduce
hallucination it makes it less useful
when you need to use it as a learning
tool or getting factual updated
information another thing is it tends to
forget things as the chat message get
long you will finally suddenly forget
some of the details and that probably
because the information you're giving to
it hits the contextual window limits and
in fact chat B4 has the lowest
contextual window limits compared to
clock Pro or German Advanced probably
this may be the reasons why they launch
the memory features which I found useful
you can just ask it to remember anything
related to the chat so if you want more
all in one solution and are able to
handle a variety of different tases
chapter before is a great choice for you
I wouldn't say is performance across all
areas is superior like I mentioned but
definitely good enough if you want a
daily productivity boost out of your
existing routine Tes while you don't
have a specific preference on AI models
but if your Tes mainly involve test
writing and test document analysis and
you really appreciate a very thoughtful
coherent humanized respon then you
should consider the next one clock Pro
clock is now my new favorite I
immediately upgrade it as soon as it's
available in Canada it had never never
disappoint me so far since I've grade
now I use it daily and start using it
more than I use charg before to be
honest I use it mainly for brainstorming
and test generation from video titles
thumbnail text to even strategic
thinking for my business because the
response is always useful and not
generic it always think from a dynamic
perspective I get lots of fresh angles
that I probably wouldn't be able to
think of myself it always make you feel
comfortable to chat with and this is an
experience you won't get from chaty
before and when you explore about his
company en thropic the CEO Dario is
actually coming from open AI he love
open AI because he decides to focus on
AI safety and alignments with human
values then you won't be surprised why
the experience is so different on claw
compared with Char bd4 it is also a
really good writer that can mimic your
writing style well with use of complex
sentence structure but still sounds
natural sometimes I also use it to
generate drive for my social polls prly
to optimize the sentence flow video
description or other mini test
generation Tes the biggest strength of
clock Pro is the large contextual window
size which has 200,000 tokens that means
it can intake about 500 pages of Tex
more while on the free versions you may
encounter a lot more restrictions in
terms of the message length you can fit
it with lots of documents tags and do
analysis summaries and I found this is
particularly useful if you use it
together with its project features which
is only available on his paper version
so under each project you can fit it
with all relevant information background
information and you can set custom
instructions for all the chest that's
happening in the project it is similar
to chat gbts custom gbts but I found is
even more useful because it's Project
based so you don't need to restate all
the contacts and background whenever you
start a new chart now there are some
surprise to me clock is really excellent
in retaining contacts it never miss a
single detail is respond is always human
with excellent understanding of the
whole context and attention to detail it
always try to think like a human it
gives you suggestions even if you don't
ask unlike other chat BS they just list
up pros and cons and response is always
inconclusive there is an official
prompting guide library and even a prom
generator specifically designed for use
with clock that is super useful so how
about the weakness I think the biggest
one is that it can access to Internet
for realtime information so the response
can be outdated often has a few months
of legancy so I don't recommend you ask
questions related to Trends or news also
even though on the Pro Plan the usage
limits on the message Lane can be
restrictive sometimes and I found the
most annoying thing is it lacks
transparency on the usage limit except
just a warning message this is
particularly obvious when you use it to
analyze large data size in Excel or CSV
format you also can generate images
which I tend to believe is the intention
not to explore in this area because of
its potential safety and copyright issu
issues and also it doesn't have external
plugins or extension to extend the
functionalities the biggest reason you
should consider switching to clock Pro
is that you really use it a lot other
than that the free versions should be
sufficient unless you also want is
Project features because on the free
plan you enjoy almost the same set of
features you can upload documents use
artifacts the only difference is the
message you can send is very restrictive
around 40 shot messages per day which
makes it not really useful the next one
gini advice to be honest Google Gemini
is the only AI out four that I haven't
subscribed yet until now I'm still using
his free version when it first rote out
I was impressed because of its
multimodel capability and particularly
its creative writing ability Gemini is
always able to generate lots of creative
ideas Tech lines hes they sounds natural
and human I also like how it always
provide three versions in its response
and the double check response which is
very helpful and unique features that
you won't able to find from other chat
Boots the biggest strength for Gemini
advice is definitely is 1 million tokens
contextual window with its latest a
models 1.5 Pro that's approximately up
to 1,500 Pages PDF so you can upload
different large documents images for
analysis it also has much reduced
hallucinations compared with chachu B
before and its latest updates is also
giving 2 Millions tokens to gini API and
Google AI Studio this will be a big plus
if you use it for coding if you want to
give it a try you can go to AI Studio I
will include the link below another
stream is this integration with Google
ecosystem using the gini extension like
Google Maps your Gmail drive and YouTube
and with gini advice you can even use
gini directly on Gmail and Google doll
and you can execute Tes more efficiently
a great surprise to me is that the over
upgrade package is really attractive you
have one month free trial you got two t
of Google one storage along with your
subscription which is a big deal you can
also share with others and also it has
the biggest coverage of support country
out of the four so very likely you're
able to use it no matter where you are
but why I did an upgrade first I found
the performance of Gemini is not quite
predictable and I found it's quite
restrictive in its response after I have
used it for a while I kind of understand
this because it's developed by Google
which is one of the biggest Tech
corporations in the world so the
expectation from a public on German to
say the right things is just so high so
some times it say it kind execute the
toses but then after a few attempts it
will try to give you the response you
will also find it to refuse to provide
answers to questions that might involve
even minimal risk or potential liability
I would say is even more obvious than
clock so although I'm impressed by its
creative rating capability its
fluctuations and response quality just
make it less useful compared with other
popular air chat BS and this also makes
me hesitate to upgrade and this
restriction is so obvious that Google
even pause the generation of image of
people capability and second it response
on the same question it's just not as
in-depth as compared with Char gbt and
clock Pro although the answer is correct
and also I find most of the features on
the free versions are already sufficient
for most of my use cases and because
other AI like clock perplexity is really
strong so there's not a strong push for
me to do the upgrade so when you should
consider going for Google gini advice if
you are heavy user of Google we place
and you appreciate the stimulus
Integrations of using German in this
product German advice definitely has an
advantage also Google is a top player in
search I think if they fully integrate
that realtime search capability into
Google German then it will be a complete
different story than it is right now now
let's move on to perplexity Pro since I
started using perplexity for a while I
immediately switch to Pro I use it daily
and I even instore is app so I can
search things on a go whenever I come
across a piece of news a trend and a new
tool it just tanic my productivity in
researching finding information and
learning as well and you got so much
value added when you do the upgrade you
get more researches for more in-depth
research and breaking down complex
questions which means even if you type a
very complicated question loss of
contacts it can still understand very
well and be able to give you organized
answers you can also switch to other
Advanced models on perlex Pro which is
not a bonus but I would say the biggest
strength of perlex pro is actually is
response freshness and with lots of
sources as backup it always pull the
latest information whenever you ask time
sensitive questions almost in real time
making it no difference compared with a
standard search engine and I can say
perplexity is the most outstanding AI
search engines that I have used it so
far and I found as surprisingly useful
features on perplexity Pro is the reite
function you can just out it to rewrite
any sort of response using different am
models to get a more satisfied response
for example examp Le I really like clock
free because it's great for summarizing
information with humanik response and so
I can even change it to my default am
model if I really have to say something
about its limitation I would say it's
not good to do any kinds of tosses other
than search based cury so for example if
you needed to do data analysis image
generation or text Generation all the
air tools like chat gbt just do it
better I'm not saying that perplexity
can do it but the performance definitely
wouldn't be that outstanding as you
compare with other chat BS I also have a
very in-depth comparison video about
proplex Pro and chil 4 you can check it
out also sometimes the surface is not
stable since I've used it it for
probably 3 to four months I've encounter
at least two times of surface outage and
sometimes the response will be quite
slow and a bit laggy so if your daily
Tes involve lots of researching finding
factual up-to-dated information or even
learning new knowledge on Google you
should consider perlex Pro it will save
you lots of time finding the right
information and to be honest nowadays I
seldom use Google I think I use Google
mainly because I need to check ranking
results or search features or I have a
really specific question that I want to
manually check on Google so here's the
wrap basically it really depends on your
needs as I said there is no absolute
winner some AI excel in certain areas
while some don't you just need to weigh
in your case which is the most important
factor for example if getting the most
updated information is the most
important factor then Absol go for
proplex pro and if you think a humanized
wrer is a non-negotiable then go for
clock I also make a cheat Shi for you
you can find the down link below now
some of my final thoughts regarding
upgrading first try to lay out all your
important factors and see if you can
still able to achieve each one with the
free versions sometimes the free version
can still do the job but perhaps they're
just more constrain like usage limits so
be open to using a mix of premium and
free tools depending on your needs and
second I don't recommend subscribing on
any plan but monthly basis as this AI
just changed super fast like perplexity
I'm still subscribing on a monthly basis
and finally don't fear of missing out in
the end you don't need to chase the
so-called number one because in reality
the difference in the outcome is just
not as much as you think you still need
to review the response with your
strategic thinking critical judgment AI
is just a compliment it won't 100%
replace your input as a human if you
enjoy this video please show me your
support by by hitting the like And
subscribe button and before you go make
sure you also watch my other videos
about some great AI prompting techniques
that you can use on all these AI Cho BS
I guarantee you will like it see you
soon
[Music]
Browse More Related Video
Has Google Met its Match | ChatGPT and Perplexity AI
Which AI Chatbot Should We Use? Is it ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Copilot, or Perplexity AI?
Ω ΩΨ§Ψ±ΩΨ© Ψ§ΩΨΆΩ Ω£ Ψ§Ψ―ΩΨ§Ψͺ ΩΩΨ°ΩΨ§Ψ‘ Ψ§ΩΨ§Ψ΅Ψ·ΩΨ§ΨΉΩ | ChatGPT ΩΩΨ³ Ψ§ΩΨ§ΩΨΆΩ
My AI "Second Brain" To Make Life Easier
Solar Power Generator and Gas Generator - The Perfect Combination - Charging Solar Gen with Gas Gen
Which AI API is Best For Creating Software: OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, or Anthropic's Claude
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)