The Election Campaigns Have Some of The Dumbest Economic Ideas

Summary

In this episode of the Liberty Report, hosts discuss the role of government and its impact on people's lives, liberty, and peace. They critique the bipartisan approach to legislation, pointing out 'dumb' economic ideas and the FDA's approval of a COVID-19 vaccine without clinical data. The conversation emphasizes the need for free markets, the dangers of government and corporate overreach, and the importance of individual liberty. They argue against the notion of government protection, advocating instead for a society where individuals can make their own decisions and bear the consequences.

Takeaways

• 😀 The hosts discuss the lack of positive contributions by the government in terms of saving lives, returning liberty, and creating peace.
• 😅 They highlight the absurdity of bipartisan actions, such as passing legislation without proper consideration, exemplified by an article from the Wall Street Journal criticizing a 'dumbest economic idea'.
• 😳 The FDA's decision to authorize a new COVID-19 vaccine without clinical data is criticized, raising concerns about safety and the agency's role in protecting public health.
• 😲 The conversation points out the contradiction in the government's role, where it is meant to protect citizens from corporations but often ends up empowering them.
• 🤔 The hosts argue for the importance of private organizations in providing health information and services, suggesting they would be more reliable and less influenced by state power.
• 😠 There's a critique of the government's tendency to use fear as a tool for control, especially in the context of public health emergencies.
• 😡 The discussion touches on the issue of government overreach, where politicians attempt to block a business deal between US Steel and Japan's Nippon Steel, despite shareholder approval.
• 😤 The hosts express concern over the increasing corporatism and the negative impact of government involvement in economic planning and trade.
• 😓 The conversation emphasizes the need for free markets and the removal of state power from corporations, arguing that this would lead to more competition and less concentration of power.
• 🙄 The script concludes with a call for a free society where individuals can make their own decisions and bear the consequences, advocating for less government control and more personal liberty.

Q & A

What is the main topic of discussion in the Liberty Report?

The main topic of discussion in the Liberty Report is the critique of government actions, particularly focusing on the perceived absurdities and negative impacts of government policies and regulations on individual liberties, economic decisions, and public health.

What is the stance of the hosts on the role of the government in protecting citizens?

The hosts argue that the government should protect citizens' liberties, allowing them to take care of themselves, rather than being directly involved in providing care and making decisions for them.

What is the criticism of the FDA's recent actions as discussed in the transcript?

The criticism is that the FDA has authorized a new COVID-19 vaccine without requiring clinical data, which is seen as a repetition of past mistakes and a disregard for safety and efficacy standards.

How do the hosts feel about the economic policies proposed by bipartisan politicians?

The hosts express that many of the economic policies proposed by bipartisan politicians are 'dumb ideas' that do not contribute to saving lives, returning liberty, or creating peace.

What is the argument against the involvement of the FDA in vaccine approval?

The argument is that the FDA's involvement in vaccine approval is unnecessary and potentially harmful, as it may lead to vaccines being approved without proper testing, and that private organizations could provide more reliable and unbiased health information.

What is the hosts' view on the role of corporations in relation to government regulations?

The hosts believe that corporations should not have the power of the state behind them and that government regulations often give corporations undue power, which is contrary to the principles of a free market.

What is the concern about the acquisition of US Steel by Japan's Nippon Steel as discussed in the transcript?

The concern is that politicians are interfering in a business decision that has been approved by the shareholders, potentially due to protectionist sentiments and the desire to keep industries 'American,' despite the potential economic benefits of the acquisition.

What is the hosts' opinion on the concept of 'prior restraint' in the context of government regulations?

The hosts are against the concept of 'prior restraint,' arguing that it should not be applied to goods, services, or speech, and that individuals should be free to make their own decisions without government approval.

How do the hosts suggest the government should intervene in economic activities?

The hosts suggest that the government should only intervene in cases of force or fraud, and otherwise allow for voluntary economic decisions and free market competition.

What is the hosts' view on the relationship between free markets and corporate power?

The hosts advocate for free markets as a way to reduce corporate power, arguing that corporations currently wield too much power due to their close relationship with the state and government regulations.

Outlines

00:00

😀 Introduction to the Discussion on Government and Liberties

The paragraph introduces the Liberty Report with co-host Chris Rosini. The hosts discuss the lack of positive contributions by the government in terms of saving lives, returning liberties, and creating peace. They express difficulty in finding any good aspects of government actions and decide to focus on the absurdities of bipartisan actions, particularly in the economic sphere. They reference an article from the Wall Street Journal that criticizes a 'dumbest economic idea' and prepare to discuss it, along with other government follies, such as the FDA's authorization of a COVID-19 vaccine without clinical data, which they view as a threat to health and liberty.

05:01

🤔 Critique of Government Agencies and Corporate Influence

This paragraph delves into the role of government agencies like the FDA, questioning their true purpose and effectiveness. The hosts argue that these agencies, instead of protecting citizens, often serve to give corporations state power, leading to negative outcomes. They discuss the concept of free markets and the belief that private organizations would be more credible and effective in providing services like health advice. The conversation also touches on the idea that people are waking up to the failures of government agencies and the need to rely on private solutions and personal responsibility.

10:03

😡 Opposition to Foreign Takeover of US Steel

The hosts discuss the proposed acquisition of US Steel by Japan's Nippon Steel and the political backlash against it. They critique the politicians' intervention, arguing that the shareholders' decision should be respected. The paragraph highlights the hypocrisy of politicians who claim to protect national interests while often acting against the free market. The discussion also touches on the broader issues of economic planning, tariffs, and the influence of unions on such decisions.

15:04

😕 The Impact of Economic Nationalism and Protectionism

This paragraph continues the discussion on economic nationalism and protectionism, criticizing the government's role in economic planning and the use of tariffs. The hosts argue that free trade and market forces should dictate economic activities, not political agendas. They also discuss the negative impact of government intervention on businesses and consumers, suggesting that the government's involvement often leads to worse outcomes than individual decision-making.

20:06

📢 The Dangers of Prior Restraint and Government Control

The final paragraph addresses the concept of prior restraint, which traditionally applied to media and speech but has expanded to include goods and services. The hosts express concern over the increasing control of the government over all aspects of life, from economic activities to personal beliefs. They advocate for a society where individuals have the freedom to make their own choices and bear the consequences, rather than having every decision scrutinized and controlled by the state.

Keywords

💡Bipartisan

Bipartisan refers to situations where members of two major political parties work together or agree on a particular issue. In the video, the term is used to describe a group of politicians coming together to make decisions, often criticized as leading to 'dumb' or unwise decisions. The script mentions 'the bipartisan gang of people up there' to highlight the irony that such cooperation doesn't necessarily lead to better outcomes.

💡Liberty

Liberty, in the context of the video, refers to individual freedom and autonomy, particularly in making personal choices without excessive government intervention. The video emphasizes the importance of liberty by questioning how much of it the government has returned to the people, suggesting that government actions often infringe upon personal freedoms.

💡FDA

The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) is a United States federal agency responsible for protecting public health by ensuring the safety, efficacy, and security of human and veterinary drugs, biological products, and medical devices. The video criticizes the FDA for authorizing a COVID-19 vaccine without clinical data, suggesting a lack of proper oversight and a potential risk to public health.

💡Economic Idea

An economic idea in this context refers to a proposal or policy related to economic management and decision-making. The video discusses 'the dumbest economic idea' as a way to critique certain policies that the hosts believe are not well-thought-out or detrimental to the economy. The script mentions an article from the Wall Street Journal that labels a certain policy as 'the dumbest economic idea,' indicating a strong disapproval.

💡Inflation

Inflation is the rate at which the general level of prices for goods and services is rising, and subsequently, the purchasing power of currency is falling. In the script, inflation is mentioned in the context of a 'nonsense' idea that printing more money will increase its value, which is a critique of certain economic policies that the hosts believe do not understand the basics of economics.

💡Prior Restraint

Prior restraint is a legal term referring to the suppression of free speech before it occurs, typically by the government. In the video, prior restraint is discussed as a concept that has expanded beyond its original scope of regulating media to now include various goods and services. The hosts express concern that this expansion leads to excessive government control and a reduction in individual freedoms.

💡Free Markets

Free markets are economic systems where prices are determined by open competition between buyers and sellers with little to no government intervention. The video advocates for free markets as a solution to the problems caused by corporate power and government intervention. The hosts argue that free markets would lead to competition and prevent corporations from wielding state power against individuals.

💡Corporatism

Corporatism is an economic system in which industries are dominated by large, oligopolistic corporations that often work in close cooperation with the government. In the video, corporatism is criticized as a system that leads to the concentration of power in the hands of a few corporations, which can then use their influence to shape government policies to their advantage, often at the expense of smaller businesses and individual consumers.

💡State Power

State power, as discussed in the video, refers to the authority and influence that a government holds over its citizens and within its territory. The hosts argue that state power should not be used to support or protect corporations, as it leads to an imbalance of power and undermines the principles of free markets and individual liberty.

💡Social Engineering

Social engineering in the video refers to the manipulation of social and psychological environments to influence the behavior of individuals and groups. The hosts criticize social engineering as a tool used by governments and institutions to control people, often in ways that are not transparent or consensual, such as through educational curricula and media influence.

Highlights

Discussion on the government's role in saving lives, returning liberty, and creating peace, with a focus on the lack of positive outcomes.

Mention of an article from the Wall Street Journal criticizing a bipartisan economic idea as the 'dumbest'.

Critique of the Federal Reserve's approach to inflation by printing more money.

Concerns about the FDA authorizing a COVID-19 vaccine without clinical data, raising questions about safety and efficacy.

Argument that government agencies like the FDA should protect citizens from the government, not just from corporations.

Discussion on the need for private organizations to provide health information and the potential for them to be more reliable than government agencies.

Criticism of the government's involvement in health care and the potential for private organizations to provide better services.

Analysis of the political response to US Steel being acquired by Japan's Nippon Steel and the implications for economic planning.

Debate on the role of tariffs and free trade, with a critique of government intervention in economic activities.

Concerns about the concentration of power in large corporations and the impact on small businesses and individual freedoms.

Discussion on the concept of 'prior restraint' and its expansion from media to goods and services, implying excessive government control.

Call for a free society where individuals can make their own decisions and bear the consequences, without government overreach.

Final thoughts on the importance of liberty and the need to reduce the government's role in people's lives.

Transcripts

[Music]

hello everybody and thank you for tuning

in to the Liberty Report with us today

we have Chris rosini our co-host Chris

good to have you with us it's great to

be with you Dr Paul good we're we're

going to talk about the government but

uh we were looking around for some good

things to say about government how many

lives have they saved how much Liberty

has they returned to us how much peace

have they created Chris I'm having

trouble I can't find anything so but I

did find something that you know because

it's so bad it's a little bit

entertaining so we're going to talk a

little bit about the absurdities of the

bipartisan gang of people up there they

get together and do dumb things and you

know I want to start off by one article

that was on the Wall Street Journal

today that that makes a point but we can

apply that to More Than This One Thing

The Wall Street Journal said Biden

Harris Trump Vance and the dumbest

economic idea and uh I said well that's

bipartisan you're supposed to do things

bipartisan we want to talk about that

and and explain a little bit about the

dumb idea that's a real contest because

there's so many dumb ideas floating a

while we could associate some of these

dumb ideas with the Federal Reserve oh

print more money and the money will go

up in value it we'll solve our problem

with inflation all that nonsense and uh

yet there there's a one here that they

you discovered that was I think pretty

darn important too it's it's not much

smarter than the one I just mentioned

and uh the title from your article that

you picked from Zero Hedge it says FDA

authorizes new

covid-19 vaccine without clinical data I

thought that was a problem with the last

time people died because they didn't do

it so here and they're they're bragging

about this but you know what they're

doing is lining up a couple bucks and uh

they're they're ready to bring bring

that out but no no uh no uh real testing

and uh and I think that uh this

represents a principle that happens is

why do why do they exist why does the

FDA exist well the pretense to the

people is that they're to protect us

they're to protect our health they're to

take care of us which is a nonsense that

shouldn't be the reason we have

governments government should could

protect our liberties so we can take

care of ourselves instead they get

involved in taking care of everything

that we do and provide everything and

they interfere but it's always to

protect us and uh but they never think

about protecting us from the government

and that's what this program is

frequently about how do you protect

yourself against the government and the

abuse and the destructions of our

freedom so this is uh this is something

that's going on right now uh I think uh

the this whole idea is just a you know a

falsehood that they can protect us and

to get involved in medicine and You'

think they would have learned something

you know you know from Co the co a c

couple years ago we're still suffering

from it and they're getting ready to do

it again in the same thing without

without really uh testing is it safe and

effective well even if the government

told us if it was uh we couldn't believe

them but no they're not they don't even

go through that anymore they uh they

said we just make sure these assumptions

and uh and tell it's okay and all of a

sudden but guess what from my first

guess uh what's going on Chris uh is

that uh the the the companies are

probably not going to roll in quite as

much dough as they did a couple years

ago but they're trying to they have to

scare people so we can expect uh even

though they have a struggle finding

without there's no new medication enough

justification to uh scare the people

enough for the people to go along and

roll up their sleeves and do what

they're ever what they're told so uh

this is again is over and over again and

uh this FDA their stupidity is in

competition with uh this Coalition of uh

the dumbest economic idea that was ever

proposed Chris that's right Dr Paul and

uh if you ask the average average

American they really do believe that

these federal agencies are there to

protect us from the

corporations and it's I mean it it's the

ultimate trick uh because it's really

the corporations that are doing the

regulating you know they're on these uh

the FDA you know they come from fizer

they come from uh so what what has what

has happened is we've given the

corporations the power of the state

we've given them the ability to use

Force via the government uh the exact

opposite of the free market but

Americans believe that no you need the

FDA otherwise the corporations they

they'll do whatever they want to us no

they are doing whatever they want to us

with the FDA and you know they're

calling this another vaccine without

clinical trials everybody knows you know

I have people tell me all the time that

I know they took the vaccine they're

like you know that wasn't a vaccine I

don't know what they gave me uh but this

is what Americans have been conditioned

to believe that we need and it's you

know it's the worst thing you've given

corporations who are driven by money not

NE you know any in any way that they can

get the power of the state behind them

and uh it's this is what has hurt us and

all the dumb economic ideas that we hear

from both sides this is the core issue

that we have we have to get rid of all

these agencies and force these companies

to compete with one another without any

state power uh in their

hands you know one thing they wanted to

do because they anticipated there' be

people like this Crush Rini coming up

with these ideas and telling the truth

so they had to counteract uh from him

getting this truth out but there is an

there is a paragraph in here to try to

answer Chris all your concerns and uh in

in the article it says the United States

uh this is to show that no they didn't

do the testing of safe and effective but

but they're explaining why you don't

have to worry about that United States

ended the covid-19 public health

emergency in

2023 oh well now they lost their

Authority huh but extended the emergency

declaration under the public Readiness

and emergency preparedness act until the

end of

2024 all the way through the election

they can be busy scaring the people the

FDA issued the emergency authorization

under that Authority oh they have the

authority and uh that's uh that that

pleases them but uh they they shouldn't

even be involved and a lot of people

will come up and I'm sure you've heard

this Chris is that uh PE people will say

well if if if the government doesn't do

it who's going to do it well if nobody

did it it'd be a lot better than when

the government doing it because they

make things worse but the whole thing is

is there would be

private organizations that would be uh

credible because uh you you know they

would do this research and and their

reputation would depend on giving

correct advice and there'd probably be

two or three uh groups like this doing

it and uh for a service like that and

information that you finally found

somebody that you could trust you could

pay on some money to get information

because it would be so much more

valuable with with than the government

telling what to do but their motivations

are different if it's private their

motivation is to provide a service and

to help people and to contribute to Good

Health but unfortunately we have gone in

the opposite direction especially with

the co disaster and yet they're still at

it they're not willing to give up except

Chris I think the people are waking up

and I'm hoping they don't get any clear

sailing like they did a couple years ago

Dr Paul that is such a great point we

can have private uh you know like

consumer reports and and any you know

any uh derivatives of that the these uh

they would have a much different

incentive than what the government has

the FDA lied to everybody and they're

still they're cranking out another

vaccine what they're calling a vaccine

that's another lie uh and there is no

recourse nobody gets fired nobody cares

we're just going to ignore it and and

that's it but a private uh organization

you're you're going to go out of

business you don't get taxpayer

money you're you're out of business you

lie to everybody and you and you're out

nobody's going to trust you again the

government they just keep taking

taxpayer money so you're not gonna

you're not gonna stop that and they'll

just keep lying and you're not gonna do

anything about it the only thing you can

do is stop believing them you know it's

the best you can do Stop Believing them

don't listen to them um which most

people are doing they don't go get these

jobs anymore

and and that's a good thing but yeah it

reputation should be done by people who

can lose their reputation you know by

lying you know the uh the the the people

are definitely waking up but you know

those uh those uh vaccines that cause so

much harm they're still around uh PE

people can still receive these vaccines

uh before they can get a single dose of

the new stuff Mna and fiser vaccines are

available for individuals who are at

least 6 months old oh boy that's good

that's good I'm glad they're thinking

about the kids again and then the CDC is

recommending vaccination for all people

age six months and older so Something

Magic happens at six months you know

that people oh you're going into the

doctor's office you didn't inoculate

your kids I think we're going to have to

send a child protective agency out there

to check just see how well you're taking

care of your kids and that is the

trouble that's part of the scheme behind

here is to make sure that parents are in

charge of all that they do look at what

they're doing in our schools and the

teaching and all the social engineering

it's it's just terrible but that's what

they're that's what they're planning for

and they're involved and yet so far I

haven't seen that they have been

enlightened at least the people who run

the FDA because their job depends on

scaring people but fortunately a lot of

people people have uh have uh awakened

and they're aware of this and the

doctors that suffered so much uh with

reputation and all over the over the

last several years are now seen as

people who knew what was going on and I

think that there's more and more

Americans starting to realize there's a

difference but there you know it the

federal government has a powerful bully

p pulpit and especially when they can

you believe this Chris they work with

the social media to it's not their

propaganda and no wonder people go along

with this but still in spite of it all

you can't stop truth from bursting out

when it's important very good Dr Paul

I'll go on to our Second Story uh and

that is that uh us

steel uh is about to be acquired by

Japan's nipon steel I think that's how

you say it uh and the owners the

shareholders of us Ste steal have

approved of this 98% of the votes were

to be acquired but of course here come

the goofy politicians saying no no we we

have a problem with this a foreign

company uh you know that we want this to

remain

American

and you know uh I on the one hand on the

surface you could I could understand

something like that but when it comes to

economics the point of the government is

to force and fraud not who's in the

buildings you know it's not like Japan

is going to import their military into

US steel and they're going to take us

over okay that's not what is going to

happen they they will do it more

efficiently uh and they're saying that

we're gonna keep Americans as the

employees but the politicians like to

stick their nose where they don't belong

they're not the owners the politicians

of the corporation the shareholders said

98% of them that they want this but the

politicians do this to us all the time

they want to overrule the people in the

local situation they do it with parents

you know nobody knows their kids better

than the parents yet the

politicians uh you know they call them

our kids you know they're not

necessarily yours yeah they came from

you but they're our kids and and they do

this all the time and they they try to

use Force to do what the parents would

not

do what the government should do is

protect us against Force like if nepon

steel tries to force somebody to use

their product the government should

inter you know intervene and prohibit

something like that or fraud if if the

steel is fraudulent if they tell you

it's one thing and does one thing and it

does the opposite and they lied like the

vaccines are fraud that's where the

government should come in and punish and

the rest should be us making voluntary

decisions this is what I want this is

what I don't want I can say no to

Walmart I can say no to nipon Steel I

have that power to say no the government

should only interfere if force or fraud

are are involved and we are very far

sadly from such a state of affairs you

know I think what's going on here

represents the fact that uh people don't

believe in free trade and we've heard

that from both political parties and

it's worse now than it was 30 40 years

ago because they didn't believe in the

use of tariffs protective tariffs and

yet there's been more and more of that

but there's so much corporatism going on

they're always trying to protect it but

Union also have a voice in this too so

the unions even though when this sale

was moving along the uh the unions uh

you know objected to it and that got a

lot of attention so that's why you have

this bipartisanship because uh you you

you can't have uh a an individual who

wants to be the the labor president uh

you know he might lose some votes so th

this is um uh the one one thing that

they're doing is trying to make sure

sure that uh the the people will uh you

you

know in the activities economic this is

part of the economic planning and part

of free trade why do why do the uh uh

nipon have the money well there's

dollars over there in a free market the

people who hold dollars are supposed to

spend them if there's too many dollars

overseas in home they're supposed to be

allowed to bring it here which you know

the company that would have bought they

they weren't going to you know pack up

everything that exists that us steel and

haul it off they were going to keep it

right there and put in billions of

dollars of upgrades the whole thing is

is why this article written by The Wall

Street Journal which is not exactly a

Libertarian magazine uh or saying you

know these are dumb ideas they were

going to keep it here and build it up

and increase the amount of Steel they

were going to make that's how stupid you

know economic planning is and and uh

they turn it into a political stunt uh

and if you don't go along with it

there's a lot of things especially when

they deal with China there's a lot of

things going on about the patriotism

well if you do anything to trade with

China you're not patriotic even if it

cost the consumer billions of dollars

and you bankrupt companies and all this

nonsense and even stir up uh trouble

with the possibility of having military

confrontation with countries like China

so it makes no sense what's soever and

uh I I think uh uh that uh the company

that wanted to take it over uh you know

and they canceled it would have been uh

uh would have made things much much

worse and it is going to get worse if

this the deal doesn't go through but my

prediction is there'll be a lot of noise

up until Christmas and maybe sanity will

s sink in but it makes it makes no sense

to say that okay we bought all the stuff

you sent to us the China in Japan every

place else and you saved your money what

they're doing is they're more

capitalistic than we are so uh they're

just spending their money and they're

bringing back some it it helps the

balance of trade and everything else so

anything natural seems to be resentful

of people who are destined to be

economic planners and believe that

people business people and politicians

you know they don't know what you're

doing so they have to have the

authoritarians over to take the

political system and run the show not

only you know run the kids from grade

school up but also everything that we do

economically speaking and that to me is

the big problem excellent Dr Paul I'll

finish up with my last Point uh we need

to

remove the power of the state from the

corporations and there's only one way to

do that one there's one road and that is

free markets and that those two uh words

put together scare people in in our day

they didn't scare people before but they

scare people in our day they they will

think oh my goodness free markets that

means corporations they'll be able to do

whatever they want I feel safer with the

USDA and the FDA and the CDC I feel

safer even though I'm not I feel it

because I've been told that this is

right but it's you know it's the

opposite and that's why we're suffering

and we're going to keep suffering until

the power of the state can know no

longer be wielded by corporations and

the number one opponent of the of the

idea of free markets is the corporations

they love this they have the power now

you know they can they get subsidies

they get our tax we go to work we pay

taxes and it goes right to them they uh

they create laws to crush little guys

you know have you noticed that in every

single industry every single industry

everything is being Consolidated and

centralized around these big

corporations and the little guys just

get crushed you know uh with uh with

with laws with licensing you need a

license to do everything but who do you

think is behind that it's to keep you

out you go and you labor for the big

corporations that's that's the only

choice that's going to be uh available

to you and the corporations had a chance

several times you know Ron Paul ran for

president he's for free markets do you

know how many of the big corporations

supported him uh zero they do not want

free markets they do not want you to

want free markets because that will

diminish and destroy their power to

wield the State against all of us so

that's the way we have to go how do we

get there I don't know but speaking at

least the truth is a good start very

good you know we are talking a lot about

regulations why they do it how they

justify it and why they're going to do

good and it's responsibility and people

can't take care of themselves and think

that the number one job uh or excuse or

propaganda is to make people safe and

it's pretty hard uh to argue against

safety it's hard to argue about people

sayfe well you're unpatriotic but you

have to argue it you have to explain it

we have to be able to defend our our

position but the big problem with all

this nonsense that going on is they've

taken a principle that a lot of people

used to know about but they've even

given on this basic principle and that

is um prior restraint there there's most

people over the years and still there's

a few left that said that if you have a

newspaper or magazine you never had to

turn it into the government and have the

government approve what you're

publishing but think of the internet now

even the complexity of the internet you

if you don't do it you're cancelled so

there's it's epid mic on this prior

restraint and who are they you know it's

uh it's it's social media uh people that

uh you know Delight in it and they make

a lot of money doing it by scaring

people and now but it what was happened

is this prior restraint has expanded it

originally was dealt with with ideas and

newspapers and radio and TV and this

sort of thing but now now this whole

idea has shifted over to include good

and services and that is no matter what

you do or make or say or everything

everything has to be approved by the

government and the people have gone

along with this you know all the goods

and services get reviewed by the

government and there's people who assume

that people aren't capable they argue I

had other congressmen tell you the

people are too dumb we can't let them

make their own decision so we put the

dumb people in Congress and make worse

decisions for everybody but uh the the

this prior restraint is on on Pol

political events we see it every single

day now you can do this you can do that

and you can say this you can't say that

and uh the political activities and uh

also you know they're getting involved

in religious activities too that uh it's

popping up all the time because if you

use a a cover by saying well this is a

religious belief that that doesn't that

doesn't mean that we aren't vulnerable

to somebody saying we need some prior

restraint on you we need to make sure

you don't mislead the People by telling

them the truth and that's what we want

we want a free Society where you can

make things and individuals can make

their decisions and if they mess up they

suffer the consequences and they can't

crawl by and get their Congressman to go

to the neighbor and steal what they want

that's what has to happen and the whole

principle of prior restraint not only if

you have a newspaper which is ancient

history now is the prior restraint the

concept that a bunch of bureaucrats who

are looking to make money and satisfy

special interest and we cannot allow

that to happen a free society means

people get to do what they want with

their lives and they can benefit from

what they do and their the the merits

that they might uh you know have and

making good use of it and they and but

they if they have problems you cannot

blame somebody else because if you

decide the government is going to

prevent us from having problems like I

said our problems get much worse and uh

because the mistake made by the

government is just think of the mistakes

that were made under covid compared to

if uh you know uh a few people made a

mistake there there would still be

mistakes without the federal government

but we don't need the FDA uh and all

these agencies of government to tell us

what to do what we need is more

Liberty thank everybody for tuning in to

the Liberty report please come back soon

[Music]