The creators of Talking Tom are REALLY shady 2

The 1st Gamer

1 Sept 202401:01

Summary

TLDRThe video script delves into the controversial practices of Outfit7, creators of Talking Tom, suggesting they may not be as innocent as perceived. It highlights the game 'Talking Roby,' which was removed due to legal issues over its character's resemblance to 'Chilik,' a mascot for a coffee machine company. The video aims to educate without animosity, acknowledging Outfit7's impact on children's entertainment, and teases more content if viewers are interested.

Takeaways

😶 The creators of Talking Tom, Outfit7, have a controversial history.
🔍 Users requested a follow-up video, which this script is for.
🎮 'Talking Roby' is an early game developed by Outfit7, featuring a character with a striking resemblance to 'Chilik', a mascot from a different company.
🤖 'Chilik' is the mascot for a company that manufactures coffee machines, which seems unrelated to the character's use in a game.
🚫 Outfit7 faced legal issues due to the unauthorized use of the Chilik character, leading to the game's removal.
👀 The video script suggests that viewers, especially those from Turkey, might recognize the Chilik character.
📚 The video aims to educate and does not intend to express hate towards Outfit7, acknowledging their impact on many children's experiences.
📹 There is more content to cover about Outfit7, hinting at potential for further videos.
🗣️ The script invites viewers to share their thoughts and recognition of the character in the comments section.
🔑 The video serves as a key to understanding the legal and ethical challenges faced by game developers when creating characters.

Q & A

Who created Talking Tom?
-Talking Tom was created by Outfit7.
What was the issue with the character Talking Roby?
-The character Talking Roby was not original and was found to be very similar to another character named Chilik.
What was Chilik's original purpose?
-Chilik was a mascot for a company named R Chilik that made coffee machines.
Why did Outfit7 get into legal trouble?
-Outfit7 got into legal trouble because they used the character Chilik without permission, which led to the game featuring the character being taken down.
What was the relationship between Talking Roby and Chilik in terms of design?
-Talking Roby's design was strikingly similar to Chilik's, suggesting a lack of originality on Outfit7's part.
What is the purpose of this video according to the script?
-The video is for educational purposes, aiming to inform viewers about the controversy surrounding Outfit7's character creation.
Is there a part one to this video?
-Yes, the script suggests that there is a part one of the video where the issue of originality of Outfit7's characters was discussed.
What was the viewer's response to the first part of the video?
-The viewers asked for a part two, indicating that they were interested in learning more about the subject.
Are there more controversies to cover about Outfit7?
-Yes, the script implies that there is more to cover regarding Outfit7, suggesting that additional parts might be released.
What is the intended audience for this video?
-The intended audience includes people who are familiar with Outfit7's characters and those who want to know more about the company's history and controversies.
How does the script address the viewers who are Turkish?
-The script asks Turkish viewers who recognize the character Chilik to comment, indicating that the character might be more well-known in Turkey.

Outlines

00:00

🕵️‍♂️ Outfit7's Controversial Character Origins

The video script discusses the creators of Talking Tom, Outfit7, and their alleged lack of originality. The script revisits the issue of Outfit7's characters being unoriginal, suggesting a darker side to the company. It then delves into the history of 'Talking Roby,' an early game by Outfit7, which featured a character suspiciously similar to 'Chilik,' a mascot for a Turkish coffee machine company named R Chilik. The script points out the striking resemblance between Chilik and Roby, questioning Outfit7's choice to use this character, which led to legal issues and the game's removal. The video aims to educate rather than criticize, acknowledging Outfit7's impact on children's entertainment. It ends with an invitation for viewers to share their recognition of the character and express interest in further exploration of the topic.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Talking Tom

Talking Tom refers to a popular mobile app developed by Outfit7, featuring a character that can mimic the user's voice. In the context of the video, it is used to introduce the topic of the video, which is about the creators of Talking Tom and the controversies surrounding their other creations.

💡Outfit7

Outfit7 is a company known for creating mobile applications, including the Talking Tom franchise. In the video, it is mentioned as the developer of the game 'Talking Roby,' which is at the center of a controversy regarding the originality of its characters.

💡Originality

Originality in this context refers to the creation of unique content, free from plagiarism or copying. The video discusses how Outfit7's characters were accused of lacking originality, suggesting they were derived from existing characters, which is a central theme of the video's critique.

💡Talking Roby

Talking Roby is a game developed by Outfit7, featuring a robot character. The video points out that the character was not originally named Roby but 'Chilik,' which was the mascot for another company, indicating a potential copyright infringement issue.

💡Chilik

Chilik is the original name of the character used in the game Talking Roby. The video explains that Chilik was the mascot for a company that manufactures coffee machines, and its likeness was used by Outfit7 in their game, leading to legal troubles.

💡Legal Trouble

Legal trouble in this context refers to the potential lawsuits or copyright infringement claims that Outfit7 faced due to using the character Chilik in their game Talking Roby without proper authorization. This is a significant point in the video as it highlights the company's alleged unethical practices.

💡Mascot

A mascot is a character or symbol used to represent a company or brand, often to create a friendly and memorable image. In the video, Chilik is described as a mascot for a company that makes coffee machines, which was allegedly used by Outfit7 in their game without permission.

💡R chilik

R chilik is the company that originally used the character Chilik as their mascot. The video suggests that Outfit7's use of this character in their game Talking Roby led to legal issues, indicating a possible case of intellectual property theft.

💡Educational Purposes

The phrase 'educational purposes' is used in the video to clarify that the content is intended to inform and educate viewers about the backstory and controversies surrounding Outfit7's games. It sets the tone that the video is an exposé rather than a personal attack.

💡Turkish

The video mentions that if viewers are Turkish, they might recognize the character Chilik. This suggests that the character was well-known in Turkey, and the video is addressing a specific audience that might have a deeper understanding of the context.

💡Controversies

Controversies in the video refer to the various allegations and issues surrounding Outfit7's practices, particularly in relation to the originality and use of characters in their games. The video aims to shed light on these controversies to inform the viewers.

Highlights

The creators of Talking Tom are accused of being less than original.

A follow-up video to a previous one is promised.

Outfit7's characters are claimed to not be original.

Talking Roby, an early game by Outfit7, is discussed.

Talking Roby's real name is revealed to be Chilik.

Chilik was originally a mascot for a coffee machine company.

Visual comparison between Chilik and Roby shows striking similarities.

Outfit7 faced legal issues for using Chilik's character.

The game featuring Roby was taken down due to legal troubles.

A call for Turkish viewers to comment if they recognize the character.

The video is presented for educational purposes without animosity towards Outfit7.

Outfit7 is acknowledged for being part of many children's childhoods.

A request for viewer feedback on whether to create another part of the video.

An implication that there is more content to cover regarding Outfit7.