Why A1C Isn't Enough: Insights from Dr. Ben Bikman with Dr. Ken Berry
Summary
TLDRThe transcript discusses the importance of understanding insulin, particularly endogenous insulin produced by the pancreas, in managing type 2 diabetes. It challenges the misconception that beta cells fail in type 2 diabetes, emphasizing that insulin resistance and high insulin levels are often overlooked. The conversation also delves into the limitations of A1C as a diabetes indicator, the potential for diet-induced changes in red blood cell lifespan affecting A1C readings, and the role of fructose in glycation and uric acid production, highlighting the need for a more comprehensive approach to assessing metabolic health.
Takeaways
- π The speaker emphasizes the importance of understanding endogenous insulin, which is produced by the pancreas, as opposed to exogenous insulin, which is administered to diabetic patients.
- π There's a misconception among many primary care practitioners that in type 2 diabetes, beta cells burn out and stop producing insulin as the disease progresses, which the speaker refutes.
- π The speaker argues that even when insulin production decreases in type 2 diabetes, it remains higher than the initial levels before metabolic issues arose.
- β οΈ The conventional focus on glucose levels in diabetes management overlooks the significance of insulin levels, which can be a more sensitive and early indicator of metabolic health.
- π©Ί The speaker advocates for measuring fasting insulin levels early in a patient's metabolic assessment and suggests that levels below 6 micro units per milliliter indicate insulin sensitivity.
- π« There's criticism of the clinical norm that considers any fasting insulin level below 25 as normal, which the speaker believes represents severe hyperinsulinemia.
- π The speaker promotes the use of the oral glucose tolerance test, which provides more detailed information than the A1C test, despite the latter being more commonly used.
- β³ The A1C test measures glycation, which is not solely a result of hyperglycemia but also influenced by the lifespan of red blood cells, potentially leading to false readings.
- π½οΈ A shift towards a carnivore diet may lead to longer-lived red blood cells, which could falsely elevate A1C levels, despite improved metabolic health.
- π The speaker suggests using fructosamine tests or monitoring uric acid levels as alternative indicators of glycation in patients with potentially skewed A1C results due to diet changes.
Q & A
What is the main focus of the discussion in the transcript?
-The main focus of the discussion is the importance of understanding endogenous insulin production by the pancreas, its role in type 2 diabetes, and the misconceptions in mainstream medical practice regarding insulin and glucose metabolism.
Why does the speaker believe that primary care practitioners are often oblivious to the insulin produced by the pancreas?
-The speaker believes that primary care practitioners are often oblivious to the insulin produced by the pancreas because their training and focus are primarily on managing glucose levels and administering exogenous insulin, rather than understanding the intricacies of endogenous insulin production and its impact on health.
What is the speaker's bold statement regarding beta cells in type 2 diabetes?
-The speaker's bold statement is that in type 2 diabetes, beta cells never completely disappear. Instead, insulin production may decrease due to insulin resistance, but it is still higher than before the onset of metabolic issues.
Why does the speaker argue against the common treatment approach of pushing insulin levels higher to lower glucose in type 2 diabetics?
-The speaker argues against this approach because it can lead to increased insulin resistance and does not improve outcomes. The more insulin that is given, the higher the risk of mortality in type 2 diabetics.
What does the speaker suggest as a more effective clinical marker than fasting glucose for assessing insulin resistance?
-The speaker suggests that fasting insulin levels are a more effective clinical marker than fasting glucose for assessing insulin resistance, as it provides an insulin-centric view of metabolic health.
What fasting insulin levels does the speaker consider to indicate insulin sensitivity or resistance?
-The speaker considers fasting insulin levels of six micro units per milliliter or less to be a very good sign of insulin sensitivity, while levels in the high teens to 20s indicate compromised health due to insulin resistance.
Why does the speaker criticize the reliance on A1C as a primary marker for metabolic health?
-The speaker criticizes the reliance on A1C because it can be falsely elevated or decreased due to factors affecting red blood cell lifespan, not just glucose levels. This can lead to misdiagnoses and an incomplete understanding of a patient's metabolic health.
What alternative test does the speaker recommend for patients who follow a carnivore diet and have slightly elevated A1C levels?
-The speaker recommends a fructosamine test for patients on a carnivore diet with slightly elevated A1C levels, as it measures glucose glycation without being influenced by red blood cell lifespan.
Why is there no clinical test available to measure fructose glycation, according to the speaker?
-The speaker indicates that there is no clinical test available to measure fructose glycation, which is a significant oversight since fructose is more reactive than glucose and can lead to increased glycation and inflammation.
What role do ketones play in mitigating the inflammation caused by uric acid, as discussed in the transcript?
-Ketones are discussed as having anti-inflammatory properties that can counteract the pro-inflammatory effects of uric acid, potentially explaining why some individuals on a ketogenic diet may have elevated uric acid levels but improved metabolic and inflammatory markers.
Outlines
𧬠The Misunderstanding of Insulin in Medical Practice
The speaker begins by reflecting on the evolution of their understanding of insulin from primarily knowing about exogenous insulin to focusing on endogenous insulin produced by the pancreas. They express concern that primary care practitioners are largely ignorant about the role of endogenous insulin in type 2 diabetes, commonly but incorrectly believing that beta cells fail and stop producing insulin as the disease progresses. The speaker challenges this notion, asserting that beta cells are not typically depleted in type 2 diabetes and that insulin resistance and production levels are more complex than commonly taught.
π Rethinking Insulin Measurement in Diabetes Management
The speaker advocates for the measurement of fasting insulin levels as a critical yet overlooked aspect of diabetes management. They argue that conventional clinical practice often prioritizes glucose levels over insulin, leading to ineffective treatment strategies. The speaker provides a range for fasting insulin levels, suggesting that levels below 6 micro units per milliliter indicate insulin sensitivity, while levels in the high teens to 20s may indicate a problem. They also criticize the broad 'normal' range provided by major diagnostic labs, which they believe reflects a misunderstanding of insulin resistance.
π©Έ The Complexities of Hemoglobin A1C Testing
The speaker discusses the Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) test, which measures the degree of glycation of hemoglobin in red blood cells, and its limitations. They explain that glycation is a chemical process that can affect various parts of the body, not just hemoglobin. The speaker points out that factors affecting red blood cell lifespan can lead to falsely high or low A1C readings, independent of actual glucose levels. They also lament the decline of the oral glucose tolerance test, which they believe provides more detailed information about an individual's metabolic health.
π The Impact of Diet on Red Blood Cell Lifespan and A1C Levels
The speaker explores the impact of diet, specifically a carnivore diet, on red blood cell lifespan and A1C levels. They hypothesize that a diet focused on animal-sourced foods may lead to longer-lived red blood cells, potentially skewing A1C readings. They also discuss the role of iron, vitamin B12, and omega-3 fats in red blood cell health and how deficiencies can affect A1C levels. The speaker recommends the fructosamine test as a more accurate reflection of glycation for individuals following a carnivore diet.
π« The Overlooked Dangers of Fructose Glycation
The speaker raises concerns about the lack of clinical tests for fructose glycation, a process more reactive than glucose glycation and potentially more harmful. They discuss the ubiquity of fructose in modern diets and the potential for this to lead to widespread but undetected glycation damage. The speaker emphasizes the need for greater awareness among healthcare providers about the risks of fructose and the limitations of current testing methods.
π Uric Acid as a Surrogate Marker for Fructose Metabolism
The speaker discusses uric acid as a potential surrogate marker for fructose-induced glycation, given the absence of direct tests for fructosamine or fructose glycation. They explain the link between fructose metabolism and uric acid production and how this can impact inflammation and insulin resistance. The speaker also delves into the paradoxical effects of uric acid and ketones on inflammation, suggesting that ketones may counteract the pro-inflammatory effects of uric acid, leading to improved metabolic health despite elevated uric acid levels.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘Insulin
π‘Beta Cells
π‘Type 2 Diabetes
π‘Insulin Resistance
π‘Fasting Insulin Levels
π‘Hemoglobin A1c (A1C)
π‘Glycation
π‘Oral Glucose Tolerance Test
π‘Fructosamine
π‘Uric Acid
π‘Ketones
Highlights
Insulin understanding has shifted from exogenous to a focus on endogenous insulin and its importance in type 2 diabetes.
Mainstream medicine often overlooks the role of endogenous insulin produced by the pancreas in type 2 diabetes management.
A common misconception is that beta cells burn out in type 2 diabetes, but in reality, they do not completely disappear.
Insulin resistance and production levels vary among individuals, and insulin levels remain high even when production starts to decline.
The conventional focus on glucose levels neglects the importance of insulin as a sensitive and early marker in diabetes.
Increasing insulin dosage in type 2 diabetics does not improve outcomes and can increase mortality.
The importance of measuring fasting insulin levels early in a patient's metabolic health assessment.
Fasting insulin levels can indicate insulin sensitivity, with levels below 6 Β΅U/mL being very good.
High fasting insulin levels (high teens to 20s) can signal compromised metabolic health.
The need for clinicians to measure insulin levels as a clinical marker for better diabetes management.
LabCorp and Quest consider fasting insulin levels below 25 Β΅U/mL as normal, which may not be accurate.
A1C test has limitations and can be falsely elevated or decreased due to factors affecting red blood cell lifespan.
The oral glucose tolerance test provides more detailed information than A1C but is less commonly used.
Glycation is a broader process affecting all cells in the body, not just hemoglobin in red blood cells.
Uric acid levels can serve as a proxy for fructose-induced glycation, which is not directly measurable.
Ketones have anti-inflammatory properties that can counteract the inflammation caused by uric acid.
The paradox of elevated uric acid levels alongside improved metabolic and inflammatory markers on a ketogenic diet.
Transcripts
e
I want to start talking first with you
about
insulin uh in the first few years of my
medical practice I definitely knew what
insulin was 99% of my understanding was
exogenous insulin and how to give that
to people with diabetes uh but
increasingly over the past few years all
I care about all I want to focus on and
study about is endogenous insulin the
that's produced by the beta cells in the
human pancreas and how important that is
and how under underestimated and and not
even underestimated by the mainstream uh
primary care practitioner but just com
they're completely oblivious to the
insulin that's produced by the pancreas
indeed I think if you lined up 100
practicing Primary Care Providers and
you ask them what happens to U the beta
cells in a person with type 2 diabetes I
think that the at least 70% of them
would say well as your type two diabetes
gets worse the the beta cells burn out
and they stop producing insulin and
that's why most people with type two
diabetes when the disease gets bad
enough they have to go on uh insulin
injections walk us through how this
is not true the vast majority of the
time yeah yeah in fact I would even be
more bold and bold enough indeed to say
that if it is if it is actually type two
diabetes and that's an important
distinction because there is the kind of
rare coincidence where someone with type
two actually develops true type one but
it's not a consequence of the type two
diabetes that is just a bizarre
Confluence of events that wherein this
person has had this later in life
autoimmune disease namely type one so my
bold statement is in type two diabetes
there will never be a situation in which
the beta cells are gone it is true that
in some instances insulin production has
been going up for years in this
individual and and then eventually the
body becomes so resistant to its own
insulin that the glucose starts to come
up and then in some people so that's a
reflection of the insulin resistance but
in some individuals the insulin
production will start to go down not all
some just have have a straight line and
the insulin is as high as ever sometimes
the insulin will come down a little
which further amplifies the glucose but
even when the insulin starts to come
down it is still much higher than it was
before they ever started on this descent
into metabolic derangement uh it's still
multiples higher than it was before but
all of this is just a reflection of how
the conventionally trained clinician has
been taught to focus on the glucose at
the expense of the much more sensitive
much earlier marker namely the insulin
if we had trained these clinicians to
have an insulin Centric view of type 2
diabetes in particular then we wouldn't
say let's lower that glucose at all
costs even if we have to push the
insulin up even higher which is a very
common course of treatment and yet it
doesn't work to help improve any outcome
the more you give the type two diabetic
more insulin the more they die
absolutely and do you believe that every
clinician should be trained by some
Society or organization to check fasting
insulin levels very very early in their
patients metabolic career so to speak
and if so what do you what would you
consider an insulin level that's too
high yeah in fact indeed Ken that is the
drum I beat louder than any other if I
can end my career um with having
realized one single outcome namely that
insulin becomes a more commonly measured
clinical marker than I will have
considered my career a success frankly
um so that is absolutely the drum I beat
the loudest and it's difficult to get a
firm cut off now I'm going to give them
anyway but I want people to know that
insulin like almost every hormone in the
body does have a little bit of Rhythm to
it and it has a little play and and so
while I'm going to give some hard cut
offs please everyone know that it's
possible to kind of be outside of this
and it be a bit of a false indicator now
having said that if someone has a fasted
insulin that is six micro units per Mill
or less that's a very very good sign
that they're insulin sensitive if
someone has uh fasting insulin that goes
from seven to about the mid teens let's
say seven to 17 just to kind of create a
nice range there that's a possible
problem now I emphasize possible because
it's it is possible that someone comes
in and gets a fasted insulin measurement
and it's at 11 but that just happened to
be the high point in their natural
little rhythm and in fact in most of the
time they're down around three or four
so that's why I say that's a bit of a
warning range but then if it's High
Teens into the 20s that's generally
going outside the natural oscillation of
insulin and then the score starts to get
a little compromised now please pardon
the Shameless plug in my newest book how
not to get sick that's this book right
here I actually give a bunch of clinical
tests and have people create a bit of a
an Al an amalgamation of all of these
numbers to really come to a firm
understanding of their own insulin
resistance but fasting insulin is the
first one I talk about because it is the
one that I think is the most overlooked
for the value that it provides oh I
totally agree and you know lab core and
Quest the two largest diagnostic labs in
the United States uh both have a any any
fasting insulin that's less than 25 they
consider that normal
isn't that remarkable and and to me
that's severe hyperinsulinemia if you're
that's just further evidence that the
average American because those those
blood those blood um C offs those ranges
are provided based on kind of national
averages yes that to me is just further
evidence of the problem that the average
American is so insulin resistant that we
think anything up to the mid-20s is
normal that's not normal I totally agree
let's let's talk about A1 C uh this is a
and again this if I ask that same 100
Physicians you've got a 40y old patient
who's slightly overweight their blood
pressure is a little high uh but their
fasting blood glucose is normal or just
a tiny bit elevated should you check an
A1C on that patient I think that at
least 40 if not 50% of those Primary
Care Providers would say no I don't
think it's worth the money uh let's talk
about the A1C test what it checks what
can falsely Elevate or falsely decrease
it and is there another test that we
should be considering if your A1C seems
to be falsely High yeah in fact let me
start with that last point because there
there are a group of there have been
several biomedic scientists that have
bemoaned the shift in clinical practice
um to focus on A1C given its its
challenges which which I'll elaborate on
in a moment but but boning it
particularly because with the rise of
A1C came the death of the oral glucose
tolerance test that used to be a more
commonly used clinical intervention but
you know it's a little timec consuming
which means it's more financially it's
more costly um there's a little more
Nuance into its interpretation but it
gives far more detail than the A1C gives
for reasons that I'll get into in just a
second but by way of brief background
it's helpful for people just to
appreciate that glycation is this
chemical process that is uh a function
of a reducing sugar irreversibly non
non-enzymatically so it doesn't need an
enzyme to do it it doesn't need
something to kind of mediate the two and
bring them together it's just this
reducing sugar glucose fructose
galactose even other molecules that you
wouldn't think of um can fit into this
where they will irreversibly bind to a
protein or DNA um or a lipid and create
this glycation end product now
importantly and this in fact is somewhat
driven from a conversation that Ken and
I have had just recently that term
glycation can even be invoked with other
reducing sugar so it's important for
people to know that that term is
sometimes used as an all-encompassing
term even though as we'll get into not
all tests will measure all of that but
it's important for people to realize
that as much as we focus on hba1c or
hemoglobin
A1c this is in fact itself a reflection
of
of glycation that can be happening
everywhere it's just not easy to measure
glycation in the kidney which is going
to be increasing the risk of kidney
failure or it's not easy to measure the
degree of glycation in the blood vessels
which is a very telling feature for
atherosclerosis or the the synthesis or
the beginning of an atherosclerotic
plaque so as much as we just want to
look at hba1c as some marker of glucose
in the blood we should also appreciate
that it can potentially be a sign of
glycation that's happening everywhere
even skin collagen causing wrinkles and
premature aging of the skin all of these
things can be impacted by glycation so
it helps us appreciate hba1c which if we
just drill right down to it is US
measuring the degree to which we've had
this irreversible glycation binding to
the functional part of the red blood
cell and very briefly within the red
blood cell we have this comp complicated
protein structure called hemoglobin
hemoglobin's most famous job is to carry
oxygen and at the same time to carry
some other gases even like carbon
dioxide albeit to lesser degrees one
immediate effect at the red blood cell
is that the more it is glycated the less
suitable it is now to carry oxygen so
one immediate consequence of this is the
person's reduced ability to move oxygen
potentially creating conditions of
hypoxia or compromised oxygen movement
through the body now this of course
becomes a particular problem in a
diabetic and someone who's chronically
hypoglycemic they not only have the the
the glycation of the blood vessels
damaging blood vessels but to compound
that they also have the blood itself not
carrying oxygen as well so no wonder
they develop such poor wounds and and
sort of Decay flesh because the blood
isn't flowing very well so it's
important for people to appreciate that
what glycation is and how the hb1c is a
reflection of a greater wholebody
phenomenon but then kenu
mentioned where it can be sort of
misdiagnosed or misunderstood it is so
important for people to realize the the
the problem with hba1c namely that while
we always focus on hba1c as a
consequence of hyperglycemia we need to
remember that there's another part of of
this formula that when we're measuring
hba1c as much as we say it's a marker of
gly of glucose and glycation we could
also say someone could equally make the
argument that no it's actually uh a
result of how long lived the red blood
cells are because a red blood cell that
lives longer that has gone beyond its
120 average days of life it just becomes
more likely that it will experience some
degree of glycation that's not the red
blood cell's fault it's not even
glucose's fault it's just the longer it
has lived the more likely it is to have
undergone some degree of glycation thus
you could have someone who has very
long-lived red blood cells has very
normal glucose and yet the their A1C is
high it's a false positive it's a false
sign of glucose and that's more a
function of the red blood cell living
long in contrast you could have someone
who has very short-lived red blood cells
perhaps because they're iron deficient
or they vit Vin B12 deficient alol yeah
yeah right yes so they a disease where
the red blood cells have a very short
life they turn over much more rapidly in
this case the red blood cells are never
around long enough to even undergo
glycation even if a person's fasting
glucose levels are high and they're
struggling with hypoglycemia so in this
case it's a false negative where the A1C
looks normal but in fact there is a
glucose problem it's just that the
fragility of that person's red blood
cells mask it you don't see it so people
we have to appreciate that while AWC has
value while it can be a sign of
glycation occurring elsewhere in the
body it also can't be taken as the
gospel Truth where it is the endall
marker of metabolic Health like you
started the conversation with we have
become so obsessed with A1C that we
refuse to acknowledge its flaws yeah and
any good doctors should know the list of
things that can shorten the life of a
red blood cell and give you a falsely
low A1C they should also know the list
of things that can cause your red blood
cells to live longer and thus give you a
falsely high A1C but I I can just tell
you from personal experience the vast
majority of Primary Health Care
Providers they might know about
alcoholism but that's that's literally
the extent of their knowledge about what
could give a falsely high or low A1c
uh so I have noticed a signal and that's
as a primary care doctor I look for
signal in patients right I i' change
something and then when they come back
in three or six months I'm like okay has
that made a noticeable difference in
enough people routinely enough
predictably enough that I can say okay I
need to adjust my practice based on that
uh I have seen a signal in the carnivore
Community very meat heavy meat Centric
diets where I'd say 5% five out of a 100
carnivores will notice that their a1c's
creeping back up not never to di to
diabetic levels but maybe 5.7 5.8
5.9 and many of we you and I have
discussed this before and I've discussed
this with Shawn Baker and many other
people in the carnivore Community How
likely is that that now that they're not
eating all the inflammatory hypoglycemic
Foods How likely is it that the red
blood cells are just living longer now
than 110 days which seems to be the
average it's living 120 130 140 days How
likely is that and how can we ever dig
into that and and maybe provide some
proof and some reassurance to the
carnivore Community oh yeah in fact my
whole um viewpoint on it that I just
elaborated with regards to the failure
to appreciate variables that influence
the longevity or the lifespan of a red
blood cell actually was born from this
very issue where I would hear from
carnivores where they would say hey I
don't know what's going on I reversed my
type two diabetes but yet my A1C is
creeping um it's exactly what you just
said and it was me wondering how could
the physiology fit into this that led me
to these conclusions all of which is
supported so just to kind of revisit
that I had mentioned two variables
namely iron which is a fundamental
component of hemoglobin in order to
carry the oxygen this is why someone
who's iron deficient will experience the
most common type of anemia on the planet
which is iron deficiency anemia the
number of red blood cells is fine but
the ability of the red blood cells to
carry oxygen is not because in the
absence of heem iron consumption you're
not going to have sufficient iron uh
oxygen binding capacity and then I'd
mentioned vitamin B12 once again this is
becomes relevant the further someone
gets from eating animal sourced Foods
because there is no plant version
there's no plant source of vitamin B12
and in this case it gives rise to
another one of the most common types of
anemia worldwide which is pernicious
anemia that's a fascinating physiology
to it or cell biology and I won't bore
everyone with the details that I share
when I teach this principle to my
students but basically in this scenario
the the bone marrow which is the origin
of the red blood cell it has enough
material to to prepare the the precursor
cells the cells that are going to
someday become red blood cells normally
the process is the cells will grow and
then divide grow and then then divide in
the absence of sufficient B12 because
for example the person isn't consuming
animal products or because they've had
gastric bypass and they don't have
enough of a stomach left to to absorb
the B12 so they need injections forever
but in that case the bone marrow is able
to grow the progenitor red blood cell
but not actually divide them so the
person has this kind of paradoxical
situation where the cells are big but
they're just not nearly enough and so in
this case once again the person has they
have the risk of having so few red blood
cells that it can give you know a sort
of mistaken um number here with A1C then
my last point would be the fluidity um
the ability of the red blood cell to be
as dynamic as it needs to be the red
blood cell is very unique among all
cells in the body in that while it
doesn't it has very little by way of
internal structure that enables it to
slip through incredibly tight spaces to
move in and out of sinuses and
capillaries and to do that it needs to
be very pliable and Squishy well the
more omega-3 fats you're eating the more
those fats get enriched in the membrane
of the cell allowing it to have a higher
fluidity to give it a little bit of
Squish and mean making it so that it can
fit through spaces without shattering as
opposed to other fats that start to get
enriched in that membrane which can make
it a little more rigid so for these
three reasons in addition to several
others the more a person is changing the
diet to be to quote you a proper human
diet focused on animal sourc Foods the
more those red blood cells are likely to
be more robust a little heer longer
lived and thus increasing the potential
of the individual having an artificially
inflated
A1C and in people like that in the five%
of carnivores that I'm seeing I don't
know if you're seeing a different
percentage but if they have an A1C
that's a little bit elevated and they're
like what's going on here the test I
recommend is a
fructosamine test I used to recommend a
glycated albumin but labor and Quest
both stop offering that test but the
fructosamine even though fructo is in
the name it checks only for glucose
glycation uh it looks for the the
glucose lysine Bond I think is what it
actually looks for and invariably every
time a carnivore gets a fructosamine
checked it's within normal limits uh
verifying verifying that they are not
overly glycating it's just that the red
blood cells almost certainly are living
longer because of their healthier diet
and I I want to dig into that a little
bit to my
knowledge there is no commercially
available test that a doctor can order
that checks for fructation or fructose
glycation and This concerns me because
there are many doctors out there who are
recommending to their patients eat lots
of fruits and vegetables and you know
what the patient's going to focus on the
one that taste better and the one that
they don't hate which is fruit and so
they wind up living on fruit juice
smoothies but but when you check an
A1C you don't you don't see reflected
you don't that fructose glycation and I
I want I want to reiterate a point you
said earlier which is super important
because a lot of people if you're not a
doctor or a PhD you just think oh well
glucose just glyc hates hemoglobin right
in the red blood cell that's that's what
it does that's the bad thing that it
does but Professor bman was very clear
it glyc hates every cell in your body
the cells in the nefron of the kidney
the cells in your heart your cardio
myocytes literally every cell in your
body is also being glycated we just use
the glycation of the hemoglobin molecule
the A1C as a proxy marker for all this
other dangerous glycation that's going
on in the human body do you know of a
test that a doctor can order because I
don't know of one that checks for
fructose gly or even when it comes to
drinking milk galactose gation because I
do not know of a test no no I don't
either um in fact I love in fact this
was something that as you and I have
communicated this you you opened my eyes
to this um so so we know that fructose
is much more reactive than glucose which
makes this part of the conversation all
the more relevant as much as we focus on
glucose and and rightly so fructose is
known to elicit the these reactive
reactions that's a little redundant
these glycation reactions again that
being a broad term to refer to any
reducing sugar binding irreversibly
these molecules it seven times more than
glucose so to make sayate that again
because it was a bit awkwardly delivered
fructose can induce glycation seven
times more readily than glucose can and
and thus I think it is uh much more
relevant but no no all the more tragic
this fact is made this is a this is a
non
enzymatic glycation this is does not
require an enzyme this is not a pathway
this is just a function of basically how
much fructose is in your bloodstream the
the higher the level the more the
glycation is going to be is that correct
there's no there's no clinical test to
answer the question no unfortunately
there's no way to do it so basically
people who are living on fruit juice
smoothies are eating hundreds of grams
of carbohydrates in fruit or fruit juice
per day there's currently all Healthcare
providers are blind to the fructose
glycation you cannot detect it yeah
that's right in fact I would say can at
the risk just to give some answer if
perhaps the closest a person could come
to understanding their fructation or the
degree of fructose induced glycation it
would probably be uric acid just as a
surrogate marker because uric acid just
runs so tightly with fructose metabolism
which itself of course is a product of
fructose consumption so yeah probably
the closest we can get is getting a uric
acid marker I I agree with you I think
uric acid is a a fairly good rough proxy
marker for the degree of fructation uh
what else do people need to know about
uric acid levels and how they how they
give us insight into our own metabolism
yeah yeah in fact what a timely question
because what if if what I was doing
literally one hour ago was working on a
manuscript that we are preparing to
publish this is something I've alluded
to over the past year or so it's finally
come to fruition and we're going to
submit it for publication the joys of
being a publishing scientist is the
frustration of trying to then get your
work published but I do it for the
students because these are all
student-led projects and I want them to
have that experience and then have that
help them get onto their next part of
their lives and career so what we found
was so so briefly uric acid um and and
my friend and even collabor on this
project Dr Rick Johnson has really been
the champion I was unaware I'll confess
of the effects of of FR of uric acid let
alone the involvement of fructose until
I read his work and became familiar with
him and it's been one of the great joys
of my life professionally to get to know
him better and now consider him a friend
he's a wonderful gentleman scientist
great guy he was really the one who
highlighted that every time your cell is
metabolizing a molecule of fructose it's
giving birth to a molecule of uric acid
which makes it far more relevant to uric
acid production than any amount of meat
or fish consumption which is an idea
that just continues to really fail you
see in the highest meat consuming
populations on the planet like Hong Kong
and Argentina their their uric acid
levels are are nothing they're
absolutely bottomed out and so let's we
just have to kind of drop this idea that
it's Meat and Fish that's contributing
to uric acid no it's fructose look at
those societies that are eating a lot of
fructose or a lot of sugar or drinking a
lot of fruit juice then you'll see the
uric acid then uric acid itself can have
Myriad consequences including what Rick
has outlined namely stimulating hunger
what I have focused on and back to the
paper we're publishing is looking at how
uric acid is a contributor to insulin
resistance however I consider a
secondary cause because it happens
through its increase in inflammation
uric acid is known to be an activator of
inflammation now what we're studying is
to try to reconcile the the Paradox that
some people notice on a ketogenic diet
which is twofold on one hand they may
notice that in some people the uric acid
levels stay high or even go up a little
second their inflammatory markers have
absolutely dropped so they much less
inflammation and indeed much greater
improvements in insulin sensitivity as
evidenced by their resolution of type
two diabetes this shouldn't be happening
given Uric acid's involvement however
what we are publishing so this is early
data here um so unpublished results at
the moment is that ketones are are
sufficient to wipe out the inflammation
caused by uric acid so ketones are known
to be anti-inflammatory molecules so
this is another instance whereby ketones
have gone beyond their simple caloric
value ketones have a caloric value
roughly compar able to glucose which is
good news for all the cells that want to
use the ketones as energy but at the
same time ketones act as a signaling
molecule and in this case controlling
literally inhibiting inflammation so
whereas uric acid levels are trying to
stimulate this kind of metabolic
inflammation ketones are inhibiting it
and that might help us reconcile how we
could have a situation where a person
has stubbornly elevated uric acid and
yet every metabolic and indeed
inflammatory marker has improved it's
because there's a lot else going on
including the contribution of the
ketones to directly antagonize the
pro-inflammatory effects of the uric
acid
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)