UP TALKS | How Do We Study the Physical World
Summary
TLDRThis script explores the methods of studying the physical world, from observable phenomena like rainbows to subatomic particles detected through technology. It emphasizes the scientific process, the importance of creativity and simplicity in theory development, and the role of experiments in validating or falsifying theories. The speaker discusses the evolution of scientific thought, the predictive power of mathematics in scientific theories, and the interplay between science and technology, concluding with the pursuit of a unified theory explaining all physical phenomena.
Takeaways
- π³ The physical world encompasses everything perceivable by our senses, including tangible objects like trees and intangible phenomena like electrons detected through technology.
- π Studying the physical world involves using our observations and experiences, like the shape and color arrangement of rainbows, to form hypotheses and understand natural phenomena.
- π§ͺ The importance of a laboratory in studying the physical world cannot be understated, as it allows for controlled experiments to create and study phenomena like rainbows.
- π Rainbows serve as an example of how initial clues from observations can lead to a deeper understanding of the physical world, such as the role of water droplets and sunlight in their creation.
- π‘ The scientific process values creativity and the ability to connect seemingly unrelated observations to form a cohesive theory that explains all observable phenomena.
- π Sir Isaac Newton's experiment with a prism demonstrated the properties of light, which is crucial for understanding the creation of rainbows and the arrangement of colors.
- π€ Science is a creative endeavor that often involves a quantum leap from logical deduction to crucial intuition, rather than following a rigid, well-defined recipe.
- π A good theory in science should be simple, have few adjustable parameters, and be able to explain past and current observations while predicting future outcomes.
- π’ Mathematics is essential in science for summarizing theories in a concise and elegant manner, enhancing the predictive capabilities of scientific theories.
- π« Experiments are crucial for the falsification and validation of theories, but they cannot prove a theory; a single contradicting experiment can invalidate it.
- π¬ Technology and science have a symbiotic relationship, with technological advancements often stemming from scientific understanding and, in turn, aiding further scientific discovery.
Q & A
What does the term 'physical world' encompass according to the script?
-The 'physical world' includes everything that can be perceived through our five senses, such as trees and music, as well as things that are not directly observable but can be detected through instruments, like electrons and subatomic particles.
How are rainbows typically observed in relation to the horizon?
-Rainbows are typically observed as a circular arc over the horizon at an angle of approximately 43 degrees relative to the ground.
What is the significance of the laboratory in studying natural phenomena like rainbows?
-The laboratory is significant because it allows for the controlled creation and study of natural phenomena, such as rainbows, enabling faster and more detailed investigation within a confined and controlled environment.
What is the role of creativity in the scientific process?
-Creativity plays a crucial role in the scientific process by allowing scientists to piece together observations and experimental results into a coherent theory, often requiring innovative thinking to make connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Why is simplicity considered a virtue in a good scientific theory?
-Simplicity is considered a virtue in a good scientific theory because it allows for easier understanding and application. A theory with fewer adjustable parameters is more likely to be correct and is preferable over a more complex competing theory.
What is the difference between the primary and secondary rainbow?
-The primary rainbow is more intense and has the color sequence of red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, and violet, while the secondary rainbow is less intense, appears higher than the primary, and has the color sequence in reverse order.
What does the script suggest about the scientific method?
-The script suggests that while the scientific method is often taught as a step-by-step process, in reality, scientific discovery is more complex and involves elements of chance, intuition, and insights that cannot be easily replicated through a defined method.
How does the use of mathematics in science both aid and challenge the understanding of scientific theories?
-Mathematics aids in making the presentation of scientific theories more simple and elegant, providing a predictive capability. However, it also challenges understanding because it can make science more difficult for those who have an aversion to or lack proficiency in mathematics.
What is the importance of falsifiability in a scientific theory according to the script?
-Falsifiability is important because it allows for the possibility of disproving a theory through clear-cut experimental designs. A good theory must be testable and open to the potential of being shown incorrect by experimental evidence.
How does technology contribute to scientific progress?
-Technology contributes to scientific progress by providing tools and methods that are based on scientific understanding, allowing for better manipulation, control, and visualization of phenomena. This, in turn, can lead to new discoveries and advancements in science.
What is the ultimate goal of science as described in the script?
-The ultimate goal of science, as described in the script, is the search for unity, which involves finding a theory that can explain all phenomena, often referred to as the 'theory of everything.'
Outlines
π Understanding the Physical World and Rainbows
The script introduces the concept of the physical world, encompassing both directly observable phenomena like trees and music, and indirectly observable phenomena such as subatomic particles. It uses the example of a rainbow to illustrate the scientific method, discussing initial observations like shape, color sequence, and position relative to the horizon. The importance of laboratory experiments in studying natural phenomena like rainbows is emphasized, highlighting the need for a theory to explain all observable clues, including the secondary, less intense rainbow.
π¬ The Role of Experimentation and Theory in Science
This paragraph delves into the necessity of experimentation for scientific progress, stating that a good theory must be able to withstand experimental validation and falsification. It discusses the historical development of scientific understanding, from Newton's color dispersion experiments to the formulation of scientific theories that require creativity and logical deduction. The paragraph also underscores the belief in nature's rationality and simplicity, suggesting that the best theories are those that are simple and elegant, reflecting the underlying order in the natural world.
π The Evolution of Scientific Thought
The script reflects on the evolution of scientific thought, from the early beliefs in divine intervention to the modern scientific method. It discusses the transition from Aristotle's four elements to the modern era, marked by the use of experiments for verification. The paragraph highlights the non-linear nature of scientific discovery, which often involves intuition, chance, and trial and error, rather than a strict adherence to a predefined scientific method.
π The Importance of Simplicity and Predictive Power in Theories
This section emphasizes the characteristics of a good scientific theory, including simplicity, few adjustable parameters, and the ability to explain and predict observations. It introduces the concept of falsifiability by Karl Popper, stating that a theory must be open to experimental disproval. The use of mathematics in science is highlighted as both a boon for simplifying and predicting phenomena and a barrier for those who find it difficult.
π§ͺ The Interplay Between Theory, Experiment, and Technology
The script explores the relationship between theory, experiment, and technology in scientific advancement. It explains that while experiments can validate or falsify theories, they cannot prove them. The paragraph also discusses how technology, often based on scientific understanding, can provide new tools for scientific investigation, such as electron microscopy, which in turn can lead to further scientific progress.
π The Branches of Science and the Quest for Unity
The final paragraph outlines the various branches of science, from particle physics to cosmology, and discusses the goal of finding a unified theory that can explain all physical phenomena. It acknowledges the complexity of the physical world and the division of scientific disciplines to study different scales of existence, while also expressing the aspiration for a 'theory of everything' that would represent the ultimate understanding of the universe.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘Physical World
π‘Observables
π‘Theory
π‘Experiments
π‘Creativity
π‘Rationality
π‘Simplicity
π‘Falsifiability
π‘Technology
π‘Branches of Science
π‘Theory of Everything
Highlights
Definition of the physical world as things perceivable by our senses or detectable through technology.
Rainbows as a simple example to illustrate the scientific method of studying the physical world.
Initial clues for understanding phenomena like rainbows come from observation and prior knowledge.
Characteristics of rainbows, such as shape, color sequence, and position relative to the horizon.
The concept of the secondary rainbow and its differences from the primary.
The importance of the laboratory in recreating and studying natural phenomena like rainbows.
The necessity for a theory to explain all observable aspects of a phenomenon.
The role of creativity in the scientific process and the assembly of a coherent theory.
Historical studies on light properties by Newton and their relevance to understanding rainbows.
The scientific method's idealized process from question to hypothesis to experiment to conclusion.
The misconception that all scientific progress strictly follows the scientific method.
The actual nature of scientific revolutions often involving chance, intuition, and insights.
Attributes of a good theory: simplicity, few adjustable parameters, and explanatory power.
The predictive capability of a good theory and its importance in scientific progress.
Karl Popper's criterion of falsifiability as the most important attribute of a scientific theory.
The use of mathematics in science for simplifying and elegantly presenting theories.
The dual role of mathematics as both a blessing for prediction and a curse for its complexity.
The purpose of experiments in science: to validate or falsify theories, but never to prove them.
The impact of technology on science, with technology often being a product of scientific understanding.
The reciprocal relationship between technology and science, with advancements in one feeding the other.
The branches of science, from particle physics to cosmology, all striving to understand the physical world.
The ultimate goal of science: the search for a unified theory explaining all physical phenomena.
The ongoing quest for the 'theory of everything' and the philosophical implications of such a discovery.
Transcripts
[Music]
hello everyone today I will be talking
about the ways and means on how we study
the physical world but first we are
going to define in today's context what
we mean by physical world so physical
world consists of the things that
manifest through our five senses
like for instance trees we can see them
we can feel them we can touch them you
can taste them if you want music you can
hear it our galaxy we can see them or
rainbows perhaps and it also includes
the things that we cannot readily
observe and usually these things
manifest their existence indirectly
through our use of detectors I'm talking
about things like electrons or the
subatomic particles that we know the
other subatomic particles microwave
ultrasound we know that these things
exist because of the many ways that we
detect them the many ways that we use
them we use electrons we use ultrasound
wheels microwave in our daily activities
that means that we already have the
means to detect control and manipulate
them so this is the physical world that
we mean observable or not as long as
they are a compulsive matter or they
have energy then they belong to our
physical world so how do we proceed so
to give you an idea on how we go about
in studying our physical world I'm going
to give a very simple example for
instance how a rainbow is created we
want to know we want to understand how
rainbows are created in at least in our
atmosphere so where do we start well
initial clues are drawn from our
experience our observations or sometimes
we throw also from our a priori
knowledge about the event so what do we
know about the Rainbows at first glance
well about their shape they always
manifest themselves a circular arc over
the horizon in terms of colors they
always appear in the same arrangement of
colors red orange yellow green blue
indigo violet depending on your
reference literature sometimes the
indigo is removed from the colors what
else do we know what else do we have as
initial clues we also know that they
always appear at the same location
relative to the ground
something like 43 degrees with respect
to the horizon and another clue is that
we always see them in pairs the primary
one is more intense but there is always
a secondary one a little bit higher than
the primary rainbow and it is less
intense that's why most people don't
notice the presence of the secondary
rainbow so you have these clues but you
cannot still answer the question how are
rainbows created but you have blues and
of course you may as well observe the
Train balls usually appear right after
rain on a relatively sunny day and so
perhaps you you hypothesize that water
droplets may have something to do with
the production or the creation of
rainbows and since you they appear
during a relatively sunny day then maybe
perhaps the Sun also as the source of
light has something to do with rainbow
and of course the best way to study
rainbows is your ability
to create them by yourselves so in this
instance the importance of a laboratory
cannot be under stated if you can only
produce rainbows in your laboratory so
that we can study further within the
confines of your own laboratory within
the home part of your laboratory then
you can proceed faster and whatever
theory that you will arrive at in the
end to be able to explain the existence
or the creation of rainbows
they must explain your theory must be
able to explain all the initial clues
that we already present that the Haller
the shape the exact location with
respect to the horizon the presence of
the secondary rainbow which has a
reverse order of colors by the way if
the primary rainbow is Roy gbb the
secondary rainbow is Libra your reverse
in order so your theory should be able
to explain all these observables but
then you might also need further clues
from sometimes seemingly unrelated
observations you cannot explain of
course I am talking with the benefit of
hindsight because I already know how
rainbows are created you cannot explain
how rainbows are created without
invoking certain properties of light and
this properties of light have been
studied centuries before us in fact we
order the arrangement of color to the
pioneering study conducted by Newton
Newton observed that when you pass light
the visible light through a prism the
light bends and some colors Bend more
than other colors that's why they don't
bend at the same angle some are less
bent and some are more bent so that
gives us the arrangement
colors so you have to draw from the
results of that experiment so suppose
you know these things and to piece them
together it takes creativity to put
these things together to tie these
things up to make them part of a single
puzzle it takes creativity that's why we
also say that science is a creative
human endeavor so upon tying these
things up you now have a very good
picture on how rainbows are created you
know how the theory and your theory as
far as you are concerned because you
were able to explain all the
observations to account for all of those
clues that we have been countered in the
actual rainbow or in the simulated
rainbow in your laboratory then you have
a reason to believe your theory and
these theories theories like this this
make up the science that we know and
after you have put all these things
together you now come up with probably a
statement we of course utmost confidence
on how rainbows are created this is what
we call a theory and theories like this
is what builds science science is not
only a way of knowing the process that
we undertake towards knowing but it is
also about the results the results of
our investigation
the results of our seeking for answers
and this resource is of course these
results are embodied on a theory so we
say that we study physical world through
science not only in numerating the
observables but also being able to fix
on certain laws that govern the
existence of things
and of course being able to explain the
characteristics the observables and all
the clues in science there is always
this underlying faith in the existence
of rationality we say that nature or
parts of nature follow and orderly and
predictable patterns governed by fixed
laws ever since we took away as the main
cause
divine intervention or the whims of the
gods like why why is there a storm
because our ancestors might say because
the gods willed it so maybe we did
something bad and the gods are punishing
us ever since we abandoned that paradigm
we abandon that thinking that belief
that is the true start or the true birth
of science as a way of knowing so we
always have this underlying faith that
things can be explained in a logical or
rational manner that all phenomena
behave in a rational manner there is
also another underlying faith in its
simplicity we assume that these laws are
simple enough for man to be able to
discover and at the same time comprehend
simplicity by the way is one virtue of a
good theory if a theory can explain a
certain phenomenon but it is made up of
a lot of assumptions of a lot of
adjustable parameters then it's not a
good theory because it's a very
complicated theory in science there is
more probability that the theory is
correct when it is a lot simpler than a
competing theory and may I warn you
about the use of the word correct in
here when I say correct it's not a
permanent thing it may be correct up to
the
point in time only because we can never
tell when somebody can make an
observation that cannot be explained by
this cotton code correct theory so we
study the physical world through science
starting from the days of Aristotle
Aristotle gave us a very simple science
around 300 BCE the main characteristic
of that science is the simplicity of its
theory remember only four elements in
the whole world the fifth element does
not reside in our world it resides up
there it's called the quintessence
perfection it's the fifth element from
the Earth's Italian time to modern
science around 1700 see the Common Era
the only addition to the simplicity of
theory is our use of experimental
verifications so the characteristic of
science during our civilian time is
simplicity while the characteristics of
modern science from 1700 up to our time
is simplicity plus experiments science
is as I said a while ago a creative
human enterprise we have been thought
since we were kids in our primary years
that science proceeds in a well-defined
recipe if you may called the scientific
method and in scientific method you
start with a question a curiosity or a
problem and then you make a guess this
guess is what we call technically as
hypotheses so you list down all probable
answers as many as you can
and then you start observing you start
conducting your experiments through your
experiments one by one you eliminate the
hypotheses until only a single one
remains and then at the end you
say that this is the most probable
reason or this is the most probable
answer that is the scientific method but
in truth
very rarely do we investigate using the
scientific method most of the scientific
revolutions that we have going back to
the years of the modern the so-called
modern scientists actually were products
of chance intuition insights trial and
error it's a quantum leap sometimes from
a logical deduction to that crucial
intuition there's nothing in between
there is no way of explaining how this
particular scientists arrived from point
A to point B such is the case of Bohr's
hydrogen atom when explain why the
hydrogen atom is very stable
nobody can provide a proof that would
lead to those quantization of orbits so
some authors would call it a
misconception whenever we attribute a
scientific method to every scientific
inquiry and as I have said after the
most of the things that we know today
are products of things other than the
scientific method but it is true it is
always true that science progresses
through two things the use of
mathematics and the use of experiments
so we asked ourselves what makes a good
theory a good theory should be simple it
must have very few adjustable parameters
or the use of constants that we insert
in those terms so that it will give a
number that is in agreement with
observed
or measure number from experiments the
simple parameters that you have the
better the theory is and of course it
must be able to explain all the past and
current observations and at the same
time it has the ability to predict what
happens when certain conditions are not
met when certain conditions are changed
so science has this predictive
capability a good theory has this
predictive capability and according to
the philosopher of science Karl Popper
the most important attribute of a good
theory is that it must allow for
falsification it should be falsifiable
there should be a clear-cut experimental
design that could result in things that
would falsify the theory if it doesn't
allow for falsification then it's it's
an overly encompassing theory there is
no way to know if it is wrong because it
is never if it is right because it is
never wrong so theory and mathematics on
the other hand this is both a blessing
and a bane it is a blessing because when
science came up with the theory and that
theory is expressed in its ultimate form
using the language of mathematics we are
able to summarize everything into a
single mathematical sentence most of the
time for instance Faraday's law in
electromagnetism when Faraday I
completed his series of experiments he
summarizes observations and results and
conclusions he was able to come up with
two volumes of books this stick and it
doesn't contain a single equation
because Faraday was not that much adept
in mathematics and Maxwell summarized
those two volume books of Faraday in a
single equation
so mathematics makes the presentation of
theories more simple and more elegant
and at the same time if you know how to
manipulate mathematics if you know how
to do mathematics then you have a way of
predicting what will happen to a certain
variable when certain parameters are
changed and there is your predictive
capability I said it is also a bane this
also occurs because ever since science
adapted the use of mathematics as its
main language science became so very
difficult to some people who have this
natural aversion of mathematics in fact
studies show that what makes science
difficult is not the science because the
concepts of science are very very simple
easy to understand that's what good
theories are but it's the language that
it use the mathematics that it use so
it's a blessing and a curse the use of
mathematics theory and experiment so
what is the use of experiment aside from
providing a chance to falsify a theory
so experiments are used actually in
order for us to gain more observables
measure quantities gain clues gather
clues and order for us to develop a very
good theory and when the theory is made
when the theory is done because it has
this predictive capacity then we also
design experiments that might falsify
the theory if there is no experiment
that can falsify the theory then as we
have learned a while ago the theory is
no good if it doesn't allow for
falsification so if you take a look at
in general theory of relativity it
actually provided in its claim that
light is affected by gravity it provided
an opportunity for an experiment to
disprove him and that's what Sir Arthur
Eddington D we went to Africa to conduct
an experiment that would in all
probability falsify Einstein's general
theory of relativity well as it turned
out what Eddington measured was in
agreement with what Einstein predicted
and so that was the start when we
started embracing the general theory of
relativity of Einstein because a
landmark experiment agree with what the
theory predicted so that's how important
experiments are they validate the theory
but also they falsify the theory
experiments however cannot prove a
theory even if you already have
conducted a million experiments and they
all agreed to the theory a single
experiment that does not agree with the
theory makes the theory no longer viable
no longer correct in our sense of
correctness just a single experiment can
do that so the main purpose therefore of
experiment is simply falsification /
validation but never proving the theory
so we therefore say the theories are
accepted until such time that the
particular observation comes along that
does not agree with the theory and it is
time to look for a better theory it
doesn't necessarily mean that the theory
is wrong if you compare Newtonian
mechanics with Einstein's relativity
theory actually Einstein did not
of Newtonian mechanics what the
relativity theory did to mechanics is
that it just relegated it into a limited
applicability we now know that for very
fast motion we can no longer use
Newtonian laws if we are expecting
accuracy or precision we have to use the
relativistic mechanics according to
Einstein we now know that for very very
small particles we can no longer use
Newtonian laws we have to use the loss
resulting from quantum mechanics but I
repeat this do not mean that Newtonian
laws are wrong because for all practical
purposes as far as we are concerned
based on our daily experience we are not
living in subatomic world we do not
experience speed close to the speed of
light we are very slow and very big
particles therefore as far as we are
concerned Newtonian mechanics is still a
correct theory
what about technology what is the
contribution of technology to science
it's actually a two-way relationship
most technology that we know are based
from understanding provided by science
the ability to manipulate to tamper with
to control to troubleshoot a certain
phenomenon that is that ability is given
to us by science which provided us the
basic understanding of that phenomena
and so we have this technology for
example the technology of electron
microscopy that technology was only made
possible when we understood the nature
of electrons when we understood how to
produce electrons with different
energies when we understood that
electrons behave like waves sometimes as
all matter
the behaviors particle but sometimes
they behave as wave the so called
wave particle duality so our creativity
our ingenious ability for design allow
us to come up with this electron
microscope and what that does the
electron microscope do as far as
scientific progress is concerned it
allows us better degree of visualization
imaging we can now study insects very
small insects bacteria cells and so on
so this added capability provided by
technology gives back to science a
certain crucial steps towards further
progress and because of the nature of
our physical world from the very small
very to the very big from the very slow
to the very fast in the process of
studying our physical world we came up
with several branches of science that we
know today from the sub-atomic domain
which is of course the domain of the
particle physicists we call it particle
physics to the study of the nucleus the
nuclear physics and to the largest
dimension that we know probably the
radius or the diameter of the known
universe that is the discipline of
cosmologists geology the study of the
earth or we can extend its definition to
the study of other planets chemistry of
molecules biology also of cells of
life-forms and so on all of these
branches are rose from our single
objective of making sense of the
physical world but since there are many
so many things to study we begin to
allocate or apportion this
lots of things into several branches of
science now it is faith in simplicity
the ultimate goal of science is the
search for unity the search for the
theory that could explain everything the
search for the theory that could explain
gravitation and electromagnetism at the
same time in a single equation the
search for a theory that could explain
black holes and the shape of chicken
eggs and that is the holy grail of
science most people believe that that
theory exists that we can succeed in
looking for that theory that so-called
the theory of everything and there's no
telling if ever we will come to that
point and thank you that's how we study
the physical world
[Music]
you
Browse More Related Video
Fact vs. Theory vs. Hypothesis vs. Law⦠EXPLAINED!
Whatβs the difference between a scientific law and theory? - Matt Anticole
What is a Theory?
SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY | Lesson 1: Historical Development of S&T in the World
PAANO NAGSIMULA ANG MUNDO? | Iba't ibang Paniniwala sa pinagmulan ng Mundo
The Beauty and Power of Mathematics | William Tavernetti | TEDxUCDavis
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)