Pengertian Tentang Ilmu, Ilmu Hukum dan Hukum | PART 2

Summary

This video script features a comprehensive discussion on the nature and scope of law as a discipline. It begins with an exploration of the definition of science and knowledge, distinguishing between theoretical and practical aspects. The script delves into the specifics of legal science, including its rational, empirical, and accumulative characteristics. It also addresses the etymology and general definition of law, emphasizing its role in society. The discussion covers the scope of legal studies, touching on theory, doctrine, and empirical aspects. The video concludes with a Q&A session, addressing the unique nature of law as a discipline, its application in daily life, and the challenges of law enforcement. The script is a rich resource for those interested in the foundational concepts of legal studies.

Takeaways

• 📚 The presentation introduces two sessions: a material presentation followed by a Q&A session, highlighting the structure of the event.
• 👨‍🏫 The first part of the presentation explains the definition of science, with different speakers elaborating on various aspects of knowledge and law.
• 🔍 Yogi discusses that science is derived from knowledge, which is obtained in various ways, and not all knowledge is considered science unless it meets certain criteria.
• 🌐 Vanessa explains the two parts of knowledge: pure science, which is the result of contemplation and research, and applied knowledge, which includes practical skills beneficial to life.
• 📘 The material explains that the objects of knowledge include material objects and formal objects, with examples provided from the field of law.
• 🏛️ Ilmu Hukum is defined by Satjipto Rahardjo as a science that examines laws and includes everything related to law, emphasizing its scope and discussion.
• 🌐 The etymology and general definition of 'law' in various languages are discussed, showing the universality of legal studies.
• 📝 Peter Marzuki highlights three important aspects of legal science: its origin as an applied science, its study of rules, rulings, and legal doctrines, and the use of synergistic analysis and dialectics.
• 📚 Soedjono dirdjosisworo outlines the outline of legal science, including the knowledge of truth according to human dignity, formal knowledge about positive law, and the study of norms and legal techniques.
• 🏛️ The scope of legal science is described to include the study of legal principles, concepts, and factual aspects of law, as well as the behavior or attitudes within society.
• 🤔 The Q&A session addresses questions about the nature of law, its application, enforcement, and the role of dialectics in legal science, providing deeper insights into the practical and theoretical aspects of law.

Q & A

What is the main topic of the presentation?

The main topic of the presentation is the definition and scope of the science of law, including its various aspects and characteristics.

What are the two sessions included in the presentation?

The two sessions included in the presentation are a session on the material to be presented and a subsequent question and answer session.

According to Hajar Basah, what is considered science?

According to Hajar Basah, science is something that is obtained from knowledge, and not all knowledge is considered science unless it meets certain criteria.

What is the distinction between 'science' and 'knowledge' as described in the script?

In the script, 'science' is described as the result of contemplation and scientific research, such as social science and natural science. 'Knowledge', on the other hand, refers to the skills possessed by humans that are useful for their lives, such as sewing, cooking, and driving.

What are the main characteristics of the science of law according to Sujono?

According to Sujono, the main characteristics of the science of law are that it is rational, based on formal logic; it is empirical, meaning it can be verified by human examination; it is general, with truths that can be verified by scientific review; and it is accumulative, building upon previously developed knowledge.

What does Satjipto Rahardjo define the science of law as?

Satjipto Rahardjo defines the science of law as a body of knowledge that endeavors to examine laws, encompassing and discussing everything related to law.

What are the three important aspects of the science of law according to Peter Marzuki?

According to Peter Marzuki, the three important aspects of the science of law are that it is born as an applied science, it studies rules, judgments, and legal doctrines, and the method used within the science of law is synergistic analysis and dialectics.

What is the scope of the science of law according to the script?

The scope of the science of law includes the study of law as a doctrine or system, the understanding of fundamental concepts in law, and the study of law as behavior or attitudes, which are examined in disciplines such as legal sociology, legal anthropology, legal psychology, comparative law, and legal history.

What does the term 'sui generis' mean in the context of the science of law?

In the context of the science of law, 'sui generis' refers to the idea that law is a unique and independent discipline, separate from other sciences.

Why is the science of law considered an applied science?

The science of law is considered an applied science because it is applied in everyday life, used to regulate social norms and ensure orderly and peaceful coexistence among people.

What are the reasons for the lack of enforcement of legal regulations by the public?

The reasons for the lack of enforcement of legal regulations by the public include a lack of respect for others, high levels of selfishness, and an ineffective legal system in enforcing penalties for lawbreakers.

What is the method of dialectics in the context of the science of law?

In the context of the science of law, the method of dialectics is a philosophical argument method involving a process of opposition between parties with contrasting views, used to examine and reveal the limitations of opposing arguments.