Kolkata Case | How to Make India SAFE for Women? | Dhruv Rathee

Summary

The video script discusses a shocking crime against a trainee doctor in Kolkata, igniting nationwide protests and raising questions about the authorities' response. It highlights the arrest of the main suspect, Sanjay Roy, and the subsequent demand for a CBI inquiry, reflecting a lack of public trust in the state police. The script also addresses the broader issues of rape culture, victim blaming, and the need for societal change to prevent such heinous acts, urging viewers to be part of the solution and not just spectators to the outrage.

Takeaways

• 😔 The script discusses a shocking incident of violence against a trainee doctor in Kolkata, highlighting the nationwide protests and the subsequent strike by doctors.
• 👮‍♂️ It criticizes the involvement of Sanjay Roy, a civic volunteer with a history of domestic violence, and questions the recruitment process that allowed him to have access to hospital departments.
• 🚔 The police's role is scrutinized, with 25 arrests made, but also a call for the case to be transferred to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) due to a lack of public trust.
• 🏛️ The Calcutta High Court's intervention is noted, emphasizing the failure of the state's leadership, particularly Mamata Banerjee, in addressing the incident and the broader issue of public safety.
• 🏥 The script raises concerns about the appointment and actions of Sandeep Ghosh, the principal of R.G.Kar Medical College, who is accused of corruption and attempts to suppress the incident.
• 🌟 The Supreme Court's suo-moto cognizance of the case is mentioned, underlining the importance of workplace safety and gender equality under the Constitution.
• 📈 Statistics on the increasing number of reported rape cases in India are presented, indicating a growing societal issue rather than a recent surge in incidents.
• 🤔 The script challenges societal attitudes towards rape, emphasizing the need for a change in perception that currently tolerates or even indirectly supports such behavior.
• 👗 It refutes common myths and excuses used to justify or downplay rape, such as the victim's attire, being out late, or having a history of romantic relations with the perpetrator.
• 🔍 The importance of consent and the irrelevance of a victim's character or circumstances to the crime of rape are emphasized, advocating for a clear understanding of these concepts.
• 🌐 The script calls for collective action to address the root causes of rape culture, including societal attitudes, education, and legal reforms, urging viewers to be part of the solution.

Q & A

What was the incident that took place at R.G.Kar hospital in Kolkata?

A heinous crime involving a 31-year-old trainee doctor at R.G.Kar hospital in Kolkata shocked the nation, leading to protests and strikes by doctors across the country.

Who is Sanjay Roy and what is his connection to the incident?

Sanjay Roy is a civic volunteer in West Bengal Police who was identified as the main culprit of the incident at R.G.Kar hospital. He had a history of domestic violence and was arrested using CCTV footage, Bluetooth device, and DNA samples.

What is the controversy surrounding Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee's response to the incident?

Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee faced criticism for her handling of the situation, including her decision to take out a protest rally after the incident and her initial reluctance to transfer the case to the CBI.

Why was there a demand to transfer the case to the CBI?

A demand to transfer the case to the CBI arose due to a lack of trustworthiness in the state police, which was highlighted by the Calcutta High Court, indicating a failure of the Home Minister and Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee.

Who is Sandeep Ghosh and what are the allegations against him?

Sandeep Ghosh is the principal of R.G.Kar Medical College who is accused of corruption and running the college like a mafia. He is also accused of trying to suppress the incident and playing it off as a suicide.

What steps did the West Bengal government take in response to the incident?

The West Bengal government announced some initiatives for the safety of women in workplaces and formed an SIT to investigate corruption charges against Sandeep Ghosh, who was sent on an extended leave of absence.

What did the Supreme Court do in response to the incident?

The Supreme Court took suo-moto cognizance of the matter and issued strong statements about the need for equality and safety for women in their workplaces.

What societal attitudes does the script suggest contribute to the problem of sexual violence?

The script suggests that societal attitudes that normalize sexual violence, such as victim-blaming, making light of sexual assault in media and jokes, and the objectification of women, contribute to the problem.

What are the three types of rapists identified in the script?

The script identifies three types of rapists: Power rapists, who seek to assert dominance; Anger rapists, who are motivated by anger and abuse; and Sadistic rapists, who derive pleasure from the suffering of others.

What are some of the root causes of rape identified in the script?

The script mentions several root causes of rape, including child abuse, exposure to pornography at a young age, physical and emotional abuse, and a culture that trivializes or normalizes rape.

What solutions does the script propose to address the issue of sexual violence?

The script proposes solutions such as removing root causes to prevent the formation of twisted personalities, improving legal processes, promoting education on consent and respect, and challenging societal attitudes that contribute to rape culture.

Outlines

00:00

😣 Kolkata Hospital Violence and Political Accountability

This paragraph discusses a shocking crime involving a trainee doctor in Kolkata's R.G. Kar hospital, which led to nationwide protests and a strike by doctors. The incident was followed by violence against protesters and the hospital being ransacked. The police arrested 25 people, and the main suspect, Sanjay Roy, confessed to the crime. The narrative questions the political responsibility of West Bengal's Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, who also holds the Home and Health Minister portfolios, and criticizes her response to the incident. It also raises concerns about the appointment of Sandeep Ghosh as the principal of R.G. Kar Medical College, given his alleged corrupt practices and attempts to suppress the case. The paragraph concludes with the Calcutta High Court's intervention, ordering the case to be handed over to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and highlighting the lack of public trust in the state police.

05:03

📊 The Alarming Increase in Rape Cases and Societal Attitudes

The second paragraph presents a concerning analysis of the increasing number of rape cases in India, noting a rise in incidents that outpaces the country's population growth. It criticizes societal attitudes that contribute to the problem, such as the tendency to justify or condone rape under certain conditions, reflecting a deep-seated issue with gender equality and the perception of women in society. The paragraph also touches on the impact of political opinions on the public's view of rape, with examples of political figures and media personalities making insensitive statements or supporting rapists based on political affiliations. It emphasizes the need for an uncomfortable but necessary discussion on societal norms and attitudes towards women to address the root causes of the problem.

10:03

🚨 The Misguided Justifications and Conditions Applied to Rape

This paragraph delves into the various justifications and conditions that people apply to rape cases, such as blaming the victim's behavior, attire, or the time of day they were out. It criticizes the media and individuals for making insensitive statements that perpetuate harmful stereotypes and misunderstandings about consent. The paragraph emphasizes the importance of recognizing rape as a violation of freedom and the need for mutual consent in any relationship, regardless of the circumstances. It also highlights the legal aspects, such as the POCSO Act of 2012, which increased the age of consent to 18 years, and the fact that most rape cases are committed by someone known to the victim, debunking the myth that rape is solely a stranger's crime.

15:04

👗 The Fallacy of Blaming Victims for Their Clothing

The fourth paragraph addresses the misguided belief that a woman's choice of clothing can provoke sexual assault or rape. It refutes this notion by pointing out the irrationality of blaming the victim's attire, especially considering that rape victims include children of all ages, the elderly, and those wearing traditional clothing. The paragraph also criticizes societal attitudes that objectify women and perpetuate rape culture through media, casual conversations, and even court judgments. It calls for a change in societal perceptions and the need to address the root causes of such attitudes, including the influence of media and the normalization of sexual violence in everyday language and humor.

20:04

🤔 Understanding the Psychological Roots of Rapists

This paragraph explores the psychological roots of rapists, distinguishing between different types such as power rapists, anger rapists, and sadistic rapists. It discusses the findings of research on convicted rapists, highlighting the backgrounds of child abuse, exposure to violent media, and dysfunctional family environments as contributing factors. The paragraph also addresses misconceptions about the relationship between mental illness and rape, emphasizing that while some rapists may have mental health issues, the act of rape is a choice driven by societal and personal factors, not an involuntary manifestation of mental illness.

25:05

🌟 Addressing the Multifaceted Problem of Rape Culture

The final paragraph outlines the need for a comprehensive approach to tackle the problem of rape culture. It emphasizes the importance of addressing the root causes to prevent the formation of twisted personalities, the need for societal attitudes to change, and the improvement of legal processes. The paragraph calls for collective action, including government initiatives for women's empowerment, education about consent and healthy relationships, and the eradication of sexist language and attitudes in media and daily life. It concludes with a call to action for everyone to contribute to creating a society where women are respected and safe from sexual violence.

Keywords

💡Rape Culture

Rape culture refers to societal attitudes and norms that trivialize or normalize sexual assault and violence. In the video, this concept is discussed as a pervasive issue that allows harmful behaviors and attitudes towards women to go unchecked. The script mentions how jokes about rape, casual use of sexist language, and media portrayals contribute to this culture, thereby influencing the way people perceive consent and gender relations.

💡Consent

Consent in the context of the video signifies the voluntary and continuous agreement between participants to engage in sexual activity. The script emphasizes that consent is crucial, reversible, and must be obtained regardless of the relationship between the parties involved. It is used to counter arguments that attempt to justify sexual assault by suggesting that certain behaviors or situations negate the need for consent.

💡Toxic Masculinity

Toxic masculinity is a concept that highlights harmful stereotypes and expectations placed on men, often leading to aggressive or dominating behaviors. The video discusses how this concept is linked to the normalization of sexual violence, where men are conditioned to assert dominance and control over women, contributing to a culture that excuses or tolerates rape.

💡Victim Blaming

Victim blaming is the act of holding the victim of a crime, in this case, sexual assault, responsible for the actions of the perpetrator. The script provides several examples from the media and public figures who have blamed the victims for the assault, citing what they were wearing, their behavior, or their presence in certain places as reasons for the crime.

💡Patriarchal Culture

Patriarchal culture refers to a social system in which men hold primary power and are dominant in roles of political leadership, moral authority, and social privilege. The video explains how such a culture can foster attitudes that devalue women and contribute to the prevalence of sexual violence by treating women as inferior or as objects.

💡Sexual Assault

Sexual assault is defined as any type of non-consensual sexual contact or behavior that violates the autonomy and sexual privacy of the victim. The video script uses this term to describe the act of rape and emphasizes that it is a grave violation of a person's rights and dignity, which is often misunderstood or trivialized in society.

💡Power Assailants

Power assailants, as mentioned in the video, are individuals who commit sexual assault to exert dominance and control over others. The script explains that this type of assailant is driven by a desire for power and may not necessarily be motivated by sexual desire, highlighting the non-sexual motivations behind some acts of rape.

💡Legal Processes

Legal processes refer to the mechanisms and procedures through which justice is sought and administered. The video discusses the need for improvements in legal processes to better support victims of sexual assault and to ensure that perpetrators are held accountable, pointing out the current shortcomings in handling such cases.

💡Stand-up Comedy

Stand-up comedy is a form of entertainment where a performer addresses an audience directly, often telling jokes and humorous stories. The script criticizes certain stand-up comedians for using rape jokes and sexist humor, contributing to a culture that normalizes sexual violence and objectifies women.

💡Feminist Perspective

The feminist perspective, as touched upon in the video, involves a critical analysis of gender relations and an advocacy for women's rights and equality. The script uses this perspective to challenge societal norms and attitudes that contribute to the prevalence of sexual assault and to call for a societal shift towards greater respect and autonomy for women.

💡Civic Volunteer

A civic volunteer is an individual who performs unpaid work to help their community or country. In the context of the video, the term is used to describe the perpetrator of a crime, raising questions about the selection and oversight of volunteers in sensitive roles, especially in law enforcement and public service.

Highlights

A 31-year-old trainee doctor's heinous crime in Kolkata's R.G.Kar hospital has led to nationwide protests and a doctors' strike.

Police have arrested 25 people, including Sanjay Roy, a civic volunteer with a history of domestic violence, who confessed to the crime.

Questions are raised about the recruitment process of civic volunteers and the access they have to hospital departments.

Calcutta High Court ordered the case to be handed over to CBI due to a lack of trust in the state police, indicating a failure of the Home Minister and Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee.

Sandeep Ghosh, the principal of R.G.Kar Medical College, is accused of corruption and trying to suppress the incident as a suicide.

The West Bengal government has formed an SIT to investigate corruption charges against Sandeep Ghosh and is asked to submit its report within a month.

The Supreme Court took suo-moto cognizance of the case, emphasizing the constitutional equality and safety of women in workplaces.

The country witnesses nearly 80 rape cases daily, highlighting the need for immediate and effective changes.

The discourse on rape cases has not improved since 2012, with the number of reported cases increasing by 1.25 times compared to the population growth.

Societal attitudes and reactions to rape cases often involve victim-blaming and the application of unjustifiable 'conditions' to the crime.

The influence of toxic masculinity and patriarchal culture contributes to the normalization of rape and objectification of women.

Media, films, and advertisements often perpetuate harmful stereotypes and attitudes towards women, contributing to rape culture.

The root causes of rape include childhood abuse, exposure to violent media, and dysfunctional family relationships.

Rape is not about sexual urge but is an act of power, anger, or sadism, often stemming from the perpetrator's personality and societal influences.

The three types of rapists identified in research are Power rapists, Anger rapists, and Sadistic rapists, each with distinct motivations.

To prevent the creation of new rapists, society must address the root causes and work on women empowerment, education, and legal improvements.

Everyone has a role to play in eradicating rape culture by not using sexist language, calling out sexist attitudes, and supporting stronger law enforcement.

Transcripts

Hello, friends!

The heinous crime that took place with a 31-year-old

trainee doctor in Kolkata's R.G.Kar hospital

has shocked our nation's soul.

We have seen protests in many parts of the country including West Bengal.

Doctors have gone on strike,

the protesters were attacked by goons,

and the hospital was being ransacked.

So far, the police has arrested 25 people.

Everyone is questioning Mamata Banerjee,

who is not only the Chief Minister of West Bengal

but also the Home Minister and Health Minister of West Bengal.

It was strange to see

her take out a protest rally after this incident.

But the question is, against whom?

No one could understand this.

The main culprit of this incident is Sanjay Roy,

a civic volunteer in West Bengal Police.

In the past, three of his marriages

ended due to domestic violence.

The first question is,

what kind of a person was recruited here to become a civic volunteer?

Looking at his history of domestic violence,

police should have taken against him already.

CCTV footage, his Bluetooth device,

and DNA samples were used

by the police to arrest him.

He has confessed to his crime.

But the second question is,

how did he have access to all the departments in the hospital?

A few days after the incident,

there was a demand to transfer this case to CBI.

CM Mamata Banerjee tried to shrug off this demand

by saying that she has no problem with this.

If the police couldn't do anything in the next few days,

she said that she would transfer this case to CBI.

The Calcutta High Court,

while citing reasons such as lack of trustworthiness of the police,

ordered the case to be handed over to CBI.

Along with this,

the High Court has also reminded that

the demand to hand over a case to the CBI shows that

the state police is no longer trusted by the people.

And this is the failure of the Home Minister

and Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee.

Here comes our third question,

how was a man like Sandeep Ghosh,

appointed as the principal of R.G.Kar Medical College?

He is accused of being a corrupt person.

Allegedly, he ran this medical college like a mafia.

But his transfer was stopped again and again.

It's suspected to be because he was close to TMC.

In this case too, he is accused of atrocities.

He is accused of trying to suppress the matter.

Trying to play it off as a suicide.

The victim's parents were not allowed to see the victim's body for hours.

There was a delay in filing the FIR

and when he was removed from there,

he was made the principal of Calcutta National College.

I mean, if a person is not fit to be in charge of one place,

what sense does it make to transfer him to another place?

Calcutta High Court pointed out this nonsense

and sent Sandeep Ghosh on an extended leave of absence.

To investigate the corruption charges on Sandeep,

West Bengal government has made an SIT,

which is asked to submit its report in a month.

CBI has interrogated him four times in this particular case.

When people all over the country wanted justice for this case,

then for the safety of women in workplaces,

West Bengal government announced some initiatives.

Supreme Court took a suo-moto cognizance of the matter,

gave some strong statements like

"What is equality under the Constitution

if women can't be safe in their workplace

and are being denied basic equality?"

To bring about ground level changes,

the country can't wait for another r@pe.

A few days ago, I wrote a post on this case

and asked you not to "lose your interest" in this issue.

By the time this video is released,

maybe the outrage will be over,

maybe the protests will have stopped.

But will the nearly 80 r@pe cases taking

place in our country every day have stopped?

Not at all.

After Kolkata, we got this news from Uttarakhand.

A similar incident with a nurse.

In this case, the bus driver and bus conductor were involved.

In Bengaluru, a 21-year-old college student was going home from a party

when a similar incident happened to her.

In Maharashtra's Badalapur area

a school cleaning staff

was reported to have s€xually abused two girls aged 3 and 4.

Hundreds of agitated parents blocked the railway station.

Looking at these news, you may feel that

over the last 8-10 days,

there have been more incidents of r@pes in the country.

But this is not true.

r@pes are happening every day,

but they are not reported every day.

Outrage and protests do not happen every day.

The first large-scale protests in the country

were probably in 2012 after the Nirbhaya case.

Then in 2019,

when a 26-year-old veterinary doctor was r@ped and mu₹dered in Hyderabad.

Then in 2020, people were outraged about the Hathras case.

Where this happened to a 19-year-old Dalit girl.

And now in 2024,

this case happened in Kolkata.

Over the last 12 years,

there were 4 large-scale outrages and protests.

Maybe I'm even forgetting a few cases,

but broadly speaking, there haven't been more than 7-8 outrages and protests.

And it's not that there is something wrong with being outraged.

Feeling outraged after hearing something like this is a natural emotion.

Protesting is also a sign of our being alive.

But there needs to be some improvement in the situation.

If we look at the situation from 2012 to now,

it has been the opposite.

Around 2012,

25,000 such cases were reported in a year.

Whereas according to the latest figures of NCRB,

in 2022, 31,000 such cases were reported.

That is, 85 r@pe cases per day.

If we compare the proportion with the increasing population,

we can see a leap there too.

Since then,

the country's population has increased by 1.14 times.

But the r@pe cases have increased by 1.25 times.

It's clear as day,

the situation is getting worse.

The root causes of r@pe

not only do they continue to exist,

but are even increasing.

This is why I feel absurdity.

It's okay to protest for a week,

but for the rest of the year, if a person is behaving

like everything is fine

it's absurd.

What should be done to improve the situation?

Are you ready for this uncomfortable discussion?

This discussion will be uncomfortable because

you will perhaps see that

many of you are

indirectly a part of this problem.

Will you acknowledge this?

I don't know.

Because Vir Das had simply said that

we are living in Two Indias.

On one hand, women are worshipped in our country

and on the other hand, they are subjected to heinous crimes.

It wasn't incorrect,

but people took offense.

Similarly, after the Nirbhaya case,

Leslee Udwin released a documentary.

India's Daughter.

It was such a powerful and thought-provoking documentary

that it should have been shown to 10th-grade students all over the country.

But in our country, people were uncomfortable

and banned this documentary.

Claiming that this would ruin India's international image.

After today's discussion too,

you may feel uncomfortable like this.

But if you are genuinely concerned about this issue,

then watch the video till the end

and the steps we will discuss as the solution,

let's be a part of the solution.

Let's start this video with a small info,

those of you who have purchased ChatGPT's course,

can now access a new free update.

New lessons of over 2 hours have been added to this course.

And in these new lessons,

not only ChatGPT,

I will teach you about software like Perplexity.

This is a free update for those who have purchased this course.

You don't need to do anything except

log in to the course and watch the lessons.

And those who haven't bought it yet,

you still have the chance

use coupon code GET41

to get 41% off.

The first 500 people can avail of this coupon code.

The link to the course is in the description.

Or you can scan this QR code.

Right now, the total content length of the course is more than 8 hours,

but you will continue to receive such free updates in future.

Let's start this video with a very simple question.

Is r@pe wrong?

You will accuse me of asking an insensitive question.

Obviously, r@pe is wrong.

But when we look at the societal attitudes around us,

then we get a completely different picture.

Everyone says that r@pe is wrong,

but everyone applies their own conditions to it.

Take Nupur Sharma, for example.

The BJP leader who

said objectionable things about Prophet Mohammad

thrice in a single day on three different TV channels.

I had made a video criticising this

in which I explained how Nupur's statements were completely deliberate and malicious.

And because of this, our country was embarrassed in front of Arab countries.

But merely because of Nupur's misstatements,

is it justified to send her r@pe threats?

Not at all.

God knows how many de@th threats and r@pe threats she received

which can't be justified in a civilised society.

Look at Audrey Truschke's case.

She is a trained historian.

She has written about Aurangzeb a lot.

She hasn't called Aurangzeb a great ruler.

But according to her findings,

Aurangzeb was a complicated character.

On one had, he broke down Hindu temples

and on the other hand, had saved them many times.

If someone finds her historical findings wrong,

they are free to argue with her,

can present evidence against her claims.

But no, what do people give?

de@th threats and r@pe threats.

Look at Indira Jaising's case.

Famous human rights lawyer.

In her fight for gender equality, she appeared in many landmark cases.

When Nirbhaya's r@pist was about to be hanged,

she made a statement against capital punishment.

For context,the de@th penalty has been abolished in 112 countries.

Still, it can be argued that Indira Jaising's statement

was ill-timed, wrongly worded,

or it was wrong of her to make such an appeal to Nirbhaya's parents.

We may disagree with her views on the de@th penalty,

but what did Kangana Ranaut say?

She called her a r@pist sympathiser.

Not only that,

she was Jaising to be jailed with the r@pists for some days.

"Keep that lady in jail with those boys for 4 days,

she wants to show them mercy.

Women like her give birth to such monsters."

this trap of political opinion or political support makes it possible

for Bilkis Bano's convicted r@pists to be released.

Such r@pists are welcomed and honoured,

are called modest Brahmins

but people don't outrage.

Prajwal Revanna,

who was reported for s€xually exploiting more than 2,500 women,

but many chose to remain silent.

Convicted r@pist Gurmeet Ram Rahim

is given parole before the elections again and again.

His blind devotees agree that r@ping is wrong

they acknowledge that their leader was convicted too,

but still, they choose to ignore this

and vote for the person their leader tells them to.

Brij Bhusan Singh,

Kuldeep Sengar,

and the Kathua case's r@pists

get rallies supporting them.

And BJP leader Choudhary Lal Singh

who was holding a rally in support of the r@pe accused,

was later included in Congress

and was given a ticket for the election.

That's why I say,

on social media, everyone agrees that r@pe is wrong.

But when it comes to supporting the r@pist,

when it comes down to their political opinion

and their own views,

then people apply 'conditions' to it.

If you do not agree with someone,

you can criticise them.

If they have done something illegal, report them to the police.

But r@pe is wrong.

Full stop.

Giving r@pe threats is wrong.

Full stop.

But the problem is that

people keep on adding ifs and buts.

And it's not just limited to sociopolitical opinion.

In fact, in numerous other provisions too,

people apply 'conditions'.

For the Hathras case, on Zee News, Sudhir Chaudhary said that

the victim had romantic relations with the accused.

To prove this, he interviewed a villager.

"According to our investigation,

the victim and the main accused, Sandeep,

knew each other for a long time."

"A love affair?"

News18's reporter Anamika kept shouting for 45 minutes on a show

that there were 104 calls from the victim to the accused's number.

They had been talking for hours.

She claimed to be delivering the truth to you.

"They have been talking for hours, for total 104 times."

"We bring the truth to the fore."

"Whatever News18 claims,

it always speaks the truth."

Arnab Goswami went as far as to say that

there was no r@pe.

And the accusations were baseless.

BJP leader and former Chief Minister of Haryana,

Manoharlal Khattar said something similar.

He claims that in 80%-90% cases,

the accused and the victim know each other.

And if they get into a fight,

the girl accuses the boy of r@pe.

We have heard similar insensitive statements

from West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee.

For example, the 2022 Nadia r@pe case.

Where a 14-year-old child was the victim.

The CM said that the girl had a love affair with the boy.

It feels awkward debunking such statements.

Do we really need to explain that

being in love

doesn't mean a license to r@pe?

It's very simple.

r@pe means a violation.

It is a violation of someone's freedom.

No matter how much a person is in love with another,

both partners need to consent.

Consent means agreement.

The girl's consent is crucial.

And the second thing is that consent is reversible.

That means, the boy or girl

can withdraw their consent whenever they want.

Everyone has the right to withdraw their consent at any time.

Thirdly, the case Mamata Banerjee was speaking about,

the victim was a minor.

And in cases of minors,

consent is not even considered.

Earlier, the consenting age was 16 years,

But under the POCSO Act of 2012,

this age was increased to 18 years.

Now, the first thing we saw people's sociopolitical opinion.

Second, love affair, being in a romantic relationship.

Third, 'if and but' condition of people is

"What was the girl doing out so late at night?"

Two minors were r@ped in Goa.

BJP leader and Goa's chief minister, Pramod Sawant asked

"Why were the girls out at night?"

When a tribal girl was r@ped and mu₹dered in Jharkhand,

then a MLA of Jharkhand Mukti Morcha said the same thing.

He blamed the victim's parents and asked them

why do they let their daughters go out after evening.

Do you know what is interesting?

One of Nirbhaya's r@pists, Mukesh Singh thought the same.

He believed that if a girl goes out at night

and wears "wrong" clothes,

then she is responsible for the r@pe.

Once again, this is utter nonsense.

r@pe doesn't happen because girls are out at night,

they happen because r@pists are out at night.

If someone thinks that their child is a potential r@pist,

then they need to keep their child locked up in their house at night.

Secondly, year after year, NCRB reports show that

in more than 90% of the cases,

the accused was someone close to the victim.

In the 2015 report, 95% of the accused knew the victim.

93% in 2017,

and 96.8% in 2021.

This includes neighbours, friends, co-workers,

immediate family members, and relatives too.

In November 2020, Delhi police

handed over a report to a Parliamentary Panel

that stated similar data.

In the cases that took place in Delhi,

in 98% of the cases, the accused was close to the victim.

In 57% of cases,

it was a family member, a relative, or family friend.

This is seen in other countries too.

In America, it was found that in 80% of cases,

the victim and accused knew each other.

So in most cases, when someone close to the victim assaults them,

then how does it matter whether a girl goes out at night or not.

The fourth condition is the victim's "loose character."

It is said that though s€xual harassment is wrong,

but it was a sign of the girl's loose character.

"Drinking and going out with guys,

girls like her do these.

Not girls from decent families.

This is what happens to such girls.

If she calmly goes with a guy and drinks with him,

any guy would think that they are asking for it.

Or else why would they go with them, drink with them?"

In the protests against r@pe, we often hear that

women are the form of goddesses.

She is someone's daughter, sister, or mother.

But another problem is that

people either see women as goddesses

or they see them as mere objects.

Why not treat them as humans instead?

Like a man, every woman is a human too.

Whether this woman is a local stage dancer

or even a s€x worker,

our Constitution gives her a right to freedom like everyone else.

But then what are the dialogues we get in films?

"Saving the dignity of a s€x worker

and imprisoning Tees Mar Khan,

are both useless."

"Saving the dignity of a s€x worker

and imprisoning Tees Mar Khan,

are both useless!"

Some people with a r@pist mentality think that

if a girl is dancing on a stage,

it's okay to harass her.

Such people point fingers are the woman's character.

While the truth is, no one can be more

characterless than people who think like this.

There is a great film on this topic,

Anaarkali of Aarah.

in which Swara Bhaskar

played the role of a local stage dancer.

A politician assaults her

so she fights back.

The film shows that every woman

has a right to her own body.

"Pink" is another sensitive film which shows that

a girl drinking alcohol does not mean that

she can be misbehaved with.

This is another excuse of the people with a r@pist mentality.

That the girl was drunk.

It's true that drinking alcohol is harmful to health.

But drinking alcohol cannot be a parameter to judge someone's character.

And it cannot be used as an excuse for s€xual assault.

Consent is required here too.

In fact, Section 63 of the BNS also states that

if the woman's consent was given while intoxicated,

it can be grounds for r@pe charges too.

The sixth condition,

the most common form of victim blaming,

that though r@pe is wrong

but the girl was wearing short clothes.

Once again, this is a vile, nonsensical argument.

If r@pes occur due to short clothes,

then why are young children r@ped?

Why are older women r@ped?

Why are mentally ill children r@ped?

Why are women covered in saree or burkhas r@ped?

Why are there r@pes in villages?

In Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh,

it is very rare to see girls in short clothes.

So why is it that most cases of r@pe in our country are from there?

Such a stupid argument,

but still, I don't know why,

many people in our society think like this.

They hold on to this thinking

that a girl is r@ped because of her short clothes.

"All the ladies,

wear short dresses

or are n@ked,

to (get) r@ped.

If you are the parents,

please control the girls."

A man made this statement in front of the Bombay High Court,

that short clothes are the causes of r@pes.

In Kozhikode Session Court, a judge said that

in a photo, the complainant

was wearing provocative clothes.

So, prima facie, the accused will not be

charged under sections for s€xual harassment.

BJP leader C.C. Patil gave similar statements

who was later caught watching p0rn in the Assembly.

BJP MLA Renukacharya and Rajkot BJP Mayor Raksha Boriya

have given similar statements too.

An NGO, Akshara Centre surveyed 8 cities.

It surveyed approx 3,000 men and 3,000 women

between the ages of 15-29.

54.8% of the men said that

wearing revealing clothes leads to r@pe and s€xual harassment happens.

But amazingly,

39.2% of females also believe this.

That means women themselves believe these lies.

A popular perception is responsible for this way of thinking

people believe that r@pe is caused by s€xual Urge.

A few days ago the film Maharaja was released.

It was a good film

but it showed this incorrect representation of r@pe.

In many old Hindi films,

r@pe is used as a shallow plot device.

Where Prem Chopra, Shakti Kapoor, and Ranjeet,

have played the roles of r@pists,

there too r@pists have been portrayed in the same way.

This old film, Jaani Dushman,

crossed all limits.

Akshay Kumar's character asks the girl to forgive her molesters.

Saying that, because she was so beautiful

even a dead man would be tempted.

"Even a dead man would be tempted if he sees someone as beautiful as you."

"And these young men are alive."

"How can they resist?"

But the truth is that

s€xual urge has nothing to do with r@pe.

So stop justifying it as the passion of youth.

It's not that those who don't r@pe don't have an urge.

And r@pists have such an urge that it becomes uncontrollable.

This is nonsense.

Many times r@pists do have a consenting partner.

They are married.

In Paul Gebhard's research

and many other surveys,

this has been proved repeatedly.

In reality, there are three reasons behind r@pe.

And r@pists are divided into three categories.

First are Power r@pists,

who are victims of self-worth issues.

Through this act, they want to feel in power.

Second are Anger r@pists.

They are angry.

They are abusive and use vile language.

And even if the victim doesn't resist,

they still become violent.

The r@pists of this category often kill their victims.

The third type are the Sadistic r@pists.

Sadism means to get pleasure in other people's physical and mental suffering.

To enjoy themselves seeing others being oppressed or being tortured.

Such r@pists often torture their victims over a long time.

But one question that will arise here is

this evil desire to gain control,

this anger, and sadism

where do these come from?

Often in discussions, it is seen that

to express their anger,

people say that the r@pists must be mentally ill.

It is wrong to compare so

because we are only stigmatising mental illness.

Some r@pists may have a history of mental illness

but not all r@pists are mentally ill.

They are simply monsters.

You can call them demons, monsters, evil or anything else.

But the next question you'll ask is

why do some people become like this?

There must be some root causes behind this.

Look at this research.

This research was done on 269 offenders

and included r@pists.

Many causes were identified.

The child abuse they faced in their childhood.

P0rn0graphy exposure before the age of 10,

physical abuse,

parental violence,

emotional abuse,

cruelty to animals,

exposure to violent movies or media in childhood,

a relationship filled with anxiety or distance from parents.

It is important to study these causes so that

we can prevent the creation of new r@pists in our society.

Now, due to such reasons,

a person's personality is shaped so

that he has an evil desire, anger or sadism and wants to dominate.

But in America, when we hear of mass shootings,

there too, anger is a common factor.

In some people, such deep-seated anger turns into depression.

So, the question arises,

in the case of r@pists,

their evil desire to dominate, their anger or their sadism,

why is it expressed as r@pe?

The answer to this is our r@pe Culture.

This phrase is used all over the world

to denote those mass media, societal attitudes, and traditions

that trivialise or normalise r@pe.

For example, in the film Kambakht Ishq,

Kareena Kapoor says

that he can't stop her from speaking.

So Akshay Kumar's character forcibly kisses her.

And this was supposed to be "comedy."

The same so-called comedy

is also seen in the film Kabir Singh,

where the lead character molests a girl holding her at a knife point.

Many famous stand-up comedians like Louis CK, George Carlin and Norm MacDonald

have been seen making jokes about r@pe.

And even in Indian stand-up comedy

there's no end of vile language.

Not only male

but even female stand-up comedians

use such vulgarity, insulting mothers and sisters,

which normalises s€xual violence.

Even in casual conversations with friends,

many people use such insults

which has now become common.

Some people do so in anger,

some only as a joke.

But doing this,

normalised r@pe culture.

This is called r@pe Normalisation.

Where you laugh at r@pe jokes,

you don't feel guilt watching r@pe videos or giving r@pe threats.

Psychologist Madhumita Pandey

talked to 122 convicted r@pists and 65 convicted mu₹derers.

She noticed a clear difference between mu₹derers and r@pists.

Most mu₹derers regretted their crimes.

They also realised how their actions destroyed other people's lives.

But on the other hand, most r@pists

had no regrets about their actions.

That's why we see this in our society

that many r@pe accused persons are repeat offenders.

Because even after they commit their first crime,

they do not see it as something wrong.

And the question here is,

why don't they regret this?

Madhumita gave them two questionnaires

and their regressive views about women was clearly seen.

But this is not the only such research,

There have been many such researches before.

Susan Brown Miller said this

in her 1975 book Against Our Will: Men, Women, and R@pe.

That r@pe is a conscious process of intimidation.

Apart from Susan, researchers like Richard Johnson, Danielle Cusmano,

Rebecca Whisnant, and many other researchers

reached the same findings.

On top of this, we come to toxic masculinity and patriarchal culture.

Where, instead of a free human, a woman is

seen as an inferior subhuman.

There are countless restrictions on women.

Don't wear this, don't go out,

don't laugh out loud.

A woman is often seen as an object.

Ranbir Kapoor's cringe-worthy ad,

"Score More With *** Blast,"

shows the same mentality

that girls are objects.

Kareena Kapoor's song,

"I'm a Tandoori Chicken,

gulp me down with alcohol."

"Impress me with only a missed call."

Badshah's song,

"I'm the one your mother must be warning you about."

They are basically glamorising assaulters.

Toxic masculinity is being stylised in movies and songs.

"They want a virgin wife,

but like to visit Bangkok frequently.

A guy surrounded by six girls is a stud.

But a girl surrounded by six guys is a sl*t."

And then these singers say that

they have female family members at home.

Their music always comes from a place of responsibility and respect.

Singer Honey Singh showed outrage about this Kolkata case.

But what does he write in his songs?

"I can't get enough of brown girls,

I'm a lion, I don't graze grass."

As long as women are being objectified like this,

as long as this r@pe culture continues,

this problem won't be solved.

And talking about solutions,

there are three types of problems here.

First, the conditions that can damage someone's personality.

Second, the societal attitude

due to which such people

take out their urge to dominate, anger or sadism on a woman.

And third, the material conditions

mismanagement of which leads to such cases.

To end this problem from our society,

we have to work on all three fronts.

And everyone has to take part in this.

First, the root causes need to be removed

so that twisted personalities can be prevented before they are formed.

The government needs to speed up women empowerment across different departments.

People need to be educated.

Education needs to be our number one priority.

We need to improve employment conditions.

s€x education should be given in schools.

Children should be taught about good touch and bad touch.

All governments need to bring improvement in the legal processes.

Second, talking about other societal attitudes,

this isn't government's responsibility only,

all of us need to work on this.

First of all, we need to eradicate these insults targeted at women.

Friends, let's make a commitment today

that you will never use these words or phrases ever again.

Neither in your daily life, nor on social media.

No matter how much you disagree with a person,

or how much you hate a person,

r@pe threats should not be made.

You should not laugh at r@pe jokes.

After this, wherever you see a s€xist attitude in the society,

whether it is an ad, a film, a song,

a YouTube video, a comment, a stand-up act,

it should be called out.

We need to raise our voices against it.

To make law and order strong,

we need to fill the vacancies in the police.

The police need to be more independent from the state government

so that in any such case,

politics can never interfere with justice.

I hope you learned something new from this video.

Share this video with your friends and family

so that we can spread awareness about this among all.

So that all of us can work together on these solutions.

The link to download the ChatGPT course is in the description below.

And if you want more discussion on this issue,

I have talked about it in detail in the video about the film Animal.

I have also discussed sadism and violence in detail.

You can click here to watch it.

Thank you very much!