Peachy, nagwala sa loob ng korte dahil sa sinabi ni Loida | Pamilya Ko (With Eng Subs)
Summary
TLDRIn the criminal case of People of the Philippines vs. Loida Magtulis, the accused stands charged with frustrated murder under Article 50 of the Revised Penal Code. The incident occurred on December 13, 2019, in Marikina City, where Loida allegedly shot Luzviminda Mabunga with a gun, intending to kill. Despite the victim's daughter's outburst in court, Loida pleads not guilty, leading to a dramatic confrontation. The court demands order, highlighting the tension and the quest for justice.
Takeaways
- π The case is a criminal trial in the Philippines with the title 'People vs. Loida Magtulis'.
- π©ββοΈ Atty. Raul Malvar is representing the accused, Loida Magtulis, while Atty. Angela Isip and Atty. Canlas are representing the prosecution.
- βοΈ The court is confirming readiness from both prosecution and defense, as well as the accused herself, before proceeding.
- πͺ Loida Magtulis is accused of committing frustrated murder, which is a serious crime under Article 50 of the Revised Penal Code.
- ποΈ The alleged crime took place on the evening of December 13, 2019, in Marikina City, Philippines.
- π« The accused is said to have been armed with a gun and attacked Luzviminda Mabunga with the intent to kill, causing physical injuries.
- π ββοΈ Loida Magtulis pleads 'not guilty' to the charges brought against her.
- π‘ There is an emotional outburst from a person named Peachy, who accuses Loida of lying and being a heartless monster, which causes a disruption in the court.
- π¨ββοΈ The judge orders silence and demands order in the court, using the gavel to emphasize the command.
- π₯ Peachy is asked to leave the court by the prosecution due to her inability to control her emotions and maintain decorum.
- πͺ Loida asserts her innocence, claiming to be the only victim in the situation, and vows to clear her name.
- ποΈ The judge warns against attempts to manipulate justice, indicating the importance of a fair trial.
Q & A
What is the case number and title?
-The case number is 64329, and the title is 'People of the Philippines vs. Loida Magtulis'.
Who is representing Loida Magtulis?
-Atty. Raul Malvar is representing Loida Magtulis.
Who are the attorneys for the prosecution?
-Atty. Angela Isip and Atty. Canlas' associate are representing the prosecution.
What crime is Loida Magtulis accused of committing?
-Loida Magtulis is accused of committing frustrated murder.
What is the legal reference for the crime Loida is accused of?
-The legal reference is Article 50 of the Revised Penal Code.
When and where did the alleged crime take place?
-The alleged crime took place on the 13th of December 2019, in the evening in Marikina City, Philippines.
What was the weapon used in the alleged crime?
-The weapon used in the alleged crime was a gun.
Who was the victim of the alleged crime?
-The victim of the alleged crime was Luzviminda Mabunga.
How does Loida Magtulis plead to the allegations?
-Loida Magtulis pleads 'Not guilty, Your Honor.'
Who is Peachy, and what is her relationship to the victim?
-Peachy is the daughter of the victim, Luzviminda Mabunga, and she is emotionally affected by the case.
What action does the judge take when the court is disrupted by outbursts?
-The judge orders silence and uses the gavel to restore order in the court.
What does Loida Magtulis claim about herself at the end of the transcript?
-Loida Magtulis claims that she is the only victim and that she will clear her name.
What is the judge's response to the prosecution's inability to control their client?
-The judge threatens to hold the prosecution in contempt if they cannot control their client and orders the family to be taken out of the court.
Outlines
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowMindmap
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowKeywords
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowHighlights
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowTranscripts
This section is available to paid users only. Please upgrade to access this part.
Upgrade NowBrowse More Related Video
Criminal vs. Civil Court Cases (using OJ Simpson).
Simulasi Persidangan Kasus Pidana KDRT-Pkn-XII IPA 2-SMAN 1 Ciawi Tasikmalaya
Lalaki, arestado dahil sa panghahalay umano sa menor de edad niyang kapitbahay | Unang Balita
MODULE 9, 2 EXEMPTING CIRCUMSTANCES PART 1
Two Colville 5th graders face murder conspiracy charges
βDi blurred na mugshot ni Quiboloy at iba pa, inilabas; PNP - Nag-blur nung una dahil sa.. | 24 Oras
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)