Monkeys Justice Story | Grandma English Stories | Stories For Kids | Stories For Children HD

Summary

In this fable, two cats argue over a piece of bread, each claiming it as their own. A passing monkey is asked to mediate the dispute. He takes the bread, attempting to divide it equally, but repeatedly eats from the larger piece to balance it. Eventually, he consumes the entire bread, leaving the cats with nothing. The moral of the story is that constant quarreling often benefits a third party.

Takeaways

• 🐒 The story features a monkey acting as a judge to resolve a dispute between two cats.
• 🐱 Two cats find a piece of bread and argue over who has the right to it.
• 🤔 The cats believe in different principles: one claims 'first pick', the other 'first choice'.
• 👨‍⚖️ The monkey agrees to mediate, attempting to divide the bread equally.
• 🍞 The monkey's method of division involves eating parts of the bread to make the portions equal.
• 🔄 The process of making the bread equal continues until there is very little left.
• 😋 The monkey consumes the bread bit by bit, under the guise of ensuring fairness.
• 🤷‍♂️ In the end, the monkey eats both remaining pieces, leaving the cats with nothing.
• 😿 The cats are left empty-handed, highlighting the consequences of their argument.
• 📚 The moral of the story is that quarreling often allows a third party to benefit.
• 🕊️ The narrative serves as a cautionary tale against unnecessary disputes.

Q & A

What did the two cats find that led to their argument?

The two cats found a piece of bread, which led to their argument.

How did the first cat claim the bread as hers?

The first cat claimed the bread as hers because she was the one who jumped and picked it up.

What was the second cat's reasoning for wanting the bread?

The second cat believed that the bread should be hers due to the concept of 'first choice.'

Who did the cats ask to resolve their dispute?

The cats asked a monkey passing by to act as a judge and settle their quarrel.

What was the monkey's initial approach to dividing the bread?

The monkey's initial approach was to divide the bread into two equal parts.

Why did the monkey eat portions of the bread?

The monkey ate portions of the bread because he claimed that the two parts were not equal in size.

What happened to the bread after the monkey's attempts to divide it?

After the monkey's attempts to divide the bread, only two small bits were left.

How did the monkey ultimately resolve the dispute between the cats?

The monkey resolved the dispute by eating the remaining two small bits of bread, leaving the cats empty-handed.

What is the moral of the story conveyed through the monkey's actions?

The moral of the story is that when two parties quarrel, a third party often gains an advantage.

What lesson can be learned from the cats' argument over the bread?

The lesson is that disputes can lead to the loss of the very thing being fought over, and it's important to resolve conflicts amicably.