Inigo Mujika - Science and Practice
Summary
TLDRThis podcast discusses a book focused on combining sports science and practical training advice on endurance training. Topics include the importance of training continuity, avoiding illness and injury, optimizing recovery, heat adaptation benefits, tapering strategies, and strength training for endurance athletes. The hosts emphasize adapting programs based on athlete response, embracing both science and 'art' in coaching, using overlapping training intensities to achieve physiological adaptation, and periodizing strength training to avoid interference with endurance goals.
Takeaways
- 😀 Continuity in training is crucial - interruptions can negatively impact performance
- 👍🏻 Elite athletes tend to get sick less often due to better training practices and genetics
- 🧠 Periodization of recovery strategies is important for maximizing adaptation
- ❄️ The usefulness of cold water immersion depends on the training phase and goals
- 🔥 Heat exposure after running could boost hematological adaptation
- 📈 Overlapping training zones can target multiple physiological adaptations
- 🤔 The importance of zone training for adaptation may be overstated sometimes
- 🏋️♀️ Strength training benefits endurance athletes via multiple mechanisms
- ⚖️ Strength training must be periodized appropriately to avoid interference
- 😊 Maximizing adaptation rather than just training load should be the goal
Q & A
What is the main idea behind producing new editions of the book on endurance training science and practice?
-The main idea is to compile the latest scientific research and evidence accumulated over the past 10 years in a practical way so that practitioners can understand the science and apply it to improve training and performance of endurance athletes.
How does continuity in training contribute to successful endurance competition outcomes?
-Research shows that performing at least 80% of the planned training program is key to having a successful endurance competition outcome. Any interruptions due to injury, illness, or other factors disrupts this continuity and is problematic.
Why might elite athletes have a lower risk of illness compared to highly trained athletes?
-Possible reasons are: 1) Better education on preventative self-care, 2) Enhanced immune function from high quality training, 3) Genetic gifts making their immune systems more resistant, and 4) Access to expert staff helping them manage various stressors.
What are some key strategies for proactive recovery that can help continuity in training?
-Key strategies include nutrition, hydration, sleep, hot/cold water therapy, compression, massage, and most importantly, periodization of recovery including strategically avoiding proactive recovery to maximize adaptation.
How does the concept of overlapping intensity zones and adaptations challenge traditional views of training physiology?
-Rather than isolated intensity zones only yielding specific adaptations, there is actually considerable overlap where training in certain zones can stimulate multiple physiological adaptations. The body and training should be viewed holistically rather than compartmentalized.
Why has strength training become more popular for endurance athletes in recent years?
-Growing research over the past 20 years clearly demonstrates strength training can boost endurance performance by improving power, efficiency, fatigue resistance, and more in both short and long duration efforts.
What are some simple recommendations for endurance athletes wanting to add strength training?
-Choose basic exercises matching movement patterns of the sport, focus on quality over quantity, periodize to coordinate with other training, and strategically time nutrition around sessions to manage interference and adaptation.
How much strength training are elite swimmers doing currently and why?
-Elite swimmers are doing extensive strength training nearly daily for power production, propulsive force, overcoming drag, core stability, body positioning, and more depending on their events.
What should be the main priority when designing a training program - maximizing training load or maximizing adaptation?
-The priority should be maximizing adaptation rather than just maximizing training load or volume. It is about optimizing the dose-response to stimulate optimal adaptations, which often requires avoiding excessive fatigue.
What is the key takeaway message when implementing sports science into practical coaching?
-There needs to be both science and 'art' - data-based programming as the foundation but also creative adjustments as an athlete. Finding the optimal balance and timing of training elements is a nuanced art.
Outlines
😀 Introducing the topic of endurance training science and disclaimer about book involvement
The hosts Lars and Ino introduce the topic of discussing the science and practice around a new edition of the endurance training book edited by Ino. Ino discloses that he is the editor and publisher of the book but the intent is to have an objective discussion about the science and recommendations that practitioners can apply.
😊 Emphasizing training continuity as key and examining factors influencing injury risk
They agree training continuity without interruptions is very important for successful competition outcomes. An S-shaped curve shows injury risk is lowered at high training volumes when athletes take proper preventive measures guided by scientific support staff. Various stressors affecting injury risk are examined.
😎 Discussing periodized recovery strategies and enhancing adaptation
The need to periodize and proactively plan recovery using science-based strategies is emphasized, not just focusing on the training stimulus. Sometimes withholding recovery aids adaptation. The goal is maximizing adaptation not necessarily maximizing training.
🤔 Balancing training plans as both science and art
Coaching endurance training is both science and art. Training plans should be adaptive frameworks not rigid programs. Uncertainties in adaptation science means getting the perfect physiological stimulus is less critical than continuity guided by evidence.
😕 Criticisms of compartmentalized training zone concepts
The common view of isolated training intensity zones stimulating specific adaptations is criticized. Overlapping intensity effects and interconnection of physiological systems is emphasized instead.
🤨 Questioning the focus on lower training zones for peripheral muscular adaptations
The idea that lower training zones stimulate peripheral muscle adaptations more than higher zones is questioned. Counter-evidence for high-intensity zones stimulating factors like sodium-potassium pumps is raised.
🤔 Examining integration of strength training for endurance athletes
The growing evidence over 20 years showing strength training benefits for endurance is examined. Considerations around periodization and interference with endurance training are raised.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡continuity
💡periodization
💡recovery
💡illness
💡strength training
💡periodize
💡adaptation
💡intensity
💡zone
💡transfer effect
Highlights
Continuity and avoiding illness are key for endurance performance.
Elite athletes often have lower illness risk due to better education, support staff, and potentially genetics.
A good training program is evolving and adapts based on the athlete's response.
Training is an art - science provides guidance but coaches still need creativity and intuition.
Strength training benefits endurance through increased power, efficiency, fatigue resistance.
Strength training strategies should match sport demands - different for runners vs. cyclists.
Swimmers utilize strength training for power, propulsion, core stability - often training twice per day.
The goal is to maximize adaptation, not necessarily maximize training.
Recovery should be periodized - sometimes no strategies are best to maximize adaptation.
Environmental heat exposure enhances subsequent exercise heat adaptation.
Post-exercise heating expands blood volume, boosting endurance adaptation signaling.
Training intensity zones overlap in their physiological adaptations.
Strength and endurance can be separated within a day to manage interference.
Simple strength exercises with good form and movement specificity are most important.
Take home message: Maximize adaptation, not necessarily maximize training.
Transcripts
hello and uh a very warm welcome to this
series of podcast focusing on if I say a
little lower here science and practice a
new edition of a book that has been led
by Eno Mika which I have with me here
today and a very warm welcome to you Ino
thank you
Lars H and um first of all we should
make a disclaimer I just made a chapter
for this book I enjoyed reading some of
the other chapters and therefore I
thought it could be interesting to
invite you in nro who has so to say
edited all of the the book and uh who
will at least have your your cost of
producing the book covered by this it's
not a big industry but at least we
should maybe make the disclaimer that
all of the uh the advertising for this
book of course you have a small uh
interest in it but uh otherwise we're
here to discuss the science behind and
and some of the challenges that there
are from you could say translating
science what is the level of evidence
for a given practice uh procedure into
practice well yes uh that disclaimer is
important I'm the editor of the book but
I'm also the publisher of the book yeah
um but the whole idea behind this book
uh from the very first edition 11 years
ago that was that uh I thought it was
necessary to to put together a a book
that compiled all the science that we
had accumulated over the past 10
years um in a practical way so that
practitioners could understand the
science and try to apply and implement
the science in their daily practice uh
the reason for the first edition was
that the previous uh good endurance
training scientific book was already 10
years old it was part of the
international Olympic committees uh
Sports Medicine encyclopedia and I
thought well it's been already 10 years
I think we need a new book uh on this
topic that's why I produced the first
edition of endurance training science
and practice and it has been another
decade since uh I I published the first
edition so I thought it was time
uh to publish a new edition because I
consider that within 10 years as Sports
scientists can accumulate sufficient um
evidence base to uh change our
understanding and add sufficiently to
the scientific literature on the one
hand and to the recommendations that we
can give to practitioners on the other
hand yeah so that's that's the main
reason why we put together this uh
Second Edition that came out a couple
months ago yes and of course the book
has 33 chapters and covers all aspects
from recovery to uh uh risk of illness
to different kinds of training practices
and so on and of course we will have to
refer the reader to subsequent talks
maybe I already arranged the talk with
Steven Siler and I also took the his
hierarchy of training needs to say okay
we we sought to say agree that there's a
kind of a base the the major of training
you need to have a certain kind of
volume intensity and you need to include
different kind of training and we will
specifically touch upon strength
training as also a part of maybe the
base for for endurance performances also
even though that's in the more intense
area and you can always discuss but it
fits with my and I added my notes here
over in in red that that the base of of
becoming better as an endurance athlete
is continuity I mean you can train
excellently for a long period of of
years if you're sick the last month
before of the Olympics you will so to
say waste all of your uh uh your effort
on the continues and of course illnesses
Every Man's uh you can suffer from that
from from various reasons but I mean you
can also become injured and so on so
that is of course kind of the base uh
for this country
and then I also like this idea of
introducing okay what is well
established and where is it that we uh
so to say where the the training
practice also is so to say something
where you it's not that well established
but you have certain experiences with
it and I added that I think it's quite
well established and maybe some that has
been done over the last uh 10 years that
some of the for example giving the
environmental aspects that they have now
become well established at least if you
want to perform in the heat it is
evident that that heat adaptation is
important but I also think we have
accumulated evidence since the last book
that that it actually also has a
transfer effect and likewise with the
tapering that you have leted some of the
experiments in I mean it's well
established of course you have to have
it on top if if you don't have a base if
you don't have a volume to taper from
then then then there's no need for the
tapering m I totally agree with you uh
Lars particularly on the topic of
continuity uh I think it's key uh in
Endurance Sports because you mentioned
the fact that you might get ill in the
final month before the main competition
but also if you get continuous
interruptions in your training process
that is going to be a a big big problem
there is now sufficient evidence uh
indicating that the
main uh the main thing leading to a
successful endurance competition is
being able to perform at least 80% of
the of the training process as initially
planned by the coaches if you manage to
fulfill 80% of the of the training
program you are very likely to have a
successful outcome in your in your
competition yeah so any interruption in
the training process is going to be
problematic and I I remember one of the
uh one of the athletes that I coached
one of the triathletes that I coached to
uh four Olympic Games she used to tell
me that uh the thing that gave her most
confidence was
knowing that she had done everything
that was written in the training program
she said I don't need a psychologist I
don't need anything else if I know I
have done everything that is written in
the training program that is my biggest
um
contributor to being confident in
competition and that comes with this
idea of continuity and fulfilling and
being able to perform the entire program
properly no but also sometimes you can
have the idea I need to optimize all
parameters and so on and I mean if at
the end of the day your backpack is
getting too fill and that will will stay
to say that you overdo it so of course
that is one of the balances that we also
have to how do we actually do that and
that is of course a manage from
everything from you could say organizing
the training so it is feasible to have
the high intensity the kind of volume
and all that you need but also to
integrate the other types of stress uh
that the athlete will be be exposed to
and maybe we should actually uh start
with the last figure here uh because in
the in this discussion of having a
continuity I mean I think that these two
key figures from the book uh may be
showing two of the most importance that
I mean you have a training session and
if you need to be ready for the
subsequent training uh session you both
have to optimize your
recovery all the aspects from nutrition
hydration sleep that is on the bottom to
other you could say more applied uh so
on but of course you also need to avoid
uh
illness um and in in that chapter in in
chapter 18 where this figure is from
there's actually also this uh this
classical U or j-shaped where you can
have okay if you have low activity
moderate and then if you have high
intensity but then I like the figure
that in the elite maybe there is
actually a lowering again and and then
you could discuss is that the natural
selection or is it that because I mean
training hard is not a matter of
exhausting and also maybe uh making
yourself vulnerable to illness that the
elite has a lower
risk or is that just because what
characterized the very very top uh Elite
is that they don't get ill as easily is
that because they have a a better um
coping and a better balance between the
stress because the exercise is a stress
can it also make you more vulnerable and
you chose this figure up
here because I mean it it's it's so to
say tried to integrate that it's the
it's the total stress that an athlete is
exposed
to well this this is uh this is one of
the ideas that has been an evolution
over the past 10 years initially we
thought that the the risk of illness
um had a a u
shape with uh with the intensity of your
training program program so uh if you
don't do anything you have more risk of
illness if you train moderately then you
have a a lower risk of illness but then
if you train a lot like Elite athletes
do then your risk of illness is
increased so it would be a use shape but
over the past years we have learned that
it's more likely to have um what the
authors of the chapter of chapter 18
call an S shape meaning that
at the very top Beyond highly trained
and going into Elite there might be a
drop in the risk of illness and they
attribute that drop to um one the fact
that Elite athletes train more
consciously and they take care of
themselves very very well because they
are more educated and they are
surrounded by better staff that educate
them into taking care of of themselves
and taking all the preventive measures
to avoid illness secondly there is
probably because of the quality of
training there is probably uh some kind
of um enhancement of their immune system
so that they develop some resistance to
illness and thirdly there is the
possibility that they might be
genetically
uh gifted and more system to to uh
falling ill but the the reason why I
chose this particular graph is because
it shows very well it summarizes very
well the different
stressors that might affect the injury
risk and one of the reasons that I just
mentioned and that the authors mention
in the chapter why Elite athletes might
have a lower risk of illness is because
they are very well educated
regarding uh how to take care of
themselves when they have to face
extreme
environments latly they are very well
educated on the importance of sleep
quite often they are uh supported by uh
psychology professionals and they can
face the psychological stressors they
are way well educated in general and
they have the support of good
nutritionists so they know how they
should eat they know what supplements
they need they know what probiotics they
should be taking whenever they have to
face international travel they have
recommendations from the sport Science
staff about how to deal with that jet
lag and travel fatigue Etc and uh the
endurance exercise that they perform is
usually well planned and that's another
point that I wanted to make regarding
the continuity idea of course if you do
everything that is written in the
training program we we start from the
from the concept that the program is
well designed and and that whoever has
designed the program knows very well
what he or she is doing that's the only
way that we can make sure that you do
everything that's in the program uh the
outcome is going to be good it has to be
a good program of course but all these
factors uh we have learned a lot about
extreme environment sleep psychological
support of athletes nutrition
international travel uh etc etc and that
is another factor that contributes to
that continuity by helping Elite
athletes avoid illness we we have a
saying that you don't become a world
champion by doing the influenza interval
which is so to say the the the
additional interval that actually make
you overdo it but also make you have a
large open window afterwards but of
course it's a balance because on the
other hand you don't want to skip a
given interval so I guess that's where
you as you said many athletes they tend
to say okay I have to follow the program
and and if the program says you have to
do five times five minutes uh maximal
efforts or something whereas it could be
finding the balance of what is
appropriate and of course that is both
in terms of of uh of reducing the the
illness risk but of course also in
having the continuity in terms of just
you could say just recovery from one
training session to the
next that's why the program is not
written in stone the program has to be
evolving
changing and although you might have a
general idea of where you want to go as
a coach or as a practitioner you have a
general idea of how you want to do it
and where you want to go uh you need to
adapt it progressively as the training
process goes
and when I when I worked as a coach of
elite triathletes I hardly ever gave
them more than one week at a time of
course I had my general program the
overall plan for the entire season
but the the the plan for week to week
training was actually designed week to
week if everything had gone according to
the program then I could continue as
planned but of course I needed to make
changes as we went along that's what I
meant by saying that the program should
not be written in stone and if one day
instead of eight repetitions you need to
do six well then do six and if one day
instead of doing eight you need to do 10
well then maybe you need to do 10 but
you need to modify the program as you go
yeah uh and and ensure that continuity
by avoiding illness and I think besides
all those measures that we have just
mentioned the the graph at the bottom is
very important the U the use of
proactive recovery because for many
years all training and all adaptation
process has been centered around the
exercise part of the training process
and I always say that I don't consider
training as the time you are training I
consider it a cycle in which you need to
take into consideration the time you are
training and also the time you are
recovering from that training and for
many many years we have focused on the
part of the exercise but we have
forgotten about the part of the recovery
and over the past 15 to 20 years there
has been a lot of emphasis on learning
how to implement adequate recovery to
make sure that the entire circle is well
covered the entire cycle not just the
exercise part but also the recovery part
and I think the uh the chapter on
recovery in the new edition of the book
is is really good and I love this figure
uh figure 72
because it it shows most of the recovery
strategies that are used on a day-to-day
basis by Elite level athletes but it
shows is within a within a graph of cost
to benefit
ratio because some some strategies might
be useful but they are
so uh expensive sometimes or so
difficult to access that they are of
very little use to the majority of
athletes you could also argue here that
that the the things in the green to the
far right nutrition hydration sleep and
you have adequate oparation of of
recovery sometimes you might train uh
before you're fully recovered but you
should allow that on at least a longer
basis that they are the base and I mean
you can have some of the top I mean
having hot bath and so on uh but if you
if if the base is not there if you don't
sleep and you don't hydrate and so on
then the other thing is uh I mean you
will lose uh many of these things what
one of the things that I would like to
challenge on that one is the cold water
immersion I mean that was introduced in
sort to say to reduce inflammation
following training and you could also
say maybe in some of running and some
that has a high exentric uh component
maybe you can reduce it but on the other
hand there's also some that it can
confine
adaptation I thought there was a recent
meta analysis where it showed that I
mean it was almost every study showed
that there was a lower outcome when you
use post uh strength training cold water
in in submersion not in endurance uh
sport no no no but it might it might it
might uh hinder uh hypertrophic uh
adaptation it might hinder strength
training adaptation but uh the latest
Research indicates that when you are uh
in a phase of intensive training for
endurance actually those who did cold
water immersion got a better outcome of
a of a training camp in this case it was
uh Elite cyclists but that's why you
need to put this in in relation with
that most beneficial and less least
costly uh recovery strategy which is
periodization of recovery it doesn't
cost anything to periodize
recovery and it provides a lot of
benefit and sometimes sometimes what
this means is that you are not supposed
to use any recovery strategies so when
you are in a phase when adaptation is
not is the most important not
performance not competition outcome when
adaptation is the most important the
best recovery strategy you might use is
not to use any proactive recovery
strategy because the main goal is to
maximize adaptation no no that's Al
always important to have in mind is it
performance or adaptation which is
important here ex was just to say that
some Sometimes
some a factor can have a positive effect
on one but then it can offset other
things one of that's why you need to
periodize it are you in a phase when you
want to emphasize a strength well you
can take out a cold water immersion and
maybe you can use something else you can
use compression garments if you want to
help the athlete but at some point you
might you might want to not use
anything and and let the athlete adapt
following the stress of training without
any help yeah but it's also started to
use I mean either if you're a runner to
use post exercise actually Heating in
order to boost the the the hematological
adaptation I think there's some recent
evidence that uh that for runners they
use it as passive in cyclist use it as
active they can do it while they're
training but the whole idea is actually
to heat up the body in order to say have
the Vaso dilation have an increased
vascular space which may be a signaling
then for uh for further
irres I mean training in itself seems to
stimulate it because I mean we see blood
volumes are higher in trained athletes
but the idea that you can prolong the
period where you have an increased
vascular space might actually also have
have some signaling uh effects that can
can have you boost the blood volume and
then if you use the cold water then you
could reverse that so maybe you should
have to have them in in so to say
variation therapy I
mean I I I can follow the idea that
let's say that you are running and you
want to reduce the inflammation okay use
this in a period but then maybe you
should reverse it to have it increased
afterward perhaps well that's in this
graph we also have hot water immersion
and we also have contrast water therapy
as pure recovery strategies whereas what
you are mentioning would be more in the
sense of uh adaptation enhancement and
and inducing inducing additional benefit
from from training and that is a section
that is covered in your chapter in
particular the one about uh training and
competing in the heat but it also
sometimes shows how complex it can be
and how it how important it is to
actually be specific and be very aware
of what you have to
do I would like to me another thing
because I think that this as you said
that you are actually aware of the
Holistics of it you're aware of all of
the stressors up in the upper part
you're aware of the differences and say
okay don't be overdoing it and so on is
is where the the science meets the
practice because you would have a lot of
scientists and I also still see it in
some of the scientists go out and become
coaches I don't want to mention any
cycling teams but where they they still
think that okay if a training session
says five hours then if it's only four
and a half because it starts raining or
here in Denmark I mean snowing in the
winter and so on and you do that to
avoid illness and then instead you put
on a half an hour on another day or you
say okay maybe on the big picture
because I need to have the continuity I
do this I mean I see some of these uh
because they say oh the program says 5
hours it has to be 5.0 hours and I mean
they so to say they they lose themsel in
a little detail that so to say actually
compromise the overall yeah we are not
we are not so smart we don't we we don't
know
the science of adaptation so
precisely uh to the point that uh 10
minutes here uh are going to make a
difference one repetition there is going
to make a difference I always say that
training and coaching is always going to
be an art yeah but you have more
possibilities of getting it right uh the
more science you implement in your
program the more your program is uh
based on on sound scientific evidence in
that case you have more possibilities of
of getting it right but you still have
to be an artist and good coaches are
artists in the same way that good
doctors are artists and good Architects
are artists and and uh any professional
who is excellent in their own job they
have this component of being more
creative than the rest and and being
more uh yeah having having better ideas
than the rest and maybe that could
naturally take us to this because I have
a little tight with these zones training
zones because I mean the body doesn't
know zones at least some of the zones
are quite well defined and I will have a
talk with Stephen and I think his
chapter is really good it for the first
time it convinced me of the of the need
of some of the zones but as you said
okay what if you let's say the
Discrimination between Zone one and zone
two is it arbitrary and likewise zone
four and five and would the body know
okay I go 89% I mean sometimes some of
these zones could have a very narrow
indication to an athlete that it's very
important that your heart rate is 94% of
Maximum instead of 92 and again within
what we know is biological variation and
would the body know how to respond to
this and even we don't know what is it
that actually stimulate Ecentric
hypertrophy of the heart is that to have
a specific high heart rate or is it just
to in the in some of the zones but I
still think that his chapter is elegant
and also this figure that you you chose
here because it both includes the
aerobic and also you could say uh the
anerobic Energy System the strength
training part and and specifically we
will focus on some of the transfer
effects from strength
training uh to to some of those um but
of course also as indicated to the right
there's a lot of overlap between uh the
zones and and you can um you can train
in even if you do training in at a lower
intensity it can still stimulate your VI
to Max I mean you don't need to have a
peak heart rate in order to be able to
perform so even if you are 1500 meter
Runner where you can say Peak aerobic
power is extremely important you can
still get training
benefits uh and and stimulate your your
vascular cardiovascular fitness by doing
lower intensity training and that is of
course why it's important to spread over
all of these Zone and mixing it
up exactly and and that that's that's
the reason why I chose this particular
figure Lars because of the idea of
overlapping between uh intensity SS on
the one hand and physiological
adaptations on on the other the way um
Sports physiology and also training
science has been taught over over the
years
uh sometimes leads to the to the
misunderstanding and the idea that if
you want to do the if you want to
achieve this you need to do that if you
want to achieve this you need to do that
um and and it's like in isolation they
they don't see the the athletes organism
as a as a whole and this figure I love
it because it shows that you can work on
the cardiovascular adaptations from Zone
one to zone six or even zone seven and
you can work on your peripheral muscular
adaptations between Zone one and zone
six and you can work on on buffering
capacity from Zone 3 4 to Zone 8 so you
there is no um there is no isolated
space in physiology there is no isolated
space in training you can achieve
several adaptations with the same
Training Method or the same training
Zone if you prefer and you can use the
same Zone to hit different physiological
targets so the same Zone might help you
develop several physiological
adaptations and the same adaptation can
be achieved by training in different
zones and that overlapping idea I think
it's something that is very important
for practitioners to understand instead
of
this
compartmentalized uh concept that we
often hear in um in in the in the
teaching of physiology and and also in
the in the teaching of U training
courses and and coaching courses one
thing that I would like to hear your
opinion about and I think that I will
challenge Steven not because I mean it's
his figure at least that figure has has
rejoined from the Norwegian Olympic educ
is this purial muscle adaptation which
indicate that it's the lower zones which
are more stimulating that the fire I see
that for a lot of parameters at least
per minute done you could argue that
okay because you can do a much more
higher volume in the lower zones when
you do so but I I would say that and and
also for the strength training that some
of the the muscular adaptations that you
can get from this very high intense
types of training in terms of let's say
sodium potassium pumps uh but maybe also
for calization and so on they are much
more potent in the higher zone so I
think that it's a little misleading with
this that that they should be more
stimulated by the lower intensity or how
do you see that yeah well even even the
graph can be criticized and and and and
the and the size of the of the diamonds
whether it should be wider here or
thinner there but you know in that that
the sodium pottassium pumps maybe maybe
you can include them in the uh in the
section of power and efficiency muscular
adaptations in the uh one two three four
in the fifth column there so you know
again
criticized it can be criticized but the
idea or the concept of it's in the title
you know overlapping of training
intensity effects on specific endurance
adaptations the idea of overlapping is
something that I that I really like from
this graph and that's mainly the reason
why I chose it no no and you can always
also discuss whether Zone a is should be
on I mean for the the anerobic it's a
matter of also of the time that you
spend there and I if you have uh when
you indicate that zone five is harder
than zone four I mean it's a matter of
how much time you you spend in in the
zone but let's and even even Lars um the
uh the squares that you added to the
left of the figure of aerobic and
anerobic that also can be criticized you
know that that could be over that was
more to explain that that that is how
they are defined that they an because of
course it starts earlier it already
starts when you surpass your your first
lactate threshold yeah and somebody
could somebody could misunderstand this
if if they don't get this idea of
overlapping physiological systems and
overlapping training zones they could
say oh it's it's only aerobic until Z5
and then it becomes anerobic after Z6 no
no no concept of overlapping applies to
everything so yeah yeah and it's also I
also have it a little bit tight with
this of colag IT anerobic training
because I mean it's specifically that of
course that you stimulate some of the
anerobic systems and uh energy provision
and so on but yeah but that's what I
like with with Steven's chapter I think
he explains it nicely and why where is
it there is a sharp kind of definition
but also even discriminating I see
lactate threshold to I mean it's a
difficult task to establish it and of
course that is also why you go back and
I always also think that Stephen would
say oh it's better that you don't I mean
can you have it very sharp and if you do
that and you use it as training
prescription to say okay you should be
specifically at this target then you
might have a chance of people being over
the Target and that they therefore would
so to say overload the system if they
did
so uh but you also chose this one to
focus and and maybe also because that is
something that has developed more and
more that strength training is not
longer only considerate for of of course
many endurance performances will be
determined at the End by an in spert or
the ability to do very intense I mean
cycling for example uh can be decided uh
in in in the Sprint up a hill uh where
the the most powerful but not even for
that but also you could say for Pure
endurance athletes marathon runners
where it's more of a continuous effort
strength training has become C of of the
base of it exactly that's that's why I
chose it Lars because um until about
yeah it's already been about 20 years I
would say um there was no scientific
evidence to to actually say well highly
trained athletes if they do strength
training they will get a benefit but
over the past 20 years and this was
already in the previous edition of the
book but I think it has become so
popular and so so important for
endurance athletes to um to understand
the potential benefits of strength
training that I decided to to uh select
this particular uh figure from from the
from chapter six um I think in the past
years we have learned a lot about the
potential benefits of uh strength
training not only in the gym also uh on
the field we can we can train our
strength
uh for endurance athletes without
necessarily getting in the gym there is
even recent evidence showing that simply
doing
jumps and and hooping can provide a lot
of benefits for for endurance athletes
so I like this graph because it very
nicely
summarizes um the potential mechanisms
by which strength training can benefit
endurance athletes for both as we can
see in the middle uh Square short
endurance short duration endurance which
arbitrarily was considered from 1 minute
to 15 minutes and also for long duration
endurance arbitrarily again from 15
minutes to several hours of of effort
and one of the examples that you
mentioned finishing with a Sprint is
shown below the short duration endurance
performance if you are strong stronger
and you can produce more um more force
or more power and you improve your rate
of force
development it's obvious that your
sprinting ability at the end of a
mustard uh event yeah is going to be
improved and therefore you might win not
because you are more endurant but
because you you can Sprint better than
your Rivals and end up uh winning the
race and then
uh there might be an effect also in
reduced fatigability and that's one
topic that uh in the past few years has
become very very popular the idea of
durability or fatigue
resistance and that is something that
can be achieved in part through uh
strength training for endurance athletes
so I think this is a very important
graph uh in chapter six of the book
designed by um per a
and uh TR
rest but I think that also at least one
of the things that I have when I do
coaching and planning is of course that
strength training I mean it has to be
something that you can include in your
training without compromising all of the
other elements so I mean if it is so
that because you're are doing strength
training uh you will not be able to have
the intensity in other parts you will be
sore and so on so of course
it's typically something that you used
in periodization so you have it more
still more in your program and so but I
mean I guess you should also think of it
as having it at least as something where
you maintain it also in the season uh
but I mean if it's let's say you are an
a tun Rider I mean it's very difficult
to maintain it in the periods where you
also have to have a weekly training
volume of 30 hours you do stage race es
and so on I mean of course you might
have to compromise the the keeping of it
and again it takes back to this having
this holistic part of it so I think uh
yeah and a periodize approach you need a
periodize approach to to your strength
training and and that's another part
where we have learned a lot in the past
few years on the uh on the interference
between strength and endurance training
so sometimes you might need to avoid
that strength training some other times
you might keep it but you we have
learned how to
separate uh within a day how to separate
the strength training from the endurance
training what to do first depending on
what you are trying to achieve uh what
nutritional uh strategies we might use
so that strength training might have a
lesser impact on your key endurance
training session etc etc so I think we
have learned a lot yeah and of course
will also be very highly specific let's
say that you are engaged in in rowing
where the weight doesn't mean anything
or you're skier and and you would like
to build up mus muscle mass you would
have one strategy whereas if you're a
runner and you just want to use the
strength training to improve your rate
of force development low of Che ability
but you do not want to have an increase
in muscle mass because any kilo you have
to move uh will will of course cost you
extra so so that will of course have to
have very different strategies if
depending on on the target of that and I
think that that both are possible I mean
you can gain weight with a with an a
sufficient nutrition and you can also
avoid it if you just do enough training
it's important for practitioners to
understand that uh strength training for
endurance athletes can be very very
simple I I usually say you don't have to
be the uh the smartest person in the gym
or the person doing the most original
exercises Etc it can be very very simple
you can do four four or five
exercises that
are they have to be well done yeah the
most important is actually to to choose
the right uh exercise I I mean for
movement specificity so if you are
Runner you should really think of okay
how do I actually stimulate the the
muscles of particular relevance if
you're cyclist I mean if you do knee
extension where versus leg extension the
transfer effect will probably be l from
the leg extension so that you
choose exercises that resembles the the
movement pattern or at least that
there's a big transfer effect yeah and
and a few years ago Ben ronad and myself
we wrote a paper a review paper uh
making recommendations for strength
training and separating the
recommendations for cyclists on the one
hand and the recommendations for runners
on the other hand yeah yeah yeah and
then of course it will be a continuous
if you do if let's say that you how
about you have worked a lot of with
swimmers I mean I guess that that could
also be of particular importance also of
course because it's it's down in the
domain where you will have a large
anerobic contribution in most of the
disciplines but also because with the
upper body it might be even more
important to have strength training how
much strength trainings do swimmers do
they are doing a lot at the moment uh
for for all kinds of reasons you you you
can focus on on power production for the
explosive parts of swimming which are
the starts and the turns uh you can do
other type of strength training for the
propulsive forces and to overcome the
resistance from uh from the water and
also you can do other type of strength
training uh simply for stability reasons
for body positioning in the water a lot
of core strength Etc so they at the
moment they are doing a lot of as a
general rule
the 50 me the sprinters of course they
are they are they are Sprint athletes so
they will do a lot but also for those
who do the let's say 1500 meters or the
Open Water swimmers they also do a lot
of strength train in the group I mostly
work with uh in the uh lead up to Tokyo
we were doing a strength
training every single day and sometimes
twice a day it might maybe it was uh
more power oriented in the in the
morning and then it would be more core
stability oriented in the
but we were doing a lot of a strength
training yeah yeah swiers
also new a very high volume in total
training oh yeah six six and a half
hours a day of training but then we when
we were where you could say okay I do
strength training on top of a large
volume and I mean how how much can you
tolerate and still uh recover from it
and I mean you know Elite athletes can
tolerate a lot of TR yeah they can
training otherwise they wouldn't be
elite athletes but sometime it is also a
matter of allowing your body to recover
and you could say okay if I need I mean
sometimes you can do the training but
it's also a matter if you are capable of
responding to it so let's say that you
do strength training too much or if you
don't allow to maybe in a period lower
some of the other types of training in
order to be able to respond to the
strength training so I mean I think
that's also something where uh that the
the the
clever practice in here can can can find
the balance to say okay not overdoing it
because a lot of practitioners might
think that the more training you do the
better but the idea is not to maximize
training the idea is to maximize
adaptation so if you can maximize
adaptation with five hours instead of
seven why do seven you will not recover
and you will not maximize the the the if
you can maximize with less go for Less I
think that should be the concluding uh
remark here because I think that would
be an excellent uh take-home
message uh yeah but there could be a lot
of more discussion and hopefully there
will follow more talks other chapters
and maybe we will will return on other
specific points in the book but um yeah
I enjoyed the talk very much inro so
thanks for that and of course thanks for
leading the book thank you for the
opportunity Lars
Browse More Related Video
How Many Sets YOU Should Do For MAXIMUM Muscle Growth (ft. Dr Mike Israetel)
Maximise Your Strength Gains For Grappling
Core Stability Training: Are You Wasting Your Time? | Sebastian Sitko interview
How Fit Can You Get If You Only Trained In Zone 2
Pro Athlete Trainer Critiques Jake Gyllenhaal’s “Road House” Workout
Why You Should Train Like A Hybrid Athlete (Running + Weight Lifting)
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)