Introduction to Ethics
Summary
TLDRThis lecture provides an introduction to ethics, exploring its origins in ancient Greece and key concepts such as moral realism versus subjectivism, Hume's is-ought problem, and the distinction between teleological and deontological ethical theories. The lecture also questions whether ethics can truly transform individuals into virtuous beings, citing perspectives from philosophers like Immanuel Kant, Arthur Schopenhauer, and Richard Taylor. Ultimately, it emphasizes the practical aim of ethics in determining how one ought to live and the importance of pursuing meaningful goals in life.
Takeaways
- 📚 Ethics is a philosophical discipline originating from ancient Greece with Socrates and the sophists as early moral philosophers.
- 🔍 Ethics is defined as the study of what is good and bad to pursue in life and what is right and wrong to do, focusing on practical guidance for conduct.
- 🏷️ Morality is described as standards of right and wise conduct, determined by reason rather than custom, distinguishing it from descriptive disciplines like anthropology.
- 🤔 Key questions in ethics include understanding what makes actions moral or immoral and why one should act according to ethical theories.
- 🌐 Meta-ethics deals with the nature of ethical statements and whether morality is objective, questioning if moral judgments can be true or false independently of personal opinions.
- 🙅♂️ Moral subjectivism posits that moral judgments are personal opinions with no objective truth value, in contrast to moral realism which asserts the existence of objective moral truths.
- 🔍 The 'is-ought' problem, or Hume's law, questions whether one can derive normative statements ('ought to be') from descriptive statements ('is') about the world.
- 🌐 Theological (consequentialist) and deontological ethical theories differ in their basis for evaluating actions as moral or immoral, with the former focusing on consequences and the latter on inherent duties.
- 🌟 Theological theories include egoism, utilitarianism, and hedonism, which identify happiness, pleasure, or general welfare as the ultimate end of life.
- 📜 Deontological theories emphasize the authority of moral duties, independent of consequences, often linked to divine law or other forms of moral authority.
- 🤷♂️ Debates exist on the effectiveness of ethics in transforming individuals into virtuous beings, with some philosophers skeptical of its practical impact on behavior.
Q & A
What is the origin of ethics as a philosophical discipline?
-Ethics originated in ancient Greece over 2,000 years ago, with Socrates and the sophists from ancient Athens being considered the first moral philosophers in Western civilization.
How is ethics defined in the context of the script?
-Ethics is defined as the study of what are good and bad ends to pursue in life and what it is right and wrong to do in the conduct of life, making it a practical discipline aimed at determining how one ought to live and what actions one ought to take.
What is the distinction between morality and ethics?
-Morality is defined in the script as standards of right and wise conduct, the authority of which is determined by reason rather than custom. Ethics, on the other hand, is the discipline that studies these standards and seeks to understand and prescribe how one should act.
What is the normative realm in ethics?
-The normative realm in ethics refers to the aspect of the discipline that is concerned with prescribing how one should act, as opposed to the descriptive realm, which observes, describes, and explains actions without prescribing them.
What are some of the key questions in the history of ethics?
-Key questions in the history of ethics include what makes actions moral or immoral, what is good or bad, right or wrong, and why one should behave in accordance with an ethical theory or do what morality prescribes.
What is meta-ethics and why is it significant?
-Meta-ethics is a branch of ethics that deals with the nature of ethical statements and the act of prescribing how one should act. It is significant because it addresses whether morality is objective and whether moral judgments can be true or false in an objective sense.
What is moral subjectivism and how does it differ from moral realism?
-Moral subjectivism is the position that moral judgments are expressions of preference or personal opinion, with no objective truth value. Moral realism, in contrast, holds that moral judgments can be true or false based on objective features of the world.
What is Hume's law and its significance in ethics?
-Hume's law, as discussed in the script, concerns whether one can derive a statement of what ought to be the case from what is the case. It suggests that it is not logically possible to derive normative statements (what ought to be) from descriptive statements (what is) about the world.
What is the difference between theological and deontological ethical theories?
-Theological ethical theories, such as consequentialism, utilitarianism, and egoism, evaluate the morality of an act based on its consequences. Deontological theories, on the other hand, believe that the morality of an action is grounded by an authority independent of the consequences, such as duty or moral law.
What are some examples of theological ethical theories mentioned in the script?
-Examples of theological ethical theories mentioned in the script include egoism, which identifies happiness or pleasure as the ultimate end; utilitarianism, which identifies the general good or welfare of humankind as the ultimate end; and Aristotelian ethics, which focuses on eudaimonia or well-being.
How do deontological theories differ from theological theories in terms of evaluating morality?
-Deontological theories evaluate the morality of an action based on whether it adheres to a set of duties or moral laws, regardless of the consequences. Theological theories focus on the consequences of actions and their tendency to produce certain outcomes, such as pleasure, happiness, or general welfare.
What is the debate on the effectiveness of ethics in transforming individuals into virtuous beings?
-The debate centers on whether ethics as a philosophical discipline can effectively guide individuals to live virtuous lives. Some philosophers, like Arthur Schopenhauer, are skeptical, arguing that virtue cannot be taught. Others, like Richard Taylor, see ethics as a means to pursue a deliberate and thoughtful life, aiming for worthwhile goals.
Outlines
📚 Introduction to Ethics and Moral Philosophy
This paragraph introduces the concept of ethics as a philosophical discipline, emphasizing its practical nature and focus on determining how one should live and act. It begins with a quote from Albert Camus, suggesting the importance of ethics in human society. The paragraph discusses the origins of ethics in ancient Greece with Socrates and the Sophists, and defines ethics more precisely through John Day's definition, which focuses on the study of good and bad ends in life and right and wrong actions. It also distinguishes between morality and ethics, with morality being the standards of conduct determined by reason. The paragraph further explores the normative nature of ethics versus the descriptive nature of other disciplines like anthropology. It concludes by touching on the central questions of ethics, including the objectivity of morality and the 'is-ought' problem introduced by David Hume.
🤔 The 'Is-Ought' Problem and Theological vs. Deontological Ethics
This paragraph delves into the 'is-ought' problem, a philosophical dilemma concerning the derivation of normative statements from descriptive ones, as highlighted by David Hume. It explains that Hume argued one cannot logically derive 'ought' statements from 'is' statements, using the example of wealth disparity to illustrate the point. The paragraph then contrasts two major types of ethical theories: theological (or consequentialist) and deontological. Theological theories, such as egoism, utilitarianism, and hedonism, judge the morality of actions based on their consequences and the resulting pleasure or happiness. Deontological theories, on the other hand, assert that the morality of an action is not dependent on its consequences but on adherence to certain duties or rules. The paragraph also mentions that while deontological theories often invoke a divine authority, not all do so, reflecting a broader philosophical consideration of ethics.
🔮 The Effectiveness of Ethics in Shaping Human Behavior
The final paragraph questions the practical effectiveness of ethics in transforming individuals into virtuous beings. It cites the skepticism of philosophers like Emmanuel Kant and Arthur Schopenhauer, who doubt that ethical theories can significantly influence actions. Kant acknowledges the gap between ethical speculation and practical application, while Schopenhauer is more cynical, suggesting that virtue, like genius, cannot be taught. However, the paragraph concludes with a hopeful note from Richard Taylor, who views ethics as a means to pursue a life of meaningful goals, contrasting a wasted life with one lived deliberately and thoughtfully. Taylor emphasizes the importance of the question of what is good, suggesting that ethics can guide us towards a life worth living.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Ethics
💡Moral philosophers
💡Morality
💡Meta-ethics
💡Moral subjectivism
💡Moral realism
💡Is-ought problem
💡Consequentialism
💡Deontological ethics
💡Theological ethics
💡Ethical effectiveness
Highlights
Albert Camus' assertion that a man without ethics is akin to a wild beast.
Introduction to ethics, exploring the discipline's subject matter and key questions.
Definition of ethics as a study of life's good and bad ends and right and wrong actions.
Ethics as a practical discipline aimed at determining how one ought to live.
Differentiation between ethics as normative and anthropology as descriptive.
Prominence of questions on what makes actions moral and why one should follow ethical theories.
Meta-ethics as the branch of ethics dealing with the nature of ethical statements.
The debate on the objectivity of morality and the truth value of moral judgments.
Moral subjectivism positing moral judgments as expressions of preference or opinion.
Moral realism arguing for the objectivity of moral judgments based on the world's features.
Hume's Law and the 'is-ought' problem regarding deriving 'ought' from 'is'.
Theological ethical theories focusing on the consequences of actions for moral evaluation.
Deontological theories emphasizing morality grounded by authority independent of consequences.
Theological theories including egoism, utilitarianism, and their focus on ultimate ends.
Deontological theories' reliance on duty and often a divine authority for moral grounding.
Questioning the effectiveness of ethics in transforming individuals into virtuous beings.
Philosophers' skepticism on the practical implementation of ethical theories.
Richard Taylor's optimistic view of ethics as a guide to a meaningful life pursuit.
The importance of ethics in determining the value of life's goals and actions.
Transcripts
the 20th century existentialist
philosopher Albert kamu stated that a
man without ethics is a wild beast
loosed Upon This
World in this lecture we are going to
provide an introduction to ethics to do
so we will examine the subject matter of
the discipline discuss some of the most
important questions addressed by moral
philosophers distinguish between moral
subjectivism and moral realism examine
the famous is a problem and look at the
difference between theological and
deontological theories of
ethics as a philosophical discipline
ethics originated in ancient Greece over
2,000 years ago Socrates and a group of
teachers from ancient Athens known as
the sophus are said to be the first
morals philosophers in western
civilization ethics is often defined as
the study of morality but a more
detailed and revealing definition is
provided by John Day in his book
introduction to ethics ethics is a study
of what are good and bad ends to pursue
in life and what it is right and wrong
to do in the conduct of life it is
therefore above all a practical
discipline its primary aim is to
determine how one ought to live and what
actions one ought to do in the conduct
of one's life it will also be useful to
Define morality given how often the term
is used in ethical discourse day defines
morality in the sense used in
philosophical ethics as standards of
right and wise conduct whose authority
and practical thought is determined by
reason rather than
custom because moral philosophers
attempt to determine how one ought to
act in the course of their life or in
other words with prescribing action
ethics is said to be concerned with the
normative
realm in contrast a discipline such as
anthropology is said to be descriptive
rather than normative anthropologists
observe describe and explain the actions
and behaviors of individuals they do not
like moral philosophers attempt to
prescribe action in addition to the
ultimate question of how one ought to
live their life a few other questions
which have being particularly prominent
in the history of Ethics
include what makes actions moral or in
other words good or bad right or wrong
and why should one behave in accordance
with an ethical Theory or in other words
why should one do what morality
prescribes as a quick side note
questions which deal with the nature of
ethical statements and with prescribing
how one should act are said to belong to
the branch of Ethics known as meta
ethics an important question within meta
ethics is whether morality is objective
what philosophers are trying to
determine when addressing the
objectivity of morality is whether moral
judgments have a truth value or more
simply whether they can be said to be
true or false in a manner which is
independent of personal opinions and
attitudes for example when one makes a
statement such as the Earth is bigger
than the moon or 2 + 2 equal 5 one can
determine whether these statements are
true or false in an impersonal objective
sense however the question of interest
when attempting to determine the
objectivity of morality is whether the
same can be done with moral judgments
such as it is wrong to steal or one
ought to tell the
truth those who deny that moral
judgments can be true or false in the
sense we just specified adhere to the
position called moral moral or ethical
subjectivism such a position maintains
that moral judgments are expressions of
preference or personal opinion and
therefore there is no rational way for
deciding between two conflicting
judgments those who believe on the other
hand that moral judgments can be true or
false and are made so by objective
features of the world are called moral
realists or moral
objectivists closely related to the
question of whether morality is
objective is the is a problem this
problem was famously examined by the
Scottish philosopher David Hume and his
exposition of it forms the basis of what
is called hume's law basically the is a
problem concerns whether one can derive
a statement of what ought to be the case
from what is the case or in other words
from descriptive statements about the
world as David Hume
wrote in every system of morality which
I have hither to met with I have always
remarked that the author proceeds for
some time in the ordinary ways of
reasoning
and establishes the being of a God or
makes observations concerning human
Affairs when all of a sudden I am
surprised to find that instead of the
usual culations of propositions is and
is not I meet with no proposition that
is not connected with an ought or an
ought not for as this ought or ought not
expresses some new relation or
affirmation is necessary that it should
be observed and explained and at the
same time that a reason should be given
for what seems all together
inconceivable how this new relation can
be a deduction from others which are
entirely different from
it philosophers commonly interpret Hume
stance as being that you cannot
logically derive a statement of what
ought to be the case from what is the
case so let us say that we observe it to
be the case that in certain areas of the
world there exists a great disparity of
wealth this would be a descriptive
statement about the way the world is
however from the statement of how the
world is according to Hume we cannot
derive a statement about how things
ought to be so from the descriptive
statement about wealth inequality we
cannot derive the normative statement
that we ought to equalize wealth through
redistribution nor the normative
statement that we ought to abstain from
redistributing
wealth another important distinction
within ethics which is especially
pertinent to the question of what makes
an action good or bad is that between
theological and deontological ethical
theories Robert almader in his work
human happiness and morality a brief
introduction to ethics nicely
distinguishes between the two by saying
the first kind of theory asserts that
the morality or the immorality of an act
and hence the rightness or wrongness of
an act is a function solely of the
consequences of the Act and the natural
tendency of those consequences to
produce pleasure or pain or goodness or
happiness in some degree and in some way
any such Theory we call a
consequentialist or a teic theory the
second kind of theory asserts that the
morality or the immorality of an act has
basically nothing to do with the
consequences of the ACT this latter kind
of theory we call
deontological with a teic theory of
Ethics an end is selected as the
ultimate or highest good in life and
actions are then evaluated as moral or
immoral depending on whether they help
or hinder one in achieving that
end theological theories of ethics
include egoism which identifies the
ultimate end as happiness or pleasure
Udonis which identifies the ultimate end
as well-being and utilitarianism which
identifies the ultimate end as the
general good or welfare of humankind
Plato Aristotle and epicurus whose
ethical theories are some of the oldest
we have record of all put forth
teologico view of ethics differs from
theological view in that actions are not
evaluated as moral or immoral based
solely on their consequences rather
those who Advocate deontological
theories believe that the morality of an
action is grounded by some form of
authority independent of the
consequences that such actions generate
accordingly on deontological accounts
people must obey the actions prescribed
by morality not because of the
consequences that will follow from such
actions but rather because they are Duty
bound to do so often deontological
theories have used a god as the
authority which grounds morality and the
judaic and Christian conceptions of
Divine Law are believed to be the
original inspiration for deontological
ethics however it should be noted that
not all deontological theories of ethics
make use of a supernatural
being to conclude this lecture we must
play Devil's Advocate and question
whether ethics is effective that is can
ethics as a philosophical discipline
striving to understand how one ought to
live be effective at trans transforming
depra wrd individuals into virtuous and
good human
beings there have been numerous
philosophers throughout history who have
been skeptical that it can Emmanuel Kant
for example understood that within the
discipline of Ethics there is a vast
Gulf which exists between theoretical
speculation and practical implementation
he wrote the point is not always to
speculate but also ultimately to think
about applying our knowledge today
however he who lives in Conformity with
what he teaches is taken for a
dreamer Arthur schopenhauer was even
more cynical regarding the possibility
of Ethics influencing one's actions
writing virtue cannot be taught no more
than genius we would thus be just as
foolish to expect that our moral systems
and ethics might awaken The Virtuous
Noble and saintly as that our Aesthetics
might awaken poets sculptors and
musicians however this view is not
shared by all and to finish the lecture
we will provide a quote by Richard
Taylor from his book good and evil who
saw ethics in a more optimistic light
the question what is good is certainly
the most important question you can ask
for it comes to this each of us has One
Life to Live and that life can be as it
commonly is wasted in the pursuit of
specious goals things that turn out to
be worthless the moment they are
possessed or it can be made a deliberate
and thoughtful art wherein what was
sought and let us hope in some measure
gained was something all the while worth
striving for or we can put it this way
there will come a day for each of us to
die and on that day if we have failed we
shall have failed irrevocably
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)