Why Are There Only Two CPU Companies?

Summary

This video script explores the dominance of Intel and AMD in the desktop CPU market, tracing back to the IBM PC's choice of Intel's 8088 CPU in 1981. It explains how Intel's licensing of the x86 architecture to companies like AMD created a duopoly. Despite other companies' attempts to compete, Intel and AMD's innovation in 64-bit processing solidified their positions. Meanwhile, ARM-based chips by Qualcomm and Apple's M1 processor thrive in other markets, but the PC CPU duopoly remains strong.

Takeaways

• 🤔 The CPU market is dominated by two major players, AMD and Intel, due to historical decisions and market dynamics.
• 💡 The IBM PC's choice of Intel's 8088 CPU in 1981 set a precedent for the x86 instruction set, which became the standard for many software developers.
• 🔧 Intel's licensing of the x86 architecture to other companies, including AMD, allowed them to meet demand while maintaining control over the market.
• 🏁 AMD's x86 license has been pivotal in their ability to compete with Intel, sometimes even outperforming them in certain areas.
• 🛠️ Other x86 licensees, such as Cyrix, struggled to compete effectively, often failing to deliver on performance promises.
• 📉 The shift in software development towards optimizing for Intel's Pentium's floating point unit, rather than integer performance, undermined Cyrix's strategy.
• 🚀 AMD's innovation in 64-bit processing with x86-64 has been a significant contribution to modern computing, further solidifying the x86 architecture's dominance.
• 🌐 The x86 architecture's prevalence has made it difficult for smaller chip makers to establish a significant market presence.
• 📱 Companies focusing on alternative instruction sets, like Qualcomm with ARM-based chips, have found success in other markets, such as mobile devices.
• 🍎 Apple's transition from PowerPC to Intel and later to their own ARM-based M1 processor illustrates the industry's evolution and the challenges faced by traditional PC chip manufacturers.
• 🔒 The duopoly of AMD and Intel in the PC CPU market is expected to continue, with no immediate signs of new major competitors emerging.

Q & A

Why are there only two major CPU options for desktop computers?

The dominance of Intel and AMD in the CPU market stems from the IBM PC's choice of Intel's 8088 CPU in 1981, which led to widespread adoption of the x86 instruction set and a strong position for Intel in the microcomputer CPU space.

What was the significance of the IBM PC's choice of the Intel 8088 CPU?

The IBM PC's choice of the Intel 8088 CPU was significant because it set the standard for the x86 instruction set, which became the foundation for most PC software development, leading to Intel's dominance in the CPU market.

How did Intel manage to maintain its dominance in the CPU market?

Intel maintained its dominance by licensing the x86 architecture to other companies, including AMD, which allowed them to meet demand without solely manufacturing the chips themselves, while still profiting from the technology.

Why did AMD become a serious contender in the CPU market despite being a licensee of Intel's x86 architecture?

AMD became a serious contender due to its knowledge, resources, and status as a publicly traded company with multiple chip fabs, allowing it to improve upon the x86 design and compete directly with Intel.

What was the role of 64-bit processing in the evolution of desktop CPUs?

AMD developed 64-bit processing technology, which was cross-licensed to Intel, paving the way for the modern era of x86-64 computing used in virtually all modern PCs, further solidifying the position of Intel and AMD in the market.

What was Cyrix's strategy in trying to compete with Intel's Pentium lineup in the mid-1990s?

Cyrix focused on integer performance to compete with Intel's Pentium, but this strategy failed as developers coded for the Pentium's floating point unit due to its popularity and low cost.

Why did other potential competitors fail to make significant inroads into the CPU market?

Other potential competitors were typically late to the game and could not offer products that were as powerful or as efficient as those from Intel and AMD, which had already established a strong presence in the market.

How did Apple's switch from PowerPC to Intel affect the CPU market?

Apple's switch to Intel chips, partly because of their higher power efficiency, reinforced Intel's position in the CPU market and demonstrated the strength of Intel's product offerings.

What is the current state of non-x86 instruction set chip makers in the market?

Chip makers focusing on other instruction sets, such as ARM-based chips by Qualcomm and Apple's M1 processor, have found success in mobile and other specialized markets, indicating a diversification in the broader chip industry.

What does the future hold for the CPU market in terms of competition between Intel and AMD?

While the duopoly of Intel and AMD is not expected to disappear soon, the ongoing competition between these two companies is likely to continue driving innovation and performance improvements in desktop CPUs.

How does the script relate the competition between Intel and AMD to the audience's interests?

The script uses the analogy of a 'red versus blue fight' to engage the audience's interest in the ongoing competition between Intel and AMD, emphasizing that it is a rivalry driven by technological advancements rather than politics.

Outlines

00:00

💡 The CPU Duopoly: AMD and Intel

This paragraph delves into the dominance of AMD and Intel in the desktop CPU market. It starts by contrasting the variety of choices in everyday life with the limited options available in the CPU world. The script explains the historical roots of this duopoly, tracing back to IBM's decision to use Intel's 8088 CPU in their first personal computer in 1981. This choice, based on the x86 instruction set, led to IBM PC's popularity and a subsequent push for software developers to create programs compatible with x86 CPUs. Intel's licensing of the x86 architecture to other companies, including AMD, is highlighted as a strategic move that has kept them at the forefront of the industry. The paragraph also touches on AMD's role as a licensee and competitor, their improvements to the x86 design, and the challenges faced by other x86 licensees like Cyrix in competing with Intel's Pentium lineup.

Keywords

💡CPU

CPU stands for Central Processing Unit, which is the primary component of a computer that performs the basic arithmetic, logic, controlling, and input/output (I/O) operations specified by the instructions of the computer's programs. In the context of the video, the CPU is the focus as it discusses the dominance of Intel and AMD in the desktop CPU market, highlighting the lack of variety in choices for consumers.

💡AMD

AMD, or Advanced Micro Devices, is a multinational semiconductor company that develops computer processors and related technologies for businesses and consumers. The video script mentions AMD as one of the two main competitors in the CPU market, alongside Intel, and discusses its history of licensing the x86 architecture from Intel and its role in developing 64-bit processing.

💡Intel

Intel is a technology company known for its line of processors used in computers. It is one of the two dominant players in the CPU market, as mentioned in the video. Intel's significance is underscored by its early adoption in the IBM PC and its licensing of the x86 architecture, which has shaped the landscape of the microcomputer CPU industry.

💡IBM PC

The IBM PC refers to the first widely successful personal computer developed by IBM in 1981. It used the Intel 8088 CPU, which was pivotal in establishing the x86 instruction set as a standard in the industry. The video script explains how the IBM PC's popularity led to a widespread adoption of Intel's CPUs and the x86 architecture.

💡x86 instruction set

The x86 instruction set is a type of instruction set architecture that is used in most personal computers and many server and workstation computers. The video script discusses how the IBM PC's use of the Intel 8088 CPU, which was based on the x86 instruction set, influenced the software development landscape and solidified Intel's position in the CPU market.

💡Software developers

Software developers are professionals who create software by designing, coding, and debugging programs. In the video, the script explains that the widespread adoption of the IBM PC led software developers to write programs for x86 CPUs, further reinforcing Intel's dominance in the CPU market.

💡Cyrix

Cyrix was a company that designed and manufactured x86 CPU chips. The video script mentions Cyrix as an example of a company that attempted to compete with Intel's Pentium lineup but ultimately failed due to a misjudgment in focusing on integer performance instead of floating-point performance, which became the standard as developers coded for Intel's popular chips.

💡Floating point unit

A floating point unit (FPU) is the part of a CPU that performs arithmetic operations on floating point numbers. The video script explains how the popularity of Intel's Pentium lineup led developers to code for its FPU, which was a key factor in Cyrix's failure to compete effectively in the CPU market.

💡x86-64 computing

x86-64, also known as simply x64, is a 64-bit extension of the x86 instruction set. The video script highlights AMD's role in developing this technology and cross-licensing it to Intel, which has become the standard for modern PCs and further entrenched the dominance of Intel and AMD in the CPU market.

💡ARM-based chips

ARM-based chips refer to processors that use the ARM architecture, which is a Reduced Instruction Set Computing (RISC) architecture. The video script mentions Qualcomm as a company that has found success with ARM-based chips in the mobile space, indicating an alternative to the x86 architecture used in PCs.

💡M1 processor

The M1 processor is a chip developed by Apple that uses the ARM architecture, marking a departure from Intel's x86 chips for Mac computers. The video script notes the impressive performance of Apple's M1 processor as an example of successful competition outside the x86-dominated PC market.

Highlights

The limited choice in CPU brands for desktops, primarily AMD or Intel, is a result of historical decisions and market dominance.

IBM's choice of Intel 8088 CPU for its 1981 PC set the stage for Intel's dominance in the microcomputer CPU market.

The IBM PC's popularity led to widespread software development for x86 CPUs, solidifying Intel's position.

Intel's licensing of the x86 architecture to other companies, including AMD, was a strategic move to meet demand and maintain revenue.

AMD's x86 license has been pivotal in its competition with Intel, allowing them to challenge Intel's market share.

AMD's innovation in the 1990s improved the x86 design, marking a shift from being a second source supplier to a direct competitor.

Other x86 licensees like Cyrix struggled to compete effectively, often failing to deliver on performance promises.

Cyrix's focus on integer performance was a strategic misstep as the market shifted towards floating point unit optimization.

The transition of companies like Apple from PowerPC to Intel highlights Intel's superior power efficiency.

AMD's development of 64-bit processing and subsequent cross-licensing with Intel revolutionized modern computing.

The widespread adoption of x86-64 computing has made it increasingly difficult for smaller chip makers to establish a presence.

Companies focusing on alternative instruction sets, such as Qualcomm with ARM-based chips, have found success outside the x86 duopoly.

Apple's recent M1 processor, which does not use x86 architecture, demonstrates the potential for innovation beyond Intel and AMD.

The CPU market's duopoly is not expected to change soon, but the competition between AMD and Intel remains beneficial for consumers.

The video also humorously suggests that the AMD vs. Intel rivalry is more about performance than politics or violence.

The video promotes FreshBooks accounting software as a sponsor, highlighting its ease of use and automation features for small business owners.

Transcripts

- Life is great when you have lots of choices.

I mean who hasn't had a little party

in their head when getting off at a highway exit

and seeing two dozen fast food places

vying for your attention.

Please Colonel I'm married.

But (chuckles) but this isn't the case in the CPU world

where you basically only have two choices on desktop,

AMD or Intel.

So how did this happen?

I mean, with as many computers

as there are in the world,

no other companies want a piece of the action?

To understand why there are only two CPU options

for your PC,

we have to go back to the first PC,

the original IBM personal computer from 1981.

IBM chose the Intel 8088 CPU,

to power the machine,

which was based on the x86 instruction set.

This ended up being an enormously consequential choice

as the IBM PC exploded in popularity,

and pushed lots of its competitors out of the market

because it was a versatile, well-built computer,

that offered great value for money,

at the same time.

This meant that software developers wanted to write programs

for the IBM PC and compatibles,

that utilized x86 CPUs.

Meaning Intel quickly became a very powerful name

in the microcomputer CPU space.

So powerful in fact,

that they ended up licensing out the x86 architecture

to other companies in order to keep up with demand,

without having to manufacture x86 chips

completely on their own,

but still make money.

Ironically, AMD was one of these licensee companies

and although Intel and AMD obviously

remain rivals to this day,

AMD still has an x86 license,

which it's used at various times,

to beat Intel at its own game.

Obviously, their rise in lineup is the one

currently giving Intel fits

but this was also true back in the 1990s,

when AMD started improving upon the x86 design,

and competing directly with team blue,

rather than just being Intel's second source chip supplier.

Although AMD wasn't the only x86 licensee

that tried to make inroads into the market,

they did have the knowledge and resources

to become a serious contender,

as they were already a publicly traded company

that had multiple chip fabs.

Other firms that had access to the x86 architecture,

simply didn't compete all that well.

One notable example is Cyrix,

who tried to go toe to toe with Intel's new Pentium lineup

in the mid 1990s.

Cyrix promised big time performance

but their chips rarely delivered.

And they made an infamous mistake,

when they decided to focus on integer performance,

to compete with the Pentium.

At the time, Cyrix thought that the trend

of most desktop programs using mostly

integer-based processing would continue.

But what actually happened is that the low cost

but powerful Pentium,

became so popular,

developers instead coded for it's floating point unit.

And if you're confused about the difference

between integer and floating point,

you can learn more about it,

in this video.

So Cyrix's challenge,

didn't last very long.

And other potential competitors

were typically late to the game,

compared to what teams red and blue were offering.

Think about how Apple switched from PowerPC to Intel

partly because Intel chips,

were simply more powerful per watt.

And of course the next major innovation

in desktop CPU's 64-bit processing,

was developed by none other than AMD,

who subsequently cross-licensed that technology to Intel,

paving the way for the modern era of x86-64 computing,

employed by virtually all modern PCs,

and making it even harder,

for smaller chip makers to get a foothold,

in time to be relevant.

Now, of course, because most of these issues

revolve around the x86 architecture,

chip makers who have focused on other instruction sets,

have done quite well.

Qualcomm, you might've heard of them for example,

is a huge force in the mobile space

with its ARM-based chips.

And Apple has made headlines recently

for releasing its NaN x86 M1 processor,

which offers very impressive performance for Mac users.

But if you're a PC loyalist,

I wouldn't expect the duopoly to disappear anytime soon.

But don't worry,

at least this red versus blue fight,

shouldn't involve politics,

or frag grenades.

Speaking of fights,

stop fighting with your finances and use our sponsor,

FreshBooks.

Their easy-to-use accounting software

is designed specifically with you in mind,

this small business owner.

FreshBooks has everything you need to manage your books,

invoices, expenses, time tracking and more.

It's designed to be easy to use with built-in automation.

So you spend less time doing all that stuff,

and more time growing your business.

Whether you're a trades person,

creative agency or a YouTuber, you can choose a plan,

that's right for you.

They have an award-winning Toronto-based support team

who are always happy to help if you need it.

Try FreshBooks free for 30 days today.

No credit card required at freshbooks.com/techquickie.

Well, that's it for this video.

Thanks for watching guys.

Like the video if you liked it,

dislike it if you disliked it.

Check out our other videos,

'cause why not?

Comment below with video suggestions,

'cause we check those and then we'll read them

and then we'll be like,

oh, we should do a video on that,

oh my gosh.