Lecture 3, Video 2: Efficient algorithms for linear codes
Summary
TLDR在这个视频中,我们讨论了任意线性码是否存在高效算法。对于线性码C,可以实现三个高效算法:编码消息、检测错误和纠正擦除错误。然而,纠正错误的问题对于任意线性码是NP难的,因此不太可能找到多项式时间算法。虽然对任意线性码无法高效解决此问题,但可以设计特定结构的线性码,以实现快速算法。此外,这种难题在密码学中也有应用。
Takeaways
- 😀 线性码可以高效地进行编码,即将消息从\( F_q^k \)映射到\( F_q^n \)中的码字。
- 😀 编码映射是通过乘以生成矩阵\( G \)实现的,这是一种多项式时间内的高效算法。
- 😀 线性码可以高效地检测最多\( d-1 \)个错误,通过使用校验矩阵\( H \)进行检验。
- 😀 如果校验矩阵\( H \)与接收到的码字\( \tilde{c} \)的乘积为零,则认为码字是合法的;否则,认为发生了错误。
- 😀 线性码可以高效地纠正最多\( d-1 \)个擦除错误,通过使用生成矩阵\( G \)来解决线性系统。
- 😀 当部分坐标被擦除时,可以通过删除生成矩阵\( G \)中的相应行来形成新的线性系统,从而找到一致的码字。
- 😀 存在唯一的解\( x \)可以解决这个线性系统,因为码的汉明距离为\( d \)。
- 😀 通过高斯消元法或其他线性代数算法,可以在有限域上高效地解决这个线性系统。
- 😀 对于任意线性码\( C \),可能没有一种多项式时间的算法来纠正最多\( \lfloor \frac{d-1}{2} \rfloor \)个错误。
- 😀 最大似然解码问题(即找到与接收码字\( \tilde{c} \)最近的码字)是NP难问题,这意味着很难找到多项式时间的解。
- 😀 尽管最大似然解码问题被认为是困难的,但这种困难性在密码学中有时是有利的,例如在下一个视频中将讨论的应用。
Q & A
什么是线性码?
-线性码是一种编码方式,其中码字的集合在有限域上形成一个向量空间。线性码的每个码字都可以表示为有限域元素的线性组合。
什么是有效的算法?
-有效的算法指的是运行时间是多项式时间的算法,即算法的运行时间与输入大小的多项式成正比。
线性码的编码映射是什么?
-线性码的编码映射是一个将消息从有限域映射到码字的函数。具体来说,它通过与生成矩阵的乘法来实现。
如何检测线性码中的误差?
-可以通过奇偶校验矩阵来检测线性码中的误差。如果一个码字乘以奇偶校验矩阵的结果为零,则该码字是合法的;否则,它可能包含误差。
线性码中的错误检测和错误更正有什么区别?
-错误检测是指识别出码字是否包含误差,而错误更正则是指找出并修正这些误差。线性码可以有效地检测最多d-1个误差,但更正这些误差通常更复杂。
什么是线性码的擦除更正?
-擦除更正是指在已知某些码字的坐标被擦除的情况下,恢复原始码字的过程。这可以通过解决由生成矩阵的子集构成的线性系统来实现。
为什么最大似然解码问题是NP难的?
-最大似然解码问题涉及找到与给定码字距离最近的码字,这是一个组合优化问题。由于其复杂性,目前没有已知的多项式时间算法可以解决这个问题。
为什么计算线性码的距离是NP难的?
-计算线性码的距离涉及到确定码字之间的最小汉明距离,这同样是一个组合优化问题,因此被认为是NP难的。
为什么有些特定的线性码可以有快速的解码算法?
-特定的线性码,如汉明码,由于其结构的特殊性,可以设计出快速的解码算法。这些算法利用了码的特定性质来简化解码过程。
为什么最大似然解码问题被认为在密码学中有应用?
-最大似然解码问题的难度可以被用来设计密码学算法,使得攻击者难以解码,从而提高安全性。
Outlines
😀 线性码的高效算法讨论
本段视频脚本讨论了任意线性码是否能够实现高效算法的问题。首先定义了线性码C和其属性,包括其在有限域Fq中的子集,以及其具有的三个主要特点:1) 存在一个高效的编码映射,将消息从Fq映射到码字;2) 能够高效检测多达d-1个错误;3) 能够高效纠正多达d-1个擦除。接着,提出了一个关键问题:是否存在一个通用的算法,能够高效地纠正最多d-1/2个错误。视频鼓励观众暂停并思考这些算法可能是什么,并解释了使用生成矩阵G进行编码和使用校验矩阵H进行错误检测的方法。最后,介绍了使用生成矩阵解决擦除问题的方法,并强调了这些算法的高效性。
😟 线性码最大似然解码问题的困难性
第二段视频脚本指出,尽管对于特定的线性码如汉明码,可能存在高效的算法来纠正错误,但对于任意线性码C,找到一个能够高效纠正最多d-1/2个错误的算法可能是不现实的。这里引入了最大似然解码问题,即给定一个可能受到干扰的码字c'和生成矩阵G,找到最接近c'的码字x。这个问题被证明是NP-hard的,意味着找到多项式时间的算法解决这个问题是非常不可能的。视频进一步解释了NP-hard问题的含义,并指出即使在已知码的情况下,这个问题也很难近似。最后,视频以一种积极的角度结束,指出虽然我们可能无法为任意线性码设计高效的算法,但我们可以在设计特定结构的线性码时利用这一困难性,例如在密码学中的应用。
Mindmap
Keywords
💡线性码
💡有效算法
💡生成矩阵
💡错误检测
💡校验矩阵
💡擦除
💡最大似然解码
💡NP-难问题
💡距离
💡设计线性码
💡密码学
Highlights
讨论任意线性代码的有效算法。
编码映射是通过生成矩阵乘法实现的。
线性代码可以有效地检测多达 d-1 个错误。
使用奇偶校验矩阵来检测代码字中的错误。
线性代码可以纠正多达 d-1 个擦除。
通过删除生成矩阵的行来处理擦除。
高斯消元法可以有效地解决线性系统。
编码、错误检测和纠错是线性代码的基本功能。
讨论纠正多达 d-1/2 个错误的算法。
最大似然解码问题与纠错问题类似。
最大似然解码问题是 NP 难问题。
即使代码已知,最大似然解码问题仍然是 NP 难。
计算线性代码的距离也是 NP 难问题。
专门设计的线性代码可以有快速算法。
某些情况下,解码问题的复杂性对密码学有利。
Transcripts
in this video we'll briefly discuss the
extent to which arbitrary linear codes
admit efficient algorithms
if c is a linear code then it emits
some efficient algorithms
here by an efficient algorithm i mean an
algorithm that runs in time polynomial
and n
the block length of the code
in more detail suppose that c subset of
fq to the n
is a linear code of distance d
then the following three things are true
first there is an efficient encoding map
inc which maps a message from fq to the
k
to a code word in fq to the n in c
why don't you pause the video now and
try to figure out what this encoding map
is
great so hopefully you've realized that
this encoding map is just multiplication
by a generator matrix
g so ink maps
x some message x
to the code word g times x and matrix
multiplication we can do in polynomial
time so that's an efficient algorithm
the second thing we can do efficiently
for linear code is detect
up to d minus 1 errors
that is if we see a corrupted code word
c twiddle which is corrupted with fewer
than d minus one errors
there is an efficient algorithm that
will say hey something is up
once again pause the video for a second
and try to come up with this algorithm
one way to do this is with the parity
check matrix
so given c twiddle and we want to know
if c twiddle is a legit code word or if
it's suffered up to d minus one errors
we can just check if h times c
twiddle is equal to zero if it is then
we'll say that c
twiddle is a legit code word nothing
went wrong and if it's not
we'll say that something went wrong once
again this is an efficient algorithm
because all we have to do is a matrix
multiplication
third there's an efficient algorithm to
correct
up to d minus one erasures
once again pause the video now and try
to come up with the algorithm
one way is to use the generator matrix
suppose that we see a code word with
some erasures that
was originally equal to g times x for
some vector x
so the picture looks like this and some
of the coordinates of c
have gotten erased let's say i don't
know this one here
and that one and that one
and here when i'm coloring these in i
just mean that they're getting colored
over or something so they're getting
erased
if we think about what this does to the
linear system effectively this is just
sort of erasing those rows of g
so erase that row and that row
and that row and if we gather together
all the information that we know
we can form some new linear system
where now we have a matrix g twiddle
that we got just by removing these
rows from g the key is that we now know
everything in this target vector
so a solution x to this system
corresponds to a code word that is
consistent with these at most d minus 1
erasures
we already know that there is at most
one such
x because this code has distance d
and so it can handle up to d minus one
erasures at least non-efficiently
so we know that there's a unique
solution x to this linear system
okay so our algorithm is just solve the
linear system find the unique solution
notice that for example gaussian
elimination or whatever your favorite
linear algebra algorithms are
work just fine over finite fields so we
can still solve this system of equations
efficiently
so that gives us an efficient algorithm
to correct up to d minus one erasures in
a linear code
so all of this is good news you give me
a linear code any linear code
i can do these three things efficiently
i can encode a message
i can detect errors and i can correct
erasures
this is leaving out one important thing
i might like to do which is correcting
errors
so here's the question if i have an
arbitrary linear code c
of distance d is there an algorithm
to correct up to the floor of d minus 1
over 2 errors
efficiently notice that for some
particular codes like for example the
hamming code
the answer might be yes but what what
this question is asking is can i do this
in general for
any linear code c
okay so here's the bad news
the bad news is probably not the answer
is probably no
in more detail consider the following
problem
given some c twiddle in fq to the n
and a generator matrix g and f q to the
n
times k find x
in fq to the k that minimizes the
hamming distance
between c twiddle and g times x
that is the problem is given c twiddle
find the code word in c that is closest
to c twiddle
this problem is called the maximum
likelihood decoding problem
notice that solving this problem is
pretty similar to being able to correct
up to d minus one over two errors
efficiently
in particular if we could solve this
problem we would be able to correct this
many errors
unfortunately this problem is np-hard
if you don't know what np-hard means
that's okay informally what it means
is that it's really unlikely that we're
going to find a polynomial time
algorithm that solves this problem
for a worst-case code c if you're
curious in fact the problem is np-hard
even if the code is known in advance and
with arbitrary pre-processing time
moreover it's also np hard to
approximate
in fact even computing the distance of
linear code given the generator matrix
is np hard
so this problem and a lot of problems
surrounding it
are hard so they take away
is that we are not likely
to find a polynomial time algorithm for
this task
here when i say not likely and probably
not
i'm referring to the fact that we don't
actually know whether or not
p is equal to np if you know what that
means so it could be the case
that someday someone finds a polynomial
time algorithm but that would imply some
really weird things in complexity theory
okay so that's the bad news we're
probably not going to be able to solve
this problem efficiently
for a arbitrary linear code c
however the good news
is that we don't care about an arbitrary
linear code c we care about a linear
code that we get to design
going forward we're going to focus a lot
of our time on trying to design
specific special structured linear codes
that
do admit fast algorithms but wait
there's more good news
the more good news is that actually
sometimes it's kind of convenient
that this problem is thought to be hard
in the next video we'll see an
application to cryptography
which relies on this fact
Посмотреть больше похожих видео
Lecture 1.1 — Why do we need machine learning — [ Deep Learning | Geoffrey Hinton | UofT ]
Intro to Algorithms: Crash Course Computer Science #13
Backpropagation and the brain
Alan Turing: Crash Course Computer Science #15
5. From Panic to Suffering
Who cares about topology? (Inscribed rectangle problem)
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)