حكم الڨار ينصف المنتخب العراقي ويصدم المنتخب الأردني .. اعاده مباراه العراق و الاردن

اسود الرافدين

29 Jan 202408:11

Summary

TLDRThe video discusses the controversial Iraq versus Jordan soccer match and its disputed outcome. It highlights the Iranian referee's controversial red card given to Iraqi player Ayman Hussein for celebrating by eating grass. The video alleges bias against Iraq, noting the Japanese media defended Iraq despite their loss. It also discusses Iraq's strong fanbase protesting for a rematch, Iraq's Football Association demanding accountability for the referee, and Asia's Football Confederation banning improper journalists. Overall, it aims to bring attention to the alleged injustice Iraq faced in the match.

Takeaways

👋 Greetings and introduction to a new video discussing the controversial Iraq vs. Jordan match replay due to a refereeing decision.
📺 Highlighting new developments regarding the match and doubts about its integrity due to the Iranian referee's decisions favoring the Jordanian team.
🏆 Discussing the Japanese media's fair treatment of the Iraqi national team, despite Iraq having previously defeated Japan, and highlighting an incident where a player was penalized for celebrating a goal.
🔥 Covering the Asian Football Confederation's (AFC) historic decisions following the Iraq vs. Jordan match.
🧳 Mentioning the Iraqi public's formal protest against the match replay and their support for the national team's continuation in the Asian Cup.
🛡️ Analysis of a perceived conspiracy against the Iraqi national team, as acknowledged by the Japanese media, suggesting a deliberate refereeing mistake.
💡 Exploring the Iraqi fans' planned protest to voice their opinions to the AFC and the international community, emphasizing their full support for the national team.
🚨 Addressing the AFC's response to the chaos caused by journalists during a press conference with the Spanish coach, leading to a ban on the involved journalists from future Asian Cup events.
📝 Highlighting the Iraqi Prime Minister's office's investigation into the misconduct towards the Spanish coach, emphasizing the importance of accountability.
👊 Advocating for the match replay due to the controversial decision made by the Iranian referee, emphasizing the need for a strong response to ensure fairness.

Q & A

Why was the match between Iraq and Jordan replayed?
-The match was replayed due to a controversial decision made by the video referee.
What was the issue with the Iranian referee in the match between Iraq and Jordan?
-The Iranian referee made a decision that favored the Jordanian team, which raised questions about fairness.
How did the Japanese media react to the Iraqi national team's situation?
-The Japanese media supported the Iraqi national team significantly, despite the Iraqi team having previously defeated the Japanese team.
What actions did the Asian Football Confederation take following the Iraq vs. Jordan match?
-The Asian Football Confederation took historic decisions in response to the events of the match.
What was the Iraqi public's reaction to the replay of the match?
-The Iraqi public protested officially against the replay of the match and supported the continuation of the national team in the Asian Cup.
Why was player Ayman Hussein penalized during the match?
-Ayman Hussein was penalized for his celebration, which involved eating grass, leading to his ejection from the game.
What did the Japanese media say about Ayman Hussein's ejection?
-The Japanese media found it amusing and unjust that Ayman Hussein was ejected for such a celebration, indicating a perceived conspiracy against the Iraqi national team.
What measures did the Asian Football Confederation take against journalists after the match?
-The AFC banned journalists who caused chaos during a press conference from covering future sporting events related to the Asian Cup.
How did the Iraqi fans plan to support their team upon their return?
-Iraqi fans planned to welcome the national team back as heroes, regardless of the outcome, showing full support.
What was the controversy surrounding the Iranian referee's decision not to use VAR?
-The controversy was that the referee made a unilateral decision to eject Ayman Hussein without consulting VAR, which contradicted the practices observed in similar situations involving Iranian players.

Outlines

00:00

😃 Greeting and video introduction

The speaker greets the audience and introduces the video, which will discuss details and developments regarding the controversial Iraq vs Jordan match. He highlights the Iranian referee's role in Jordan's victory and the Japanese media's perspective, which defended Iraq's team. The speaker also previews discussing the Iraqi fans' planned protest and the Asian Football Confederation's response.

05:03

😄 Iraqi fans' support and media's role

The speaker praises Iraqi fans for their awareness and support of the national team despite the controversial loss. He criticizes media figures for attacking the coach instead of constructively criticizing. The speaker argues media should support the team especially after an unfair loss.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Iraq-Jordan match

This refers to a football game between the national teams of Iraq and Jordan, which is a central topic of the video. The match is discussed in the context of controversy and a potential replay due to decisions made by the referee, highlighting issues of fairness and governance in sports competitions. The script mentions details about the match, the reaction of the media, and the response from fans, underlining its significance in the narrative.

💡Video referee

The video referee (VAR) system is mentioned in the context of a disputed decision during the Iraq-Jordan match. The controversy revolves around the use of VAR and the referee's decisions, which are questioned for their fairness and impact on the match's outcome. This highlights the reliance on technology in modern sports to aid decision-making and the ongoing debates about its effectiveness and application.

💡Japanese media

The Japanese media's role in the video is noteworthy for its fair treatment of the Iraqi national team, despite the team's previous competition against Japan. This example illustrates the capacity of sports media to transcend national biases and recognize fairness and sportsmanship, contributing to the video's theme of seeking justice and fairness in sports.

💡Asian Football Confederation (AFC)

The AFC is mentioned in the context of making historic decisions following the match. This highlights the organization's role in governing football in Asia, including enforcing rules, managing controversies, and ensuring the integrity of competitions. The script suggests the AFC's decisions have significant implications for the teams and the tournament.

💡Iraqi fans

Iraqi fans are depicted as passionate supporters who file an official protest against the match's replay and support their team's continuation in the Asian Cup. Their actions illustrate the deep emotional connection between fans and their national teams, and their role in advocating for fairness and supporting their team through challenges.

💡Protest

The term 'protest' in the video refers to the formal objection lodged by Iraqi fans and possibly officials against the decision to replay the match due to refereeing decisions. This underscores the avenues available to stakeholders in sports to seek redress and fairness, highlighting the procedural aspects of sports governance.

💡Referee bias

Referee bias is a critical issue raised in the video, particularly concerning the Iranian referee's decisions favoring the Jordanian team. This concept is crucial for understanding the video's theme of seeking justice and transparency in sports, as it discusses the implications of perceived partiality on the game's integrity and fairness.

💡Ayman Hussein

Ayman Hussein is mentioned as an Iraqi player who faced a controversial decision during the match, which led to his dismissal for celebrating a goal. His case exemplifies the broader issues of refereeing decisions and their impact on players and teams, serving as a focal point for discussions on fairness and the rules of the game.

💡Grass-eating celebration

This unusual celebration by Ayman Hussein, leading to his red card, is highlighted to discuss the inconsistency in refereeing decisions, especially when compared to similar actions by players from other teams that went unpunished. This specific incident is used to illustrate the perceived unfairness and the call for a match replay.

💡Media investigation

The video mentions an investigation by the Prime Minister's office into misconduct by journalists during a press conference, reflecting on the broader theme of accountability and professionalism in sports coverage. This aspect ties into the narrative of ensuring all stakeholders in sports, including the media, adhere to standards of conduct and integrity.

Highlights

The study found a significant increase in happiness levels for participants who exercised regularly.

Researchers developed a new technique to image single molecules with unprecedented resolution.

The new theory proposes a novel mechanism for how neural networks in the brain learn and adapt.

Early results show the new drug therapy reduces inflammation and joint damage in arthritis patients.

Analyzing social media data revealed interesting insights into how misinformation spreads online.

The study found no evidence that the intervention improves academic performance in children.

Researchers identified a gene associated with increased risk of heart disease in women.

Simulations demonstrate the self-driving algorithm handles complex urban environments well.

Interviews with employees suggest communication problems may be causing decreased productivity.

The new material shows promise as a cheaper, sustainable alternative to traditional plastics.

Survey data indicates the new product features are highly valued by customers.

The study provides insight into how climate change may alter species distribution over time.

Preliminary results reveal the receptor plays a key role in the immune response to infection.

Further research is needed to determine the clinical usefulness of the biomarker.

More work is required before the approach can be applied in real-world settings.