Is Film School Worth It? — Everything to Consider When Deciding

Summary

The video script explores the subjective decision of attending film school, highlighting the financial burden, the value of education in both technical and theoretical aspects of filmmaking, and the importance of networking and hands-on experience. It emphasizes that while film school can provide structure and resources, success in the industry is not guaranteed and often depends on individual motivation, talent, and the ability to create a network outside of formal education.

Takeaways

• 🤔 The decision to attend film school is subjective and complex, with no one-size-fits-all answer.
• 💰 Film school can be expensive, with top institutions like USC and NYU potentially costing $300,000 for a four-year education.
• 🏫 State schools offer more affordable options, such as UCLA and Cal State Northridge, which are significantly cheaper for residents.
• 🎥 Skipping film school is a valid choice; some successful filmmakers like Paul Thomas Anderson and Kevin Smith did so to fund their own projects.
• 📚 Film school education includes both technical skills and the study of film as an art form, which can be self-taught but requires discipline.
• 🎓 A degree from film school is valuable for formal recognition and can enhance a resume, but the film industry often values work experience and a strong portfolio over education.
• 🛠 Film school provides access to professional equipment and resources, but these can also be obtained independently or through online learning.
• 📈 The democratization of filmmaking through technology means anyone can create films, increasing competition but also opportunities.
• 🔗 Film school offers networking opportunities and mentorship, which are crucial in the industry but can also be built outside of formal education.
• 💡 Success in filmmaking is not guaranteed by attending film school; it requires talent, motivation, and a strong network.
• 🚀 Ultimately, the desire to be a filmmaker should be the driving factor, not the pursuit of fame or wealth, as the majority of filmmakers do not achieve mainstream success.

Q & A

What is the main argument presented in the script regarding the necessity of attending film school?

The script argues that attending film school is not a one-size-fits-all decision and is subjective. It suggests that while film school can provide education, resources, and networking opportunities, it is not a requirement for becoming a filmmaker.

Why might film school be considered expensive according to the transcript?

Film school is considered expensive because top institutions like USC and NYU have high tuition fees, potentially costing around $300,000 for a four-year education, which often results in significant student debt.

What alternative did Paul Thomas Anderson take after leaving film school?

Paul Thomas Anderson attended film school for only two days before quitting. He got his tuition back and used the funds to help finance a short film, emphasizing learning through practical filmmaking rather than formal education.

What are some of the educational aspects one might gain from attending film school?

Film school education includes both the technical skills of filmmaking, such as operating cameras and lighting, and the theoretical understanding of the art form, including film history, technological innovations, scriptwriting, and film movements.

How does the script address the importance of networking in the film industry?

The script highlights that networking is crucial for success in the film industry and that film school provides a community and opportunities for mentorship, which can be beneficial for building a network of collaborators.

What does the script suggest about the democratization of filmmaking?

The script suggests that the democratization of filmmaking, where anyone can make a film using tools like smartphones, has made it easier to create films but also more challenging to stand out among the increased number of filmmakers.

What advice does the script offer for those who are self-motivated and considering skipping film school?

For self-motivated individuals, the script suggests that they might not need the formal environment of film school and can learn through alternative means such as watching films, reading books, attending festivals, and gaining hands-on experience.

What is the role of a film school degree in the job market according to the transcript?

The transcript indicates that while a film school degree has value and can look good on a resume, getting jobs in the film industry is usually not dependent on educational background. Instead, one's work and reel are what typically land jobs.

How does the script discuss the importance of motivation for aspiring filmmakers?

The script emphasizes that motivation is a key quality for future filmmakers. Film school can provide structure and deadlines for those who need it, but even without it, self-motivated individuals can succeed by actively pursuing their filmmaking goals.

What is the script's view on the correlation between attending film school and achieving fame or wealth?

The script states that there is no guarantee of a successful career or wealth from attending film school. It suggests that the desire to become rich and famous should not be the primary motivation for becoming a filmmaker.

What question does the script suggest one should ask themselves before deciding on film school?

The script suggests that one should ask themselves whether they genuinely want to be a filmmaker or if they are more interested in becoming rich and famous, as the latter is statistically unlikely for the majority of people.