AI and the Paradox of Self-Replacing Workers | Madison Mohns | TED
Summary
TLDRThe speaker, a middle manager facing the AI revolution, discusses the paradox of training AI systems that could replace their own workforce. They propose three ethical principles: transformational transparency, collaborative AI augmentation, and reskilling to realize potential. Drawing parallels to the Industrial Revolution, they argue for a balance between human creativity and AI efficiency, emphasizing the importance of adapting and innovating to ensure that AI enhances rather than replaces human potential.
Takeaways
- 📄 The script discusses the urgent request from the board of directors to compile a document on AI-related work due to the buzz around ChatGPT and the future of AI.
- 🚀 The rapid development of AI technologies offers endless opportunities for innovation but also poses an existential threat to the workforce by potentially automating jobs.
- 🤖 AI systems require training and fine-tuning by subject matter experts, which ironically includes the same people whose jobs might be automated.
- 🔑 The speaker introduces three ethical principles to address the self-replacing workforce: transformational transparency, collaborative AI augmentation, and reskilling to realize potential.
- 🔢 Research indicates that a significant portion of the US workforce could be impacted by AI, with nearly 20% potentially seeing half of their tasks automated.
- 🏭 The script draws a parallel between the current AI revolution and the historical Industrial Revolution, noting that humans adapted and new roles emerged despite initial fears.
- 🛠 The tension faced by the speaker as a middle manager is highlighted, with the dilemma of innovating quickly and risking job displacement or refusing to innovate and risking the company's competitiveness.
- 🗣️ The importance of transformational transparency is emphasized, advocating for open dialogue and involving employees in the decision-making process regarding AI implementation.
- 🤝 AI should be viewed as an augmentation device, not a replacement, by identifying tasks that can be automated to free up time for higher-value activities.
- 🆕 The script shares a personal example of a project that saved significant working hours by automating tasks that subject matter experts were eager to delegate.
- 💼 The necessity of reskilling the workforce to equip them with skills for an AI-powered future is underscored, with the speaker's experience of improving technical literacy within their team.
Q & A
What was the urgent request from the manager's manager's manager in the script?
-The manager's manager's manager requested a document by the end of the day that records everything the team has been working on related to AI.
Why were the board of directors interested in AI?
-The board of directors were interested in AI because they had been hearing buzz about ChatGPT and wanted to know what the company was doing about it.
What is the paradox mentioned in the script regarding AI systems and subject matter experts?
-The paradox is that to train AI systems to a high-quality standard, real-life subject matter experts are needed, who are often the same people whose jobs might be displaced by the AI systems they help train.
What are the three ethical principles the speaker relies on to handle the implications of a self-replacing workforce?
-The three ethical principles are transformational transparency, collaborative AI augmentation, and reskilling to realize potential.
What percentage of the US workforce could be impacted by AI according to the research mentioned in the script?
-Approximately 80 percent of the US workforce could see up to 10 percent of their tasks impacted by AI, while around 19 percent could see up to 50 percent of their tasks impacted.
How does the speaker compare the current AI revolution to the Industrial Revolution?
-The speaker compares the AI revolution to the Industrial Revolution by highlighting the historical example of workers training systems that would eventually replace them, such as in Henry Ford's Model T automobile production line.
What is the role of AI as an augmentation device according to the speaker?
-AI as an augmentation device is meant to take over the worst or most repetitive parts of a job, allowing employees to focus on higher-value activities that require critical thinking and creativity.
What is the importance of reskilling in the context of AI and workforce development?
-Reskilling is crucial to avoid replacement by AI, as it equips employees with new skills and knowledge to thrive in an AI-powered future and to adapt to evolving roles and expertise.
How did the speaker's team save over 12,000 working hours with AI?
-The team saved over 12,000 working hours by training an algorithm to automate tasks that were previously done manually by subject matter experts, allowing them to focus on more valuable work.
What is the speaker's view on the relationship between humans and machines?
-The speaker views the relationship between humans and machines as a delicate balancing act, where humans train machines to replace certain tasks while simultaneously creating unique roles for themselves and discovering new possibilities.
What is the speaker's advice for managers and leaders navigating the AI revolution?
-The speaker advises managers and leaders to embrace innovation, foster a culture of adaptation, and intentionally invest in the professional development and well-being of their workforce to prepare for the challenges ahead and address the complexities of introducing AI.
Outlines
🤖 The AI Paradox: Ethical Principles for a Self-Replacing Workforce
The speaker describes the sudden request from the company's board to document all AI-related work, reflecting on the rapid development of AI and its potential to displace jobs. The speaker acknowledges the paradox of training AI systems with the same experts whose jobs might be at risk. Three ethical principles are introduced to address this issue: transformational transparency, collaborative AI augmentation, and reskilling to realize potential. The speaker also discusses the impact of AI on the workforce, referencing research indicating significant task automation potential across various occupations. Drawing parallels with the Industrial Revolution, the speaker emphasizes the historical pattern of adaptation and innovation in the face of technological change.
🛠 Embracing AI: Enhancing Human Potential Through Ethical Leadership
The speaker outlines strategies for integrating AI into the workforce ethically, starting with the importance of transparency in AI transformation. Leaders are encouraged to involve employees in decision-making and ensure their consent, particularly when their tasks are being automated. The concept of AI as an augmentation tool is explored, with the speaker sharing an example of how AI saved significant working hours by automating data curation. The speaker also stresses the importance of reskilling to avoid displacement, sharing personal experiences of improving technical literacy and fostering a culture of continuous learning. The talk concludes with a call to action for managers and leaders to navigate AI development with sensitivity and foresight, preparing teams for future challenges and ensuring AI enhances rather than replaces human capabilities.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡AI
💡Buzz
💡Paradox
💡Quality
💡Transformational Transparency
💡Collaborative AI Augmentation
💡Reskilling
💡Industrial Revolution
💡Innovation
💡Upskilling
💡Human Ingenuity
Highlights
Manager's manager requests a document on AI-related work by the end of the day to inform the board of directors about the company's AI initiatives.
80% of the US workforce could see up to 10% of their tasks impacted by AI, while 19% could see up to 50% of their tasks impacted, according to OpenAI research.
AI technologies do not discriminate and can impact high-skilled occupations just as much as others.
The Industrial Revolution serves as a historical example of humans adapting to technological advancements and finding new roles.
Three ethical principles are proposed to manage the implications of a self-replacing workforce: transformational transparency, collaborative AI augmentation, and reskilling to realize potential.
AI transformation requires transparency and fostering dialogue with employees to address concerns and involve them in decision-making.
AI should be used as an augmentation device to delegate rote tasks and enhance employees' potential and productivity.
Subject matter experts were excited to delegate tasks to automation, allowing them to focus on higher-value activities.
Reskilling and professional development are crucial to avoid replacement and empower employees to adapt to an AI-powered future.
Investing in employees' well-being ensures they are equipped with the skills needed to thrive in an AI-driven environment.
A culture of continuous learning and reskilling makes AI transformation exciting and less intimidating.
Managers and leaders must navigate the AI revolution with sensitivity and foresight, embracing innovation while investing in workforce development.
The goal is to create a future where AI enhances human potential rather than replacing it, combining human ingenuity with technological progress.
The speaker shares a personal project that saved the company over 12,000 working hours by automating tasks previously done by subject matter experts.
The paradox of training AI systems that may displace the same team members who train them is a significant ethical and practical challenge.
The speaker emphasizes the importance of transformational transparency, ensuring employees have a voice in their professional destiny.
AI can be used to identify underperforming areas and make direct suggestions for improvement, as demonstrated by the operations analyst's contribution.
Transcripts
I'm going about my day, normal Tuesday of meetings
when I get a ping from my manager's manager's manager.
It says: “Get me a document by the end of the day
that records everything your team has been working on related to AI."
As it turns out, the board of directors of my large company
had been hearing buzz about this new thing called ChatGPT,
and they wanted to know what we were doing about it.
They are freaking out about the future,
I'm freaking out about this measly document,
it sounds like the perfect start
to solving the next hottest problem in tech, right?
As someone who works with machine-learning models
every single day,
I know firsthand that the rapid development of these technologies
poses endless opportunities for innovation.
However, the same exponential improvement in AI systems
is becoming a looming existential threat to the team I manage.
With increasing accessibility
and creepily human-like results coming out of the field of AI research,
companies like my own are turning toward automation to make things more efficient.
Now on the surface, this seems like a pretty great vision.
But as we start to dig deeper, we uncover an uncomfortable paradox.
Let's break this down.
In order to harness the power of AI systems,
these systems must be trained and fine-tuned
to match a high-quality standard.
But who defines quality,
and who trains these systems in the first place?
As you may have guessed, real-life subject matter experts,
oftentimes the same exact people who are currently doing the job.
Imagine my predicament here.
I get to go to my trusted team, whom I've worked with for years,
look them in the eyes
and pitch them on training the very systems that might displace them.
This paradox had led me to rely on three ethical principles
that can ensure that managers can grapple with the implications
of a self-replacing workforce.
One, transformational transparency,
Two, collaborative AI augmentation.
And three, reskilling to realize potential.
Now before we get into solutions, let’s zoom out a little bit.
How deep is this problem of self-replacing workers, really?
Research from this year coming out of OpenAI
indicates that approximately 80 percent of the US workforce
could see up to 10 percent of their tasks impacted
by the introduction of AI,
while around 19 percent of the workforce
could see up to 50 percent of their tasks impacted.
The craziest thing about all of this is,
is that these technologies do not discriminate.
Occupations that have historically required an immense amount of training
or education are equally as vulnerable to being outsourced to AI.
Now before we throw our hands up and let the robots take over,
let's put this all into perspective.
Fortunately for us,
this is not the first time in history that this has happened.
Let's go back to the Industrial revolution.
Picture Henry Ford’s iconic Model T automobile production line.
In this remarkable setup,
workers and machines engage in a synchronous dance.
They were tasked with specific repetitive tasks,
such as tightening bolts or fitting components
as the product moved down the line.
Ironically, and not dissimilar to my current predicament,
the humans themselves played a crucial role in training the systems
that would eventually replace their once multi-skilled roles.
They were the ones who honed their craft, perfected the techniques
and ultimately handed off the knowledge to the technicians
and engineers involved in automating their entire process.
Now on the outset, this situation seems pretty dire.
Yet despite initial fears and hesitations
involved in these technological advancements,
history has proven that humans have continuously found ways
to adapt and innovate.
While some roles were indeed replaced, new roles emerged,
requiring higher-level skills like creativity
and creative problem solving that machines just simply couldn't replicate.
Reflecting on this historical example
reminds us that the relationship between humans and machines
has always been a delicate balancing act.
We are the architects of our own progress,
often training machines to replace us
while simultaneously carving out unique roles for ourselves
and discovering new possibilities.
Now coming back to the present day, we are on the cusp of the AI revolution.
As someone responsible for moving that revolution forward,
the tension becomes omnipresent.
Option one, I can innovate quickly and risk displacing my team.
Or option two, I can refuse to innovate in an effort to protect my team,
but ultimately still lose people because the company falls behind.
So what am I supposed to do
as a mere middle manager in this situation?
Knowingly introducing this complex paradox for your team
presents strong challenges for people management.
Luckily, we can refer back to those three ethical principles
I addressed at the beginning of the talk
to ensure that you can continue to move ahead
without leaving your people behind.
First and foremost,
AI transformation needs to be transparent.
As leaders, it is imperative to foster dialogue,
address key concerns,
and offer concise explanations regarding the purpose
and potential challenges entailed in implementing AI.
This requires actively involving your employees
in the decision-making process
and valuing their autonomy.
By introducing the concept of consent,
especially for employees who are tasked
with automating their core responsibilities,
we can ensure that they maintain a strong voice
in carving out their professional destiny.
Next, now that we've gotten folks bought into this grandiose vision
while acknowledging the journey that lies ahead,
let's talk about how to use AI as an augmentation device.
Picture the worst part of your job today.
What if you could delegate it?
And no, not hand it off to some other sad soul at work,
but hand it to a system that can do your rote tasks for you.
Instead of perceiving AI as a complete replacement,
identify opportunities where you can use it
to enhance your employees' potential and productivity.
Collaboratively with your team,
identify areas and tasks that can be automated,
carving out more room for higher-value activities
requiring critical thinking that machines just aren't very good at doing.
Let's put this into an example.
Recently, I completed a project with my team at work
that's going to save our company over 12,000 working hours.
The folks involved in training this algorithm
are the same subject matter experts that worked tirelessly last year
to hand-curate and research data to optimize segmented experiences
across our website.
Now because of the sheer amount of time spent and the level of detail involved,
I would have expected
that there was an immense amount of pride behind this workflow.
But to my surprise, as it turns out,
the subject matter experts who built this model
were actually excited to hand these tasks off to automation.
There were things that they would have much rather spent their time on,
like in optimizing existing data to perform better on product surfaces
or even researching and developing new insights to augment
where the model just simply doesn't do as well.
Lastly, we must reskill in order to avoid replacement.
Knowingly investing in the professional development
and well-being of our workforce
ensures that they are equipped with the skills and knowledge
needed to thrive in an AI-powered future.
By providing opportunities for upskilling and reskilling,
we can empower our employees to rethink their roles as they exist today
and carve out new possibilities that align with their evolving expertise
and interests.
So how does this work in practice?
When I started introducing AI as a way to accelerate my team's workflows,
I used it as an opportunity to improve my team's technical literacy.
I worked with my team of engineers on a tool
that could transparently identify
the impact of data on a model's outcomes.
I then went to my operations analyst,
who didn't have technical training at the time,
and they were able to quickly identify areas where the model was underperforming
and hand off direct suggestions to my data science team
to make those models do better next time.
Fostering a culture of continuous learning
and reskilling is paramount.
It makes AI transformation a lot more exciting and a lot less scary.
We have reached a critical juncture
where the rapid development of AI technology
poses both opportunities and challenges.
As managers and leaders,
it is imperative that we navigate this terrain
with both sensitivity and foresight.
By embracing innovation,
fostering a culture of adaptation,
and ultimately intentionally investing in the professional development
and well-being of our workforce,
we can ensure that we are preparing our team
for the challenges that lie ahead
while addressing the complexities of introducing AI.
Together, let's forge a future that harmoniously combines human ingenuity
and technological progress,
where AI enhances human potential
rather than replacing it.
Thank you.
(Applause)
Посмотреть больше похожих видео
Why AI will never replace humans | Alexandr Wang | TEDxBerkeley
World Changing: Data Science and AI | Fred Blackburn | TEDxWakeForestU
How to self-host and hyperscale AI with Nvidia NIM
EKOJISHARE #1 | 10 Mitos Artificial Intelligence
Principles For Human-Centered AI | Michael I Jordan (UC Berkeley)
L'AI è una figata, sei tu che sei "vecchio"
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)