Joe Rogan: The Questions Atheism Can't Answer
Summary
TLDRThe video script discusses the philosophical implications of the Big Bang theory and the concept of a multiverse. It delves into Fred Hoyle's objections to the Big Bang and his development of the steady-state model, which was later refuted by cosmic background radiation evidence. The conversation explores the fine-tuning of the universe's parameters, which some interpret as evidence of a designer, while others propose the multiverse theory as an alternative explanation. The script also touches on the challenges of faith and the resistance to the idea of a divine authority, suggesting that the multiverse theory may be more appealing to those who reject the concept of God's sovereignty.
Takeaways
- 🧬 The script discusses the concept of the Big Bang and its criticism by Fred Hoyle, who favored the steady-state model over a universe with a beginning.
- 🌌 Hoyle's steady-state model, which proposed an eternal universe, was later disproven by evidence such as the cosmic background radiation.
- 🤝 The speaker had personal encounters with key proponents of the steady-state model, including Hermann Bondi and Thomas Gold.
- 🔬 Fred Hoyle's later life saw a shift in his worldview due to the discovery of fine-tuning parameters in the universe, leading him to a quasi-theistic perspective.
- 🌟 The phenomenon of fine-tuning refers to the precise balance of physical constants and parameters that allow for the existence of life and the universe as we know it.
- 🤔 The script raises questions about the implications of our current understanding of physics and cosmology, and how it might evolve in the next 100 years.
- 🌍 It explores the idea of a multiverse as an alternative explanation to fine-tuning, suggesting that our universe's life-friendly conditions may not be as improbable if many universes exist.
- 🔮 The multiverse theory is seen by some as a counterargument to the fine-tuner argument, proposing that our universe's specific conditions are a result of chance among many universes.
- 💭 Both the fine-tuner and multiverse hypotheses require a level of faith, as neither can provide the concrete evidence that skeptics demand for the existence of God or the physical reality of other universes.
- 🛠 The script uses analogies like a well-designed engine or recipe to illustrate the intuitive appeal of the fine-tuner argument, suggesting design implies a designer.
- 📜 It also touches on the philosophical and ethical implications of an intelligent designer, including the concept of authority and the resistance some people have to the idea of being under divine authority.
Q & A
What was Fred Hoyle's objection to the Big Bang theory?
-Fred Hoyle objected to the Big Bang theory because he believed that 'nothing comes from nothing,' and he rejected the idea that the physical universe came from nothing. He also felt that the Big Bang theory was too similar to the Genesis account in the Bible, which he detested.
What is the steady state model proposed by Fred Hoyle?
-The steady state model proposed by Fred Hoyle is the idea of a past eternal universe, which suggests that the universe has no beginning or end and has been existing infinitely. This model was later refuted by the discovery of cosmic background radiation.
What evidence led to the rejection of the steady state model?
-The discovery of cosmic background radiation provided evidence that the universe had a beginning, which contradicted the steady state model's claim of an eternal universe. This evidence led to the rejection of the steady state model in favor of the Big Bang theory.
What is the concept of fine-tuning in the universe?
-The concept of fine-tuning refers to the phenomenon where multiple parameters in the universe fall within very narrow tolerances, which are necessary for the existence of stable galaxies, basic chemistry, and life. If these parameters were slightly different, life and the universe as we know it would not be possible.
How did Fred Hoyle's discovery of the carbon resonance level lead to his reconsideration of a theistic worldview?
-Fred Hoyle discovered a special resonance level necessary for the formation of carbon, which is essential for life. This discovery, along with the realization of other finely tuned parameters in the universe, led him to consider that a 'super intellect' might have designed the universe to make life possible, moving him towards a quasi-theistic worldview.
What is the multiverse theory and how does it relate to the fine-tuning argument?
-The multiverse theory suggests that our universe is just one of an infinite number of universes, each with different laws and constants of physics. It posits that the fine-tuning we observe in our universe is not improbable because there are so many universes that at least one would have life-friendly conditions. This theory is often seen as an alternative to the fine-tuning argument for a designer.
What is the observer selection effect mentioned in the script?
-The observer selection effect is the idea that we observe a universe that is conducive to our existence because we are observers within it. If we were in a universe that was not life-friendly, we would not be here to observe it, which makes it seem as though our universe is special by chance.
What are the implications of the fine-tuner argument for ethics and human dignity?
-The fine-tuner argument suggests the existence of an intelligent designer, which can provide a basis for ethics, human rights, and human dignity. It implies that love, thoughts, and other immaterial aspects of life have meaning and purpose within the context of a designed universe.
Why might some people find the multiverse theory more appealing than the idea of a fine-tuner?
-Some people may find the multiverse theory more appealing because it does not require the acceptance of a personal intelligence or authority, such as God. The idea of God implies accountability and responsibility, which can be uncomfortable for those who prefer to avoid the concept of divine authority.
What does C.S. Lewis's statement about desiring a 'Heavenly grandfather' rather than a 'Heavenly Father' suggest about human attitudes towards God?
-C.S. Lewis's statement suggests that people often prefer a divine figure that is nurturing and indulgent, providing comfort and pleasure without demanding anything in return. This reflects a reluctance to accept a God who has authority and expects moral and ethical behavior from us.
Outlines
🌌 The Big Bang and Steady State Debate
This paragraph discusses the contrasting views on the origins of the universe, focusing on the objections of Fred Hoyle to the Big Bang theory. Hoyle, a proponent of the steady state model, believed in an eternal universe and criticized the Big Bang for implying a creation from 'nothing,' which he found preposterous. The paragraph also touches upon the cosmic background radiation's role in debunking the steady state model and the evolution of Hoyle's views towards a quasi-theistic world view due to the discovery of fine-tuning parameters. It raises questions about the limitations of our current understanding and the potential for future scientific advancements, hinting at the concept of multiverses.
🔬 The Phenomenon of Fine-Tuning and the Multiverse Hypothesis
This paragraph delves into the concept of fine-tuning in the universe, where certain parameters are precisely set to allow for the existence of life and stable galaxies. It references Fred Hoyle's reconsideration of his atheistic stance due to the evidence of fine-tuning, leading him to suggest a 'super intellect' behind the design of physics and chemistry. The paragraph contrasts this with the multiverse hypothesis, which posits that our universe's fine-tuning is not evidence of design but a result of being one of an immense number of universes with varying conditions. It discusses the observer selection effect and the philosophical implications of both the fine-tuner and multiverse theories, highlighting the role of faith in the absence of definitive evidence.
🛡 The Implications of Design and the Appeal of the Multiverse
The final paragraph explores the implications of an intelligent designer, suggesting that it provides a foundation for ethics, human rights, and the existence of immaterial concepts like love and thought. It contrasts this with the discomfort some feel with the idea of divine authority, which challenges the notion of personal autonomy. The paragraph also discusses C.S. Lewis's observation on the human desire for a benevolent but non-authoritative higher power. It concludes by suggesting that the appeal of the multiverse theory may stem from a resistance to the idea of divine authority, reflecting on the human tendency to prefer theories that align with personal beliefs rather than objective evidence.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Big Bang
💡Steady State Model
💡Fine-Tuning
💡Cosmic Background Radiation
💡Multiverse
💡Observer Selection Effect
💡Fred Hoyle
💡Intelligent Design
💡Provisional Science
💡Goldilocks Zone
Highlights
Terrence's humorous take on science's reliance on the Big Bang as a singular miracle.
Fred Hoyle's objection to the Big Bang theory, viewing it as preposterous and contrary to the laws of conservation.
Hoyle's development of the steady-state model as an alternative to the Big Bang, later refuted by cosmic background radiation.
Personal encounters with key figures of the steady-state model, including Bondi and Hoyle, revealing their perspectives on the theory's validity.
Hoyle's eventual shift towards a quasi-theistic worldview due to the discovery of fine-tuning parameters.
The unexpected evidence for a beginning to the universe challenging materialistic views.
The evolution of understanding in physics over the past century and speculation about future advancements.
The concept of multiple universes as an alternative explanation to fine-tuning and its implications for the existence of God.
Hoyle's investigation into the abundance of carbon in the universe and its significance for life.
The phenomenon of fine-tuning, where multiple parameters in the universe fall within narrow tolerances necessary for life.
Hoyle's conclusion that the fine-tuning of the universe suggests the existence of a 'super intellect'.
The comparison between the fine-tuner argument and the multiverse theory as competing explanations for the universe's order.
The role of faith in both theistic design and the multiverse theories, and the lack of concrete evidence for either.
The implications of an intelligent designer for ethics, human rights, and the existence of immaterial concepts like love and thoughts.
C.S. Lewis's perspective on the desire for a 'Heavenly grandfather' versus a 'Heavenly Father' and the resistance to divine authority.
The appeal of the multiverse theory as a way to avoid the concept of divine authority and the responsibility it entails.
Transcripts
Terrence we kind of had a very funny
thing that he said about science he said
science wants you to believe that it's
all about measurement and reason if you
allow them one miracle that one
Miracle's the Big Bang Yes that all
things come from the most Preposterous
idea ever yeah that everything came from
nothing in one big miracle that's right
I completely
this was this was her Fred hoyle's
objection to the Big Bang he was he said
he was a democracy and he didn't believe
and he said nothing comes from nothing
and I simply refused to believe that
that the physical Universe came from
nothing physical and moreover he said it
smacks of the Genesis account which he
detested and so he rejected the big bang
and formulated this steady state model
by the way really quick that steady
state model that he's talking about is
the idea of a past Eternal Universe
which modern science has basically now
I'll totally debunked just context
um that was later I think decisively
refuted by the discovery of the cosmic
background radiation his uh it happens
I've had funny coincidental meetings
with Hoyle Hermann Bondi and Thomas gold
all three of the The Architects of the
steady state model I met Bondi and Hoyle
when I was a PhD Student in Cambridge
and Hoyle held on to his dying day for
the the steady state but uh Bondi uh
actually we had a conversation about it
and he said that that well it turned out
that it was a brilliant idea it was a
beautiful idea just that it turned out
that everything about it was wrong and
he rejected it so uh but uh later Hoyle
had his own conversion to a kind of
quasi-theistic world view because of his
Discovery the fine-tuning parameters but
the the point is that the materialists
did not expect
to have this evidence for the beginning
Hoyle thought that you know the laws of
physics were the the
first law of conservation of matter and
energy
matter and energy are neither created
nor destroyed except at the big bang
and he didn't like that but eventually I
think the physics Community came around
there were so many indicators of that
beginning event now again as we're
discussing detection methods and our
ability to understand things is so
radically different from 1920 100 years
ago
what is it going to be like 100 years
from now is this they're going to be I
mean are we making assumptions based on
very limited data it's a lot of great
question for us but it seems fairly
limited given the scope of not just this
universe but then the concept of
multiverses like what is what are your
thoughts of this concept of multiple
universes I'd love to talk about the
multi infinite yeah I'm glad you're glad
you raised it uh and this also this also
connects to uh the the uh the Fred Hoyle
story which is fascinating
um again with the Proviso
science is necessarily provisional and
we of course always have to be open to
new data right
um but
um the trend lines
I think are are the things that are
really interesting
uh so there's this Hoyles let's start
with oil and then we'll get to
Multiverse okay so oil is
um great astrophysicist he's thinking
about carbon
and he realizes that carbon has this
unique property of being able to make
long chain-like molecules and long
chain-like molecules and therefore are
capable of storing information and we
need information to build so specified
structures in particular
living systems so he's trying to explain
the abundance of carbon in the universe
and he thinks of four or five different
ways that won't work and finally he
comes up a way that would work and long
story short it turns out for that that
um way of building carbon chemically to
work it has to do with combining uh
simpler
uh
what are called nucleons uh smaller
atoms to get the carbon molecule there
has to be a special resonance level for
the carbon molecule special way it sings
it has a certain energy level that that
causes it to
uh uh sing at a certain frequency turns
out the frequency he predicts which
would be necessary to explain the origin
of carbon in the universe uh
exists within a particular form of
carbon and they determine this at
Caltech but then that turns out to be
the the the the the tip of an of a
deeper Iceberg of a whole series of
other things in the universe that would
have to be just right to make this
formation of carbon possible the
gravitational force would have to it
when inside Stars the gravity couldn't
be too strong too weak it's
electromagnetic force couldn't be too
strong or too weak the ratio between
them couldn't be too strong or too weak
everything fell in this sweet spot this
kind of Goldilocks zone where um and we
now we now call this the phenomenon of
fine tuning that there are multiple
parameters in the universe that fall
Within These very narrow tolerances
outside of which
not only life would be impossible but
stable galaxies and even basic chemistry
would be impossible
and so that is to say even to get the
evolutionary process going you would
have to have all these beautifully
finely tuned parameters in place
and so oil starts having a rethink about
this and he's a staunch atheist
scientific atheist materialist but he
ends up
concluding that fine-tuning points to
some kind of a fine tuner and he's
quoted as saying that the best data we
have suggests that a super intellect has
monkeyed with physics and chemistry in
order to make life possible
and so he moves to this sort of
rudimentary theistic position in his in
his philosophy or his worldview now a
lot of other physicists have come to the
same conclusion sir John polkinghorn
great Cambridge physicist had a late in
life conversion religious conversion it
was partially predicated on his
awareness as a physicist of the evidence
for the universe as a setup job the
Goldilocks universe is some physicists
who called it
um so that's kind of as Hoyle said kind
of Common Sense interpretation when we
see other systems that are finally tuned
like a French recipe or an internal
combustion engine what we mean by
fine-tuning is an ensemble of improbable
parameters that work together to
accomplish some remarkable outcome or
functional functional or remarkable
outcome that's what if you see a
internal combustion engine you think it
was engineered because it's finely tuned
so common sense
the contrary argument to that the main
one there have been others but not even
most secular physicists regard them as
compelling anymore the main contrary
argument has been the idea of the
Multiverse that yes our universe has
this array of jointly improbable for
improbable parameters that are in that
sweet spot
but we just happen to be the lucky one
because there's a gabillion other
universes out there
and with different combinations of the
laws and constants of physics and
different initial conditions at the
beginning of those universes so all
those things that were just right in our
universe are yes extremely improbable
but there's so many other universes that
that that that that that the probability
of a universe with that set of
life-friendly conditions arising
somewhere had to arise somewhere
inevitably and we just happen to be in
that lucky universe and then we are
stunned by that and they call that this
Observer selection effect
so that's superficially
uh an equally plausible explanation to
the Fine tuner argument and a lot of
physicists have told me that they regard
the two as a wash you can believe in a
fine tuner or you could believe in a
Multiverse
I think the fine tuner the the we'll
call it theistic design argument
provides a better overall explanation in
both scenarios there is a level of faith
that is required we don't have evidence
for a Multiverse in the way that people
would want evidence of God atheists want
to see some physical manifestation of
God and they they also don't have that
for the Multiverse rather what you do is
you look at what we can observe and then
you make inferences based on that so I
love the example that he gave of a
combustible engine I love the example
that he gave of a of a well-made recipe
you look at the recipe and you infer
that there might be a cook that played a
role somewhere in this extremely
well-designed recipe you look at a
combustible engine you think there was
probably an engineer you look at a
painting like you know um like the Mona
Lisa and you think you know I wonder if
there was a painter's handiwork
somewhere along the way
um you look at the complexity of a
computer system and you think maybe
there was a designer behind this as well
you look at this universe and its
complexity and you and you realize that
due to that fine-tuning effect perhaps
just perhaps that there was actually
design that went into this for the same
reasons or you say well wait a second
like he already kind of explained I
don't need to rehash it but maybe we
just feel like it's special but really
it's just a numbers game where we're
lucky in the Multiverse both however
require Faith neither of those scenarios
meets the level of uh the the criteria
of evidence that atheists want God to be
able to bring to the table neither can
the Multiverse Theory bring that to the
table so we're left in a place of of
Faith at this juncture but again in the
scenario of there being an intelligent
designer we also have a Bedrock for
ethics for human rights for human
dignity for the fact that we actually
have things like love that exists things
like thoughts that exist that are
immaterial all of all these other things
begin to make more sense in the context
of there being an intelligent designer
I.E God what's inconvenient about that
is that then you also have this idea of
an authority if there's a personal uh
intelligence above us and who has
created the universe then we're on the
hook
in terms of him being an authority this
is where C.S Lewis talks about we desire
a Heavenly grandfather not a Heavenly
Father we want someone that gives us
presence and scratches our back and
gives us all the things that we like but
never asks anything of us and does not
ask us to be under their Authority in
any way and I really think that that is
the rub and the reason that the
Multiverse theory is more appealing is
people when their hearts are hard
against God simply cannot stand the idea
of his authority because that means that
they're not God and so just some things
to consider all this being said you guys
this was another
awesome clip I love the Rogan Stephen
Meyer mashup I hope you guys do too
um I might try to pull one more out of
there if not we'll move on to some other
good content and I'll see you guys in
the next video thanks a lot bye
[Music]
thank you
Просмотреть больше связанных видео
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)