Popular Youtuber EXPOSED Elden Ring Gamer For Being HOMOPHOBIC

Summary

The transcript discusses the controversy surrounding a player's malicious griefing behavior in an online game, where they force others into using valuable in-game items like the Bone of Order, which could unban players after disconnections. The griefer argues that victims can simply use the item, ignoring the significant time investment required to obtain it again. The frustration of the speaker highlights the lack of accountability and understanding in the griefer's defense, emphasizing that causing others distress for personal amusement is wrong, regardless of the time passed since the incident.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker is discussing the impact of griefing in online multiplayer games, where a player intentionally disrupts another's session for amusement.
• 😀 Griefing actions can lead to in-game penalties like disconnections, which are not always easily reversible without using specific items like the Bone of Order.
• 😀 The Bone of Order is an item that allows players to undo certain penalties but requires 10 to 14 hours of gameplay to obtain after each use.
• 😀 The speaker criticizes the logic of using the Bone of Order as a defense against griefing, as it places an unfair burden on the victim to play for hours to recover from disruptions.
• 😀 Using cheats like Alt+F4 to avoid penalties or forced disconnections is seen as a temporary workaround, not a legitimate solution to griefing.
• 😀 The idea that victims of griefing should 'just adapt' by using game mechanics or cheating is portrayed as absurd and unjustifiable.
• 😀 The speaker expresses frustration with people who defend griefing behavior or fail to recognize its negative impact on others.
• 😀 There is a strong condemnation of toxic gaming behaviors that disrupt others for fun, especially when there is no remorse or accountability from the perpetrator.
• 😀 The speaker highlights that this particular incident occurred 11 years ago but emphasizes that the lack of remorse from the individual involved shows a failure to understand the wrongness of their actions.
• 😀 Ultimately, the message is a call for better empathy and understanding in online gaming, encouraging players to consider the consequences of their actions on others.

Q & A

What is the main issue being discussed in the transcript?

The main issue is about griefing in an online game, where one player maliciously disrupts others' gameplay by forcing them to disconnect or crash their game. This is justified by the use of an in-game item, the 'Bone of Order,' which allows players to reverse a soft-ban, causing frustration and time wastage for the victims.

What is a 'soft-ban' and how does it affect the player?

A soft-ban occurs when a player's character is temporarily restricted from online play due to actions like frequent disconnects. This can happen either due to crashes or intentional disconnections. Players can reverse this soft-ban using the Bone of Order item.

How does the 'Bone of Order' work in the game?

The Bone of Order is an in-game item that can be used to reverse a soft-ban on a character. However, it can only be used once for free and requires 10-14 hours of gameplay without illegal disconnects to obtain it again. It cannot be dropped or shared between players.

What is the critique about the use of the Bone of Order to unban players?

The critique highlights that while the Bone of Order can be used to reverse a soft-ban, it requires players to spend significant time playing (10-14 hours) to acquire it again. This is seen as a problematic solution because it forces victims of griefing to waste valuable time to recover from the disruption caused by others.

Why is the individual's behavior in the transcript considered malicious?

The individual's behavior is considered malicious because they are intentionally causing others to disconnect or crash their games, creating unnecessary frustration and forcing them to use precious items like the Bone of Order. This is done out of malice, as the player finds it amusing to disrupt others' experiences.

What is the significance of the 10-14 hour gameplay requirement to acquire the Bone of Order?

The 10-14 hour gameplay requirement to acquire the Bone of Order again makes it clear that the process to recover from a soft-ban is not instantaneous and forces players to invest a significant amount of time. This is seen as an unfair penalty, especially when inflicted by griefers.

What is the argument against the justification that players can just use the Bone of Order to undo bans?

The argument is that the griefer is still in the wrong, as they are causing the disruption. The suggestion that victims can simply use the Bone of Order ignores the fact that players should not have to suffer time penalties to fix something caused by someone else's malice. The behavior of the griefer is still wrong, regardless of the available in-game solutions.

How does the critic feel about the audience of the griefer?

The critic expresses frustration that the griefer's audience does not recognize the harm of the behavior. They find it ridiculous that the audience might support or overlook the griefing as a joke, failing to understand how disruptive and unfair the actions are.

What is the significance of the fact that the Bone of Order cannot be shared or dropped between players?

The fact that the Bone of Order cannot be shared or dropped between players emphasizes that each player must earn their own Bone of Order through legitimate gameplay. This limits the ability to circumvent the time investment required to recover from a soft-ban and adds to the frustration when griefers disrupt the gameplay.

Why does the critic say the behavior is 'deranged' and 'mentally challenged'?

The critic uses these terms to emphasize the severity and absurdity of the griefer's actions. They believe it is unreasonable and cruel to force another player into a situation where they are required to spend hours of gameplay recovering from a soft-ban caused by malicious behavior, especially when the griefer shows no remorse.