Direksi Antam Harus Bertanggung Jawab Kasus Korupsi Cap Emas Palsu

Summary

A court sentenced six former officials from PT Aneka Tambang (Antam) to eight years in prison and a fine for their involvement in a corruption case that caused state financial losses of IDR 3.3 trillion. The officials were found guilty of mismanaging the company's precious metal refining business between 2010 and 2021. The panel of judges also held Antam's board of directors accountable, citing their failure to review the legality and financial aspects of the business operations. This case, which involved 109 tons of gold, has drawn significant public attention.

Takeaways

• 😀 Six former officials of PT Aneka Tambang (Antam) were sentenced to guilty verdicts in a corruption case.
• 😀 The corruption case resulted in state financial losses of 3.3 trillion IDR.
• 😀 Each of the six defendants was sentenced to 8 years in prison and fined IDR 50 million, with a subsidiary sentence of 4 months in prison.
• 😀 The Antam board of directors were also held responsible for the corruption, as the case occurred under their management from 2010 to 2021.
• 😀 The defendants were leaders of Antam's precious metals management and refining business unit (UBPLM), with organizational decisions tied to the Antam board.
• 😀 The court ruled that the responsibility for the corruption was not only on the defendants but also on Antam’s directors, as they failed to oversee the company's operations properly.
• 😀 According to the law, directors must manage the company for its benefit and in alignment with the company’s objectives, which Antam's directors neglected.
• 😀 The court noted that the Antam board had never conducted a review of financial, legal, or management aspects related to the business activities in question.
• 😀 The case involved allegations of corruption surrounding 109 tons of gold with Antam's stamp, drawing public attention.
• 😀 The Attorney General's Office handled the case, which was a significant corruption scandal involving a state-owned mining company.

Q & A

What was the sentence handed to the six former officials of Antam's precious metals management unit?

The six former officials were sentenced to 8 years in prison and fined IDR 50 million, with the fine being subsidiary to 4 months in prison.

How much state financial loss was caused by the corruption case involving PT Antam?

The corruption case caused state financial losses amounting to IDR 3.3 trillion.

What responsibility did the directors of PT Antam bear in this case?

The directors of PT Antam were held responsible for the corruption case, particularly for the refining and melting of Antam's precious metal gold stamp business, which was not aligned with the company's business field.

What role did the business unit leaders have in the corruption case?

The business unit leaders were responsible for the operations based on the decisions of the Antam board of directors. They were directly responsible for the corruption activities that occurred.

How long did the defendants serve as officials in Antam's precious metals management unit?

The six defendants served as officials in the precious metals management unit of PT Antam from 2010 to 2021.

What legal provisions were cited by the judge in the case?

The judge referred to Article 97 paragraph 1 Jo, Article 92 paragraph 1 of the Law on Limited Liability Companies, which states that directors are responsible for managing the company for the benefit of the company.

What is the significance of the gold stamp business in this case?

The gold stamp business, which involved melting and refining services, was a significant part of the case as it was found to be outside the scope of the company's intended purpose and business activities.

What was the reaction of the panel of judges regarding the directors' actions?

The panel of judges stated that the directors were aware of the activities but failed to take any corrective actions, including reviewing the financial and legal aspects of the business, which contributed to the corruption case.

What was the public response to the case?

The case attracted public attention due to the involvement of 109 tons of gold with Antam's stamp, leading to allegations of significant corruption.

Which organization handled the investigation into the case?

The Attorney General's Office handled the investigation and prosecution of the case involving the former officials of PT Antam.