2300억 들인 공무원 국외훈련, 보고서는 표절 또 표절 | KBS 시사멘터리 추적 28회 22.12.11

Summary

This video script investigates the misuse of public funds in South Korea through government employee training programs abroad. The investigation reveals widespread issues of plagiarism in training reports, which were funded by taxpayer money. Over the past five years, millions were spent on these programs, with many reports failing to meet the standards of originality. The report explores the costs involved, the questionable ethics of these overseas training programs, and the lack of accountability, raising concerns about whether the public benefit truly justifies the expenses.

Takeaways

• 😀 Public officials in South Korea have been refusing to meet, and only those who welcomed the journalists were considered 'friendly'.
• 😀 Many public officials attended long-term training programs abroad, despite the pandemic, costing taxpayers a significant amount.
• 😀 A total of 631 public servants from central government departments went for training during the COVID-19 pandemic, while over 2,000 have attended such programs in the last five years.
• 😀 Taxpayers spent approximately 2.3 billion won (2300억원) funding public servants' overseas training programs over the last five years.
• 😀 Some public servants, like three from Gangwon-do, went to Hawaii during the pandemic to 'research tourism recovery', even though the conditions were challenging.
• 😀 After examining submitted reports, it was discovered that a large percentage contained plagiarism, with some reports showing plagiarism rates as high as 93%.
• 😀 High-ranking officials often received significantly more training funds, with some public officials getting up to 2 billion won for training programs abroad.
• 😀 Many reports were found to have copied large sections from existing research papers, with some officials trying to evade plagiarism detection tools using various tactics.
• 😀 An investigation revealed that a large number of training reports were filled with content copied from domestic sources like research papers, news articles, and blogs.
• 😀 Despite claims of transparency and educational efforts to prevent plagiarism, many of the submitted reports were still found to be inadequate and improperly used taxpayer money.

Q & A

What issue is being investigated in the script?

The script investigates the misuse of public funds by South Korean civil servants for overseas training programs, focusing on excessive expenses and plagiarism in training reports.

What was the problem with the reports submitted by civil servants after their overseas training?

Many of the reports submitted by civil servants contained significant levels of plagiarism, with some reports having plagiarism rates as high as 93%, including verbatim copying of academic papers and research reports.

How did the investigation uncover the plagiarism in the reports?

The investigation used plagiarism detection tools to analyze the reports, revealing that a large portion of them contained plagiarized content, including direct copying from academic papers, books, and other sources.

What were some of the methods used by civil servants to bypass plagiarism detection systems?

Some civil servants used techniques to trick plagiarism detection tools, such as heavily relying on quotations and improperly citing sources, or translating foreign materials into Korean without proper attribution.

How much public money was spent on overseas training programs in the past five years?

Over the past five years, approximately 2.3 trillion Korean won (about 2.3 billion USD) was spent on overseas training programs for civil servants.

What kind of overseas training did civil servants typically undergo?

Civil servants typically participated in long-term training programs in countries like the United States, Canada, and the UK, often for professional development and research in various fields related to their roles.

What was the impact of COVID-19 on overseas training for civil servants?

Despite the COVID-19 pandemic causing disruptions in international travel, the script reveals that civil servants continued to undertake overseas training, even traveling to locations like Hawaii, where they conducted research on tourism industry revitalization during a time when tourism was nearly nonexistent.

Why was the training in Hawaii considered problematic?

The training in Hawaii was criticized because the research was done remotely through online sessions, and the reports submitted later were found to be lacking in depth and originality, contributing to questions about the effectiveness and legitimacy of the training.

How did the government respond to the issue of plagiarism in the reports?

The government promised to address the issue by introducing stricter plagiarism detection systems and conducting more thorough training on plagiarism. However, there were concerns about the effectiveness and sincerity of these measures.

What questions were raised about the necessity of these overseas training programs?

The script raises doubts about the necessity of sending civil servants overseas for training, especially considering that much of the information in the reports was sourced from domestic materials like academic papers and news articles. It questions whether the training is truly beneficial or just an expensive perk.