FBA Sista Checks The NY Reparations Commission For Using Race Based Language Which Is Illegal

Summary

The speaker criticizes Democratic-led reparations efforts in cities like California and New York, arguing they are ineffective and likely unconstitutional. They emphasize that reparations should be lineage-based, specifically for descendants of enslaved Africans, not for immigrants. Legal challenges and the racial nature of these bills are discussed, with a call for a more focused, decentralized movement. The speaker advocates for direct cash payments as reparations, rejecting symbolic gestures. Ultimately, they express optimism, urging continued activism and unity in the fight for reparations, asserting that persistence will lead to success.

Takeaways

• 😀 The reparations commissions set up in some Democrat-run cities are seen as ineffective and a waste of time, as they lack substance and legal backing.
• 😀 FBA (Foundational Black Americans) are challenging the approach to reparations, particularly highlighting the inclusion of immigrants in discussions about compensation, which they argue is not appropriate.
• 😀 The speaker emphasizes the need for reparations to be based on lineage, specifically for Freedmen, rather than race, to avoid legal challenges and to ensure fairness.
• 😀 A critical view is taken towards the current bill, which is seen as unconstitutional and a waste of taxpayer funds due to its lack of legal and practical foundations.
• 😀 The speaker calls for a nationwide movement to stand firm on the demand for reparations, emphasizing the importance of direct cash payments rather than symbolic gestures.
• 😀 The bill, despite being signed into law, is expected to face legal challenges and will likely be struck down because it lacks a clear, constitutionally sound basis.
• 😀 FBA activists are actively working with legislators to propose amendments, though they face resistance, even from those within their own community, who may not see the potential benefit.
• 😀 The speaker stresses the importance of unity and education among the Black community, pointing out that many are now more informed and prepared to fight for justice using legal and constitutional knowledge.
• 😀 There's a concern that if reparations are race-based, people who are not descended from enslaved Africans may claim a share, undermining the integrity of the reparations effort.
• 😀 Despite skepticism and doubts from some, the speaker expresses strong confidence that reparations, in the form of cash payments, will eventually be secured, citing the historical resilience of the Black community in overcoming obstacles.

Q & A

What is the primary criticism of the reparations commissions in Democrat-run cities?

The primary criticism is that these commissions are seen as a waste of time, with a lack of genuine action. The speaker argues that they are symbolic rather than substantive, focusing on legal issues and failing to provide real reparations for FBA people.

How does the speaker view the inclusion of immigrants in reparations discussions?

The speaker criticizes the idea of including immigrants in the reparations conversation, arguing that immigrants did not experience slavery like FBA people did, and that reparations should be based on lineage, not race.

What is the speaker's stance on the legal and constitutional validity of the reparations bills?

The speaker believes the reparations bills are unconstitutional and illegal. They point out that race-based reparations are not legally viable, citing the overturning of affirmative action and the necessity of reparations being lineage-based.

Why does the speaker emphasize the term 'Freedman' over other terms like 'Black' or 'African American'?

The speaker emphasizes 'Freedman' because it is a legally recognized term tied to FBA lineage, and using race-based terminology like 'Black' or 'African American' would allow non-descendants of slavery to claim reparations, undermining the purpose.

What does the speaker mean by 'race-based compensation' not being law?

The speaker argues that race-based compensation, which includes providing reparations based on race rather than lineage, will never become law because it is unconstitutional and opens the door to people of different racial backgrounds claiming reparations.

How does the speaker describe the fight for reparations in America?

The speaker describes the fight as ongoing and rooted in resilience. Despite setbacks and resistance, particularly from politicians, the movement for reparations continues with the goal of ensuring FBA people receive justice in the form of cash payments.

What role does education and research play in the speaker's argument?

Education and research are crucial in the speaker's argument, as they stress that FBA people now have access to knowledge about the law and the Constitution. This enables them to challenge political figures with educated and informed arguments.

What is the significance of the FBA movement being decentralized?

The decentralization of the FBA movement is seen as its strength because it avoids reliance on a single leader. The speaker believes this makes it harder for political forces to strike down or weaken the movement, as everyone within the movement can take leadership.

Why does the speaker believe reparations should be in the form of cash payments?

The speaker insists that reparations should be in cash payments, citing that courts regularly assign monetary restitution for injustices. They reject alternative forms of reparations as insufficient and symbolic.

How does the speaker view the future of reparations for FBA people?

The speaker is optimistic about the future of reparations, believing that FBA people will eventually receive compensation in the form of cash payments. They argue that the movement is gaining momentum, with reparations now being discussed in mainstream media and government meetings.