Ecco come la Siria ha sepolto il monopolio russo del gas.Trump ha notato la debolezza di Putin.

Summary

In this video, the speaker discusses the collapse of Bashar al-Assad's regime in Syria, marking a significant shift in the country's geopolitical landscape. The analysis focuses on Russia's involvement, driven by economic interests in gas pipelines and military strategy. The video highlights the consequences of Russia's defeat in Syria, including the loss of influence and the broader implications for international relations, especially with Turkey and Ukraine. Additionally, a pro-Russian source reflects on the military losses, the challenges facing Russia, and the potential for increased pressure from global leaders like Donald Trump.

Takeaways

• 😀 The Assad regime in Syria, which had been in power for 53 years, has collapsed after a rapid advance by a coalition of Sunni rebels, leading to Bashar al-Assad fleeing to Moscow.
• 😀 Russia's involvement in Syria, beginning in 2015, was driven by both geopolitical and economic interests, including the control of gas pipelines passing through Syria to Turkey and Europe.
• 😀 The Russian military intervention in Syria was partially aimed at preventing the completion of competing gas pipelines from Qatar and preventing a loss of influence in the Middle East.
• 😀 Despite Russia's military efforts, the intervention ultimately resulted in a costly failure, with Russia's strategic goals undermined and Assad's regime falling.
• 😀 Putin's withdrawal from Syria, marked by the retreat of Russian military forces and equipment, is seen as a major defeat for Russia's influence in the region.
• 😀 In addition to military losses, Russia suffered economically due to the collapse of its strategic ambitions in Syria, particularly concerning the energy market.
• 😀 The fall of Assad's regime in Syria has weakened Russia’s global standing, with diminished confidence in the Russian military and its ability to maintain alliances.
• 😀 The loss in Syria has led to increased pressure from international figures like Donald Trump, who sees it as a sign of Russia's vulnerability and a potential opportunity for the West.
• 😀 The Turkish government's growing ambitions in the region, particularly regarding Crimea, are seen as a direct consequence of Russia's failure in Syria.
• 😀 The situation in Syria remains unpredictable, and it is unclear how the conflict's outcome will influence Russia’s operations in Ukraine and its broader geopolitical strategy.
• 😀 The speaker highlights the personal toll of the conflict, with the loss of Russian soldiers and the emotional impact of the failure, suggesting an erosion of Russia's power and influence.

Q & A

What were Russia's primary interests in Syria according to the video?

Russia's primary interests in Syria were geopolitical, military, and economic. Specifically, Russia sought to maintain control over gas pipeline routes that could undermine its monopoly in Europe, and to regulate the price of oil and gas. These interests were closely linked to supporting Bashar Assad's regime.

How did Russia's military involvement in Syria impact its reputation?

Russia's military involvement in Syria led to a significant loss of reputation. The failure to maintain Assad's regime and the loss of Russian soldiers were seen as signs of weakness, which were interpreted as diminishing the credibility of Russia’s military power.

Why did Russia initially intervene in Syria in 2015?

Russia intervened in Syria in 2015 primarily to prevent the collapse of Bashar Assad's regime, which was critical to Russia’s strategic interests in the region, including controlling gas pipeline routes and maintaining influence in the Middle East.

What economic consequences did Russia face due to its involvement in Syria?

The economic consequences for Russia included the expenditure of billions of dollars, which could have been better used to improve the lives of Russian citizens. Additionally, Russia's actions in Syria indirectly contributed to the diversification of European gas suppliers, weakening Russia's market dominance.

What role did Turkey play in the conflict as mentioned in the video?

Turkey, under President Erdogan, played a significant role in facilitating Russia's withdrawal from Syria. Russia had to negotiate with Turkey to ensure that their military withdrawal was managed in a way that preserved valuable assets and resources in the region.

How did the US, particularly Donald Trump, react to Russia's situation in Syria?

Donald Trump viewed Russia's situation in Syria as a sign of weakness and a failure. He saw the loss of Assad as a vulnerability and used it as leverage to pressure Russia, suggesting that Putin should end the war in Ukraine as well.

What was the significance of the gas pipelines mentioned in the video?

The gas pipelines, namely the Arab Pipeline and the Qatar-Turkey Pipeline, were crucial economic projects that would have bypassed Russia's control over European gas supplies. Russia intervened in Syria to prevent these pipelines from being completed, as they would have decreased Russia's leverage in Europe.

How did Russia's failure in Syria affect its international alliances?

Russia's failure in Syria has made it more difficult to maintain and build international alliances. The loss of Assad has led to a perceived weakening of Russia's military and diplomatic influence, making it harder to secure allies globally.

What are the potential implications of the Syria defeat for Russia's future, according to the Russian source cited in the video?

The defeat in Syria may lead to increased pressure from countries like the US and Turkey. The Russian source suggests that Russia may struggle to find and maintain allies, and that the defeat could affect its military operations, including the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

What does the speaker believe is the 'ultimate' consequence of Russia's involvement in Syria?

The ultimate consequence of Russia’s involvement in Syria is a loss of strategic influence and a significant blow to its international credibility. The failure in Syria has exposed vulnerabilities that may affect Russia’s broader geopolitical strategy and weaken its position in future conflicts.