동덕여대 락카 비용 안 내고 결국 도망

Summary

The transcript discusses the ongoing protest at Dongduk Women's University, which initially focused on opposing the school's transition to coeducation. The student-led protests, led by the 'Red-Call Feminism' group, faced significant backlash due to illegal actions and the resulting 54 billion KRW in damages. The protest leaders have now disbanded, though there are indications of a 'Season 2' protest with a more cautious approach to avoid legal repercussions. The situation highlights the tension between student activism and institutional authority, with the protestors shifting their strategy in response to mounting legal pressure.

Takeaways

• 😀 The leadership of the Dongduk Women's University protest dissolved after facing challenges in managing the protest and the backlash from legal actions.
• 😀 The protest, initially sparked by opposition to the school's transition to coeducation, experienced internal chaos and lacked clear leadership.
• 😀 The protest leadership announced the use of raised funds for legal defense, likely related to lawsuits filed by the school against protesters.
• 😀 Despite the dissolution of the protest leadership, some students are already planning a 'Season 2' of the protest, but with a more cautious and strategic approach.
• 😀 The focus of the protest shifted from opposing coeducation to dealing with the legal repercussions and damages caused by the protests.
• 😀 The protest leaders, who were previously firm in their stance against coeducation, now adopted a more peaceful and conciliatory approach in response to the looming legal threats.
• 😀 The protest's initial tactics, including illegal actions like property damage, were criticized for lacking foresight, with leaders now planning to avoid such behavior in future protests.
• 😀 There is an irony in the protestors’ stance, as they opposed male inclusion in the university but sought help from male authorities (police, firefighters) when they were in crisis.
• 😀 The protestors’ initial focus on opposing coeducation has shifted towards addressing the 54 billion won in damages and avoiding further legal consequences.
• 😀 The protest’s season 1 has ended, but there are indications that the protestors may continue with a more strategically planned and legally cautious form of activism in season 2.

Q & A

What was the primary cause of the Dongduk University protest mentioned in the transcript?

The protest was primarily driven by opposition to the potential transition of Dongduk University to a co-ed institution. Students, particularly those in the women's-only college, were strongly against the idea, viewing it as a threat to their school's identity.

What role did the '총대' (student leaders) play in the protest?

The '총대' (student leaders) were responsible for organizing and leading the protest. They initially advocated for aggressive tactics such as occupations and vandalism, but later, they acknowledged the consequences and began to shift toward a more peaceful and strategic approach.

What were the key mistakes made during the protest according to the transcript?

The main mistakes included unorganized actions such as illegal occupations of the campus building, vandalism (referred to as 'Nakka 7'), and a general lack of strategic planning, which led to significant legal and financial consequences.

What financial repercussions did the protesters face?

The protesters faced a claim for 54 billion KRW in damages, related to the destruction and disruption caused during the protest, including legal costs and compensation for property damage.

How did the leadership of the protest change after the legal repercussions?

After facing the financial and legal consequences, the leadership (총대) began to scale back their actions. They decided to avoid illegal tactics, focusing instead on more strategic and legally compliant protests, which they termed 'Season 2'.

What is meant by 'Season 2' of the protests?

'Season 2' refers to the possibility of a new wave of protests that would be better organized, legally compliant, and strategically planned, based on the lessons learned from the initial failed protest.

What was the significance of the 'Nakka 7' incident mentioned in the transcript?

'Nakka 7' refers to a specific incident where students engaged in reckless behavior, causing significant damage and contributing to the financial repercussions. It served as a turning point, highlighting the unorganized and destructive nature of the protest.

How did the student leaders' attitudes shift as a result of the protest's failure?

The student leaders shifted from a more radical, confrontational stance to a more peaceful and pragmatic approach, focusing on resolving legal issues and planning future protests that would avoid illegal activities.

What is the contradiction highlighted by the transcript regarding the protestors' stance on gender?

The contradiction lies in the students' anti-male stance during the protest, where they argued for a women-only space, yet when faced with danger during the protest, they sought help from male police officers and firemen, highlighting the hypocrisy of their position.

What do the students plan to do differently in 'Season 2' of the protests?

In 'Season 2', the students plan to focus on more legal and peaceful actions, avoiding illegal tactics such as vandalism or reckless occupations. They aim to build alliances with professors and organize large-scale, legal protests while learning from their past mistakes.