AI 🧠 Kiszivárgott az OpenAI SORA! - Ezeket generálták vele!

Summary

A recent leak of OpenAI's video generation model, Sora, has sparked interest and controversy. A group of 300 testers, dissatisfied with their compensation, shared the model via Hugging Face, allowing users to generate videos briefly. While the model, speculated to be a turbo version, offers 1080p resolution at 30fps with various styles, the video quality has been critiqued as subpar compared to competitors. The delay in its official release is likely due to both regulatory concerns and the model's unfinished state. Despite flaws, the leaked videos showcase AI's growing potential in video content creation, raising questions about its future and ethical implications.

Takeaways

• 😀 A group of 300 testers (referred to as 'artists') leaked the Sora AI model after expressing frustration over low compensation from OpenAI for their work.
• 😀 The Sora model was initially released unofficially through Hugging Face, but it has since been removed and is no longer publicly accessible.
• 😀 The leaked model had the ability to generate videos in Full HD (1080p) at 30fps, with a field indicating possible customization options for different styles.
• 😀 The 'Turbo' version of the Sora model is likely a faster, less powerful version, possibly explaining the lower quality of some generated videos.
• 😀 Some of the generated videos, such as a Coca-Cola commercial, displayed significant issues like inconsistent lighting and object morphing, but were still seen as impressive overall.
• 😀 The leaked videos featured several creative styles, including anime-inspired visuals, showing that the model can produce a wide range of content.
• 😀 Despite the impressive capabilities, many of the generated videos have been criticized for quality issues when compared to rival AI tools.
• 😀 There are concerns that OpenAI has delayed the official release of Sora due to both regulatory issues and the current technical limitations of the model.
• 😀 The leak of the model could have legal consequences, as the testers who made it public might face legal action for violating terms of use.
• 😀 The video suggests that OpenAI is taking a cautious approach with AI tools like Sora due to the lack of clear regulatory guidelines in the industry, especially compared to Chinese competitors who release such tools more freely.

Q & A

What is 'Sora' and why was it leaked?

'Sora' is a video generation tool developed by OpenAI. It was leaked by a group of 300 test users who were dissatisfied with the low compensation they received for testing the tool. These users decided to release it publicly, causing a temporary availability of the tool on Hugging Face.

How were the videos generated by Sora in terms of quality?

The quality of the videos generated by Sora was somewhat disappointing. Although the tool produced Full HD videos at 30 FPS, the videos exhibited noticeable flaws, such as pixelation, strange artifacts, and unrealistic movements. Some examples included a cat's tail merging with a chair leg and an animation with inconsistent lighting and object behavior.

What were the major concerns of the test users who leaked Sora?

The test users, who identified themselves as artists, were frustrated with the low compensation they received for testing the video generation tool. Their dissatisfaction with the terms and lack of recognition led them to release the tool to the public as a form of protest or 'revenge' against OpenAI.

What does the term 'turbo model' refer in relation to Sora?

The term 'turbo model' likely refers to a faster, less powerful version of the Sora video generation model. It is speculated that the leaked version of the tool was a turbo model, which could explain the lower quality of the generated videos, as turbo models are typically designed to be more efficient but less advanced than the full versions.

What legal implications could arise from the leak of Sora?

The leak of Sora could lead to legal action against the test users who released the tool. Since the users violated their contracts with OpenAI by leaking proprietary software, they may face legal consequences for breaching non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) and causing harm to the company's intellectual property rights.

Why is OpenAI hesitant to officially release Sora?

OpenAI is likely hesitant to release Sora due to concerns about both the quality of the tool and the regulatory landscape surrounding AI. The company may be cautious about launching a product that isn't fully polished and may also be wary of potential legal and ethical challenges related to AI use and regulation.

How does Sora compare to other AI video generation tools?

While Sora shows promise, its quality doesn't yet match that of competing AI video generation tools from other companies. For example, Sora's output exhibited flaws that rival tools, such as those from Chinese companies, might not have. This suggests that while Sora is an exciting development, it still requires further refinement to compete with other leading models.

What was the significance of the 'natural' style in the Sora leak?

The 'natural' style mentioned in the leak likely refers to a more realistic or lifelike video generation mode in Sora. It suggests that the model could produce videos in different artistic styles, with 'natural' being one of the options, offering users the ability to customize the style of the video output, similar to other video generators that allow for stylistic variations.

Why might OpenAI be focusing on AI regulation rather than releasing new tools?

OpenAI is likely focusing on AI regulation due to the rapidly changing legal landscape surrounding AI technologies. In different countries, there are growing discussions on how to regulate AI, especially as it becomes more integrated into creative industries. OpenAI may be prioritizing compliance with these evolving regulations before releasing new tools like Sora more widely.

What are some of the flaws identified in the leaked Sora videos?

Some of the flaws in the leaked Sora videos included pixelation, unrealistic movements, and strange artifacts. For example, a cat's tail appeared to merge with a chair leg, and in another video, a fire scene showed inconsistencies in the building's appearance, which led to criticism of the model's current capabilities.