Bawaslu Ungkap Sejumlah Permasalahan di Pemilu 2024 #Shorts

Summary

The transcript highlights a range of issues during an election voting process across various polling stations (TPS). It details problems such as delayed voting starts, inadequate accessibility for disabled voters, incomplete election materials, and voter intimidation. Other concerns include irregularities like vote tampering, improper election procedures, lack of transparency in counting, and cases of double voting. Additionally, the document reports violations such as campaign influence, unmandated witnesses, and insufficient monitoring of the process, all of which compromised the integrity of the election across multiple TPS.

Takeaways

• 😀 37,466 polling stations (TPS) opened after the scheduled time, delaying the voting process.
• 😀 12,884 polling stations lacked assistive devices for visually impaired voters.
• 😀 10,496 polling stations had incomplete election logistics.
• 😀 8,219 polling stations reported voters using their voting rights outside their designated residence area.
• 😀 6,084 polling stations experienced confusion with swapped ballots.
• 😀 5,836 polling stations had disability assistance voters whose helpers did not sign the statement form.
• 😀 544 polling stations lacked proper explanation of the voting and counting process by election officers.
• 😀 3,724 polling stations did not display voter lists, including those marked as ineligible voters.
• 😀 3,521 polling stations saw election witnesses wearing campaign-related attire, violating neutrality rules.
• 😀 2,632 polling stations reported potential voter manipulation or directed voting by campaign teams or election officials.
• 😀 2,413 polling stations had instances of double voting by the same individual.
• 😀 2,271 polling stations saw intimidation of voters or election officials during the voting process.
• 😀 11,233 polling stations had restricted access for election observers or witnesses.
• 😀 3,463 polling stations began vote counting before voting ended, violating the timeline.
• 😀 2,162 polling stations reported discrepancies between the count of valid and invalid ballots and the number of voters.
• 😀 195 polling stations failed to provide necessary voting forms to election observers.
• 😀 1,888 polling stations made it difficult for observers or the public to clearly observe the vote counting process.
• 😀 1,473 polling stations had incidents of intimidation directed at election officials.

Q & A

What issue was observed with the opening of polling stations?

Polling stations were delayed in opening, with 37,466 stations starting later than scheduled, which affected the timely commencement of the voting process.

What was the problem with the availability of assistive devices for visually impaired voters?

12,884 polling stations did not provide assistive devices for visually impaired voters, which led to accessibility issues.

Were there any issues related to incomplete voting logistics?

10,496 polling stations experienced incomplete voting logistics, which likely disrupted the voting process.

How did discrepancies in voter eligibility affect the election process?

8,219 polling stations found voters using their voting rights in areas outside their official residence, as stated in their electronic ID cards, leading to inconsistencies in voter eligibility.

What were the issues with the ballots at the polling stations?

6,084 polling stations reported cases where ballots were mixed up, resulting in confusion and potential inaccuracies in the voting process.

How were the disability companion procedures mishandled?

5,836 polling stations had issues with disability companions not signing the required declaration forms, which was an oversight in ensuring proper assistance for disabled voters.

What problems arose regarding the communication of voting procedures?

544 polling stations failed to properly explain the voting and vote-counting procedures, leaving voters and staff unsure of the process.

What issues were found with the display of voter lists?

3,724 polling stations had problems displaying the voter list (DPT) around the station, and the list did not indicate voters who no longer met the eligibility criteria.

Were there any problems with campaign materials at polling stations?

3,521 polling stations had witnesses wearing campaign-related attire, which violated regulations prohibiting such displays of party affiliation during the election.

What issues occurred regarding voter intimidation or manipulation?

In 2,271 polling stations, voter intimidation or pressure was reported, where either voters or election officials were coerced into specific actions or choices.

How did polling station security affect transparency during vote counting?

11,233 polling stations reported issues with vote counting procedures, including lack of access for election observers, and 3,463 polling stations began counting before the official end of voting, compromising transparency.

What inconsistencies were found in the vote count process?

2,162 polling stations reported discrepancies between the count of valid and invalid ballots and the number of voters who actually cast their votes.

How did intimidation affect election observers during the vote counting process?

There were 1,473 polling stations where election officials faced intimidation, which may have hindered the accurate and unbiased counting of votes.