Le PLAGIAT le plus HONTEUX de Luc Besson ?

Summary

This video combines a promotional segment for Emma mattresses with an exploration of a legal case involving plagiarism in cinema. The speaker highlights the benefits of Emma's mattresses, offering a 10-night trial and a special discount during the French Days sale. The second part dives into a legal analysis of *Lockout*, accused of copying *Escape from New York*, and discusses famous plagiarism cases in film, like *Running Man*. The speaker also shares insights into how such legal battles are fought and the financial consequences, while inviting viewers to join an upcoming live show on Twitch.

Takeaways

• 😀 *Lockout* (2012) has been accused of plagiarism, drawing significant similarities to John Carpenter's *Escape from New York* (1981).
• 😀 The French court ruled that *Lockout* infringed on *Escape from New York*, citing numerous similarities in plot and characters.
• 😀 The lawsuit was based on similarities between the two films, not on the differences, which led to the conviction for plagiarism.
• 😀 While *Lockout* filmmakers contested the decision, the appeal court upheld the original ruling, increasing the amount to be paid in damages.
• 😀 The case of *Lockout* is part of a broader discussion of plagiarism cases in cinema, including other notable cases like *Running Man* (1987).
• 😀 The *Running Man* case involved a legal battle between the French film *Le Prix du Danger* and the Stephen King novel of the same name, where the French film was ruled as the inspiration for the American version.
• 😀 Plagiarism cases in cinema are rare, but when they occur, they often lead to detailed examination of the similarities between the works involved.
• 😀 In the case of *Lockout*, the French court required the filmmakers to pay €465,000 in damages, which could have been used for better special effects or other improvements to the film.
• 😀 The court decisions on these plagiarism cases highlight the legal importance of distinguishing between inspiration and direct copying in the film industry.
• 😀 The video includes a sponsored segment by Emma, offering discounts on mattresses and pillows, emphasizing the importance of comfortable sleep.
• 😀 The speaker also promotes a live Twitch broadcast for a show called *Camflex*, featuring upcoming guests, as well as additional discounts for viewers using a promo code.

Q & A

What is the speaker's opinion about the importance of a comfortable mattress?

The speaker emphasizes that a comfortable mattress is crucial for quality sleep and highlights the positive impact it had on their own health, specifically on their back after switching to an Emma mattress.

What is the benefit of the 10-night trial offered by Emma mattresses?

The 10-night trial allows customers to test the mattress after receiving it, with the option to return it for free if it doesn't meet their expectations, ensuring a risk-free purchase.

What is the main legal issue discussed in the video?

The video discusses a plagiarism case regarding the movie *Lockout*, which was accused of copying elements from John Carpenter's *Escape from New York*, leading to a court ruling in favor of the original creators.

What are some of the key differences between *Lockout* and *Escape from New York*?

While both films share thematic similarities, such as a dystopian prison setting and a character tasked with rescuing a high-profile person, the court found numerous detailed similarities in their plot, character development, and certain scenes, which led to the plagiarism ruling.

What other film plagiarism case does the speaker mention?

The speaker mentions the case of *The Running Man*, where the 1987 film was accused of plagiarizing elements from the French film *The Price of Danger*. The court ruled in favor of Yves Boisset, the director of *The Price of Danger*.

What was the outcome of the *Running Man* plagiarism case?

In the *Running Man* case, the French court initially ruled in favor of Yves Boisset, but the decision was appealed. Eventually, the court upheld the ruling, and the American producers were fined over 1 million francs for the plagiarism.

How did the legal process in the *Running Man* case get delayed?

The process was delayed due to the tragic explosion of the plane carrying the legal documents. The documents were eventually recovered, but this caused significant delays in the case, with a year-long lag before the French courts received the response from the U.S. defendants.

What is the significance of the French court's ruling in the *Lockout* case?

The French court's ruling against *Lockout* for plagiarism of *Escape from New York* sets a legal precedent for how similar works can be considered plagiarism in the film industry. The ruling considered various similarities, including character roles and plot progression.

What financial penalties were imposed on the defendants in the *Lockout* plagiarism case?

The defendants, including Luc Besson and the production company Europac Corp, were ordered to pay substantial fines, totaling €465,000, which included compensation to John Carpenter, Nick Castle, and the production company Studio Canal.

How does the speaker feel about the case of plagiarism involving *Lockout*?

The speaker seems to view the case as a significant legal event, acknowledging that while *Lockout* did have its differences from *Escape from New York*, the number of similarities led to a justified ruling in favor of the original creators. They also humorously suggest that Besson could have used the fine money to improve the film's effects.