🔴BAHRAIN KIAN DIKUCILKAN ~17 Negara Dukung Protes Timnas Ke FIFA ~ Bahrain Bisa Di Diskualifikasi

Ball Balan
13 Oct 202409:31

Summary

TLDRThe video discusses the controversy surrounding the Indonesian national football team’s match against Bahrain in the 2026 World Cup qualifiers, highlighting the support from 17 countries demanding FIFA annul Bahrain's second goal and declare Indonesia the winner. It emphasizes the questionable decisions made by referee Ahmed Alqaf during the match, including allowing additional injury time that led to Bahrain's equalizer. Several football associations, including those from Australia and the Netherlands, have voiced their outrage and called for Bahrain's disqualification. The video captures the escalating tensions and the call for justice within the realm of international football.

Takeaways

  • 😀 Seventeen countries are united in support of Indonesia, demanding FIFA annul Bahrain's second goal.
  • 🇳🇱 The Netherlands has voiced its support for Indonesia, suggesting Bahrain should be disqualified from the World Cup qualifiers.
  • 🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia firmly opposes competing against Bahrain due to alleged referee misconduct.
  • ⚽ Referee Ahmed alqf's decisions during the match are criticized for favoring the host team, Bahrain.
  • 📝 PSSI has lodged a formal protest to FIFA regarding the controversial decisions made by the referee.
  • ⏱️ Questions have arisen about whether FIFA can overturn the match result due to the referee's actions.
  • 🚨 Referee decisions are deemed final according to FIFA's regulations, creating frustration among supporters.
  • 😡 Indonesian coach Shin tayong expressed his disappointment over the referee's performance during the match.
  • 📜 The ongoing support from other nations highlights the seriousness of the controversy in Asian football.
  • 🤝 The calls for justice and fairness in football reflect broader issues of integrity in the sport.

Q & A

  • What controversy arose during the Indonesia vs. Bahrain match?

    -The controversy involved questionable officiating by referee Ahmed Al-Kaf, who allowed a last-minute goal by Bahrain that many believed should not have counted due to exceeding the allotted injury time.

  • How many countries supported Indonesia's claims against FIFA?

    -Seventeen countries united in support of Indonesia, demanding that FIFA annul Bahrain's second goal and declare Indonesia the winners.

  • What specific action did Indonesia take in response to the referee's decisions?

    -Indonesia's Football Association (PSSI) filed a formal protest to FIFA regarding the officiating during the match.

  • What was FIFA's response to the protests from Indonesia and other countries?

    -FIFA stated that the referee's decisions are final and cannot be changed, maintaining that the outcome of the match remains unchanged.

  • Which countries explicitly expressed their support for Indonesia?

    -Countries that voiced support included the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, and South Korea, with officials from each highlighting the need for justice in the officiating.

  • What criticism did James Johnson, President of Football Australia, have regarding the referee's decisions?

    -James Johnson criticized the referee's decision to extend injury time beyond what was warranted, labeling it as illogical and indicative of potential foul play.

  • How did Saudi Arabia respond to Bahrain's actions in the match?

    -Saudi Arabia's Football Federation declared it would refuse to play against Bahrain if FIFA did not take action against the perceived misconduct.

  • What did Chung Mongyu from South Korea say about the situation?

    -Chung Mongyu supported Indonesia's efforts to seek justice and emphasized the importance of addressing the issues with the referee's performance.

  • What were the circumstances surrounding the controversial goal scored by Bahrain?

    -Bahrain's equalizing goal occurred in the 99th minute, three minutes after the 6 minutes of injury time had been signaled, which led to claims that the goal should have been disallowed.

  • What did coach Shin Tae-yong express about the officiating after the match?

    -Shin Tae-yong expressed disappointment with the officiating, stating that the decisions taken by the referee were embarrassing and detrimental to Indonesia's performance.

Outlines

plate

Этот раздел доступен только подписчикам платных тарифов. Пожалуйста, перейдите на платный тариф для доступа.

Перейти на платный тариф

Mindmap

plate

Этот раздел доступен только подписчикам платных тарифов. Пожалуйста, перейдите на платный тариф для доступа.

Перейти на платный тариф

Keywords

plate

Этот раздел доступен только подписчикам платных тарифов. Пожалуйста, перейдите на платный тариф для доступа.

Перейти на платный тариф

Highlights

plate

Этот раздел доступен только подписчикам платных тарифов. Пожалуйста, перейдите на платный тариф для доступа.

Перейти на платный тариф

Transcripts

plate

Этот раздел доступен только подписчикам платных тарифов. Пожалуйста, перейдите на платный тариф для доступа.

Перейти на платный тариф
Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Связанные теги
Football ControversyIndonesiaBahrainWorld CupFIFAReferee DecisionsInternational SupportSports Justice2026 QualifiersAsian Football
Вам нужно краткое изложение на английском?