"Open Minded" dan Paradox Toleransi.

Summary

The speaker reflects on their evolving views about open-mindedness in Indonesia and how increased openness hasn't led to the societal improvement they once envisioned. They recount the controversy over a viral video where they discussed religious questions, only for parts to be taken out of context. The speaker also addresses the paradox of people who claim to be open-minded but act intolerant towards differing beliefs. Drawing on philosophical theories of tolerance, they emphasize the need for true mutual respect and highlight the importance of understanding diverse perspectives without resorting to judgment or aggression.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker initially believed that an increase in open-mindedness among Indonesians would lead to a more tolerant and understanding society.
• 📚 They reflect on their past thoughts during high school in the early 2000s about the positive impact of open-mindedness on the nation.
• 🔥 The speaker's content about their spiritual journey and belief in a single God went viral, especially on TikTok, where a short clip was shared widely.
• 🗣️ The viral clip was taken out of context, leading to misunderstandings and aggressive reactions from some viewers who felt triggered or offended by the idea of multiple religions.
• 🤔 The speaker expresses confusion over the reactions, as they did not intend to attack or belittle anyone's beliefs in the original content.
• 👥 They mention receiving positive comments from various religious backgrounds, indicating a shared appreciation for different perspectives and experiences.
• 😓 The speaker is disappointed by the aggressive and intolerant behavior of some individuals who claim to be open-minded yet attack others for their beliefs.
• 📚 They reference theories about tolerance, suggesting that tolerant societies should not tolerate intolerance and that there should be limits to tolerance.
• 🌐 The speaker calls for a better understanding of tolerance, emphasizing the importance of respecting individual choices and lifestyles, regardless of whether they align with one's own beliefs.
• 📖 They conclude by encouraging viewers to learn from the discussion and to reflect on what it means to be truly open-minded and tolerant.

Q & A

What was the speaker's initial belief about open-mindedness in Indonesia?

The speaker initially believed that as more Indonesians became open-minded, the country would improve, leading to greater tolerance and understanding among people.

What content did the speaker create a year ago, and why is it significant?

The speaker created a video titled 'If there's only one God, why are there many religions?' This content became one of their most popular and 'everlasting' videos, as it continues to receive comments and views. It was significant because it reflected their spiritual journey and how they found peace in their beliefs.

What specific verse from the Quran did the speaker mention, and how did it impact them?

The speaker mentioned finding peace through Quran verse Al-Maidah 48, which provided them with a sense of tranquility and helped answer their questions about God and religion.

How did the speaker's original video become viral again on TikTok?

The video went viral on TikTok because someone cut and uploaded a short portion where the speaker questioned why there were many religions if there's only one God. This part, taken out of context, sparked widespread engagement but gave a misleading impression of the speaker’s beliefs.

How did the speaker feel about the comment comparing 'one God, many religions' to 'one answer, multiple choice options'?

The speaker found this comparison unhelpful and confusing, as it didn't address the depth of their original question and only added to their confusion.

What made the speaker appreciate the positive comments on their original content?

The speaker appreciated the positive comments, particularly those from people of different faiths, as they shared diverse perspectives on the same spiritual topic, creating a sense of unity and mutual understanding.

What issues did the speaker face after creating their original content?

The speaker faced aggression and attacks from certain individuals who felt triggered or offended by the content, despite it being a personal spiritual experience that didn’t attack or criticize any group.

Why did the speaker feel confused by the reactions of some people who identified as 'open-minded'?

The speaker was confused because individuals who identified as 'open-minded' were acting intolerantly by attacking the speaker’s beliefs, which contradicted the very essence of being open-minded and tolerant.

What philosophical concept does the speaker reference to discuss tolerance, and how does it apply to their situation?

The speaker references Karl Popper's theory of tolerance, particularly the idea that a tolerant society should not tolerate intolerance. They also mention John Rawls' opposing view, which suggests tolerance should be extended to everyone, including the intolerant. The speaker uses this to reflect on how different groups react to each other's beliefs.

What final message does the speaker convey regarding tolerance and open-mindedness?

The speaker emphasizes that people should respect others' choices, whether religious or non-religious, and avoid labeling everyone with differing views as intolerant. True open-mindedness should mean allowing others to live by their beliefs as long as they do not harm or interfere with others.