Test: Funktioniert dieses Abhörgerät von Amazon ?

Summary

In this intriguing video, the host embarks on a real-world test of a surveillance device found on Amazon, claimed to function up to 300 meters away. With anticipation, the package is unboxed, revealing the device, headphones, and an unclear instruction manual. Despite the cold weather, the experiment proceeds outdoors for optimal testing conditions. The device's initial setup hurdles, like the need for batteries and a screwdriver, are humorously tackled. Although it powers on, the device disappointingly fails to live up to its promises, especially in capturing voices from a distance, though it amplifies other sounds. The video concludes with a call for better recommendations and a reflection on the device's failure to kickstart the host's detective aspirations, humorously likening it to a thwarted football career.

Takeaways

• 📺 The video is a product review of a listening device found on Amazon, which is tested for its claimed range and functionality.
• 🔊 The device is purported to work up to 300 meters, a feature that the reviewer is skeptical about and intends to test.
• 🎧 The package includes the listening device, headphones, and a manual, with the headphones being a surprising addition.
• 📲 During the review, the product's ability to pick up sounds clearly over distances and its overall performance are scrutinized.
• 🔔 The reviewer experiences disappointment with the device's effectiveness, noting issues with sound clarity and the functionality of the zoom feature.
• 💬 The device fails to clearly capture voices from a distance, undermining its purported ability to function as a reliable eavesdropping tool.
• 🛠 The necessity of batteries and a screwdriver for operation presents a minor inconvenience highlighted during the setup process.
• 📚 The manual's quality and the need for additional equipment like batteries and a screwdriver for setup are critiqued.
• 🎵 Sound tests reveal that the device picks up ambient noise well but struggles with voice clarity, challenging its utility for eavesdropping.
• 🔧 The reviewer concludes that the device does not meet expectations, especially for its intended use of capturing conversations at a distance.

Q & A

What is the main purpose of the video?

The main purpose of the video is to test an eavesdropping device found on Amazon, specifically its claim of functioning up to 300 meters.

What items come with the eavesdropping device according to the video?

The eavesdropping device comes with headphones, a screen, and a manual.

What was the reviewer's initial expectation about the eavesdropping device's functionality?

The reviewer expected the eavesdropping device to function up to 300 meters and possibly include a feature for recording via an SD card slot.

Did the eavesdropping device meet the reviewer's expectations?

No, the device did not meet expectations. It failed to pick up voices from the expected distances, and there was no SD card slot for recording.

What were some of the challenges mentioned in using the eavesdropping device?

Challenges included needing batteries and a screwdriver for setup, the device's screen being blurry and unusable for identification, and the device only picking up loud noises or steps clearly but not voices at a distance.

How did the reviewer test the eavesdropping device's capabilities?

The reviewer tested the device by attempting to listen to conversations and noises from a distance, including directing the device towards a person speaking and listening for the sound through headphones.

What was the outcome of the tests conducted with the eavesdropping device?

The outcome was disappointing; the device was unable to clearly pick up voices from a distance, only capturing loud noises and steps effectively.

What was the reviewer's final verdict on the eavesdropping device?

The reviewer deemed the device ineffective and not recommendable for its intended purpose of eavesdropping or recording conversations from a distance.

Did the reviewer express any interest in trying out other products?

Yes, the reviewer expressed interest in finding and testing better performing products and encouraged viewers to suggest alternatives in the comments.

What humorous comparison did the reviewer make about their own expectations and reality?

The reviewer humorously compared their thwarted detective aspirations due to the device's failure to a past incident where their potential football career was jokingly blamed on a pen running out of ink.