9 Most Shocking P. Diddy 'Freak Off' Party Details Revealed in Indictment

Summary

In the case against rapper Sean 'Diddy' Combs, the term 'freak off' has become central to allegations of sex trafficking and abuse. The indictment details how Combs allegedly used his influence to coerce women into participating in these orchestrated sexual performances, often involving drugs and commercial sex workers. The government's case includes evidence such as videos, witness testimonies, and records of payments. Despite the serious charges and public scrutiny, it is claimed that Combs continued these activities even while under investigation, highlighting a pattern of alleged criminal enterprise.

Takeaways

• 📜 The term 'freak off' has become synonymous with Shawn 'Diddy' Combs and is central to his federal sex crimes case.
• 🚨 Diddy is facing serious charges including racketeering, conspiracy, sex trafficking, and transportation to engage in prostitution, which could lead to 15 years to life in prison.
• 🤝 The indictment alleges that Diddy led a criminal enterprise that involved the abuse of women, sex trafficking, force labor, and prostitution.
• 🎭 'Freak offs' are described as elaborate, orchestrated sex performances that Diddy allegedly arranged, directed, and recorded for his pleasure.
• 💊 During these performances, Diddy is accused of distributing controlled substances to victims to keep them obedient and compliant.
• 💉 After 'freak offs', Diddy and victims reportedly received IV fluids to recover from the physical exertion and drug use.
• 🗓️ The government claims that 'freak offs' have been happening since 2009 and involved drugs like ketamine, GHB, and ecstasy.
• 📹 There is evidence of Diddy keeping videos of the 'freak offs' without the victims' knowledge, which could be problematic if true.
• 💼 The indictment suggests that multiple employees and associates of Diddy's business allegedly facilitated the 'freak offs' by booking hotel rooms, stocking supplies, and arranging travel.
• 🚫 Despite being aware of the criminal investigation, Diddy allegedly continued to engage in 'freak offs', use narcotics, and contact multiple witnesses.

Q & A

What is the term 'freak off' as mentioned in the script?

The term 'freak off' refers to elaborate and produced sex performances that Shawn 'Diddy' Combs allegedly arranged, directed, and participated in, which are now at the center of his federal sex crimes case.

What are the major accusations against Shawn 'Diddy' Combs as described in the script?

The major accusations against Shawn 'Diddy' Combs include racketeering, conspiracy, sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion, transportation to engage in prostitution, and the distribution of drugs.

What could be the potential sentence Shawn 'Diddy' Combs is facing according to the script?

Shawn 'Diddy' Combs could be facing 15 years to life in prison based on the severity of the charges against him.

How does the script suggest that the 'freak offs' were organized?

The script suggests that 'freak offs' were organized by Shawn 'Diddy' Combs and members of his enterprise, who booked hotel rooms, stocked them with supplies, arranged for travel, and facilitated payments to commercial sex workers.

What role did the associates of Shawn 'Diddy' Combs play in the 'freak offs' as per the script?

According to the script, associates of Shawn 'Diddy' Combs played a significant role in facilitating the 'freak offs' by booking hotel rooms, stocking them with required supplies, arranging travel, and cleaning up after the events.

What substances were allegedly distributed during the 'freak offs' as mentioned in the script?

The script mentions that controlled substances such as ketamine, GHB, and ecstasy were distributed to victims during the 'freak offs'.

How does the script indicate that the 'freak offs' were not just consensual sexual encounters?

The script indicates that the 'freak offs' involved force, threats, and coercion, and that participants were sometimes subjected to physical, emotional, and verbal abuse to make them participate.

What evidence does the government have to support the allegations of 'freak offs' according to the script?

The government has evidence including video recordings of 'freak offs', witness testimony, travel records, hotel records, and electronic devices that were seized.

What is the significance of the 2016 incident mentioned in the script in relation to the 'freak offs'?

The 2016 incident, where Shawn 'Diddy' Combs allegedly assaulted Cassandra Ventura, is significant as it ties to the 'freak offs' allegations. Ventura claimed she was trying to escape a 'freak off' when the assault occurred.

How does the script suggest that the 'freak offs' were continuing even after legal troubles began for Combs?

The script suggests that even after being sued and after the term 'freak off' was publicized, Shawn 'Diddy' Combs allegedly continued to engage in 'freak offs', as evidenced by the government's claim that he engaged in multiple 'freak offs' after being aware of the criminal investigation.

What is the potential impact of the 'freak offs' on Shawn 'Diddy' Combs' reputation as outlined in the script?

The script outlines that the 'freak offs' could significantly and negatively impact Shawn 'Diddy' Combs' reputation, as the government has substantial evidence that is highly sensitive and could damage his public image.

Outlines

00:00

🚨 Shawn Colmes' 'Freak Off' Allegations

The paragraph discusses the allegations against Shawn 'Diddy' Combs, commonly known as 'freak offs', which involve sexual abuse and trafficking. The term 'freak off' has become synonymous with Combs due to his federal sex crimes case. The speaker, Jesse Weber, explains the major accusations and details surrounding these incidents, including physical, emotional, and verbal abuse aimed at forcing victims to participate. Combs is facing serious charges such as racketeering, sex trafficking, and more, which could lead to a life sentence. The paragraph also mentions other civil lawsuits that involve similar allegations of 'freak offs'.

05:02

📜 Evidence and Legal Strategy

This section delves into the evidence that supports the allegations of 'freak offs', including witness testimonies and physical evidence like videos and electronic records. The government is moving forward with the case, suggesting that the concept of 'freak offs' is substantiated by more than just witness accounts. The defense may argue that these acts were consensual, despite the wild nature of the accusations. The paragraph also discusses the potential impact of such allegations on Combs' reputation and the strategy of using the term 'freak off' in court.

10:04

🏨 Hotel Damages and Continued Allegations

The paragraph discusses specific instances where hotel rooms were damaged during 'freak offs', with one example being a $46,000 damage claim in Manhattan. It also mentions the ongoing nature of the 'freak offs', suggesting that they continued even after Combs was aware of the criminal investigation against him. The government is using this continued behavior as evidence of Combs' lack of regard for the law and as a reason for his detention.

15:07

🔍 The Extent of the Criminal Enterprise

This final paragraph outlines the extent of the alleged criminal enterprise, involving high-ranking supervisors, security staff, and personal assistants who facilitated the 'freak offs'. It discusses the roles these individuals played, such as booking hotel rooms, stocking supplies, and cleaning up after the events. The paragraph also mentions the seizure of various 'freak off' supplies from Combs' residences, including narcotics and large quantities of baby oil and lubricant. The government's case is building on the consistency of witness testimonies and the collection of physical evidence.

Keywords

💡Freak off

A 'freak off' is a term used in the script to describe an alleged sexual performance that is central to the criminal case against Shawn 'Diddy' Combs. It is defined as an elaborate and produced sex performance that Combs allegedly arranged, directed, and participated in for his pleasure. The term is integral to understanding the accusations of sex trafficking and abuse of women as it is claimed that victims were coerced into participating in these acts.

💡Indictment

An 'indictment' is a formal charge or accusation of a serious crime, originating with a grand jury. In the context of the video, it refers to the legal document outlining the charges against Combs, including racketeering, sex trafficking, and other serious allegations. The indictment is a key part of the case against him and details the alleged criminal activities.

💡Racketeering

Racketeering refers to a pattern of illegal activity, typically for financial gain, carried out as part of an organized crime operation. In the video, it is one of the charges against Combs, suggesting that he led a criminal enterprise engaged in various illegal activities, including abuse of women and sex trafficking.

💡Sex trafficking

Sex trafficking involves the recruitment, transportation, or harboring of persons by force, fraud, or coercion with the purpose of compelling them into sexual activity. The script alleges that Combs used force, threats, and coercion to cause victims to engage in sexual performances with male sex workers, which is a form of sex trafficking.

💡Coercion

Coercion is the act of persuading someone to do something by using force or threats. In the video, it is mentioned that Combs allegedly used coercion to force victims into participating in 'freak offs', which is a central element of the sex trafficking accusations against him.

💡Bail

Bail is the temporary release of an accused person from custody, on the condition that a sum of money is deposited as a guarantee that they will appear for trial. The script mentions that Combs' bail was denied twice, indicating the severity of the charges and the perceived risk that he might not appear for court proceedings.

💡Enterprise

In the context of the video, 'enterprise' refers to a large-scale business or organization, often implying criminal activity. The government alleges that Combs led a criminal enterprise that engaged in various illegal activities, including the abuse of women and sex trafficking.

💡Force, fraud, or coercion

These terms are used to describe the means by which victims were allegedly made to participate in illegal activities. 'Force' implies physical strength or compulsion, 'fraud' involves deception for illegal gain, and 'coercion', as mentioned, involves threats. The script indicates that these were the methods used to compel victims into participating in 'freak offs'.

💡IV fluids

IV fluids, or intravenous fluids, are liquids administered into a vein for medical purposes, such as rehydration or recovery from drug use. The script mentions that Combs and victims received IV fluids after 'freak offs' to recover from physical exertion and drug use, highlighting the extreme nature of the alleged activities.

💡Consent

Consent is the voluntary agreement to engage in a particular activity. The script suggests that a potential defense strategy for Combs might be to argue that the 'freak offs' were consensual acts, despite the allegations of force, fraud, and coercion.

💡Criminal case

A 'criminal case' is a legal process involving a crime where the accused stands trial to determine their guilt or innocence. The video discusses the criminal case against Combs, which includes serious charges that could result in significant prison time if he is convicted.

Highlights

Shawn 'Diddy' Combs is facing serious federal sex crimes charges including racketeering, conspiracy, sex trafficking, and more.

The term 'freak off' has become synonymous with Combs and is central to his case.

Freak offs are alleged to be elaborate, produced sex performances arranged by Combs.

Combs' bail was denied twice due to the severity of the accusations and potential flight risk.

The indictment alleges that Combs led a criminal enterprise to engage in abuse of women, sex trafficking, and other crimes.

Freak offs allegedly involved the use of force, threats, and coercion to make victims participate.

The government claims that freak offs have been happening since 2009 and involved drugs like ketamine, GHB, and ecstasy.

Combs may argue that the freak offs were consensual, though the government has substantial evidence to the contrary.

The government has video recordings, witness testimonies, and other evidence to support their case.

Freak offs allegedly resulted in significant hotel room damages, with one instance costing over $46,000.

The indictment suggests that Combs used violence and threats to coerce victims into participating in freak offs.

Combs allegedly used recordings of freak offs as collateral against victims.

The government claims that freak offs continued even after Combs was aware of the criminal investigation.

Over 50 victims and witnesses have been interviewed, with many corroborating each other's accounts.

The government has seized a large number of electronic devices that may contain evidence of the freak offs.

Members and associates of Combs' enterprise allegedly facilitated the freak offs by booking hotel rooms and arranging travel.

The government alleges that Combs attempted to bribe hotel security to cover up an assault related to a freak off.

The investigation is ongoing, and more witnesses may come forward or cooperate with the government.

Transcripts

when Colmes didn't get his way he was

violent and he subjected victims to

physical emotional and verbal abuse so

that they would participate in the freak

offs the Freak off a term that has now

not only become synonymous with Shawn

Diddy comes but it is at the center of

his Federal sex crimes case we're going

to explain some of the major accusations

and details surrounding the freak offs

and what this could mean for the

indicted rapper welcome to sidebar

present by law on crime I'm Jesse

Weber there is one term that has gone

viral since the indictment of Shawn

Diddy combes more than anything else

you've heard it here on sidebar you've

heard it Amplified in the media it is

called a freak off this alleged sexual

performance that is at the center of

this criminal case facing the rapper and

producer sha Diddy Combs and I'm going

to go over some of the details of these

freak off sessions as laid out in the

government's indictment and in their

subsequent letters that they filed with

the court when they argued against

colm's bail which by the way was denied

twice now he's currently locked up in

the Brooklyn Detention Center comes is

facing charges of racketeering

conspiracy sex trafficking by force

fraud or coercion transportation to

engage in prostitution we've mentioned

it before but he could be looking at 15

years to life in prison that's how

serious these charges are but the main

theme Here the main allegation is that

comes led a criminal Enterprise and the

goal of this criminal Enterprise other

than to operate a global media and

entertainment business was to engage in

the abuse of women sex trafficking Force

labor prostitution the distribution of

drugs to use violence and threats to

commit crimes like kidnapping arson

bribery obstruction of justice to carry

out their goals their missions all the

while making sure to satisfy the sexual

desires of Shawn Colmes and one of those

desires as alleged by the government by

prosecutors and also alleged by several

Colmes accusers in separate civil

lawsuits that they filed against him

were the commission of freak offs so

with that in mind now we're going to get

into these shocking details surrounding

these freak offs and I guess we should

start with saying what are freak offs

right well let's go to the indictment it

says quote comes and other members and

Associates of the comes Enterprise

wielded the power and Prestige of com's

role at the com's business to intimidate

threaten and lure female victims into

com's orbit often under the pretense of

a romantic relationship coms then used

Force threats of force and coercion to

cause victims to engage in extended sex

acts with male commercial sex workers

that comes referred to as among other

things freak offs freak offs were

elaborate and produced sex performances

that comes arranged directed pleasured

himself during and often electronically

recorded now while this indictment came

down I said at the time this may be a

term that is foreign to any person that

was not familiar with Shawn comes but

for me who's been following this whole

Saga for what a year now I have heard

this term multiple times because in the

Cassandra Ventura lawsuit com's ex-girl

and Rodney little Rod Jones lawsuit this

is com's former producer they discussed

the freak offs in their again their

sexual assault lawsuits now Ventura

alleged among other things that Colmes

would demand her participation in freak

offs and that she would have to be

forced to hire the male sex workers and

that this could happen at any random

moment Jones alleged among other things

that com's son Justin comes and DJ and

record producer Stevie Jay would engage

in freak offs now to be clear those

specific allegations those names those

details were not mentioned as part of

the criminal case I will tell you though

that the idea of this freak off now that

it is officially part of the criminal

case now that it's mentioned multiple

times this makes me wonder two things

from a legal point of view number one it

is such a wild concept and a phraseology

that it's hard to believe that that this

is something that was just made up by

com's accusers and when I say com's

accusers could that be ventor yes could

that be Jones yes perhaps the government

got this information these this idea of

the freak offs originally from them and

by the way when I say com's accusers

could be Ventura could be Jones perhaps

the government got this idea of the

freak offs from them originally but we

don't know to be clear we do not know

for sure we do not know who the accusers

are the victims are in this criminal

case who the government's Witnesses are

whoever those people may be because we

don't know for sure who is cooperating

with the government right now but the

bottom line is the idea of the Freak off

there's enough there to substantiate it

that the government is moving forward

with this and again it is so wild it's

such a wild concept to come up with that

I wonder if an argument will be made

that look jury this has to be true no

one can honor ly make something like

this up and as you'll see it doesn't

appear it was just witness testimony

that corroborates the idea of the freak

offs happening the existence of these

freak offs but there's more and I'll get

to that but this also leads me to a

secondary point that based upon what we

are already seeing from com's defense

Council during bail arguments they may

not deny that these freak offs happened

or even that Colmes called them freak

offs they may say yeah you know what he

engaged in freak offs that's what he

called them but they were consensual

that's the idea they were consensual

this is not a crime talking about sha

comes and these allegations does it not

show you just how scary the world can be

how unpredictable the world can be and

you know what you know what one of the

most unpredictable things can be in life

something that is truly terrifying that

comes out of nowhere if you get injured

right that comes out of nowhere but it's

important to realize that at those

moments what your rights are and whether

you could be compensated for your injury

well that's where our sponsor and proud

partner of sidebar Morgan and Morgan

comes in this is America's largest

injury Law Firm they have an army of

over a thousand attorneys who will fight

for what you deserve they have the track

record to prove it in the past few

months Morgan and Morgan won verdicts

like 12 million in Florida $26 million

in Philadelphia $6.8 million in New York

and mind you these are all considerably

higher than the highest insurance offers

in these cases truly your case could be

worth millions of dollars and even if

it's not why not start a claim and get

the money that you do deserve seeing if

you have a case can be done in eight

clicks or less also totally free it's

absolutely free unless you win they're

only getting paid if you get paid so if

you're injured you can easily start a

claim at forthepeople.com LC sidebar or

you can click the link in the

description and pinned in the comments

and I want to explore that a little bit

more let's explore a little bit more

details of these freak offs so the

indictment continues quote freak offs

occurred regularly sometimes lasted

multiple days and often involved mult

multiple commercial sex workers during

freak offs comes distributed a variety

of Controlled Substances to victims in

part to keep the victims obedient and

compliant sometimes unbeknownst to the

victims Colmes kept videos he filmed of

victims engaging in sex acts with

commercial sex workers after freak offs

Colmes and the victims typically

received IV fluids to recover from the

physical exertion and drug use that is

something and the government would

allege that these freak offs they have

been happening since

2009 that those drugs consisted of

ketamine GHB ecstasy now in terms of the

defense of consent the defense could say

well these people knowingly and

voluntarily took drugs but if it's true

that combms kept videos that these

participants didn't know about that

could be problematic for him especially

since we learned the government may have

the goods to back all of this up in

their bail letter to the judge they

write quote the evidence against the

defendant which would be made public a

trial includes substantial evidence that

is highly sensitive and has the

potential to significantly and

negatively impact the defendant's

reputation for example dozens of video

recordings created by the defendant of

freak offs with victims I mean we

wondered what was collected by federal

authorities after they raided com's

homes in La and Miami back in March

there were reports that they collected

did digital evidence in fact further on

in the government's letter prosecutors

write quote setting aside devices seized

in connection with the defendants arrest

the government has obtained over 90 cell

phones laptops cloud storage accounts as

well as over 30 other electronic and

storage devices such as hard drives

thumb drives cameras and a surveillance

system the government also wrote victim

testimony regarding freak offs is at

times corroborated by other Witness

testimony Communications with the

defendant and Commercial sex workers

travel records Hotel records videos of

the freak offs and Records reflecting or

indicating payment by the way you're

talking about evidence of freak offs

prosecutors revealed one other way that

they can prove that these freak off

events happen because in the

government's bail letter it states the

defendant arranged freak offs with the

assistance of members and Associates of

the Enterprise including employees of

his business bus and the hotel rooms

where they were staged often sustain

significant damages so the prosecution's

letter goes on to state that for example

in approximately 2012 in Manhattan the

defendant paid over

$46,000 to cover damages to a penthouse

hotel room following a freak off yeah

now I imagine the government plans to

produce receipts of this some

documentation or witness testimony to

corroborate that account cuz it'll be

tough for the the defense to say why

else did that hotel room sustain

allegedly $46,000 worth of Damages if it

wasn't for this wild sexual performance

event but again you could see why the

government's putting that evidence

forward to suggest that these freak offs

occurred now going back to that idea of

consent this defense of consent I couple

that with something else that I've been

hearing I've seen people say why are

these freak offs a crime right you might

be wild sexual encounters but why is

this sex trafficking why is this

racketeering well as laid out in the

indictment but also this was articulated

by Damen Williams the United States

Attorney for the southern district of

New York here's what he had to say in a

press conference after the unsealing of

this indictment as alleged Combs used

Force threats of force and coercion to

cause victims to engage in extended

sexual performances with male commercial

sex workers some of whom he transported

or caused to be transported over state

lines when Colmes didn't get his way he

was violent and he subjected victims to

physical emotional and verbal abuse so

that they would participate in the freak

offs and that Combs hit kicked through

objects at and dragged victims at times

by their

hair on one occasion in March of 2016

that conduct was captured on video and

later reported in the media specifically

comes kicked dragged and threw a vase at

a victim in a Los Angeles hotel when the

victim was attempting to

flee as alleged these assaults often

resulted in injuries to the victims

which took days or weeks to

heal in addition to the violence the

indictment alleges that Combs threatened

and coerced victims to get them to

participate in the freak offs he used

the embarrassing and sensitive

recordings he made of the freak offs as

collateral against the victims and

that's the key it's using power violence

threats coercion Force to get people to

participate in sexual activity that is

illegal sex trafficking is when you use

such methods for the purposes of

commercial sex usually over state lines

commercial sex is when money is offered

for sexual services or something else of

value and one of the things that the

indictment mentions is how coms would

allegedly dangle Promises of career

opportunities or threatening to withhold

financial support to get people to do

what he wanted now you heard Damen

Williams mention that 2016 incident so

even if you hadn't been following the

Colmes legal Saga for the past year

everyone saw that video that was

published by CNN of Colmes allegedly

beating Cassandra Ventura back in 2016

at the Intercontinental Hotel in La all

while wearing a robe this is something

that Ventura alleged had happened when

she filed her lawsuit back in November

of 2023 but when that video was released

we all saw with our own eyes what

apparently transpired and we know Shan

Colmes issued an apology on Instagram

two days after the release of that tape

but how this ties to the Freak off well

the allegation was the reason he was in

a towel the reason she was allegedly

running away the reason he allegedly

beat her was because she was trying to

escape a freak off and as ventur alleged

prosecutor SE Holmes tried to cover up

this event in the bail letter

prosecutors write quote when a member of

hotel security staff intervened the

defendant attempted to offer the hotel

security officer a stack of cash to

ensure his silence after the security

guard refused the defendant's bribe and

after coordination between the defendant

and his employees the defendant staff

contacted other members of hotel

security at the same time staff members

were in close communication with the

victim of the assault as well all in an

effort to cover up the defendant's

assault and to prevent the incident from

being publicly disclosed within days of

the incident the surveillance video

disappeared from the hotel's server by

the way that brings me to another point

about the freak offs how many people

allegedly helped Combs do this as the

indictment reads quote members and

Associates of the comes Enterprise

including high- ranking supervisors

security staff household staff personal

assistants and other com's business

employees facilitated the freak offs by

among other things booking hotel rooms

for the freak offs stocking the hotel

rooms in advance with the required freak

off supplies including Controlled

Substances baby oil lubricant extra

Linens and lighting cleaning the hotel

rooms after the freak offs to try to

mitigate room damage arranging for

travel for victims commercial sex

workers and combs to and from Freak offs

re supplying Combs with requested

supplies delivering large sums of cash

to Combs to pay the commercial sex

workers and scheduling the delivery of

IV fluids in or about March 2024 during

searches of com's residences in Miami

Florida and Los Angeles California law

enforcement seized various freak off

supplies including narcotics and more

than 1,000 bottles of baby oil and

lubricant wow so assuming the government

did in fact C all of this evidence again

I don't think there's a great defense

for why someone would have that much

baby oil in lubricant so the defense

will probably be like yeah my client

engaged in these sexual sessions but hey

that's not illegal on its face everyone

agreed to it's all consensual but here's

the larger Point first you can see how

this supports the racketeering

conspiracy charge that comes faces right

the idea that there was an agreement to

create and further a criminal Enterprise

comes can't do this alone prosecutors

need to prove he conspired with others

in this criminal Enterprise to break the

law so you see this alleged coordination

between multiple people at his behest

but this also helps explain potential

witnesses that may be working with the

government those people that used to

work for Combs associated with Combs

help facilitate these alleged freak offs

that may now be key Witnesses at a

future trial after all what did the

prosecution write in their letter to the

judge the government has conducted

interviews with over 50 victims and

Witnesses many of whom saw or experience

the defendants abuse many of these

Witnesses corroborate one another and

their accounts are similarly consistent

with the other types of evidence

discussed below the government only

expects that number to continue to grow

given that the investigation which is

now public is ongoing and we did another

sidebar on the potential that people

will come forward or take deals to

cooperate with the government you can

check it out on our long crime YouTube

page but if you thought that all of that

wasn't shocking enough when it comes to

the freak offs I want to leave you with

one final allegation regarding these

freak offs and this is something that

prosecutors mentioned in their second

letter regarding bail so let's not

forget Colmes was first denied bail by a

Magistrate Judge he appealed that

decision to a district court judge and

that judge is supposed to review this

with fresh eyes doesn't have to provide

necessarily deference to what this other

judge did so the government doubled down

to show how much of a danger sha Colmes

is how he can't be trusted on the

outside how he needs to be detained

pending trial and in their second letter

they write quote indeed since at least

in or about January

2024 when the defendant was

unquestionably aware of the criminal

investigation the evidence shows that he

is engaged in multiple freak offs some

involving the interstate transportation

of individuals to participate has

continued to use narcotics and has

contacted multiple Witnesses so if true

the government is saying these freak

offs are not years old they are

essentially still happening this was

after he had already been sued and after

the idea of the Freak off had become

publicized through those lawsuits people

were talking about in the media and he

still allegedly engaged in this Behavior

that's huge for prosecutors and of

course here we know that Colmes was

denied bail Again by that secondary

judge so there you have it a full

breakdown of the Freak off allegations

how they tie into the larger overall

case and to be clear I'm sure this is

not the last time we will hear this term

or we will hear more details surrounding

the freak offs that's all we have for

you right now here on sidebar everybody

thank you so much for joining us and as

always please subscribe on Apple podcast

Spotify YouTube wherever you get your

podcasts I'm Jesse Weber I'll speak to

you next time

[Music]