Forms of Validity in Research and Statistics
Summary
TLDRThis video delves into the concept of validity in research, complementing the previously discussed concept of reliability. Validity ensures the accuracy of measurements, crucial for drawing correct conclusions in inferential statistics. The presenter explains that while reliability can exist without validity, validity requires reliability. Three types of validity are explored: content, criterion, and construct validity, each with its nuances and examples. The video emphasizes the importance of these concepts for making accurate inferences about populations.
Takeaways
- 🔍 Validity in research refers to the accuracy of measurements, whereas reliability is about the consistency of those measurements.
- 📊 Reliability and validity are crucial for inferential statistics, which use sample data to make conclusions about populations.
- 📚 You can have a reliable measure without validity, but for a measure to be valid, it must also be reliable.
- 📝 Content validity ensures that a test or measurement tool covers a representative sample of the entire content area it aims to assess.
- 🎯 Criterion validity assesses whether a test reflects abilities in a current or future setting, with two types: concurrent criterion validity (current abilities) and predictive validity (future abilities).
- 🔮 Construct validity is about whether a test truly measures the theoretical construct it claims to, such as aggression or intelligence.
- 📋 The script uses the example of an IQ test to illustrate the importance of reliability for validity, where inconsistent scores would question the test's validity.
- 📐 The video script highlights that validity is not just theoretical but can be tested, for example, by correlating test scores with real-world behaviors.
- 📖 The importance of validity and reliability is emphasized for making accurate conclusions about populations, which is the goal of inferential statistics.
- 🔑 The script concludes by hinting at the next topic, hypothesis testing, which is a method for making conclusions about populations based on sample data.
Q & A
What is the main difference between reliability and validity in research?
-Reliability refers to the consistency of measurements, ensuring that repeated measurements under the same conditions yield the same results. Validity, on the other hand, is about the accuracy of those measurements, ensuring that they truly measure what they are intended to measure.
Why are reliability and validity crucial for inferential statistics?
-Reliability and validity are essential for inferential statistics because they ensure that the conclusions drawn from sample data accurately represent the population. Without reliable and valid measurements, the inferences made about the population could be incorrect, undermining the purpose of the research.
Can a study be reliable without being valid?
-Yes, a study can be reliable without being valid. An example given in the script is measuring thumb size to assess intelligence, which could be consistent (reliable) but is not an accurate (valid) measure of intelligence.
What is content validity and why is it important?
-Content validity is the degree to which a test or measurement tool covers all the relevant content within a specific domain. It is important because it ensures that the test items truly reflect the entire universe of possible items in that domain, providing a comprehensive assessment.
How does criterion validity differ from content validity?
-Criterion validity assesses whether a test accurately reflects a set of abilities in a current or future setting, whereas content validity focuses on whether the test items represent the entire content area. Criterion validity can be further divided into concurrent criterion validity, which assesses current abilities, and predictive validity, which predicts future performance.
What is the purpose of concurrent criterion validity?
-The purpose of concurrent criterion validity is to determine if a test accurately assesses a person's current level of ability or knowledge. It is used to see if the test results correlate with what the test-taker has learned up to the present moment.
How is predictive validity used in standardized testing?
-Predictive validity is used in standardized testing to forecast a student's future academic performance. For instance, SATs and GREs aim to predict how well a student will perform in college or graduate school, respectively, based on their test scores.
What is a construct in psychology and why is it important for construct validity?
-A construct in psychology is a group of interrelated variables that represent an abstract concept. It is important for construct validity because it ensures that the test or measurement tool is actually measuring the intended psychological construct, such as aggression or intelligence.
How can construct validity be empirically tested?
-Construct validity can be empirically tested by correlating the results of a measurement tool with actual outcomes or behaviors. For example, if an aggression scale is developed, one would look for a correlation between the scale scores and real-life aggressive behaviors.
Why is it necessary to have both reliability and validity for accurate conclusions in research?
-Both reliability and validity are necessary because reliability alone does not guarantee that the measurements are meaningful or accurate. Validity ensures that the measurements are meaningful, but without reliability, the measurements cannot be trusted to be consistent. Together, they allow researchers to draw accurate and meaningful conclusions about the population.
Outlines
🔍 Understanding Research Validity and Reliability
This paragraph introduces the concept of validity in research, distinguishing it from reliability. Reliability refers to the consistency of measurements, while validity is about the accuracy of those measurements. The speaker emphasizes the importance of both for inferential statistics, which uses sample data to draw conclusions about populations. The relationship between reliability and validity is explored, stating that while reliability can exist without validity, validity requires reliability. Examples are given to illustrate these concepts, such as measuring thumb size as a reliable but invalid measure of intelligence, and the inconsistency of IQ test scores over time as an unreliable and thus invalid measure.
📚 Exploring Types of Validity in Research
The paragraph delves into the three types of validity: content validity, criterion validity, and construct validity. Content validity assesses whether a test sample accurately represents the entire content area. Criterion validity evaluates how well a test measures current abilities (concurrent criterion validity) or predicts future performance (predictive validity). Construct validity, the most discussed type, concerns whether a test truly measures the theoretical construct it claims to, such as aggression. The speaker also mentions other forms of validity like face validity and stresses the importance of validity and reliability in making accurate conclusions about populations, which will be further explored through hypothesis testing.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Validity
💡Reliability
💡Inferential Statistics
💡Content Validity
💡Criterion Validity
💡Construct Validity
💡Test-Retest Reliability
💡Construct
💡Hypothesis Testing
💡Standardized Tests
Highlights
Validity in research is about the accuracy of measurements, in contrast to reliability which focuses on consistency.
Reliability and validity are crucial for inferential statistics, which uses sample data to make conclusions about populations.
A rule of thumb: you can have reliability without validity, but you need reliability for validity.
Example of a reliable but invalid measure: measuring thumb size as an indicator of intelligence.
Example of needing reliability for validity: an IQ test with inconsistent results over time.
Content validity ensures a sample of items reflects the entire universe of possible items on a topic.
Bad content validity example: a test that only asks about calculating the mean.
Good content validity example: a test that covers various statistical concepts like mean, standard deviation, and t-tests.
Criterion validity assesses if a test reflects abilities in a current or future setting.
Concurrent criterion validity is about assessing current abilities, like a midterm exam.
Predictive criterion validity predicts future performance, like SATs or GREs predicting college success.
Construct validity is about the degree to which a test measures the construct it claims to measure.
A construct in psychology is a group of interrelated variables that represent an abstract idea, like aggression.
Construct validity can be tested by correlating test results with real-world observations of the construct.
The importance of validity and reliability for making accurate conclusions about populations.
Hypothesis testing is the process through which conclusions about populations are made based on validity and reliability.
Transcripts
in this video we're gonna take just a
few moments to talk about validity in
research we've already spoken quite a
bit about reliability which is all about
the consistency of your measurements but
now we're gonna focus on validity which
is more about the accuracy of your
measurements I'm gonna talk about three
different forms of validity in a little
bit but I want to take a step back and
just talk a little bit more generally
about reliability and validity and where
these fit into each other and also into
inferential statistics more broadly so
remember we're headed toward inferential
statistics which is all about using
sample data to make conclusions about
populations to answer questions about
the world reliability and validity are
really important for inferential
statistics because if you have studies
that are not reliable and or not valid
you're gonna end up making inaccurate
conclusions about the world on the basis
of your data which defeats the whole
purpose of what we're trying to do so I
want to talk for a moment about the
relationship between reliability and
validity so here's the rule of thumb
that you should kind of go by you can
have reliability without validity but
you need reliability for validity so let
me illustrate with an example or two
here's an example let's say I'm a
researcher and I'm convinced that
thumb-sized is the best way to measure
intelligence well think about this this
would be a pretty reliable sort of
measure that we can use right think
about test retest reliability I can
measure your thumb now and I can measure
it a week from now and a month from now
and chances are I'll get the same exact
measurement in centimeters or
millimeters or whatever every time I
measure your thumb however do we think
that thumb size is is a valid I should
say measure of intelligence is it an
accurate measure of intelligence
probably not so this is an example of a
reliable study but a very invalid one
but now think about the flipside needing
reliability for validity we've seen an
example of this already if I'm
developing an IQ test and you take it
tomorrow and you get a 120 and then I
give it to you again and you take it and
you get up 94 well this is really
unreliable right we have very poor test
retest reliability in this case and as a
result you would probably say the
is not a valid measure of intelligence
it's not a valid IQ test because I don't
expect that you got 25 points or 30
points or whatever less intelligent over
time so again you can have reliability
without validity but you need
reliability for validity ok so now let's
talk about those three different types
of validity that I mentioned earlier
first of all we're gonna talk about
content validity next we'll talk about
criterion validity and we'll end by
talking about construct validity notice
that all three forms of validity start
with C this is kind of convenient
because it makes it easier to remember
but also kind of problematic because it
makes it slightly more difficult to
differentiate between them but I'll do
my best to help you out in that
department so let's start with content
validity content validity is used when
you want to know whether a sample of
items truly reflects an entire universe
of possible items in a certain topic all
right that's pretty wordy but I can
illustrate this very simple idea with an
example let's say as a professor of
statistics I want to design a test to
measure my students ability in
statistics pretty reasonable right but
we need to make sure that this test has
good content validity so let me
illustrate here's an example of a test
that has bad content validity question
one calculate the mean to calculate the
mean 3 calculate the mean and so on
think about our definition this doesn't
accurately kind of sample a really
representative set of questions that
covers the entire content that we're
learning about in statistics
instead I might want to ask you some
things like this on the final exam for
example calculate the mean maybe do a
standard deviation perhaps a correlation
a t-test you know some other things and
so on this is much better this has
higher and greater content validity
because I'm doing a better job of
covering all the content we learned
about in the test okay so next let's
talk about criterion validity criterion
validity is used when you want to assess
whether a test reflects a set of
abilities in a current or future setting
and there are two types of criterion
validity that are really important to
know in order to fully understand what
criterion validity is
about first we have concurrent criterion
validity so think about what concurrent
means here it means here and now at the
same time etc etc so concurrent
criterion validity is all about this
question here does this test accurately
assess again validity accuracy does this
test accurately assess my students
current level of ability so whenever
you're given a final exam or you're
given a you know midterm in a class it's
all about concurrent criterion validity
this is what your professors are
interested in if you understand 95% of
what we've learned do you get a 95% on
the exam we would hope that you do and
that would be a good example of solid
concurrent criterion validity a
different form of criterion validity
however is more interested in predicting
things about the future this is called
predictive validity and it's kind of
focused on this question here does this
test accurately assess how my students
will do in the future on the final exam
for example can I predict how well
you're gonna do in the future on the
basis of this exam that I'm giving you
right now you could think for example
about SATs and GRE so a lot of these
standardized tests that are requirements
for you know different levels in school
that you're trying to enter into that's
what these are all about we're trying to
give you an SI t as a as a way as an
extra method for us to sort of make a
best guess about how you're gonna do in
college for the GRE we're giving you you
know this test to predict how well
you're gonna do in graduate school now
how well these standardized tests
actually accomplish this goal is perhaps
another issue altogether another topic
of discussion but for now it's important
to just understand that this is the goal
behind the tests to have good predictive
validity so we're gonna end by talking
about construct validity I'll note by
the way that these you know three forms
of validity are by no means
all-inclusive there are others like face
validity and you know there's lots of
others but these are by far the most
common I would say so this is what I'm
focusing on here but before I get to
construct validity I have to take just a
second or two to define what a construct
is so in psychology a construct is a
group of interrelated variables that you
care about think about most things in
psychology that you
might be interested in measuring
aggression for example aggression is a
complicated thing there's all sorts of
things that make up this construct this
abstract idea of aggression it might
involve your behaviors it might involve
physical behaviors pushing shoving it
might involve verbal behaviors verbal
aggression
you know name-calling insults there's
also relational aggression where you
know we're talking about manipulating
friendships and ruining relationships
and things like that there's all sorts
of stuff that goes into aggression and
this is what I mean by interrelated
variables but the overall idea that's
kind of behind these interrelated
variables is your construct so construct
validity is sort of the truest validity
in in terms of how we typically think
about it construct validity is the
degree to which your test measures the
construct it claims to measure for
example am i really measuring aggression
and this is so crucial people argue
about this in the field all the time and
when you write a paper you have to
defend the construct validity of what
you've done you have to prove or at
least convince other people as much as
possible that you know I'm actually
measuring the thing that I'm trying to
measure and that's an issue of construct
validity just as one final note a way to
sort of get at the construct validity is
to correlate your scale for example or
your test or whatever you did to actual
outcomes if you developed an aggression
scale that's designed to measure
aggression do you find a correlation
between how people do on your scale how
aggressive they appear to be on your
scale and how much aggression they
actually show in real life can you
correlate your scale with real tangible
observations of behaviors and that's an
example of how we might address
something like this in most cases when
we think about validity it's sort of
something conceptual that we're focusing
on and you know we're just arguing at a
sort of theoretical level about whether
what we're doing is valid or not but
there are ways like this to sort of put
some numbers to this and and test it so
in general again why do we care about
validity and why do we care about
reliability because it helps us to make
accurate conclusions about populations
and that's where we're gonna head next
how do we make those conclusions about
populations and it's going to be through
a process called
hypothesis testing
Посмотреть больше похожих видео
Operational Definitions and Construct Validity (Intro Psych Tutorial #9)
Forms of Reliability in Research and Statistics
External and Internal Validity
Statistics Terminology and Definitions| Statistics Tutorial | MarinStatsLectures
01. Berpikir Komputasional - Validitas Sumber Data - Informatika Kelas X
LIBRENG SIT IN PSYCHOMETRICS EP. 12: VALIDITY OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS (PT. 2)
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)