Erdoğan Gülen'in İfadesini Neden İstemedi?

Summary

The speaker discusses their ongoing legal case stemming from the Özgür Gündem trial, which also involved Şebnem Koru and Erol Önderoğlu. They detail their arrest and the legal proceedings, including an initial acquittal that was overturned. The conversation touches on the potential for Fethullah Gülen to be summoned for testimony in the U.S., contrasting with the lack of such action despite numerous cases against him. The speaker ponders why Gülen has not been called upon to testify and what impact his potential testimony could have on Turkish politics and the揭秘 of various agreements and alliances, hinting at the complexity and the fear it might instill in the current government.

Takeaways

• 😕 The speaker is currently facing legal issues stemming from the Özgür Gündem trial and has been detained for 11 days.
• 📄 Despite being acquitted, the decision was overturned by a higher court, and the speaker's case continues in the judicial process.
• 🗣️ The speaker's testimony was crucial for the court to make a decision, and without it, the acquittal would not have been possible.
• 🏢 The speaker highlights the bureaucratic hurdles they faced, including difficulties with the consulate in obtaining identification documents.
• 🌍 The speaker questions why Fethullah Gülen has not been summoned to testify in court in the United States despite numerous cases against him.
• 🤔 There's a comparison made between the speaker's situation and that of Adem Yavuz Aslan, who was summoned to testify in the US but has not been taken seriously by the court.
• 🏛️ The speaker discusses the international legal process, including the role of the French Justice Ministry and how it relates to their case.
• 🚫 The speaker is not having their testimony taken by the court currently, which they find problematic.
• 🔍 There's speculation about the potential impact of Fethullah Gülen's testimony on various political and legal matters, including past agreements and the 15th of July incident.
• ❓ The speaker expresses concern and curiosity about whether the current government has requested Gülen's testimony and what the implications would be if such a request were made.

Q & A

What is the main topic of discussion in the transcript?

The main topic of discussion in the transcript revolves around the legal issues and ongoing trials involving the speaker, their experiences with the judicial system, and the broader implications of the Fethullah Gülen case and its impact on Turkish politics.

Why is the speaker currently facing legal issues?

The speaker is facing legal issues due to their involvement with the Özgür Gündem case, which has led to their trial and periods of detention.

What is the significance of the Özgür Gündem case mentioned in the transcript?

The Özgür Gündem case is significant as it involves freedom of speech and press issues in Turkey, with the speaker and others being detained and tried for their association with the platform.

Why does the speaker mention Fethullah Gülen and his potential testimony?

The speaker brings up Fethullah Gülen to draw a parallel between their own legal situation and the broader political implications of Gülen's potential testimony, which could reveal more about the Turkish government's actions and decisions.

What is the speaker's concern regarding the potential testimony of Fethullah Gülen?

The speaker is concerned that if Fethullah Gülen testifies, it could expose various political agreements and potentially change the perspective on Turkey's political landscape, including revealing the truth behind certain claims made by the government.

Why does the speaker mention Adem Yavuz Aslan in the transcript?

Adem Yavuz Aslan is mentioned as an example of someone whose address is known and who has made attempts to engage with the legal system in the United States, contrasting with the situation of Fethullah Gülen, whose potential testimony is a point of discussion.

What is the speaker's view on the relationship between Fethullah Gülen and the Turkish government?

The speaker suggests that there have been complex and changing relationships between Fethullah Gülen and various factions within the Turkish government, with past agreements and potential fears of what Gülen's testimony could reveal.

Why does the speaker discuss the potential for early elections and their impact?

The speaker discusses the potential for early elections to bring a change in government, which could influence the demand for testimonies like Fethullah Gülen's and potentially expose more about the current government's actions.

What is the speaker's opinion on the July 15 coup attempt in Turkey?

The speaker acknowledges the complexity of the coup attempt, recognizing the involvement of various groups and individuals, including those associated with Fethullah Gülen, while also expressing skepticism about the narrative presented by the government.

Why does the speaker ask if the current government has requested Fethullah Gülen's testimony?

The speaker questions whether the government has sought Gülen's testimony to understand the motivations behind such a request and the potential ramifications for the government if the testimony were to be given.