Presentasi Artikel Ilmiah[Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia]

Summary

Annisa from the Library Science Department at the University of Indonesia discusses her scientific article on the use of sarcasm in social media and its impact on human behavior. Using case study methodology with two participants, she explores the prevalence and motivations behind sarcastic language, revealing its potential to harm self-esteem and incite negative emotions. The study concludes that sarcasm violates conversational norms, highlighting the importance of understanding its psychological effects in digital communication.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker, Annisa, introduces herself as a student from the library science department at the University of Indonesia.
• 📚 Annisa discusses her scientific article on the use of sarcasm in social media and its impact on human behavior.
• 🗣️ The article explores the prevalence and types of sarcastic language used in social media, aiming to understand its usage and the reasons behind it.
• 🔍 A case study method involving interviews with two participants from different universities is used to gather data for the research.
• 🌐 The study focuses on how social media platforms facilitate easy interaction and the creation of social networks, which can be venues for sarcastic communication.
• 💬 The research reveals that sarcastic language can be used by anyone and can affect a person's self-esteem and confidence.
• 😔 The study identifies two types of sarcasm: direct, which is immediately understood and can hurt the target, and indirect, which is more subtle and might involve insults without direct confrontation.
• 🤔 The reasons behind the emergence of sarcasm in social media include joking to lighten a serious environment, expressing emotions due to stress, and personal dislike for someone.
• 🚫 The article concludes that the use of sarcasm violates the maxim of politeness, which should minimize the disparity between people in communication.
• 🔑 Key findings suggest that sarcasm in social media can have psychological impacts, leading to a decrease in self-confidence and self-esteem.

Q & A

What is the title of the scientific article discussed in the script?

The title of the scientific article is 'Penggunaan Bahasa Sarkasme Terhadap Perilaku Manusia dalam Media Sosial' (The Use of Sarcasm in Human Behavior in Social Media).

Who is the author of the scientific article mentioned in the transcript?

The author of the scientific article is Annisa from the Library Science Department, still in the 2020 batch, Faculty of Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

What is the main focus of the scientific article?

The main focus of the article is to understand the use of sarcasm in social media, its prevalence, the types of sarcasm, and the reasons behind its emergence.

What method was used in the research for the article?

The research method used in the article is the case study method, which is a research strategy in social science involving direct interviews with sources related to the use of sarcasm.

How many participants were involved in the research?

There were two participants involved in the research, both being first-year students from different universities.

What are the key findings regarding the impact of sarcasm on individuals based on the research?

The key findings suggest that sarcasm in social media can attack an individual's psyche, leading to decreased self-confidence and can be harmful, regardless of who uses it.

What are the two types of sarcasm identified in the article?

The two types of sarcasm identified are: 1) Direct sarcasm, where the target is immediately affected, and 2) Indirect sarcasm, where the insult is more subtle and not immediately obvious.

What are the three reasons behind the emergence of sarcasm in social media as discussed in the article?

The three reasons behind the emergence of sarcasm in social media are: 1) Joking, to lighten up a serious environment, 2) Emotion, as a way to vent out stress or pressure, and 3) Personal dislike, targeting someone they do not like.

How does the article define the concept of 'Maxim of Politeness' in relation to sarcasm?

The article defines the 'Maxim of Politeness' as a principle that is violated by the use of sarcasm, where the speaker maximizes the dissimilarity towards others instead of adhering to the principle of minimizing it.

What was the reaction of the first respondent when they received sarcastic comments?

The first respondent's reaction to receiving sarcastic comments was negative, as indicated by their response to the interview questions.

What was the reaction of the second respondent when they received sarcastic comments?

The second respondent also had a negative reaction to receiving sarcastic comments, as evidenced by their answers to the interview questions.