Where did God come from ? - Best answer Dr. Kent Hovind vs Reinhold Schlieter Debate

Summary

The speaker addresses the philosophical inquiry into the nature of God and the relationship between the spiritual and material realms. They argue that the concept of God, as understood in the Bible, transcends time, space, and matter, and thus cannot be limited by them. The speaker challenges the idea that a spiritual force cannot influence the material world, using emotions and human reasoning as examples of spiritual elements that affect our physical existence. They assert that God, being the creator of the universe, must exist outside of it, unaffected by the constructs of time, space, and matter.

Takeaways

• 🕰 The concept of God in the script is one that is not bound by time, space, or matter, suggesting a divine being that exists outside of the physical universe.
• 🌌 The script argues that time, space, and matter are interconnected and must have come into existence simultaneously, as they are interdependent.
• 📜 The Bible is referenced as stating that God created time, space, and matter, implying a divine origin for the universe.
• 🔄 The idea of a 'Trinity of Trinity's' is introduced, suggesting a complex, interconnected nature of time, space, and matter.
• 🤔 The script challenges the idea that a spiritual force cannot impact a material universe, using human emotions and consciousness as examples of non-material influences on the physical world.
• 🧠 It questions the reliability of human reasoning if the brain is considered to be a random collection of chemicals, implying that there might be more to consciousness than mere chemistry.
• 💭 The discussion suggests that if God could be fully understood by the human brain, then God would not be infinite or worthy of worship.
• 📖 The script implies that philosophical debates about the nature of God and the universe have been ongoing, referencing past discussions about spiritual and material matter.
• 👼 A rhetorical question is posed about how many angels can dance on the tip of a pen, which is a playful way to discuss the nature of spiritual matter and its relation to physical space.
• ⏳ The speaker emphasizes that the God they worship is not limited by human understanding or the constraints of the physical world.

Q & A

What is the philosophical issue the speaker is addressing?

The speaker is addressing the philosophical issue of reconciling the existence of a timeless, spaceless, and immaterial God with the material universe.

How does the speaker define the concept of God in relation to time, space, and matter?

The speaker defines God as being outside of time, space, and matter, unaffected by them, and as the creator of all three.

What is the significance of the phrase 'in the beginning' in the context of the speaker's argument?

The phrase 'in the beginning' signifies the creation of time, space, and matter simultaneously, as per the speaker's interpretation of the Bible.

How does the speaker refute the idea that a spiritual force cannot affect a material universe?

The speaker refutes this idea by questioning how material processes alone can account for immaterial phenomena such as emotions and rationality.

What is the 'Trinity of Trinity's' mentioned by the speaker?

The 'Trinity of Trinity's' refers to the interconnectedness of time (past, present, future), space (length, width, height), and matter (solid, liquid, gas), all of which were created simultaneously.

Why does the speaker argue that if God were limited by time, space, or matter, He would not be God?

The speaker argues that God must be unlimited by time, space, or matter because these are creations and God, as the creator, must be beyond His creation.

What is the speaker's stance on the ability of the human brain to reason if it is just a collection of chemicals?

The speaker challenges the idea that the human brain, if merely a collection of chemicals, can be trusted to produce reliable reasoning and thoughts.

How does the speaker respond to the question of where God comes from?

The speaker responds by stating that the question assumes a limited God, whereas the God he worships is not limited by time, space, or matter.

What is the speaker's view on the capacity of the human brain to comprehend the infinite nature of God?

The speaker believes that if the infinite nature of God could be fully comprehended by the human brain, which is limited, then God would not be worthy of worship.

What is the analogy used by the speaker to illustrate the creator's relationship to creation?

The speaker uses the analogy of a computer's creator not being inside the computer, to illustrate that God, as the creator, is not contained within the universe.

What is the speaker's perspective on the debate format that requires addressing one question at a time?

The speaker seems to be slightly frustrated with the debate format, as he prefers to address multiple aspects of the topic in a more fluid manner.