Le rapport Meadows (1972)

UVED
12 Jan 201607:30

Summary

TLDRThe script discusses the pivotal role of the Meadows report, also known as 'Limits to Growth,' in initiating sustainable development discourse. It highlights the report's structure involving a think tank, computer simulation, and key figures like Jay Forrester and Donella Meadows. The report's controversial predictions of resource depletion and societal collapse by 2020-2030 sparked debates, particularly among economists like Hayek, who criticized its methods and assumptions. It also mentions subsequent reports in 1994 and 2002, and the ongoing discourse on redefining growth and socio-economic models.

Takeaways

  • 🌏 The Millioz report played a significant role in highlighting environmental concerns and the concept of sustainable development.
  • 📈 The report introduced a methodological approach using computer simulations to predict long-term consequences of economic growth on the planet.
  • 🤝 The Club of Rome, an informal association led by Aurelio Peccei and Alexander King, commissioned the report to think about the future of the planet.
  • 🧠 The report was influenced by the work of Jay Forrester in cybernetics and system dynamics, focusing on feedback loops within systems.
  • 🌱 The report identified potential catastrophic scenarios, such as the depletion of natural resources like copper and oil, leading to an economic collapse by 2020-2030.
  • 💡 Economists, including Nobel laureate Friedrich Hayek, criticized the report, arguing that resources are substitutable and technological innovation can prevent catastrophe.
  • 🔄 The debate sparked by the report led to discussions on the substitutability of natural resources and the role of innovation in overcoming economic challenges.
  • 📚 The report's methodology and findings were challenged by economists like Julian Simon, who questioned the understanding of system dynamics and the scientific method used.
  • 🌡️ Subsequent reports in 1994 and 2002 continued to raise alarms about overshoot and climate change, suggesting that the scenarios predicted in 1972 were becoming increasingly likely.
  • ⏳ The latest updates on the report suggest that we might be too late to avoid a peak in resource depletion and population decline around 2030, indicating a need to redefine our relationship with economic growth.

Q & A

  • What is the significance of the Millozzo report in the context of environmental concerns?

    -The Millozzo report played a crucial role in bringing environmental considerations to the forefront, particularly by initiating the concept of sustainable development. It introduced a methodical approach and reflection on the future of the planet and its capacity.

  • What were the four core elements of the Millozzo report's model?

    -The four core elements of the Millozzo report's model were the client (the Club of Rome), the simulation (the first time a report relied on computer modeling), the institutions involved (like Jay Forrester and Donella Meadows), and the scientific method used (systems thinking and feedback loops).

  • Who were the key figures behind the Club of Rome, and what was their role in the Millozzo report?

    -The Club of Rome was informally directed by Aurelio Peccei, an administrator at Fiat, and Alexander King, a former OECD director. They were part of a think tank that aimed to reflect on the future of the planet and its carrying capacity.

  • How did the Millozzo report utilize computer simulation, and what was unique about this approach?

    -The Millozzo report was unique in that it was the first to use computer simulation with raw data and an ensemble of systems, including demographic, industrial, and urban systems, to predict long-term consequences of economic growth on the planet.

  • Which two economists were among the first to critique the Millozzo report, and what were their main arguments?

    -The economists Friedrich Hayek and David Berlin were among the first to critique the Millozzo report. Hayek questioned the media's focus on the report without considering the critiques, while Berlin criticized the misunderstanding of the model and the scientific method, particularly systems thinking.

  • What was the main argument of the economists against the Millozzo report's predictions of resource depletion and economic collapse?

    -The economists argued that natural resources are substitutable factors of production. They believed that if resources like oil became scarce and expensive, cheaper alternatives would be developed and adopted, thus averting the predicted catastrophe.

  • What were the key findings of the Millozzo report regarding the future of natural resources and economic growth?

    -The Millozzo report identified an impending depletion of natural resources like copper and oil within 50 to 60 years, predicting that exponential growth would hit a constraint and could lead to a collapse of the system by around 2020-2030.

  • How did the subsequent reports following the Millozzo report in 1994 and 2002 revise or confirm its predictions?

    -The subsequent reports in 1994 and 2002 discussed the concept of overshoot, suggesting that the scenario envisioned in 1972 was becoming irreversible, with 2020-2030 marking an inevitable peak in resource consumption and economic growth.

  • What was the main message of Donella Meadows when she presented in Paris in 2012 regarding the future of society?

    -In 2012, Donella Meadows indicated that society was on the verge of being too late to avoid the peak of overshoot by 2030, suggesting that growth would suddenly falter and the population would decrease from that point.

  • How does the Millozzo report and its successors encourage us to rethink our relationship with economic growth and societal models?

    -The Millozzo report and its successors challenge us to redefine our approach to growth and consider new socio-economic models that are sustainable and take into account the limitations and carrying capacity of the planet.

Outlines

00:00

🌿 The Milloz Report and Environmental Concerns

The first paragraph discusses the significance of the Milloz Report, also known as the 'Limits to Growth' report, in raising awareness about environmental issues. It highlights the French tradition of halting growth and the difficulty in comprehending the message of sustainability. The report is noted for its methodological approach, its initiation of sustainable development discussions, and its structure around four key elements: the Club of Rome as the sponsor, the use of computer simulation, the involvement of significant institutions and individuals like Jay Forrester and Donella Meadows, and the scientific method of system dynamics. The report's predictions of resource depletion and exponential growth leading to a potential collapse by 2020-2030 sparked debates, particularly among economists like Hayek, who questioned the report's methodology and predictions.

05:02

🔬 Economic Responses to Environmental Reports

The second paragraph delves into the economic community's response to the Milloz Report's predictions. It contrasts the report's dire outlook with the economists' belief in the substitutability of natural resources and the power of innovation to avert catastrophe. The paragraph also mentions subsequent reports in 1994 and 2002, which further discussed the potential for societal collapse due to overshoot and the inability to avoid a peak in resource consumption by 2030. The 2012 report, presented by Graham Turner, suggests that society is on the verge of a critical transition, with growth expected to falter and population decline post-2030. The paragraph concludes by emphasizing the ongoing debate about redefining the relationship with growth and the need for a new socio-economic model.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Rapport Milloz

The 'Rapport Milloz' refers to a significant report that played a crucial role in environmental considerations. It is also known as the 'Rapport Limite' and is associated with the French tradition of halting growth. The report is central to the video's theme as it initiated discussions on sustainable development and was the first to use computer simulation to predict long-term consequences of economic growth on the planet.

💡Club of Rome

The 'Club of Rome' is an informal association mentioned in the script that was influential in the creation of the Milloz report. It was led by Aurelio Peccei, an administrator at Fiat, and Alexander King, a former OECD director. The Club of Rome is depicted as a think tank that aimed to reflect on the future of the planet and the carrying capacity of Earth, which directly ties into the video's exploration of sustainable development.

💡Sustainable Development

Sustainable development is a core concept in the video, stemming from the Milloz report's approach to considering long-term environmental impacts. It is defined as development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. The video discusses how the report initiated the concept of sustainable development, which is a key theme in understanding the video's message on the future of economic and environmental balance.

💡Computer Simulation

Computer simulation is a key methodological approach highlighted in the video, used for the first time in the Milloz report. It involved creating models based on raw data and simulating various systems such as demographic, industrial, and urban systems to predict long-term outcomes of economic growth. The script mentions World2 and World3 models, emphasizing the importance of simulation in understanding the potential future scenarios of resource depletion and environmental constraints.

💡JY Forrester

JY Forrester is an important figure mentioned in the script who worked on cybernetics and system dynamics. His interest in creating a model that could generate scenarios and prospects is highlighted. Forrester's work is integral to the video's discussion on how the Milloz report used system dynamics to predict future scenarios, which is a central part of the video's narrative on the predictive power of such models.

💡Donella Meadows

Donella Meadows is identified as the author of the Milloz report and is noted for attempting to create a conceivable scenario for the next forty to fifty years. Her work is central to the video's theme as it illustrates the attempt to forecast long-term environmental and economic trends, which is a critical aspect of the report's legacy and the video's exploration of future planning.

💡System Dynamics

System dynamics is a scientific method discussed in the video, which focuses on the feedback loops and interconnections within systems. It is used to understand how changes in one part of a system can affect the whole. The video emphasizes the importance of system dynamics in the Milloz report's methodology, as it was used to predict the consequences of economic growth on planetary systems, which is a key aspect of the video's message on the complexity of environmental challenges.

💡Resource Depletion

Resource depletion is a critical concept in the video, as it refers to the exhaustion of natural resources such as copper, oil, and other materials. The Milloz report identified this as a significant constraint on growth, predicting an impending crisis within 50 to 60 years. The video uses the concept of resource depletion to discuss the limits to growth and the need for a new economic model that can sustainably manage resources.

💡Economic Growth

Economic growth is a central theme in the video, as it is the driving force behind the environmental concerns discussed. The video examines the relationship between economic growth and environmental sustainability, questioning the traditional model of growth and the potential for collapse if growth continues exponentially without considering resource constraints.

💡Innovation

Innovation is presented in the video as a potential solution to the challenges of resource depletion and environmental constraints. Economists in the video argue that innovation and technological progress can lead to the development of substitutes for expensive resources, thus avoiding catastrophe. The concept of innovation is integral to the video's discussion on how society might adapt and overcome the predicted environmental crises.

💡Catastrophe

The term 'catastrophe' is used in the video to describe the potential collapse of the system as predicted by the Milloz report if growth continues without considering environmental limits. The video discusses how the report's predictions of catastrophe sparked debates among economists and scientists, leading to different perspectives on how to address the challenges of sustainable development.

Highlights

The Milloz report played a crucial role in considering the environment.

The report is known for its limits, highlighting the French tradition of halting growth.

The report's 72 recommendations were presented at the first Earth Summit in Stockholm.

Two other reports are associated with the Milloz report: 'Our Planet' by Barbara Ward and 'Blueprint for Survival'.

The Milloz report initiated what would later be called sustainable development.

The report's architecture includes four core elements: the client, the simulation, the institutions, and the scientific method.

The Club of Rome, an informal association, commissioned the report to think about the future of the planet.

The report was the first to use computer simulation with raw data and various systems.

Key institutions involved were MIT with Jay Forrester and Donella Meadows, focusing on system dynamics and scenarios.

The report's scientific method used system dynamics, focusing on feedback loops within systems.

The report identified catastrophic scenarios, such as the exhaustion of natural resources within 50 to 60 years.

Economists, including Hayek, were the first to react to the report, questioning its predictions.

Hayek's Nobel Prize acceptance speech highlighted the lack of media coverage of those who criticized the report.

Economists argued that natural resources are substitutable and innovation can prevent catastrophe.

The report's predictions have been revisited in subsequent reports in 1994 and 2002, discussing overshoot and climate change.

The 2012 report by Turner and Hoek suggested that the scenario predicted in 1972 is becoming irreversible.

The report series has consistently pointed out the crucial question of redefining our relationship with growth and economic models.

Transcripts

play00:26

c'est bien un rapport qui a joué un rôle

play00:29

très important dans la prise en compte

play00:30

de l'environnement si le rapport milloz

play00:31

plus connus comme rapport limite tout

play00:34

klaus noter la tradition française en

play00:36

halte à la croissance ce qui montre bien

play00:38

la difficulté dans la compréhension du

play00:40

message pour appeler un petit peu les

play00:42

choses le rapport milloz ses 72 premier

play00:45

sommet de la terre à stockholm il ya

play00:47

deux rapports qui vont être également

play00:49

associés à ce rapport le rapport notre

play00:51

planète de barbara wars est erronée du

play00:54

boss qui est un rapport un petit peu

play00:55

informel rapport sur le sommet de la

play00:57

terre et puis rappeur anglais

play01:00

blueprint survival qui va être un moyen

play01:03

de replacer l'environnement au centre

play01:05

des préoccupations mais ce rapport

play01:07

milloz va jouer un rôle très important

play01:09

parce qu'effectivement il apporte une

play01:11

méthode une réflexion et surtout il va

play01:14

initier ce qu'on appellera plus tard le

play01:15

développement durable on comprendra un

play01:18

petit peu architecture il ya quatre

play01:20

éléments qui sont des éléments au coeur

play01:23

du modèle

play01:23

le premier élément c'est le mandataire

play01:26

le commanditaire le club de rome faut

play01:28

rappeler que c'est un petit

play01:29

d'associations très informel qui

play01:32

dirigeait à l'époque par aurelio rétif

play01:35

qui était chez fiat administrateurs et

play01:39

puis alexander king qui était ancien

play01:41

directeur de l' ocde et ce groupe ce

play01:45

think tank comme on l'appelle

play01:46

aujourd'hui veut réfléchir sur l'avenir

play01:48

l'avenir de la planète et la capacit

play01:50

surcharge de cette planète et il commet

play01:52

dit un rapport indépendant ce fameux

play01:54

rapport milloz deuxième élément

play01:57

important dans l'architecturé la

play01:58

simulation c'est la première fois qu'un

play02:00

modèle repose sur une simulation

play02:02

informatique

play02:03

alors il ya différents modèles world

play02:05

deux ou à trois ward 2000 et ses modèles

play02:09

ont une particularité c'est que c'est un

play02:11

chiffrage informatique avec des données

play02:13

brutes et surtout il est basé sur un

play02:16

ensemble de systèmes le système

play02:18

démographique le système industriel

play02:21

le système est gamin urbain comme on dit

play02:23

ce qu'on veut savoir c'est quelles

play02:24

peuvent être les conséquences à plus ou

play02:26

moins long terme en faisant une

play02:27

simulation notre croissance économique

play02:29

sur notre planète troisième intérêt ces

play02:33

institutions qui va travailler sur le

play02:35

projet

play02:36

sur le rapport milloz les mighty avec

play02:38

deux personnes importantes

play02:40

jy forrester qui travaille sur la

play02:42

cybernétique sur la systémique

play02:44

l'intérêt pour lui c'est de faire ce

play02:46

modèle faisant apparaître des scénarios

play02:48

de la prospective et puis d'aunis

play02:51

meadows qui va être l'auteur du rapport

play02:52

et qui va justement essayer de faire un

play02:55

scénario envisageable pour les quarante

play02:58

à cinquante ans qui vont suivre

play02:59

enfin peut-être ce qui va surtout faire

play03:02

débat c'est la méthode scientifique

play03:03

utiliser la systémique

play03:05

on parle de dynamique des systèmes c'est

play03:08

dynamisme repose sur un calibrage très

play03:10

particulier puisque on réfléchit non pas

play03:13

sur les maillons d'un système mais

play03:15

plutôt sur les boucles autrement dit les

play03:17

liens entre ces maillots et sebouh qu'on

play03:19

le verra sont des boucles qu'on appelle

play03:21

de rétroaction elles peuvent être

play03:22

positives raison clichy un phénomène

play03:24

elles peuvent être stabilisatrice si

play03:27

effectivement elle réduit

play03:28

l'amplification du phénomène

play03:30

alors ce qu'on retient surtout du

play03:32

rapport milloz cdc de catastrophique

play03:34

puisque ce rapport identifie dans les 50

play03:36

à 60 ans on est en 72 épuisement des

play03:39

ressources naturelles plus mickaël plus

play03:41

de cuivre plus de pétrole et surtout un

play03:44

phénomène exponentiel

play03:45

la croissance va buter sur une

play03:47

contrainte elle n'est pas illimité et

play03:49

ces facteurs limitants il faut pouvoir

play03:51

les définir ce rapport évoque quand même

play03:53

l'effondrement du système à l'horizon

play03:55

2020 2030

play03:57

et forcément ce type d'effondrement va

play04:00

interpeller un grand nombre

play04:01

d'économistes un grand nombre de

play04:02

scientifiques et les premiers à réagir

play04:04

effectivement à ce scénario à cette

play04:07

catastrophe

play04:08

ce sont les économistes et on va dire

play04:11

qu'un économiste va jouer le rôle de

play04:13

déclencheur de la polémique c'est hayek

play04:15

ait un économiste libéral il obtient le

play04:18

prix nobel en 74 et lors de son discours

play04:22

inaugural il est très surpris ce dit

play04:24

comment se fait-il qu'on médiatise un

play04:26

rapport et qu'on ne dit strictement rien

play04:28

sur les gens qui ont décrié ce rapport

play04:30

qui nous ont remis en cause et hayek qui

play04:33

sera diapos et à gauche va justement

play04:35

cité deux sources extrêmement importante

play04:37

dès kerman qui va effectivement écrire

play04:40

un ouvrage dans lequel il revient sur

play04:42

les scénarios du rapport milloz et puis

play04:45

surtout un autre économiste à berlin

play04:47

or qui lui va voir toutes les astuces du

play04:50

rapport tout ce qui ne va pas dans la

play04:53

compréhension de modèle et la méthode

play04:54

scientifique notamment la systémique

play04:56

mais on va dire qu'il faudra attendre

play04:59

pratiquement un an plus tard 74 pour que

play05:01

les économistes répondent très

play05:03

brutalement à ce rapport parent va dire

play05:05

une réponse qui ne débouchent sur aucune

play05:09

difficulté de compréhension pour tout

play05:11

type d'économistes qui de dire mais si à

play05:13

épuisement des ressources naturelles ci

play05:15

a plus de pétrole

play05:15

ah c'est pas grave on remplacera le

play05:19

pétrole qui coûte cher par une ressource

play05:20

qui coûte beaucoup moins cher et on

play05:22

pourra toujours remplacer une ressource

play05:25

par une autre autrement dit les

play05:27

ressources naturelles sont un facteur de

play05:30

production qui peut être remplacée et

play05:32

comme il peut être remplacé nos

play05:34

fonctions de production deviennent des

play05:36

fonctions production substituables on

play05:39

voit l'intérêt ici de cette réponse des

play05:41

économistes c'est que brutalement on

play05:43

pense qu'on pourra toujours remplacer un

play05:45

facteur qui coûte cher par un facteur

play05:47

qui coûte beaucoup moins cher

play05:48

et puis même si on n'y arrivait pas on a

play05:51

foi dans l'innovation l'innovation le

play05:52

progrès technique va nous sortir de la

play05:55

catastrophe alors ce rapport milloz date

play05:57

effectivement 212

play05:59

depuis on a eu deux autres rapports un

play06:02

premier rapport en 94

play06:04

un rapport en 2002 en 2002 on évoque une

play06:07

surchauffe ce qu'on appelle le

play06:09

versioning les économistes prétendent et

play06:12

le rapport le dis clairement il n'y a

play06:13

pas que des économistes

play06:14

il ya également des scientifiques ce

play06:16

rapport prétend que en 2020 2030 le

play06:19

scénario envisagé en 72 devient

play06:22

irrémédiable et plus récemment en 2012

play06:25

d'aunis milo est venu en france à paris

play06:27

présente et non pas un troisième rapport

play06:29

mais présentait ce que pourrait être

play06:31

l'avenir de la société

play06:32

ce troisième rapport on voudrait décrit

play06:35

comme rapport est générée par gramme

play06:38

turner qui a repris le rapport

play06:40

effectivement 2012

play06:41

et que dit hoerner on est un petit peu

play06:44

dans la vague du trop tard de la

play06:46

surchauffe

play06:46

on ne pourra pas éviter un pic qui 2030

play06:49

ce pic montrerait que la croissance va

play06:52

s'essouffler brutalement et surtout la

play06:54

population va se réduire à partir de

play06:56

cette date là on peut bien sûr critiquer

play06:59

ses références

play07:00

au catastrophisme ce qu'on peut juste se

play07:02

rappeler c'est que depuis cinquante ans

play07:04

un ensemble de scientifiques à travers

play07:06

ses différents rapports mettent le doigt

play07:08

sur une question cruciale pour notre

play07:10

avenir

play07:11

comment aujourd'hui redéfinir le rapport

play07:13

à la croissance

play07:14

et comment redéfinir un nouveau modèle

play07:16

socio-économique

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Связанные теги
Sustainable DevelopmentEconomic GrowthEnvironmental ConcernsMilloz ReportResource DepletionCatastrophe PredictionInnovation DebateSystem DynamicsThink Tank InsightsFuture ScenariosEconomic Polemics
Вам нужно краткое изложение на английском?