Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 vs. ASICS GT-2000 12 | Which Should You Choose?

Summary

In this video, Matt from Doc Running compares the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 and the ASICS GT-2000 10, two moderate stability running shoes. Despite their similarities, they diverge in execution and evolution. The Adrenaline offers a higher heel drop and firmer heel cushioning, making it ideal for runners needing heel support. The GT-2000 10, with a lower drop and softer forefoot, provides a smoother ride and is versatile for varied paces. Both shoes are highly rated, but their differences make them suitable for different preferences, with the GT-2000 being lighter and more versatile.

Takeaways

• 👟 The video compares the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 and the ASICS GT-2000 8, two popular moderate stability running shoes.
• 🔍 Both shoes have been staples in the running industry for a long time, with the Adrenaline in its 23rd version and the GT-2000 in its 8th.
• ⚖️ The Adrenaline has a 4mm heel drop with a weight of 10.1 oz for men size 9, while the GT-2000 has an 8mm heel drop and weighs 9.5 oz for the same size.
• 📏 The Adrenaline offers a slightly shorter fit with more room in the length, whereas the GT-2000 is more snug throughout.
• 👣 Both shoes have great midfoot holds and stiff heel counters, with the GT-2000 providing a bit more padding for sensitive runners.
• 👣 The Adrenaline's upper is firmer, while the GT-2000's upper has more stretch, making it more accommodating.
• 👣 The Adrenaline uses DNA Loft V2 cushioning, which is firmer, especially in the forefoot, while the GT-2000 features FlyteFoam Blast Plus, which is softer and more cushioned.
• 🏃‍♂️ The GT-2000's 3D guidance system provides a more balanced stability, focusing on the midfoot and heel, whereas the Adrenaline's guide rails offer more heel-focused stability.
• 🏃‍♀️ The GT-2000 is lighter and more versatile, suitable for a variety of paces, while the Adrenaline is a reliable daily trainer with a higher heel drop.
• 💡 The video suggests that having multiple pairs of shoes, like these two, can reduce injury risk by providing different levels of support and cushioning.

Q & A

What is the main purpose of the video?

The main purpose of the video is to compare and review the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 and the ASICS GT2000 12 to help viewers decide which shoe might be better for their needs, specifically for those looking for a moderate stability running shoe.

How many versions have the Brooks Adrenaline and ASICS GT2000 models been through?

The Brooks Adrenaline is in its 23rd version, while the ASICS GT2000 is in its 12th version.

What are the heel-to-toe drop measurements for both shoes?

The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 has a 4mm heel-to-toe drop, with a 24mm heel and 20mm forefoot for men's size 9. The ASICS GT2000 12 has an 8mm heel-to-toe drop, with a 24mm heel and 16mm forefoot for men's size 9.

How do the shoes differ in terms of cushioning materials?

The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 uses DNA Loft V2 cushioning, which is firmer, while the ASICS GT2000 12 uses FlyteFoam Blast Plus, which is softer and more cushioned.

What is the difference in fit between the two shoes?

The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 fits slightly shorter with more room throughout the length, while the ASICS GT2000 12 feels more snug. Both shoes fit true to size and have great midfoot holds and stiff heel counters.

Which shoe is considered to have a higher level of heel stability?

The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 is considered to have a higher level of heel stability due to its stiffer and more rigid heel design.

What is the difference in stability systems between the two shoes?

The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 uses guide rails for stability, while the ASICS GT2000 12 uses a 3D guidance system with internal geometric parts of the midsole to provide stability.

Which shoe is lighter and why might it be more versatile?

The ASICS GT2000 12 is lighter and is considered more versatile due to its lighter weight, snappier feel, and bouncier ride.

What is the recommendation for runners who need a higher heel drop and stable heel shoe?

For runners who need a higher heel drop and stable heel shoe, the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 is recommended.

Why might someone consider having both shoes in their rotation?

Having both shoes in rotation can reduce injury risk by providing different loading on tissues, firmnesses, and stability levels, offering variety in training.

What is the host's personal preference between the two shoes and why?

The host personally prefers the ASICS GT2000 12 because it is more versatile, lighter, and has a more balanced ride with the newer cushioning materials.

Outlines

00:00

👟 Comparison of Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 and GT22

Matt from Doc Running introduces a comparison review between the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 and GT22, two models known for their moderate stability and long-standing presence in the footwear industry. He aims to help viewers decide which shoe might be better suited for their needs. The video starts with a comparison of specifications, noting the weight and heel-to-toe drop differences. The Adrenaline GTS 23 has a 4mm higher drop and a slightly heavier weight compared to the GT22. Matt then discusses the fit, mentioning that while both shoes are similar, the Adrenaline 23 feels slightly shorter and offers more room, whereas the GT22 feels more snug. Both shoes have great midfoot holds and stiff heel counters, with the GT22 having a bit more padding. The discussion then shifts to the soles, highlighting the significant differences in cushioning materials and the impact on the ride experience. The Adrenaline uses DNA Loft V2, which is firmer, especially in the forefoot, while the GT22 features softer and more cushioned foam. Matt also touches on the stability features, with the Adrenaline having a stiffer heel and the GT22 offering a smoother, more balanced ride due to its 3D guidance system.

05:02

🏃‍♂️ Stability and Versatility in Running Shoes

In the second paragraph, Matt delves deeper into the stability aspects of the two shoes. He emphasizes that the Adrenaline GTS 23 is better for those who need a higher level of heel stability due to its stiffer and more rigid construction, particularly in the heel area. Conversely, the GT22 provides a more classic midfoot stability feel, with the support more evenly distributed along the medial side. Matt also points out that the GT22 is lighter and offers a more versatile and snappier ride, making it suitable for a variety of running activities. He suggests that the GT22 might be a better option for those looking for a more balanced stability shoe. The paragraph concludes with Matt's personal preference for the GT22 due to its lighter weight and versatility, but he acknowledges that the Adrenaline GTS 23 remains a reliable choice for those who prefer a higher heel drop and a stable heel feel. He encourages viewers to consider having multiple pairs of shoes to reduce injury risk and to share their experiences with both models.

Keywords

💡Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23

The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 is a model of running shoe known for its moderate stability features. In the video, it is compared with another model to help viewers decide which shoe might be better suited for their needs. The shoe is described as having a consistent design with minor tweaks over the years, indicating its reliability and enduring appeal among runners.

💡ASICS GT2000

The ASICS GT2000 is another model of running shoe that is compared alongside the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 in the video. It is noted for undergoing significant changes over time, with the most recent version being particularly praised by the reviewer. The GT2000 is positioned as a versatile and lighter option compared to the Adrenaline, suggesting it might be suitable for a broader range of runners.

💡Moderate Stability

Moderate stability is a feature of running shoes that provides support for runners who need a balance between cushioning and control. The video discusses how both the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 and ASICS GT2000 cater to this need, but in different ways. This concept is central to the video's theme as it helps potential buyers understand what to expect from each shoe in terms of support and comfort.

💡Drop

Drop in running shoes refers to the difference in height between the heel and the forefoot. A higher drop typically offers more cushioning and a more comfortable ride, while a lower drop promotes a more natural running gait. The video compares the 4mm drop of the ASICS GT2000 with the 12mm drop of the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23, highlighting how this difference can affect a runner's preference.

💡Fit

Fit is a critical aspect of running shoes, affecting comfort and performance. The video script discusses how the fit of the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 and ASICS GT2000 differs, with the former feeling slightly shorter and the latter being more snug. Understanding the fit is essential for runners to choose the right shoe, and the video aims to provide insights to help with this decision.

💡Foam

Foam in running shoes refers to the cushioning material used in the midsole. Different types of foam can affect the shoe's comfort, responsiveness, and durability. The video compares the DNA Loft V2 foam in the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23, which is described as firmer, with the FlyteFoam Blast Plus in the ASICS GT2000, which is softer and bouncier. This comparison helps viewers understand the impact of foam choice on the shoe's performance.

💡Guide Rails

Guide Rails is a technology used by Brooks in their running shoes to provide stability. It is a dual-density medial post that guides the foot from heel strike to toe-off, helping to control overpronation. The video mentions that Brooks has been using this technology for a long time, suggesting its effectiveness and reliability in delivering stability to runners.

💡3D Guidance System

The 3D Guidance System is a feature of the ASICS GT2000 that replaces traditional stability posts with internal geometric structures in the midsole. These structures provide support and guidance as the foot rolls through the gait cycle. The video highlights this as a significant change from the previous model, indicating a shift towards a more natural and adaptable stability system.

💡Heel Counter

A heel counter is a firm, semi-rigid structure in the rear part of a running shoe that provides support and stability, especially for the heel. The video script mentions that both the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 and ASICS GT2000 have stiff heel counters, which are important for runners seeking stability and control.

💡Versatility

Versatility in running shoes refers to the ability of a shoe to perform well in various conditions and for different types of running. The video suggests that the ASICS GT2000 is more versatile than the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 due to its lighter weight and bouncier ride, making it suitable for a wider range of activities beyond just daily training.

Highlights

Comparison review of Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 and the Asics GT2000 12

Both shoes are in the moderate stability category

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23 has a 4mm drop with a 10.1oz weight for men size 9

Asics GT2000 12 has an 8mm drop with a 9.5oz weight for men size 9

Adrenaline has been consistent with minor tweaks over the years

GT2000 has undergone significant changes, including a full video review by the reviewer

Fit comparison shows Adrenaline is slightly shorter with more room in the length

GT2000 has more stretch in the upper for a snugger fit

Both shoes fit true to size with great midfoot holds and stiff heel counters

Soles differ significantly with Adrenaline featuring DNA Loft V2 and GT2000 using FlyteFoam Blast Plus

Adrenaline offers a higher heel drop for more heel cushioning

GT2000 has a smoother heel bevel and a more balanced ride

Adrenaline's forefoot is firmer, while GT2000's is softer and more cushioned

Stability features differ with Adrenaline using guide rails and GT2000 using a 3D guidance system

Adrenaline is better for those needing higher level heel stability

GT2000 provides more midfoot stability and is lighter

Both shoes are highly rated and popular for a reason

Recommendation to try both if finances allow for different running experiences

Encouragement to comment on personal experiences with the shoes

Transcripts

hey everyone Matt here from Doc running

and today we're going to do a comparison

review of the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 23

and the as6

gt22 the purpose of this video is really

to compare these models cuz they are

quite similar in a couple ways a these

have been around forever right 23rd

version I know this is 12 but this has

been around much longer than that

they've changed names stuff like that so

they've been around as long as I've been

in the footware industry and even a

little bit before that um they're also

in the similar category moderate

stability daing trading shoes but how

they're executing that and how they have

changed over the years has gone in

completely different directions so I

really want to help you decide which one

might be better for you if you need a

moderate stability dating trading shoe

or looking for one and help you make

that decision so let's start off with

specifications first the adrenaline

there's some variance in the reporting

of this so it just heads up but what I

have so far 10.1 o men size 9 8.1 o

women size8 36 in the heel 24 in the 4

foot for a 12 mm drop the GT2 2012 is

coming in at 9.5 o men size 9 8.3 o

women size 8 322 in the 4f foot in the

heel I'm sorry 3 uh 242 in the 4 foot

for an 8 mm drop kind of standard drops

for what these two companies have been

doing the adrenaline has been very

consistent over the last several years

with some minor tweaks whereas the

gt2000 has been going through some big

changes the most recent one in my mind

is one of the best I have a full video

review of both these but I'm really

enjoying the G22 it's really come

forward but I think there's still going

to be some people that enjoy this the

adrenaline so let's talk about fit first

so fitwise the they actually are quite

similar on foot they it feels like the

GT the GT the G the adrenaline 23 fits

just slightly short a little bit more

room throughout the length of the shoe

the gt2000 feels like is just a little

bit more snug throughout the length of

the shoe both them do a great job of

opening up with some daily not my but

when you first put them on you're going

to notice those slight differences the

gt2000 has a little bit more stretch in

the upper and is a little bit more

accommodating whereas the adrenaline

upper it's accommodating they're both

really great mesh uppers I just feel

like it it kind of has a little bit more

what's the term I want just that again

that shorter fit that closer kind of fit

whereas this is kind of the more snug

fit is the best way I can describe it

other than that both of them fit true to

size both of them have great midfoot

holds heel counters are stiff there's a

little bit more padding in the gt2000

for those that are sensitive but stiff

and stable heel areas really outside of

that actually pretty similar outside of

a little bit more snug a little bit

short but very similar upper fit which

is actually really nice for helping make

that decision or if you want to switch

between the two which might not be a bad

idea more on that later the soles are

where things totally diverge and are

completely different obviously you have

the very high drop over here with the

Brooks Adrenaline obviously have the

more moderate drop is the easiest thing

to think with the gt2000 the other

things is the Foams are totally

different so the new fight foam blast

plus over here is much softer in the

g22000 the adrenaline because there's so

much under the heel it's DNA Loft V2

which in my mind I have yet to find to

be very soft it's cushion don't get me

wrong it's just the heel is a little bit

soft but the 4 foot's a little bit

firmer the foam tends to run a little

firmer in my mind whereas the foam over

here in the in the gt2000 tends to run a

little bit softer on that same note with

the better and improved heel bevel I

think the heel of the g2000 is much

smoother than the high heel drop of the

adrenaline now if you want a higher heel

drop you want a little bit more in the

heel the adrenaline is going to work

better for you but if you want a more

kind of smoother riding heel better Bev

bevel I talked about the geometry over

here Which comp compresses really well

the gt2000 is going to kind of win out

but there's some other changes you might

want to think about so when you come

over to the 4f foot 4 foot is much

firmer in the adrenaline whereas it's

much softer and a little bit more

cushioned in the gt2000 I personally

like the gt2000 more for that because

the Fone blast plus is just a little bit

more bouncy feels a little bit more

cushioned but if you want that SL this

is relative teeny bit more firm teeny

bit more not stable but teeny bit more

firm and grounded R in your foot that's

where the adrenaline is going to come in

the drop does make it feel very

different I mentioned that the heel can

feel a little clunky in the adrenaline

but if you'd like that awesome and a lot

smoother over here the 4 foot is also a

little different it's a little stiffer

over in the adrenaline little bit more

flexible over in the gt2000 again also

because the so is just a little bit

softer over here but rides are very

different again because of the drop and

the cushioning also just a little bit

more balanc with some of the newer Foams

that the that as6 is experimenting with

when it comes to stability that's also

really different so you have the guide

rails over here which Brooks has been

using for a long time as6 moved away

from Posts and is now using the 3D

guidance system that I talked about

which is really just these internal

geometric parts of the midsole where if

you start rolling into them they tend to

give you a little bit more pressure back

it doesn't feel like a traditional post

but it certainly is apparent there more

in the midfoot where the adrenaline and

I've felt this over the years a lot of

the stability and stiffness really

happens at the heel yes there's also the

lateral uh sidewall which is great for

Central guidance but I personally feel

the majority of the ability is really

centered in the heel and a little less

than the four the midfoot and for foot

not that it's not stable there it's just

not as significant as the really stiff

heel so if you need heel stability the

and want to high drop the adrenaline is

going to be really good but if you want

that more kind of classic midfoot

stability that is really really well

here it's also in the in the heel it

does a little bit into the forefoot then

you're going to want to try the GT 2012

which does a lot better job of that and

it tends to have disability a little bit

more spread out so that's also another

comment is the adrenaline I feel is the

higher level stability shoe in the heel

it's stiffer it's a it's a lot more

rigid back there whereas because of the

softer so the g2000 is much more in that

moderate realm I was always told back

when I worked in running stor the

adrenaline was just a little bit higher

than that moderate stuff um it's still

in the same it's always put in the same

category whereas the g22000 has kind of

buried and I would say it went from

being like a mild stability shoot and

now it's back in that moderate realm but

still spread out along the medial side

much better than it was beforehand so if

you want more of that midp put stability

feeling which I really get here the

gt2000 might be a better option it's

still the heal stability is plenty good

but if you really need a higher level of

heal stability that's where the

adrenaline's probably going to come in a

little bit better the other thing I got

to talk about the g2000 is lighter and

it is noticeable on foot it's not just

the ride I've really enjoyed this shoe

the Adrena is a tried and true classic

daily trainer it's really not meant to

pick up the pace it's just for getting

daily mods in and it will be consistent

in that but I personally am liking the

gt2000 more because it's a little more

versatile it's been getting lighter it's

a little snappier a little bit bouncier

and if that's something you want then

this is going to be a shoe you might

want to try out but if you just like hey

I just need my higher heel drop stable

heel shoe to get me through the miles

the adrenaline's going to do a great job

as well so both these are great great

shoes there's a reason that they're

rated really highly there's a reason

they've been around for so long and it's

there's a reason they're really popular

but they are different and I hope this

video kind of helped highlight some of

those things so you can make a decision

not which is the best shoe overall but

what's the best shoe for you and that

might vary these are all also two great

options if you have the finances to

switch back and forth they are different

enough that you can jump between the two

of them get two different stimuluses

kind of where you're going to load

tissue different firmnesses different

stability levels that again I would like

to say thanks to Lauren maslo one of the

few things we know about Footwear is

that if you have a couple pairs of shoes

in your rotation is one of the few

things that can reduce your injury risk

so if you have the finances you could

consider both these if you don't

hopefully this video helps decide which

one might be best for you please comment

below if you try them which one did you

like better if you got to try them both

what's your experiences with each one of

them I want to know cuz I'm curious cuz

I'm always curious to hear what people

are experiencing because it's not just

about us it's always about you