Precautions You MUST Take

Summary

The video script discusses concerns over a perceived two-tier justice system, where some face harsh punishments for minor online comments while others evade jail for serious crimes due to overcrowded prisons. The speaker shares personal anecdotes and advice on staying safe and cautious in various situations, emphasizing the importance of not relying on online advice as legal counsel, being vigilant in personal security, and maintaining privacy online with tools like VPNs. The script also touches on issues of trust with authorities and the need to document all interactions.

Takeaways

• 🔒 The speaker expresses concern over a perceived two-tier justice system where some individuals face harsh punishments for minor offenses while others evade justice for serious crimes.
• 👮‍♂️ The speaker suggests that the justice system may be influenced by external pressures, such as prison overcrowding, which can affect sentencing decisions.
• 📚 The speaker emphasizes the importance of not relying on YouTube or any single source for legal advice, urging individuals to seek professional counsel for personalized guidance.
• 💻 The speaker warns about the risks of misinformation online and the potential consequences of relying on unverified information, including the demonetization of channels spreading false information.
• 🏠 The speaker advises caution when inviting people into one's home, citing examples where individuals faced legal trouble due to the actions of visitors.
• 🚶‍♂️ The speaker recommends being vigilant in public spaces to avoid becoming a victim of crime, highlighting the importance of being aware of one's surroundings.
• 🤝 The speaker shares stories of individuals who faced negative consequences for trying to help others, suggesting that good deeds can sometimes be misinterpreted or lead to trouble.
• 📱 The speaker cautions against displaying valuable items in public, as it can make one a target for theft.
• 🌐 The speaker discusses the importance of online privacy and security, recommending the use of VPN services to protect one's digital footprint.
• 📝 The speaker stresses the value of documenting all interactions and agreements, as written records can be crucial evidence in disputes.
• 🏛️ The speaker shares personal experiences with local authorities and insurance companies, suggesting a lack of trust and highlighting the need for self-protection against potential injustices.

Q & A

What is the main concern expressed in the video script about the justice system?

The main concern is the perceived two-tier justice system where some individuals face severe penalties for minor offenses while others escape punishment for serious crimes, suggesting a system that may be influenced by factors other than the rule of law.

Why does the speaker mention the case of someone going to prison for Facebook posts?

The speaker uses this example to illustrate the severity of punishments for seemingly minor offenses, questioning why some individuals are incarcerated for their online activities while others are not, despite the serious nature of their crimes.

What does the speaker suggest as a reason for the discrepancy in sentencing?

The speaker suggests that external pressures on the judiciary, such as prison overcrowding, might be influencing the sentencing decisions, leading to a seemingly inconsistent application of justice.

Why does the speaker emphasize not to rely on YouTube for legal advice?

The speaker stresses that information on YouTube, including their own content, should not be taken as legal advice because it cannot account for the specific details and nuances of an individual's legal situation.

What is the role of the VPN service mentioned in the script?

The VPN service is recommended as a tool to protect online privacy and security, preventing tracking and potential misuse of personal data by malicious websites or entities.

What is the speaker's stance on plea bargaining in the legal system?

The speaker expresses a negative view on plea bargaining, suggesting that it may lead to less severe charges being filed to secure convictions, which could influence the outcome of legal cases.

What advice does the speaker give regarding interactions with local authorities?

The speaker advises caution when dealing with local authorities, recommending that one should not volunteer information unless required and to document all interactions for potential future reference.

Why does the speaker share stories of people facing legal trouble for helping others?

The stories serve as cautionary tales to illustrate that good intentions can sometimes lead to negative consequences, especially when it involves activities that could be misinterpreted or misused.

What is the importance of documenting conversations according to the speaker?

Documentation of conversations is crucial for maintaining an accurate record of interactions, which can be vital in resolving disputes or supporting one's case in legal matters.

What is the speaker's view on the use of technology for surveillance and communication?

The speaker expresses concern about the potential misuse of surveillance technology, such as hacked CCTV cameras, and advises being cautious about the technology one uses and trusts.

What is the overarching message the speaker wants to convey about the current state of the justice system?

The speaker's overarching message is one of caution and skepticism towards the justice system, suggesting that it may not always operate fairly or consistently, and individuals should be vigilant in protecting themselves.

Outlines

00:00

😕 Concerns Over Tyrannical and Two-Tier Justice System

The speaker expresses concern over a perceived tyrannical and two-tier justice system, citing examples of people receiving harsh punishments for social media posts while others escape punishment for serious crimes. They emphasize the need for viewers to stay informed and not rely solely on online sources for legal advice. The speaker also discusses the pressures on judges due to systemic issues like prison overcrowding, leading to inconsistent sentencing.

05:01

🚨 Warning Against Relying on YouTube for Legal Advice

The speaker warns against treating YouTube content as a source of legal advice, stressing the importance of doing personal research and seeking professional guidance. They discuss the dangers of misinformation on the platform, which can lead to serious consequences. The speaker also mentions the risks of sharing personal information online and the importance of using VPN services like NordVPN to protect privacy and security.

10:03

🔒 Privacy and Safety Tips in a Dangerous Digital Age

The speaker provides safety tips for the digital age, including being cautious about who is invited into one's home, being mindful of surroundings, and not trusting anyone easily. They share stories of people being reported to the police for various reasons and emphasize the importance of documenting everything, especially communications that could be used as evidence in disputes.

15:04

📝 The Importance of Documentation in Disputes

The speaker recounts personal experiences with local authorities and insurance companies, highlighting the importance of documentation in disputes. They advise viewers to keep records of all communications and to consider recording calls for personal reference. The speaker also discusses the irony of data protection policies that can both facilitate and hinder access to one's own records.

20:04

🏠 Final Tips on Safety, Privacy, and Skepticism Towards Authorities

In conclusion, the speaker reiterates the importance of being cautious about who is invited into one's home, being vigilant in public spaces, and maintaining privacy online. They advise skepticism towards local authorities and insurance companies, which may not always act in one's best interest. The speaker encourages viewers to document everything and to subscribe for more raw analysis of current issues.

Keywords

💡Tyrannical

The term 'tyrannical' refers to a government or authority that is oppressive and unjust. In the video, the speaker uses this term to describe their perception of the government's actions, suggesting that it is unjustly punishing some individuals while allowing others to escape consequences for serious offenses. This term sets the tone for the video's critique of the justice system.

💡Two-tier Justice

The concept of 'two-tier justice' implies a system where there are different standards or outcomes for different groups of people. The speaker uses this term to express concern that some individuals are receiving harsher punishments for minor offenses on social media, while others seem to evade punishment for more severe crimes, highlighting perceived inequalities in the justice system.

💡Overcrowding Crisis

The 'overcrowding crisis' refers to a situation where prisons are filled beyond capacity. The video mentions this as a reason why some individuals might not be sent to prison, even for serious offenses, illustrating the practical challenges that judges face and how these can influence sentencing decisions.

💡Public Order Offense

A 'public order offense' is a legal term describing actions that disrupt public peace or cause alarm or distress to others. The video uses this term to discuss how certain charges might be less severe and lead to lighter sentences, contrasting with more serious charges like 'violent disorder' that could result in immediate imprisonment.

💡Plea Bargaining

Plea bargaining is a legal process where a defendant and prosecutor negotiate a plea deal to resolve a case. The speaker mentions this practice, suggesting that it might lead to less severe charges being filed to secure a conviction, which can affect the outcome of a case and contribute to the perceived two-tier justice system.

💡Misinformation

The term 'misinformation' refers to false or misleading information that is spread, often unintentionally. The video warns against relying on YouTube or other social media platforms for advice, as misinformation can have serious consequences, and channels spreading it may be penalized or demonetized.

💡Data Protection

Data protection involves the privacy and security measures taken to handle personal data. The video discusses an example where a local authority's handling of personal data and communication recordings led to a conflict, illustrating the importance of data protection and the potential issues that can arise from its mismanagement.

💡Contemporaneous Records

Contemporaneous records are those made at the time of an event or conversation, providing an accurate account. The speaker advises keeping such records, especially in the form of call recordings, to document interactions and protect oneself in case of disputes, emphasizing the importance of documentation in legal matters.

💡NordVPN

NordVPN is a virtual private network service provider mentioned in the video as a way to ensure online privacy and security. The speaker recommends using such services to protect one's online activities from being tracked or exploited, highlighting the need for digital safety in the current era.

💡Victim Blaming

Victim blaming is the act of holding a victim responsible for their own victimization. The video makes a point to clarify that it is not victim blaming when advising people to be aware of their surroundings and cautious with their belongings, but rather providing practical safety advice.

💡Local Authorities

Local authorities refer to the governing bodies of a region or municipality. The speaker expresses distrust towards local authorities based on personal experiences, suggesting that they may not always act in the best interest of the public and can be untrustworthy, which ties into the broader theme of perceived injustice.

Highlights

The perception of a 'tyrannical, two-tier Justice system' is based on online opinions and various viewpoints.

People have gone to prison for months over Facebook posts, indicating potential issues with freedom of speech.

Despite serious offenses, some individuals have escaped prison due to reasons like prison overcrowding.

The justice system's pressure on judges is highlighted by cases where serious offenders avoid prison.

The video discusses the irony of receiving guidance from YouTube while advising not to base life decisions on online content.

The importance of not relying on YouTube for legal or financial advice is emphasized.

A case is presented where an individual was not imprisoned due to being charged with a less severe offense.

The video provides a list of practical tips for staying out of trouble in the current social climate.

The recommendation to use VPN services like NordVPN for online privacy and security is given.

Horror stories of people's personal information being misused or mishandled are shared as cautionary tales.

The video warns about the risks of having sensitive data on the cloud and the importance of being cautious with whom you share it.

Personal stories are told to illustrate the lack of trust in local authorities and their potential to act against individuals' interests.

The importance of documenting everything, especially conversations and agreements, is stressed for potential legal disputes.

The video concludes with a call to be cautious about what is said online, especially given the video's critical analysis of the current state of justice.

Transcripts

how do we survive a seemingly tyrannical

two-tier Justice government for the next

four years let alone the next 10 years

if that's what sakir stama really wants

now a few obligatory caveats I say

seemingly because that's the opinion

that I Garner online from Reading lots

and lots of different messages and

viewpoints from different people I say

tyrannical because we've seen people

going to prison for many months for

things that they've written on Facebook

that they didn't really mean probably

anyway and yet they've gone to prison n

less and I say Suit to tier because not

withstanding we've seen people going to

prison for what they've posted on

Facebook we've seen people escaping

prison for all sorts of really serious

offenses some of which involving

children and all sorts of serious

assaults that I Won't Say on YouTube for

fear of this video getting blacklisted

and no one will ever see it but they've

escaped prison for all sorts of silly

reasons for example the prisons were

overcrowded and there's an example of

this in fact that I'll come to now I

will be giving you some ideas on how to

survive this seemingly tyrannical period

for the next few years to keep

yourselves out of trouble but I'll also

be telling you some stories along the

way just to bring this back to reality

now the case that you've all probably

read about where the chap was supposed

to go to prison because of a serious

assault is probably the best example of

where the judges have been pressured by

the system so I don't blame the judges

because it's not the judge's fault but

there's clear pressure upon the judges

not to send certain people into prison

where they should have otherwise gone to

prison in the judge's own words and I

quote from the judge's words if we had

been in different times then it would

have been virtually inevitable that you

would have had to go into custody the

only reason you've escaped immediate

custody today is because the prison

overcrowding

crisis so he would have gone to prison

because of a serious offense now if he

hasn't gone to prison because of the

overcrowding crisis then that does beg

the question as to why people posting

things on Facebook as horrible as those

posts have been I don't condone and I

don't agree with things that have been

posted on Facebook or social media

calling for violence and calling for

people to be attacked and so on I don't

condone those I don't support those but

it does raise the question why have they

gone to prison when others haven't

particularly when we look at recent news

now I did a video which I've unlisted so

it doesn't kill the YouTube algorithm

but I did a video where I described why

the chap that threw objects at Nigel

farage didn't go to prison now I'll re

explain that here in the context of this

not that I agree with it sometimes I

give you the raw honest truth on this

channel it's not necessarily what I

agree with I'm just telling you as it is

and if you like this fresh blunt brutal

approach to what's going on please do

consider subscribing because I am not

mainstream media I'm not going to be

mainstream media I've turned down

Investments multiple times to ort of

work with me on my channel here and

become producers of my channel not going

to happen because I promise you the

brutal honest truth on this channel so

please do subscribe if you want this as

a fresh alternative but the reason that

chap didn't go to prison not that I

agree with it if you want my personal

opinion on these things I reserve those

for black belt Secrets my other channel

Linked In the description below but the

reason that he didn't go to prison is

that he was in my view perhaps charged

with something that gave the judge no

real alternative but to give him a

suspended sentence because it was much

more lenient in the way that those

offenses are charged and the sentencing

guidelines provide for so he was charged

with a bog standard section four public

order offense which is just putting

someone else in fear of immediate

unlawful Violence by your words or

behavior or insults and so on now was

that correctly charged now I'm not

criticizing the prosecutors here because

they very often will charge something

that they are more confident in securing

a prosecution or a guilty plea or

whatever not that we should condone plea

bargaining I don't think we should but

but very often it is charged much less

so that they secure a conviction however

had he been charged with violent

disorder that would have been a very

different story he would most likely

have got a custodial sentence

immediately of something in the region

of 20 to 30 months because that's what

the sentencing guidelines call for and

that's what would have been in front of

the judge to be able to pass sentence so

enough about the seemingly tyrannical

two-tier justice system government that

we've got going on at the moment let's

talk about what you can actually do do

about this to keep yourself safe for the

next few years I've got a short bullet

point list of things here that I'm going

to talk about so feel free to make notes

pause the video come back bookmark it

share it all that sort of stuff which

also helps the YouTube algorithms and

helps me out to grow my audience but

let's get into a few of those now the

first one will be really ironic the

first one is don't base any of your

decisions and your certainly life

decisions and important decisions don't

base them on what you learn on YouTube I

know ironic because here I am on YouTube

giving you guidance but that's the

important Point here it is just guidance

nothing that I tell you in my videos is

ever intended to be nor should be relied

upon as legal advice and you shouldn't

rely on anyone on YouTube for advice

guidance yes but go away do your own

research go away get your own advice I

get so many emails saying this is just a

yes no question on this set of facts can

you do a YouTube video about this now no

I can't really all I all I can do is

give you a broad overview and the

guidance as to how things would normally

apply in that situ ation it can't be

taken as legal advice and you shouldn't

be relying on anything you say on

YouTube as legal advice or financial

advice or anything else but if you want

tips on how to make money I have another

Channel which is Daniel shens Smith also

linked in the description below but just

case in point I've known of a few

channels just recently I'm not going to

name and shame anybody but a few

channels have recently been demonetized

because I believe they've had strikes

for

misinformation because they've been

saying something as though it is

absolute fact as absolute truth ET Etc

which in my view could get people into

serious trouble I've commented on some

of those before um and I just believe

that if people rely on those as advice

and fact and they get into trouble that

is why YouTube has these systems to

demonetize channels that are making

money off giving people misinformation

so that's just casing point in fact I

get lots of emails from people asking me

to talk about this that or the other

video because it seems to them to be

nonsense and humbly they come to me for

what they believe is going to be more

helpful and more accurate guidance and

I'm not saying I'm always going to be

right I won't likely always be right

which is why you shouldn't rely on

everything I say but I would hope that

it's more researched than most I

wouldn't bring something to you unless I

was absolutely researched on it so you

always need to consider your own

circumstances your own set of facts go

off and get your own discret advice on

all of these things but also not just

around you but online as well because if

you are online there's all sorts of

horrific stories now there's one with

apple I believe they dropped this uh

system where they were scanning your

photos for things that paaps shouldn't

be there or that might flag some kind of

alerts because they were planning to

develop a system whereby they might

report them to the police but I did read

of such a story with another online

provider that when a chap was asked by

the doctor to send photographs of his

son to diagnose a problem in an intimate

area so he took these fairly high

resolution photos and took sent them to

the doctor to diagnose the problem the

doctor prescribed something and got rid

of the problem but a few days later his

whole account just disappeared it was

locked access everything else and not

only that he had the police coming

around and asking him questions about

what these photos were and why they were

there obviously it was all resolved he

just said well this was a conversation

with the doctor the doctor confirmed it

Etc but he didn't re we gain access to

his account his access to his account

his whole account emails everything was

completely locked down and blocked and

seemingly no response now I'm not naming

who it was because I don't know how it

ended I don't know all the facts and

that's me being cautious because I don't

know what the end tale of that story was

so if I tell you all that as fact and

who it was without the outcome then that

might be defamatory so I'm not going to

say who that was but also whilst you're

online there are also lots of other

risks as well such as visiting malicious

websites even malicious adverts and

malicious downloads and files and all

sorts of things not to mention people

tracking what you're doing for example

visiting certain websites and things

like that which is why I partner on my

Channel with nordvpn I've been a partner

with nordvpn for quite some time now I

use it myself I paid for it with my own

money even before I partnered with

nordvpn and nordvpn will give you that

piece of Mind knowing that there are no

logs of any websites you visit any of

your downloads your browsing history Etc

they've been independently audited a

number of times to show that they do

really keep zero logs of your activity

online now of course none of you

watching or planning to visit a

dangerous or malicious website but we

have had people come to us that have had

their identities stolen they've had

their accounts taken over because they

visited a malicious website and nordvpn

will flag up those sites or downloads as

you come across them of course as a

partner to my channel I can get you four

months extra free with the link in the

description below in fact if you see at

the top there it says your status is

protected if you go to this website

which is nordvpn.com BBB because that's

the nickname you gave me and that wasn't

intended to rhyme but if you go to that

website it will show you that you are

not protected it will show you your IP

address and your location which shows

you just how easy it is for these

companies to find out this information

about you in fact quite some time ago

when I was browsing the internet without

novpn I was shopping for office

furniture a few days later I got an

email to me my wife and my Clark to say

that they knew because of their software

that I'd be shopping for office

furniture and they'd got all of our

email addresses which means their

software had taken the IP address and

other search information whilst we were

browsing online they tracked us down

found us out and started emailing me and

my wife and my staff but you can cut all

of that out and maintain your privacy

online using nordvpn which is one thing

that I highly recommend you do in this

very dangerous time moving forward to

protect what you're doing online so

check out the link in the description

below and grab yourselves four mons

extra free you get 30 days to change

your mind but the peace of mind is well

worth it now a few horror stories here

I've had a few new cases come to the

firm in the last few years which have

really heightened the concerns that I

have on certain things so I will give

you these as a broad guidance so you can

think about them moving forward probably

things that you've never even thought of

before now the first one is being

careful as to who you invite into your

home now there's a few stories about

this one person had a few antique

firearms in his home they were perfectly

legal there's nothing wrong with them at

all he had someone come in to do some

work around the house and reported him

to the police so before you know he's

got the Firearms Squad at his house

raiding his house to take these things

away and long story short they worked

out that they were antiques they were

perfectly legal and there was nothing

wrong but not before putting him through

weeks and weeks of Misery the next story

in my view is rather evil there was a

plumber went to a house to do some work

on the boiler and the heating system of

this house little did he know that the

person in the house had collaborated

with the person opposite for whatever

reason to get this plumber into trouble

the person in the house suggested that

the person opposite also wanted work

doing on their system and Julie he went

over to examine and do a little bit of

work on their system the person in that

house tipped them some money and off

they went the person in house number one

then reported this plumber to his

employer who jully sacked him for

Moonlighting doing another job on the

job which just goes to show I don't know

why people do this but why you just

sometimes you can't trust people so

always take this air of caution about

every little thing that you do if you're

out doing jobs for a company just don't

do anything outside of your company's

rules and things like that now this guy

was just being helpful and was just

given a tip for helping someone out

which proves that good old saying no

good deed goes unpunished another good

tip of being very careful is when you

are out and about in the street being

mindful of who is around you who is in

front of you who's behind you now I'm

not victim blaming here but if you walk

around with your phone in your hand like

this you are advertising here is a £200

or ,000 or500 piece of equipment that

you can take off me very easily because

my attention's focused on it and someone

can yank it out of your hand now I'm not

victim blaming this is just a sad fact

of reality that if you are walking

around like that people can take it off

you very easily just like if you again

with the helping someone out scenario of

in someone's house this applies in the

street as well a horrific Story video

actually that I saw online just a couple

of days ago someone was out and there

was one person was on the floor looking

like they' collapsed and in trouble

there was another person standing next

to them so Good Samaritan went up to the

person on the floor and tried to help

them out the second person actually

walked behind this person and injected

them with something to knock them out

and then mugged them of all their

possessions which again fairly evil but

just goes to show you have to be very

careful if even if you're trying to to

help somebody out of the goodness of

your heart just be mindful of who's

around what they're doing and especially

if you're alone but they're not alone

you really have to think twice about all

of these things every time you're moving

around now when anyone walks around with

me they'll know that I'm somewhat

suspicious and paranoid in that I'm

always looking around and checking

different directions I firmly believe

that I have stopped more than one

mugging not just in myself but other

people before now um one was absolutely

certain because grabbed someone's

handbag and because I was already aware

of it as he was coming across the road I

grabbed him took him to the floor and

removed the bag from him gave it back to

the lady called the police and he was

arrested so you have to be very careful

and mindful of what's going on around

you and just on the subject of

Technology as well we've known people

that have installed cheap CCTV only to

then hear a voice through the cameras

late at night and somebody was talking

to their child through the CCTV because

this was a cheap sort of off-brand CCTV

camera connecting to a malicious website

or it was hacked or something else and

somebody was watching and talking to

their child so this really goes to show

you have to have complete trust in the

company that sells you this equipment

not that I guarantee that all of the big

tech companies are completely

trustworthy either but sticking with the

theme of trust or lack of trust I have a

couple of stories about local

authorities and why I don't trust local

authorities anymore one's a personal

story and one is pinched from somebody

else one of my own story is that whilst

on the one hand there is no obligation

to inform a local Authority when someone

moves in or out of a property via V

council tax unless they ask you the

question of course if they ask you

whether there's any change or if they

ask you who is there for the purposes of

council tax then you have to tell them

because you can't be dishonest but

you've no obligation to inform them of

updates and things like that you just

don't have to say that and that was

decided in a case where someone was

prosecuted for fraud for failing to tell

them and the case failed on appeal I

recall because they said that she hadn't

been dishonest by not telling them that

the situation had changed she was only

found to be dishonest on those counts

where they'd asked her the question and

she didn't respond or she gave false

information but on the counts where she

just didn't tell them that was perfectly

fine because there was no obligation for

her to do so now despite that we did

tell the local Authority that there had

been a change and the local Authority

officers told us that they froze the

council tax on this property because it

was empty and vacant and being

refurbished and it was not inhabitable

at that time and so they appeared to

have some kind of consideration for us

and said that they'd Frozen the council

tax on the property until we got it

refurbished so that we could let it out

again but lo and behold later when it

was ready to let again they then said no

that was wrong the lady that spoke to us

said I don't care what the other people

said they shouldn't have told you that

it's due you've got to pay it and here's

a bill for it now you can understand why

I was a little bit annoyed here because

not only had they told us that council

tax was frozen on the property but there

was no obligation for us to tell them in

the first place and we were just being

completely upfront and honest even

though there was no legal obligation to

do so so again take formal advice if

you're in a situation where you're

wondering whether you're in a position

that you have to tell them a certain

thing because if you don't have to tell

them and certainly going forward if I

don't have to tell them I'm not going to

tell them because they just don't have

any consideration whatsoever even though

you've done the right thing and told

them the right thing which again comes

back to my earlier point no good deed

goes unpunished so if you don't have to

tell them keep it to yourself I hate to

have to say that as guidance you

understand but that's just the way we

are because they had no consideration

whatsoever they didn't care about the

situation they even went back on what

they'd originally said so which in my

view is disingenuous possibly

challengeable in the court

but it's a lot of time and effort and

ultimately all they'll do is say that

this is the law they're following the

law and they are allowed to bill us the

council tax and make that decision and

so even though we might go around in

circles maybe win maybe not but by the

time we've done all that it's time

effort expense stress Etc it's just not

worth the couple of months worth of

council tax to go through all of that to

argue over it and to top it off they

even recorded the calls and then refused

to give us the copy of the call

recording without going through hoops of

to prove prove who we are and all of

this sort of stuff even though they'd

been corresponding with us anyway so

that just goes to irony really because

if they've been corresponding with us in

the first place then that would have

been our personal data and if they

didn't know who we are it would have

been a breach of personal data and data

protection but then when we asked for

more information because we wanted a

copy of the call where they had told us

that it was frozen they said no we can't

give it to you because of data

protection so make up your mind are you

corresponding with us and your happy

with that and you're happy that you

satisfied who we are to tell us to

correspond with us or have you now

changed your mind because we asked for

something this sounds a little bit

familiar a little bit my previous story

with uh an insurance company who uh on

the one hand said they didn't have any

of the records that I wanted and yet

relied upon them when refusing my

complaint and so I said well if you're

relying on them to refuse the complaint

surely you've got the record so please

hand them over they can't have it both

ways and so that's another little final

tip that I'll leave you with really

document absolutely everything because

you could always refer back to it a

court is always going to prefer the

contemporaneous documentary evidence who

said what when and where word for word

if possible recorded if possible there's

nothing against you recording your own

telephone calls if it's for your own

contemporaneous notes and Records your

household purpose so that you've got an

accurate record of precisely what was

said just record the call and then

annotate it perfectly um there's an app

that I use called Mac whisper this is

not a sponsored portion of the video it

was I think1 or $15 and you can dump a

recording into there and it will

transcribe it just like that very

accurate very useful and if you want to

keep a contemporaneous record of all

those uh conversations I strongly

recommend that you do that because if

you get into these arguments later and

they say no we didn't say that or we

didn't agree to that if you've got it on

record your own records then a court is

more likely to believe that particularly

if you've got the recording of it but

there we are there's my final tips so in

summary be careful of who you invite

into your house be careful of when

you're out and about look in front look

behind think twice before helping

somebody um don't trust anybody

necessarily make sure you take advantage

of my offer with nordvpn to keep

yourself safe and secure and private

online with a completely secure and

private IP address which keeps no logs

of what you're doing while you're online

be careful of what photo graphs you

store on the cloud and things like that

particularly with whom you share them

and don't trust local authorities I've

found or some insurance companies for

that matter because it turns out they're

not on your side they'll use what they

can against you they'll go back on their

word they don't care about your

circumstances and they'll do everything

they can to basically screw you over is

my experience and so coming full circle

I can wholeheartedly understand why

people believe online from the opinions

that I've read that this is a tyrannical

government that is on the face of it

operating as a two-tier Justice system

it's technically not for reasons that

I've explained different offenses

different sentencing guidelines judges

are doing what they're supposed to do

but it does beg the question why some

people are not going to prison for

really serious offenses because the

prisons are full when other people are

going to prison for things that just

because they was caught up in something

else that was really serious and that

does raise a really serious question but

leave me your thoughts and comments uh

being careful about what you say

Obviously given everything I've said in

this video please do subscribe if you

like this brutal raw analysis of what's

going on and as always thank you for

watching