Ethical Relativism
Summary
TLDRThis video delves into ethical relativism, exploring whether personal or societal beliefs can dictate moral rightness. It contrasts moral judgments with scientific proofs, emphasizing the subjectivity in determining good or bad actions. The speaker, Dr. Ramos, uses examples like charitable acts and the death penalty to illustrate the complexity of moral judgments across cultures. The video also touches on the influence of personal and societal beliefs on perception and decision-making, highlighting the diversity in moral ideologies, such as Hitler's, and the importance of conviction in one's beliefs.
Takeaways
- 🤔 Ethical relativism suggests that what is considered morally right or wrong can vary based on individual or cultural beliefs.
- 🌐 Moral judgments are subjective and can differ from proving scientific facts, which are objective and verifiable.
- 🔍 The distinction between 'right' and 'wrong' is not always clear-cut and can be influenced by personal motivations and societal norms.
- 💰 An action, such as spending money to help others, can be seen as morally good depending on the intention behind it.
- 🤷♂️ Morality is a personal construct that can't be empirically tested or measured by scientific instruments.
- 💡 A person's belief in the morality of their actions can make those actions 'right' from their perspective, even without external validation.
- 👥 Society's views on what is right or wrong can influence an individual's actions, but personal beliefs often hold significant weight.
- 🏛️ Laws and norms vary across different cultures, reflecting the diversity of moral beliefs within those societies.
- 🗡️ The example of the death penalty illustrates how one country's moral stance can be at odds with another's, based on differing beliefs about justice and punishment.
- 🎭 Historical figures like Adolf Hitler demonstrate how deeply held beliefs, even if misguided or harmful, can drive actions and policies.
- 🧠 Beliefs are shaped by personal experiences and knowledge, influencing how individuals perceive and interact with the world.
- 🏆 Success, such as becoming rich, can be perceived differently based on individual beliefs about the importance of education or strategy.
Q & A
What is ethical relativism?
-Ethical relativism is the belief that moral judgments are subjective and dependent on cultural, societal, or individual perspectives, rather than being universally true or false.
Can a person's belief make an action morally right?
-According to the script, if a person believes something is morally right, it can be considered morally right for them, although this is subject to their own convictions and may not align with societal or cultural norms.
How does culture or society influence moral judgments?
-Culture or society can shape moral judgments by establishing shared beliefs about what is considered right or wrong, which can vary significantly across different groups.
What is the difference between believing something is right or wrong and good or bad?
-Believing something is right or wrong pertains to moral judgments, whereas believing something is good or bad is more about personal or societal values and preferences.
Why are moral judgments considered harder to deduce than scientific theories?
-Moral judgments are harder to deduce because they are subjective and influenced by personal, cultural, and societal factors, unlike scientific theories which are based on empirical evidence and objective analysis.
What is an example of a morally good action according to the script?
-An example given is when a person spends money to help innocent civilians in a wide-ranging country, which is considered morally good due to the motivation behind the action.
What is the significance of motivation in determining the morality of an action?
-Motivation is significant because it can influence whether an action is seen as morally good or bad. For instance, spending money for altruistic reasons is morally good, whereas doing so for personal gain is not.
Why might debating the morality of a thought or action be pointless?
-Debating can be pointless because morality is not something that can be tested or measured scientifically, and it is deeply rooted in personal and cultural beliefs.
How do personal beliefs about right or wrong differ from societal views?
-Personal beliefs are individual convictions that may or may not align with societal views, which are the collective moral standards shared by a community or culture.
What is an example of differing beliefs in different countries as mentioned in the script?
-The script mentions the death penalty as an example where one country might accept it as morally right punishment, while another country might oppose it based on their belief in the sanctity of life.
How did Adolf Hitler's beliefs influence his actions and the perception of morality?
-Hitler's beliefs, such as his rejection of non-Germans having a say in Germany and his view of communism as a threat, led him to take extreme actions, including military force, which he believed were morally justified based on his convictions.
What is the relationship between belief and conviction as discussed in the script?
-Belief and conviction are related in that a conviction is a strong belief that a person holds as true, even without evidence, and it is deeply ingrained in their mind based on their experiences and knowledge.
How do different beliefs about wealth and success illustrate the concept of ethical relativism?
-The script uses the example of two people with different beliefs about achieving wealth— one through education and the other through life strategy— to show that what is considered a path to success can vary greatly based on individual perspectives.
Outlines
🔍 Ethical Relativism and Moral Judgments
This paragraph delves into the concept of ethical relativism, questioning whether moral rightness is subjective or objective. It explores the difficulty of moral judgments compared to scientific theories and the distinction between moral rightness and goodness. The speaker discusses the complexity of determining right from wrong and how actions can be morally good or bad based on motivations. The paragraph also touches on the influence of personal and societal beliefs on moral decisions, using the example of helping civilians versus making investments for profit. It concludes by suggesting that morality is a personal conviction that cannot be scientifically tested or measured, implying that a person's belief in the moral rightness of an action can indeed make it morally right.
🌐 Cultural Beliefs and Individual Perceptions
The second paragraph examines how cultural beliefs and individual perceptions shape our understanding of wealth and success. It contrasts the beliefs of two individuals, Person A and Person B, who have different views on what leads to becoming rich. Person A believes that good grades lead to a stable job and wealth, while Person B thinks that a strategic life plan is more important, regardless of academic performance. The speaker, Dr. Ramos, emphasizes that despite their differing beliefs, both individuals could achieve wealth if they have a strong will. The paragraph concludes with a reflection on the subjectivity of beliefs and how they influence our perception of the world, without necessarily determining a single 'right' or 'wrong' path to success.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Ethical Relativism
💡Moral Judgments
💡Cultural Beliefs
💡Moral Good
💡Moral Praiseworthiness
💡Complexity
💡Conviction
💡Hitler's Ideology
💡Communism
💡Jewish People
💡Perception
💡Strong Will
Highlights
Ethical relativism discusses the morality of actions based on personal or cultural beliefs.
Moral judgments differ from scientific theories in their complexity and the way they are deduced.
Actions can be classified as morally right, wrong, good, or bad based on motivations and societal views.
An example illustrates how helping innocent civilians can be morally good, depending on the motivation behind it.
Determining right from wrong can be straightforward or complex, depending on the situation's uncertainty.
Individuals often believe in the moral rightness of their actions based on personal conviction.
Morality cannot be scientifically tested or measured, making it subjective to personal beliefs.
Society's beliefs and personal convictions often influence a person's actions and moral decisions.
Different countries have varying laws and moral stances, such as the acceptance of the death penalty.
Historical example of Adolf Hitler's ideology and its impact on his moral and ethical decisions.
Beliefs are convictions deeply rooted in a person's experiences and knowledge.
Different beliefs can lead to different perceptions of the same situation or concept.
Example of differing beliefs on the importance of grades for achieving wealth.
Even with differing beliefs, individuals can achieve success through determination and willpower.
The challenge of determining which belief is right or wrong in the context of personal and cultural differences.
Dr. Ramos concludes the discussion on cultural relativism and its implications on moral judgments.
Transcripts
[Music]
today i will be discussing
about ethical relativism
can a person make something morally
right
by simply believing it to be right can a
culture or society make something right
by simply believing it to be right
moral judgments are harder to deduce
compared to proving scientific theories
believing something to be right or wrong
is different from believing it to be
good or bad
when we assess them from the moral point
of view
it can sometimes become intricate
we can classify them as morally right or
wrong
however we can likewise judge them
morally good or bad
doing something you believe is right can
also be morally good or bad
for example if a person spends money to
help innocent civilians
in a wide-ranging country
her motivation tends to make her action
morally good
but if she spends the money only because
she regards it as lucrative investments
her action may be prudent but it would
not be morally praiseworthy
in some cases determining right from
wrong
is simple and straightforward if you are
asking the question because it's
uncertain
then there is complexity in the
situation
with that being said in my opinion
if a person thinks that something is
morally right
for him then it is pretty
straightforward that it is morally right
but there are also circumstances when a
person is debating in his thoughts
if something is morally right for him
then it means that there are thoughts in
his mind
that it might not be morally right
additionally debating whether or not a
particular thought or action
is morally right or wrong could be
pointless because
morality cannot be tested by science nor
can be measured by any scientific
instrument
with this in mind a person could make or
do something morally right
by simply believing it to be right
in most cases when any of us does
something
we try to act according to what society
believes is right
more often we listen closely to what our
own beliefs about right or wrong are
telling us
even if they are different from
society's views
these two have to do with ethics and
morals
example different countries all around
the world have certain laws
the citizens could comply to but not all
countries share that same rule
this is because each country has
different beliefs
for one another for example practicing
the death penalty
as a means of punishment for offenders
who have committed heinous crimes
can be accepted by a country because
they believe that it is morally right
and it serves as a solution
for ending crimes in their vicinity on
the other hand it can be criticized by
another country
because they believe that taking away
one's life is not a deterrence for
heinous crimes
adult peter's ideology for example
he believed that no non-germans should
have any say in germany
he did not believe that jews could be
germans
hitler believed that communism was a
huge threat to germany
and should be destroyed he thought that
communism was a jewish
intervention or invention and that was
another reason why he hated the jews
later on he resorted to military force
to enforce his ideology
in which he strongly believed in
believing in something means that a
person has a conviction
and accepts a thought or idea even
without evidence
it is the result of a person's
experience as a knowledge
about a certain topic and is deeply
etched in a person's mind
though both of them influences how a
person sees the world around them
when two people have different beliefs
about something
they are looking at then it follows that
they perceive it differently
person a believes in having a good grade
in school will make you rich
well person b says that you don't need a
good grade to become rich
the recent person a belief on having a
good grade will make him rich is because
he can have a good and stable job while
person b
believes that having a strategy in life
will make him rich
even though he doesn't have a good grade
in school
as you see these two people has a
different belief on how they will become
rich
even though person a and person b
perceive things differently
they could still be rich if they have a
strong will to be
these two persons share different
beliefs and views but we can say
that one is right while the other is
wrong
thank you very much this is dr ramos
on cultural relativism
[Music]
[Music]
you
関連動画をさらに表示
What is Ethical Relativism?
The Psychology of Morality
Symbols, Values & Norms: Crash Course Sociology #10
Why Relativism Will Lead to a Disintegrated Society | Vanessa Smiley | TEDxYouth@SAS
Relativism: Is it wrong to judge other cultures? | A-Z of ISMs Episode 18 - BBC Ideas
Lesson 1: The Ethical Dimension of Human Existence
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)