MEHDI HASAN OWNING EVERYBODY ON ISRAEL-PALESTINE!
Summary
TLDRThe video script captures a heated debate on the conflict between Israel and Hamas, focusing on the portrayal of events in media, the role of propaganda, and the responsibility of governments and journalists. It discusses the asymmetry in reporting, the alleged misinformation from both sides, and the ethical questions surrounding the conduct of war, civilian casualties, and the quest for truth in a complex conflict.
Takeaways
- 🗣️ The script contains a heated debate about the conflict between Israel and Hamas, highlighting differing perspectives on the situation in Gaza.
- 🤔 There is a discussion about the control of information, with accusations that both sides manipulate what is seen in the media to fit their narratives.
- 👁️ The script mentions the lack of visual evidence of Hamas casualties, suggesting a possible intentional selection of what is shown to the public.
- 🔍 It points out instances where Israeli spokespeople have made false claims or shared misleading information, which were later debunked or corrected.
- 🏥 The debate touches on the issue of civilian casualties, including children, and the responsibility of both sides in the conflict.
- 🚨 There is a strong emphasis on the need for transparency and international investigations into the actions of the Israeli military.
- 🏢 The script raises questions about the Israeli government's actions and rhetoric, suggesting some statements could be seen as genocidal.
- 📈 It discusses the asymmetry in the conflict, with the power dynamics favoring Israel and the implications for the people of Gaza.
- 🏠 The debate includes commentary on the living conditions in Gaza, describing it as an 'open-air prison' and addressing the concept of collective punishment.
- 🛡️ The script addresses the issue of international sanctions and the perceived double standards in how different countries and entities are treated for human rights abuses.
- 🕊️ The debate concludes with calls for a ceasefire, a political solution, and the recognition of the humanity and rights of all people involved, regardless of their nationality or ethnicity.
Q & A
What is the main point of contention regarding the control of information during the conflict in Gaza?
-The main point of contention is the alleged control of information by Hamas and the Israeli government, with accusations that each side is presenting a biased narrative to support their respective positions.
What was the false claim made by the Israeli military spokesman about the Arabic document found in a Gaza hospital?
-The Israeli military spokesman falsely claimed that the Arabic document was a list of names of terrorists, when it was actually just a calendar with the days of the week on it.
What was the mistake made by Ofir Gendelman, a spokesperson for the Israeli Prime Minister's Office, regarding a tweet about Palestinians in Gaza?
-Ofir Gendelman mistakenly posted behind-the-scenes footage from a Lebanese short film and claimed it was Palestinians in Gaza faking their own injuries, which was later acknowledged as a mistake.
What is the argument about the difference between making an honest mistake and deliberately exaggerating numbers for propaganda purposes?
-The argument is that while honest mistakes can happen, deliberately exaggerating numbers or spreading false information for propaganda purposes is a more serious issue and should be condemned.
What was the claim made about Razan al-Najar, the 21-year-old volunteer paramedic who was shot?
-The claim made was that Razan al-Najar was shot while wearing a white uniform and was allegedly holding an incendiary bomb, which is under investigation by the IDF.
What is the debate about the treatment of Gaza by Israel, as mentioned in the script?
-The debate is whether the treatment of Gaza by Israel constitutes collective punishment, with some arguing that Gaza is an occupied territory where people are living in an open-air prison.
What is the argument about the control of Gaza's borders, airspace, and territorial waters?
-The argument is about whether Israel has control over Gaza's borders, airspace, and territorial waters, with one side arguing that no, these are not controlled by Israel, while the other side implies that there is some level of control.
What was the claim made about the Israeli military's knowledge of where every bullet landed during the conflict?
-The claim was that the Israeli military bragged on Twitter about knowing where every bullet landed, implying a high level of precision and control over their military actions.
What is the discussion about the role of Hamas in the conflict and whether it is a problem or a symptom of the problem?
-The discussion is about whether Hamas is the root cause of the conflict or a symptom of deeper issues. Some argue that treating Hamas as the sole problem is misguided and that addressing the underlying issues is necessary for a resolution.
What is the controversy surrounding the Israeli government's rhetoric, with some suggesting it borders on genocidal?
-The controversy is about the inflammatory rhetoric used by some members of the Israeli government, with critics arguing that language suggesting the annihilation of Gaza can be interpreted as genocidal.
What is the debate about the role of international institutions in holding Israel accountable for its actions in Gaza?
-The debate is about whether international institutions are effectively holding Israel accountable for its actions in Gaza, with some arguing that there is a double standard and that Israel should be treated like any other human rights abuser.
Outlines
🗣️ Media Disinformation and Gaza Conflict
The paragraph discusses the issue of media disinformation during the conflict in Gaza. It highlights the debate over whether the lack of images of dead Hamas terrorists is due to control of information by Hamas or by accident. The speaker challenges the other party's stance on the issue, pointing out instances where the Israeli government has been accused of spreading false information, such as misidentifying a calendar as a terrorist list and sharing footage from a Lebanese film as evidence of Palestinians faking injuries. The paragraph emphasizes the importance of questioning both Hamas and the Israeli government's narratives and the dangers of blindly accepting any single source as the truth.
🏹 Sniper Attacks and the Gaza Debate
This paragraph delves into the contentious issue of sniper attacks in Gaza, focusing on the deaths of individuals like a 21-year-old volunteer paramedic and a 30-year-old journalist. The speaker argues against the notion that these victims posed a threat to Israeli snipers, challenging the justifications provided by the Israeli military. The paragraph also touches on the broader context of the conflict, including the treatment of Gaza as an occupied territory and the international community's view of Israel's actions as collective punishment. The discussion underscores the complexity of the situation and the difficulty in finding a resolution that addresses the root causes of the conflict.
🕊️ Ceasefire Advocacy and International Critique
The paragraph presents a call for a ceasefire and criticizes the international community's response to the conflict. It points out the discrepancy between the numerous UN resolutions condemning Israel and the lack of practical sanctions from Western countries. The speaker also addresses the issue of double standards, arguing that Israel should be held to the same standards as other human rights abusers. The paragraph includes a discussion of the Israeli government's rhetoric, which some argue borders on genocidal, and the need for consistent application of moral principles in evaluating the actions of all parties involved in the conflict.
📢 Disparity in Media Representation and War Crimes
This paragraph examines the disparity in how the media represents the conflict and the implications of war crimes committed by both sides. It criticizes the perceived double standard in the way Palestinian and Israeli lives are valued and the reluctance to hold Israel accountable for its actions. The speaker challenges the notion that the freeing of Israeli hostages justifies the killing of Palestinians and questions the logic behind such a trade-off. The paragraph also discusses the role of the media in shaping public opinion and the importance of consistent moral principles in evaluating the actions of both parties.
🔍 Scrutinizing Israel's Nuclear Arsenal and Regional Hypocrisy
The paragraph focuses on the issue of Israel's undisclosed nuclear arsenal and the hypocrisy of lecturing other nations on nuclear programs while maintaining its own secret program. It also addresses the broader context of regional tensions and the challenges of achieving a just and lasting peace. The speaker questions the lack of transparency and the double standards applied to Israel compared to other nations in the region, highlighting the need for a consistent approach to nuclear non-proliferation and accountability for war crimes.
🌐 International Politics and the Gaza Hostage Crisis
This paragraph discusses the political dimensions of the Gaza hostage crisis, implicating Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as an obstacle to resolving the situation. It references statements from a former spokesperson for the hostages' families and criticizes the Israeli government's approach to the crisis. The paragraph also touches on the role of international actors, such as the CIA director, in negotiations and the domestic politics within Israel that may be influencing the government's stance on the conflict.
📚 College Campus Activism and the Broader Discourse
The paragraph highlights the role of college campus activism in the broader discourse surrounding the Gaza conflict. It challenges the notion that criticism of Israel's policies is inherently anti-Semitic and points out the significant number of Jewish individuals participating in protests. The speaker also addresses the issue of selective outrage, questioning why certain conflicts receive more attention than others and the role of government funding in shaping public discourse. The paragraph emphasizes the importance of complexity and nuance in understanding the conflict and the need to engage with diverse perspectives.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Hamas
💡Propaganda
💡Disinformation
💡Gaza
💡War crimes
💡Collective punishment
💡Human rights
💡Nuclear weapons
💡Terrorism
💡Hostages
💡Ethnic cleansing
Highlights
Discussion on the control of information during the conflict in Gaza, with allegations of Hamas controlling what is seen.
Debate on whether Hamas or the Israeli government is more credible in their narratives, with accusations of disinformation from both sides.
Controversy over the Israeli military spokesman's claim about a calendar being a list of terrorists, which was later debunked.
The issue of civilian casualties, including children, and the responsibility for their deaths during the conflict.
The argument about whether Hamas deliberately exaggerates casualty numbers for propaganda purposes.
A journalist's admission of making professional mistakes and the call for accountability from both sides.
The role of Ofir Gendelman in sharing misinformation and the subsequent lack of correction or removal of the misleading tweet.
The debate on the use of force by Israeli snipers, with specific cases of paramedics and journalists being shot.
The differing views on Gaza's status as occupied territory and the international response to the situation.
The question of Israel's control over Gaza's borders, airspace, and territorial waters, and the denial of such control.
The accusation of Israel using collective punishment against Gaza, as stated by the ICRC.
The discussion on how to effectively deal with Hamas, with arguments against the current approach by Israel.
The potential long-term consequences of the conflict, including the creation of orphans and further resistance.
Transcripts
have you seen one picture of a single
dead Hamas terrorist in the fighting in
Gaza not one is that by accident or is
that because Hamas can control Kamas can
control the information you ask me a
question and you said you would be brief
I have I haven't you're right but I have
seen lots of children with my own Lying
Eyes being pulled from the rub because
they the pictures Kamas wants you to see
exactly the pictures Kamas there also
people your government has killed you
accept that right you've killed children
or do you deny that no I do not I do not
I do not first of all you don't know how
those people died those two Wow first of
all we don't want to see a single child
killed okay here's sing say I agree with
you I agree with you we shouldn't
blindly believe anything Hamas says but
why should we believe what your
government says either your military
spokesman on Monday pointed to an Arabic
document in the basement of a Gaza
hospital and claimed it was a guardian
list on which every terrorist writes his
name but that was false it was just a
calendar with the days of the week on it
your colleague in the prime minister's
office offia gendelman posted behind the
scenes footage from a Lebanese short
film and claimed it was Palestinians in
Gaza faking their own injuries that
tweet is still up a week later that is
endless disinformation from your
government is it not I disagree and I
think on the important issues look I
I'll give you an example Med originally
we estimated answering your question
allow me to answer your question I'm
answering your question directly if
you'll allow me but you're dodging my
question mark true why your military
spokesman on Monday point to a calendar
in Arabic and say these are the names of
terrorists on them that's false can you
accept that here and now I I I I I I'm
not aware of the the inent have the
image you have I read Arabic it doesn't
help me I have no comment I'm familiar
with spokesman you hang on I have a
question M you're a journalist have you
made a professional mistake ever not
intentionally but have you made a
professional mistake exactly and I own
up to so can can can you own up to the
mistak so if I made I've made mistakes
you've made mistakes but there's a
difference between making an honest
mistake and between Hamas that
deliberately exaggerates numbers to suit
its propaganda purposes there's a huge
difference sounds like so on you said
propaganda can we just deal with your
colleague offia gelman's tweet it's
still up 7 Days Later why is it not come
down it's a Lebanese short film we can
put it on screen it's not Palestinians
faking their own injuries can we own up
to that mistake and take that down is
that not propaganda I uh once again I
understand that that was also a mistake
and speak toer about it if you like I'll
speak to offer about it if you like he's
a friend of mine and a colleague I quite
like him he's a good man he's actually
very effective why is he effective
speaks
I agree made a mistake but let's be
let's be clear it's very good that we
have someone who can speak Arabic on in
the Arab networks to the to the directly
to Arab people so they can hear Israeli
opinions directly and is amazing at that
he's very important okay thank you Mark
I know you're short on time much more
short than me so I'm going to keep going
what threat did razan al- naar
21-year-old volunteer paramedic uh who
was shot while wearing a white uniform
in the chest 100 met away from the fence
what threat did she opposed to Israeli
snipers wait a minute this is something
I really looked into okay she I'm glad
someone yes she was having an incendiary
bomb and there is an investigation by
the IDF so she was a threat but I have
another question for why was she why was
she going into you know why she was
going because you're killing her people
and she's a paramedic you could choose
not to kill people at a fence who are
just damaging offense allegedly as the
UN the EU International lawyers have
said no other country shoots people in
this way in the back as they're running
away let me ask you this Yas M
journalist 30 years old shot in the
stomach by an Israeli sniper he was uh
250 M away from the fence why was he why
was he what knife did he had what knife
was he carrying you can quote hundreds
of names if you look at them
individually I feel bad for them and for
their families even if they were coming
to Har bad I'm asking how do you J
because they came with a harm intention
if they were your proof of that y ala
was not Hamas was journalist your
country shot him in the stomach he and
you claim he had a hurtful intention
that's outrageous claim to make someone
was dead without any evidence that's
literally smearing the dead anyone who
goes into a war zone knows exactly what
he's doing what is a war zone when they
come and attack us it's a war zone he
wasn't attacking you if you pull a gun
you aim at someone you shoot them
remember the Israeli military bragged on
Twitter we know where every bullet
landed mie you go around the circle to
the same point and the point is that we
have a border legitimate border try to
cross it is occupied territory nonsense
that you have a border is absurd Gaza is
occupied territory the people there are
living in an open air prison and saying
I beg to differ Gaza to with the United
Nations the European Union international
criminal court every Western Government
interational committee for the Red Cross
says Gaza is being treated with
Collective punishment that's the view of
the icrc can I ask a question does
Israel control gaza's borders airspace
and territorial Waters yes or no no no
no really no wow
you're going to come here and say bare
face FAL no the things so Fisher who go
beyond six miles and get shot they just
imagine the bullets hitting them and
when General zika Vogel former head of
Southern command said in April if a
child or anyone else gets close to the
fence his punishment is death you
support that death penalty for anyone
who comes near offense I I don't agree
to that except if he is holding a weapon
Muhammad Ibrahim a 14 years old was not
holding any weapon Israeli sniper shot
him in the head did he deserve to die no
one deserves to die unless why isra snip
shoot him in the unless they aim to kill
he wasn't aiming to kill so why was he
sh in head not sure I'm not sure if you
look at the if you look at the at the
facts what are the facts the facts me
you don't do there's no transparent
investigations you don't allow any
International investigators in and then
you say trust you that the nurse had a
bomb and a 14-year-old guy was going to
kill a sniper I do
trust the Israeli military I do trust
the Israeli Supreme Court which is very
much trusted by all the world Israel is
transparent is well I'm sorry that's not
what human right say I may say things
which may be Inconvenient Truth they're
also not true how else do you get rid of
Hamas if you don't go about it in the
blunt brutal manner that Israel is doing
and if you do it the way they're doing
it how do you avoid the kind of casualty
rate of people under 18 given that's
half the population so three things very
briefly number one you do it by not
deliberately targeting civilian targets
and schools and hospitals and cemeteries
and mosques and universities and
churches you don't have snipers shooting
at hospitals or Christian women inside a
church that's how you avoid the
casualties number two I don't accept the
premise of your question that this is
the way to defeat Hamas I think even if
I'm an Israeli Hawk I criticize
Netanyahu and say this is not the way to
defeat Hamas this is actually absurd to
think you can defeat Hamas in this way
we have countless episodes from history
that show us this is not how you defeat
a gorilla movement a resistance movement
a terror group as you say whatever words
you want to use in fact you have Israeli
General saying this can't be done in
this way and number three look the
reality is Hamas is a symptom of the
problem as long as you treat Hamas as
the problem rather than as a symptom of
the problem you're never going to get
rid of Hamas or if you do by some
fantasy memes get rid of Hamas you'll
just get another version of Hamas
because now you've got tens of thousands
of Orphans you've got people who have
lost their kids their spouses their
siblings what you think they're not
going to fight back in the years to come
you you think they're not going to take
that's how I feel absolute Madness to
believe I feel I feel the same way I we
agree I think you're being a little too
generous to the Israelis here and and
with the greatest respect I think your
questions reflect a little bit of a
naivity about what Israel is doing here
you're you're starting from the premise
that Israel is trying to defeat Hamas I
don't accept that premise I don't
believe that's what Israel is trying to
do you think they wouldn't be doing it
this way I think they're trying to take
back Gaza I think they're trying to
erase the resistance in Gaza I think
they're trying to get rid of the people
from Gaza I think this is their you know
they've mowed the lawn as they put it in
previous Wars this time they're going
into erase the population you know you
know there's a plausible genocide let of
Justice if you listen hold on if you
listen to Israeli officials as you know
it's laid out in the South African
petition they are very genocidal in
their approach to flattening and burning
down Gaza it's not about destroying
Hamas and if it was about destroying
Hamas why has Netanyahu and smotrich and
others talked about how Hamas is asset
to Israel why do they say that openly
bit my why is Israel singled out yeah I
don't accept the premise of the question
obviously it's interesting you should
say that Israel singled out there's a
little a going out well if you're
watching this on YouTube go back on
YouTube and see that the first
intelligence Square debate I did was not
about Israel I came here a few months
ago to talk about the Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia and its human rights abuses so
before I even turned up for Israel I
came to condemn Saudi Arabia and on and
this I get it I get it there are lots of
un resolutions uh condemning I get that
but if you look at actual practical
sanctions there are no sanctions on
Israel from Western countries for human
rights abusers there are against Syria
there are against Russia there are
against Iran there are against North
Korea so no I don't think Israel is
being singal that I'd actually like to
see sanctions put on Israel so it's
treated like other human rights abusers
consistency SLE standard I mean I would
be critical of your double standards
because you constantly criticize Hamas
for genocidal goals and I just pointed
out to you that the Israeli Finance
Minister said this week he wanted the
total annihilation of Gaza do you agree
that's genocide listen I I definitely
think some of the members of that
cabinet have used rhetoric which I think
borders on genocidal no question but
it's not as blat why not genocidal
appears why borders well okay look you
say it's genocidal anation of Gaza yeah
I would say is deeply inflammatory
rhetoric but it's not quite the same as
the Hamas spokesman saying on camera
after October the 7th we are going to
keep doing this again and again and
again that that's
different are literally doing it as we
speak they have a charter to get R much
worse K tens of thousands of people but
T thousands of pales and you and I so
does hold on hold on hold on Pi so does
the liquid party so does the liquid
party 1977 liquid party Charter what
does it say between the Sea and the
Jordan there will only be Israeli
sovereignty River to the Sea that's
liquid chter appears I haven't heard you
criticize the liquid chter Douglas
you're the guy sorry let's just be clear
you're the guy who denied earlier that
what you said in the spectator just be
the clear Contex we're October 7 October
7 5 days after October you said maybe
they will finally put an end to this
insoluble nightmare raise Hamas to the
ground or clear all the Palestinians
from that bited strip it could be a good
time to do it but you tell this audience
we can live in peace side by side not
that's a war crime ethnic cleansing is a
war crime clearing people no I said
maybe for a reason it could be a good
time to
do just
apologizing seriously as Israel's
atrocities in Gaza have become ever more
clear committed zionists have been
forced to dismiss an Ever wider range of
international institutions as Med Hassan
found out at a recent debate I want you
to also offer defense of international
institutions at this moment as it
relates to holding the state of Israel
to account I I have just one sentence to
say about that is the entire world wants
a ceasefire and the United States and
Israel and I don't know the Micronesia
and whatever else don't right the entire
world takes a very different view
unfortunately to the people in this room
and to Douglas and Natasha the
international criminal court the
international court of justice the the
unhcr UNICEF uh Doctors Without Borders
Amnesty International Human Rights Watch
Oxfam uh Christian Aid y you're booing
what does it come to when you're booing
Oxfam what does that tell you about
yourself
you're booing Ox to defend Benjamin
Netanyahu let me just deal with
something you just said you talked about
debunking propaganda first of all you
can't even get Israeli propaganda
straight the Israeli government's own
Security Agency shinb investigated what
you just said and said no we found no
evidence that workers from Gaza were
involved in the October 7th attack oh
shinb Alliance they're booing shinb the
Israeli Security Service got it the
knesset has time and again been asked
the simple question is Israel a state
that's founded on equality or is there
no equality and time and again it will
not allow a simple law that calls for
equality and the fundamental problem is
that they do not recognize my right to
exist have you ever been arrested by
Israeli police have you ever been beaten
by Israeli police have you been
ever
proba the best question to ask yes yes
yes I I really
feel you can check the bruises she's all
bruised up right let's just be clear
first you're saying that if you haven't
been beaten by the Israeli police you're
equal member of society and then when
someone says they have been beaten by
Israeli police you say where are the
bruises no no listen I'm just I'm asking
to clarify she went to school was she
denied education was she denied social
that's your definition what is your
definition hold on in in she is is just
like me black Americans during the Jim
Crow era could go to school it doesn't
mean that there wasn't massive
segregation and discrimination against
black American but there's weird but
Jews and Arabs can go to school together
and they do go to school together there
were protests on TV just a few weeks ago
Israelis were saying they didn't want to
sell a house in their town to a
Palestinian family how many and how many
Arabs that's fine did you say that's Fen
did you just say that's fine to Israeli
people protesting against the sale of a
house in their town are you okay with
that they can protest which is good are
you saying it's good your words for
people to protest against the sale of a
house to a Palestinian family to keep
the town Jewish only cuz that's what I
just said happen and you said fine and
then then you said good are you okay
with that listen you have people here
and there why do not they believe that
they are right but you would condemn
those so would you condemn those
protests because a moment ago he said
it's good that they're protesting
because it's a democratic societ RAC
protest they have to be okay with the
protest you can protest whatever you
want but you condemn those protest it's
called freedom of expression here and
I'm asking you to give us some free
speech do you condemn those protests I
condemn anything which is biased against
race religion gender condemn those
protests
Danny such or what they represent
whatever you like Dany just do something
say give me an answer I condemn any
racism okay general statement you won't
condemn those protests though I would
condemn them oh wow okay we got that in
your view is killing 274 Palestinians
including many children an acceptable
price to pay for the freeing of four
Israelis like I said I I I don't this
you want a clear answer you want to make
a you want to this black and white is
acceptable price to pay it's it's an
unacceptable price but I think it's a
price that has to be paid wow okay so
how many Palestinians would it be
acceptable to kill in order to get back
a single host what's the upper limit
with 400 when when we start talking
about human lives every single one one
life is too many and let me just I mean
274 is a price that has to be paid I'm
saying if it was a thousand would you
pay that because me because I'm in my
estimation if we if we look at if we
look at questions like this in a vacuum
of course we're going to come up with
different answers then in the context
the entire challenge of the m e because
because if we we are increasingly seen
the United States of America in
particular as unwilling to sometimes do
what's necessary to demonstrate some
strength and prevent Congress you just
said a moment ago we have a history of
killing thousands of innocent people AB
we do and my father my father died in a
war that that was so I I do need to ask
question for the value of Palestinian
life yes so if you're saying that to get
free people from the clutches of
horrible captivity hostages people
possibly being abused in captivity to
free them you have to pay a price right
it's horrible price does that ratio work
the other way how many Israelis can
Palestinians kill in order to free
Palestinian detainees who are currently
being tortured in Israeli captivity some
of them being raped to death according
to the New York Times last week can they
kill 200 Israelis hold let me finish the
question can they kill 200 Israelis to
free four Palestinians who are being
tortured in an Israeli prison I think
question that I'm sure uh Palestinians
are asking the same way as Israelis but
no but no no no you answer you answered
it for Israel I would like you to answer
it in reverse let me let me just clarify
something you just said you said
Palestinian prisoners are being raped to
death by Israel in the New York Times
last week I I don't I don't uh I don't
believe that to be true nonetheless the
question 41y old detainee said the
interrogators has made me sit on
something like a hot metal stick and it
felt like fire another he said another D
died after they put the electric stick
up his anus it's repul this is an
Israeli dungeon that CNN and New York
Times are both reported on so to free
people from that prison can you kill
lots of innocent people according to the
logic of the raid in what what I'm what
I'm trying to say is if you represent
the Palestinian people you represent the
Israeli people we look at this quite
differently I don't want to which is why
I'm asking the question Congressman I
understand that you see it differently a
lot of people watch you at home saying
why why aren't all lives equal they
should be but they're not but then but
met then let's go look I don't what I
don't want to do is get into the bet who
suffered worse whose lives by
waying innocent Palestinian lives matter
just as much as innocent Israeli lives
Muslim lives as much as Jewish and
Christian lives that's who I am now with
all that said with all that said war is
hell this is nauseating and we're try
worry about this line war is hell
because can't Hamas say the same thing
when you accuse them of War crime they
can say war is hell is that we have
rules to war we stop it from being they
can war is Hell let me just deal with a
few things that Douglas said cuz there
were a few things were said I mean it's
look it's I wasn't surprised at all I
came to a debate in Toronto to debate
Israel with two two Defenders of the
current government and so far gide and I
correct me if I'm wrong didn't call we
could have done a long list of your
apologies for genocide and war crimes
and crimes against humanity we didn't do
that but we've been called liars and
Hamas supporters and I get it neither of
us talked about Hamas we don't support
Hamas this is not a debate about Hamas I
know Douglas wants to redefine it as a
debate about Hamas great good for him
because he can't actually deal with the
arguments we're putting forward all the
Jews who are putting forward these
arguments they're all anti-semites
remember I just want to deal with one
point very important here Douglas is the
great journalist in Israel I love this
cosplaying as a journalist going into
Gaza with the IDF Douglas interviewed
Benjamin Netanyahu in January Douglas
did not you're very bothered by katar
and spunding Hamas your bosses but well
we're talking about bosses let's talk to
this you're literally paid watch I've
I've
interviewed I've interviewed Qatari
officials you can go on YouTube and
watch my interviews with Qatari official
and then you can watch Douglas interview
Benjamin Netanyahu where he asked him
pearls like is there another chapter
left in the Netanyahu biography that was
the strong question with that he didn't
ask Benjamin Netanyahu why did you work
with Qatar to fund Hamas all those years
why did you prop up Hamas all those
years why according to today's Israeli
media did you have reports that there
was going to be attack on your citizens
and completely allow that to happen
Douglas didn't ask any of those
questions instead he'd like to spray
around Hamas at the Muslim on the state
Douglas referred to ham YF the first
minister of Scotland recently as the
first minister of Gaza Muslim guy and he
said quote come to England you said
quote he has infiltrated our system
given where a debate about anti-Semitism
I find it ironic that you are throwing
out some of the most bigoted dual
loyalty tropes known to man referring to
a v a born British Muslim politician as
the first minister of Gaza so the moment
you have a pro Palestinian guest who
wants to avoid calling what herass did
an act of terrorism by terrorists I
think it's very revealing about their
mind mindset and I think it's the wrong
mindset here's my problem with that why
is that not applied to your Israeli
guests I would I would be I would be
fine peers if you had Palestinian guests
and You Begin by asking them do you
condemn Hamas war crimes because what
Hamas did on October 7th was a war crime
but then you should start with Israeli
guests and pro-israeli guests saying do
you condem Israeli war crimes which have
been documented by the UN every Human
Rights group on the planet you don't you
had naftali Bennett the former Israeli
Prime Minister on a couple of weeks ago
I watched the interview your opening
question was how comfortable are you
with the way Israel is Prosecuting the
war bit of a soft ball to start with you
didn't ask him to Israeli terrorism
Israeli war crimes Israeli genocide in
Gaza so a lot of people look at that and
they say I they get your intention but
it comes across as a bit of a racist
double standard how many nuclear weapons
does Iran have as of today right now I
hope none okay how many does Israel have
no idea no idea you were in the
government they don't tell you that
stuff no idea who do they tell no idea
I'm telling you I uh never discussed it
but it's it's irrelevant it's between
you never discussed Israel's nuclear
weapons you can say that hand on heart
you've never discussed Israel's nuclear
you're expecting us to believe that the
deputy foreign minister of Israel never
discussed Israel's nuclear deteran
seriously then all so let let me tell
you it's not all slogans and sound bites
Med I did not discuss Israel nuclear
weapons I did discuss Israel nuclear
policy there is a big difference okay
okay okay so now we've got past that
semantic evasion no no you have to how
many nuclear weapons does Israel have
because experts say it's anywhere
between 80 and 400 so what so what yeah
so what has Israel ever thre do you
recognize the hypocrisy of Israel having
a secret illicit nuclear weapons program
that it won't open up its doors to and
won't talk about and then lecturing
everyone else in the region about
absolutely not you know why AB you talk
about hypocrisy the question for me
that's caused me a moral conjury is what
is an acceptably proportionate level of
response and I don't know the answer but
I don't think you can call people
responding to an act of Terror on that
scale terrorists for responding what you
can do is hold to account the problem
the problem is if you go to Gaza if you
go to Gaza peers and you talk to
Palestinians they will say that Hamas
were responding if we play The Who
started it game we go back many decades
we need is a consist when is kill what
we need to have is hang on when did
Israel kill 1200 kill hundreds of
Palestinian civilians when did they kill
800 Palestinian civilians in one few
hour period right in the way that Hamas
killed those definition of terrorism how
many hours you do it in I can mention
many Israeli massacres going back to
Sabra and chatila which they oversaw
going back to Kia and ariiel shiron
going back to Dear Yim where rape and
violence happened the point is not to
compare atrocities the point appear is
to have a consistent moral principle
which is to say if you kill civilians
for a political cause you are a
terrorist on that basis Hamas have
committed acts of Terror and Israel have
committed acts of Terror I think that's
only fair to say that the reality is
Abby that the obstacle to a hostage deal
has always been Benjamin Netanyahu and
those are not my words those are the
words of himim Rubenstein the former
spokesperson for the hostages family who
told the Israeli press last week that
netanyahu's been the obstacle he says
that they found out there was a deal on
the table back on October 9th 10th to
get hostages released but Netanyahu hid
it from them those are the words of the
spokesperson for the Israeli families of
the hostages and he hid it from them
because he knows that if he agrees to a
hostage deal his fascist colleagues and
his coalition government will collapse
as Government this is Israeli domestic
politics Lieutenant Colonel what about
that I mean if the hostages are all
released shouldn't Israel seriously
consider ending hostilities in Gaza and
allowing for a political M that leads to
the Future yeah I'm listening to the
second edition of massan's monologue
that I saw earlier and it's not
surprising that you're parting Hamas
talking points uh really the let's put
things here in perspective we have a
terrorist organization that abducted
civilians and soldiers they're the ones
for the last 4 months have been refusing
any deal that Israel the US Qatar Egypt
and others have put forward and now when
push comes to sh and when they see
Israeli tanks lined up on their way to
RAF all of a sudden they are agreeing
they're agreeing to something that
wasn't on the table and it's quite
absurd that this is even how it's
covered and it's classic deception 101
by an organization that is very Savvy in
deception and unfortunately has
figureheads and mouthpieces all over
Western media doing their work whether
it's a Jaz or other places and getting
that message out that Israel is the
problem when Israeli civilians and
soldiers are the ones that have been
abducted I'll let Betty respond to that
so I think all of your viewers saw me
quote the spokesperson for the Israeli
hostages families and the colonel then
said I'm parting Hamas talking points
he's referring to the hostages families
as Hamas as parting Hamas talking points
cuz I quoted them I didn't quote Hamas
in fact tonight the colonel knows that
hundreds of people went to netanyahu's
house and screamed you have blood on
your hands Israeli protesters I guess
they're all Hamas right the Israeli
position now is anyone who disagrees
with the is Hamas I'm guess that
tomorrow they'll say CIA director Bill
Burns who was involved in this hostage
negotiation deal he's Hamas too
everyone's Hamas and as for deception I
mean come on the colonel was a
spokesperson for the IDF which has spent
the last 6 months lying Abby your
network has debunked multiple lies that
the Israeli military has told CNN's
Jeremy Diamond I urge all your viewers
to go and watch your colleague Jeremy
Diamond's report on 10 kids killed in
the alag gazi refugee camp last month
the Israeli said we had nothing to do
with it and yet Jeremy interviewed three
Munitions experts who looked at the
evidence said yeah Israel killed those
10 kidss so when we talk about deception
we're we're learning from the Masters
here the propositions have sprayed
around the word lie and liar so let's
return the compliment Natasha lied when
she talked about unra and terrorism the
UN set up an independent inquiry asked
the Israelis for evidence I know you
don't want to hear this the Israelis the
they asked the Israelis she's parting
propaganda for the Israeli government
the Israeli government was asked to give
the evidence they refuse to give their
evidence every Western government
including your own Canada's has
restarted funding because they looked at
the evidence and didn't see
it that's great I get it I get it I get
it but but as Douglas might have once
said facts don't care about your
feelings to come back to the other point
of light Douglas says the war would end
if Hamas gave back the hostages complete
lie the Israelis have said even if the
hostages come back we carry on the war
in fact I interviewed Abraham mun's
nephew Abraham mun is a 79y old Israeli
hostage right now poor guy tragic 79y
old in captivity should be freed of
course had to have his birthday in
captivity his nephew says that every
time he goes on the streets Ben's police
beat him they beat him and arrest him
they're arresting hostage family members
and they're coming on TV and saying why
are we being used as props by people who
support the war he doesn't support the
war he wants a deal Israeli family
members are going on the streets and
being tear Gass and water can of what
beaten by the police because they want
to deal and they want an end to the war
that Douglas and Zasha so proudly
support they keep telling us about the
horrors of October 7th I agree this side
shares the revoltion against the horrors
of October the 7th but we also share
revoltion against the horrors that came
since October 7th we don't support those
Horrors I'm opposed to the war crimes
that happened on October the 7th and the
war crimes that have happened since
October the 7th Douglas no I got to
finish this point Douglas the week after
October the 7th came out in The
Spectator and advocated for the ethnic
cleansing of Gaza which is a crime
against humanity under the Rome statute
he said now is a not true you said now
is a good time to do it Douglas ear was
telling us all about the importance of
Journalism going on the ground while
Douglas was getting awards from the
president of Israel we were actually
reporting my new news organizations ATO
from those campuses with Jewish students
in fact the most read piece on our site
is from a student called Jonathan Ben
manakum who is at Colombia and reported
from inside the encampment where they
were having a Seda where he was
protesting war crimes in Gaza which I
know the other side thinks they on a war
crimes everything we just imagine the
last eight months um what you have to
tackle tonight I'm glad we brought up
College Co campuses because again if
this ridiculous sweeping motion Douglas
says complexity we are the side of
complexity we're not the ones saying
anti-zionism across the board is
anti-Semitism you have to deal with the
fact that college protests are dispropor
there are a disproportionate number of
Jews in these protests they're all
brainwashed they're all idiots they're
all
self-hpv have come out to defend the
protest Analise or is a 65-year-old
former chair of Jewish studies at
Dartmouth she was beaten on camera by
police while she was protesting against
the war in Gaza apparently Douglas an
atheist says that she's an anti-semite
that's the debate that's what we've got
to tonight where the former chair of
Jewish studies at Dartmouth is an
anti-semite while Douglas is the
champion of the Jewish people I find it
bizarre and I'm glad we've brought up
College protest because it's the number
one evidence right now in our discourse
that actually a lot of young Jewish
people and by the way this whole
argument why didn't you protest Sudan
why didn't you protest Syria last time I
check the United States Congress does
not fund Bashar al-assad or the rsf
militias in Sudan
関連動画をさらに表示
“Israel Does NOT Want To End This War” Deadly Gaza Hostage Raid
Israel attacks explained in Hindi | Israel vs Palestine | Abhi and Niyu
🔴JD Vance ENDS CNN Dana Bash’s Career LIVE on Air!
“Truth Has A Cost”: Why This Palestinian Journalist Risks His Life
Geopolitik Indonesia dalam Merespon Persoalan Dunia
فلسطين في دقيقة (٥٣) | يافا ! | ١٦-٢٥ يوليو ٢٠٢٤
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)