NEW Goodyear DuraTrac RT vs NEW BF Goodrich KO3
Summary
TLDRThis video compares the next-generation off-road tires, the Goodyear Duratrac RT and the BF Goodrich K3. It highlights their design improvements, such as the Duratrac's aggressive wave-like pattern and the K3's refined, streamlined pattern. The script delves into performance tests on dry and wet roads, snow, and off-road conditions, revealing each tire's strengths and weaknesses. The Goodyear Duratrac RT excels in wet and snow conditions with its 3D interlocking sipes and softer rubber, while the BF Goodrich K3 stands out on rocky terrain with its durable angled sidewall lugs and central interlocking blocks.
Takeaways
- 🚀 The video compares the new Goodyear Duratrac RT and BF Goodrich K3 tires, successors to the popular Duratrac and KO2 models.
- 🔍 The Duratrac RT features improved design elements like larger central blocks with more biting edges and an aggressive wave-like pattern.
- 🌪 The BF Goodrich K3 has a refreshed design with a more refined and streamlined pattern, offering better grip and handling on various terrains.
- 🏎 On dry roads, the K3 shows superior performance in longitudinal grip and lateral traction due to its optimized contact patch and shoulder lug design.
- 💡 Steering responsiveness is better in the K3 due to its balanced understeer on entry and solid on-center feel during turns.
- 🌊 In wet conditions, the Duratrac RT excels with its efficient water evacuation through 3D interlocking sipes and a softer rubber composition.
- ❄️ Both tires have three Peak Mountain Snowflake ratings, indicating excellent snow performance, but the Duratrac RT stands out with its Tractive Groove technology.
- 🏞 Off-road, the Duratrac RT provides superior performance on soft terrains like sand and mud, while the K3 excels on rocky surfaces.
- 🏔 The K3's durable angled sidewall lugs and central interlocking blocks offer better multi-directional grip on rocks.
- 🛠 The Duratrac RT's extractive groove technology effectively breaks down and evacuates mud, improving traction on muddy terrains.
- 📊 The overall verdict is that the Goodyear Duratrac RT has an edge in off-road performance compared to the BF Goodrich K3.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the video script?
-The main topic of the video script is a comparison between the Goodyear Duratrac RT and the BF Goodrich K3, two successor models of popular off-road tires.
What are the new design improvements in the Goodyear Duratrac RT compared to its predecessor?
-The Goodyear Duratrac RT has larger central block lugs with more biting edges, a more aggressive wave-like pattern, aerodynamically aligned shoulder lugs with squared-off angles, and middle-facing notches for improved sideways grip.
What are the key features of the BF Goodrich K3's design?
-The BF Goodrich K3 has a refined and streamlined pattern, with more packed central interlocking lugs for better grip, sharp chamfered edges, increased angled notches, and siping for enhanced traction in both wet and dry conditions.
How does the BF Goodrich K3 perform in terms of longitudinal grip?
-The BF Goodrich K3 excels in longitudinal grip due to an optimized contact patch and central lugs that enhance rubber-to-road contact, resulting in smoother motion and improved traction.
What factors contribute to the lateral grip and steering responsiveness of the tires?
-Lateral grip is influenced by the shoulder lug design, with the BF Goodrich K3 showing superior performance due to compact shoulder lugs with fewer voids and optimized biting elements. Steering responsiveness is affected by the tire's ability to maintain a consistent arc and balance power and steering, with the K3 providing more satisfactory mid-corner resistance and feedback.
How do the tires perform in wet conditions?
-Performance in wet conditions relies on the efficient evacuation of water, facilitated by sipes and grooves on the tire. The Goodyear Duratrac RT shines in wet performance due to its more efficient 3D interlocking sipes and a softer rubber composition that allows for better water expulsion.
What is the significance of the 'Goodyear Tractive Groove Technology' mentioned in the script?
-Goodyear Tractive Groove Technology refers to the secondary thread pattern or place biters at the base of the tire grooves, which enhances snow traction by picking up snow particles to create snow-to-snow contact, improving grip in snowy conditions.
How do the tires perform in off-road conditions, specifically on different terrains?
-The Goodyear Duratrac RT delivers superior performance on softer sandy and muddy terrains, while the BF Goodrich K3 excels on rocky terrains due to its durable angled sidewall lugs and central interlocking hook-shaped blocks that provide multi-directional grip.
What is the role of the 'extractive Groove technology' in the Duratrac RT's performance?
-Extractive Groove technology in the Duratrac RT helps break down mud particles, allowing them to be evacuated more effectively, improving mud traction and clearing properties.
How does the script suggest the overall off-road performance of the two tires?
-The script suggests that the Goodyear Duratrac RT has the overall upper hand in off-road performance compared to the BF Goodrich K3, particularly on softer terrains and in snow.
What is the final call to action for viewers in the video script?
-The final call to action for viewers is to share their thoughts in the comments, like the video, and subscribe for more content.
Outlines
🏎 Tire Comparison: DuraTrack RT vs. K3
This paragraph introduces a comparison between the Goodyear DuraTrack RT and the BF Goodrich K3 tires, successors to the popular Wrangler DuraTrac and BF Goodrich KO2. The script discusses design improvements, such as increased biting edges and wave-like patterns on the DuraTrack RT, and the aerodynamic and squared-off lugs on the shoulders. The BF Goodrich K3 is highlighted for its refined and streamlined pattern with more packed central lugs for better grip. The paragraph sets the stage for an exploration of these tires' performance in various conditions.
🏁 Performance Analysis: Dry, Wet, and Snowy Conditions
The second paragraph delves into the performance of the two tires in different driving conditions. It starts with dry performance, emphasizing longitudinal grip, where the BF Goodrich K3 excels due to optimized contact patch and central lugs. Lateral grip and steering responsiveness are attributed to the shoulder lug design, with the K3 showing superior performance. The paragraph then discusses wet performance, where the Goodyear DuraTrack RT stands out due to its 3D interlocking sipes and softer rubber composition, providing better water evacuation and grip. In snowy conditions, both tires perform well, but the DuraTrack RT is highlighted for its Tractive Groove technology and effective thread edge design, which enhance snow traction and performance in deep snow.
🚗 Off-Road Performance and Conclusion
The final paragraph wraps up the comparison by discussing off-road performance. The Goodyear DuraTrack RT is noted for its superior performance on soft terrains like sand and mud, while the BF Goodrich K3 is favored on rocky terrains due to its durable angled sidewall lugs and central interlocking blocks. The paragraph also mentions the DuraTrack RT's Extractive Groove technology for effective mud evacuation and its optimized sidewall for better control on sandy dunes. The script concludes by summarizing the overall off-road performance advantage of the DuraTrack RT and invites viewers to share their thoughts in the comments.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Tire Comparison
💡Circumferential Grooves
💡Tire Lugs
💡Shoulder Blocks
💡Siping
💡Longitudinal Grip
💡Lateral Grip
💡Steering Responsiveness
💡Snow Traction
💡Off-Road Performance
💡Mud Traction
Highlights
Introduction of the Goodyear Duratrac RT and BF Goodrich K3 as successors to the Duratrac and KO2 tires.
Noteworthy design improvements in the Duratrac RT, including larger central blocks and more aggressive wave-like patterns.
Introduction of linear sipes in the Duratrac RT for better handling on rough terrains.
Aerodynamic alignment and squared-off shoulders in the Duratrac RT for improved grip.
BF Goodrich K3's refreshed design with a more refined and streamlined pattern.
The K3's central blocks offer more rubber to road contact for greater grip compared to the K2.
Enhanced grip in both wet and dry conditions for the K3 due to sharp chamfered edges and angled notches.
Dry performance analysis focusing on longitudinal grip, lateral traction, and steering response.
BF Goodrich K3's superior performance in dry handling due to compact shoulder lugs and optimized biting elements.
K3's steering responsiveness is better due to its under-steer tendency and solid on-center feel.
Efficient water evacuation in wet conditions facilitated by sipes and grooves on the tire.
Goodyear Duratrac RT's superior wet performance due to 3D interlocking sipes and softer rubber composition.
Performance in snow relying on maintaining forward momentum and responding to braking across surfaces.
Duratrac RT's superior performance in snow due to Tractive Groove technology and effective thread edge design.
Off-road performance comparison, with Duratrac RT excelling on softer terrains and K3 on rocky terrains.
Duratrac RT's extractive groove technology for better mud evacuation and wider circumferential rings for mud traction.
Optimized sidewall LS in Duratrac RT for better control and stability on sandy dunes.
Conclusion stating the Goodyear Duratrac RT's overall upper hand in off-road performance compared to the BF Goodrich K3.
Transcripts
welcome to compare the tire where our
most watched video to date the goodier
dura track versus the BF gridge ko2
provided some remarkable insights so I'm
naturally excited to introduce their
nextg successors the goodier dur track
RT and the newly launched BF Goodridge
K3 stay tuned guys as we explore these
updated tires testing their limits and
of course uncovering which is a better
pick for you driving
needs so what's changed with these
updated tires sure both the Wrangler dur
track and its successor the goodier dur
track R feature prominent
circumferential grooves with Tractive
Groove technology but the newer model
introduces some very noteworthy design
improvements for instance the sental
logs maintain their three pair block
configuration but are now slightly
larger and offer an increased number of
biting edges the most significant ific
an update to these Central blocks is of
course the sing design these lugs now
feature a more aggressive wave likee
pattern further enhanced by addition of
linear SES which make the tire more
adapt at handling rough terrains moving
towards the shoulders the lugs are now
more aerodynamically aligned have
laterally oriented angles and are more
squared off overall additionally these
lugs include middle facing notches and
more pronounced siping for improved
sideways grip and regarding the outer
edges the stagged shoulder design now
incorporates inblock notches along the
edges which extend to form robust
sidewall looks however there remains
some potential for further Improvement
in this area on the other hand the BF
Goodridge K3 offers a completely
refreshed design with a more refined and
stream line pattern the tire although
offers similar hook shaped Central
interlocking looks they are now
relatively more packed up together so
they offer more rubber to Road contact
providing greater grip compared to the
K2 plus with sharp chamfered edges and
increased angled notches and siping that
grip gets further enhanced in both wet
and dry conditions same is the case with
the shoulder blocks they although have
less aggressive ing Grove notches this
still offer sharp Cham fo edges and
updated siping providing Superior Car
and with similar staggered shoulder
edges and updated sidewall lugs they
provide great off-road performance as
well speaking of which let's see how
these tires performed on dry
roads now dry performance in tires is
analyzed through handling abilities
which include lateral traction and
steering response and of course the
effectiveness in maintaining directional
grip let's break down these elements one
by one starting with longitudal grip so
so the longitudinal grip pertains to the
tire's traction on straight roads
primarily measured by breaking distance
and acceleration time a critical Factor
here is the optimization of the central
thread area which Bears the most burned
of the tire's weight during straight
line motion the BF Goodridge K3 excels
here thanks to a more optimized contact
batch and sental lugs that enhance
rubber to Road contact and ensure IM
more even weight distribution compared
to the durat TR RT this results in a
smoother motion and improved traction
particularly due to the s-shaped looks
with Cham foot edges and more pronounced
offset sides when it comes to dry
handling there are two things to
consider the lateral grip and steering
responsiveness speaking of lateral grip
first it's influenced by shoulder lug
design for the most part and here the BF
Goodridge K3 demonstrates Superior
performance evidenced by lateral G
forces in comparison tests so why is
that well because the K3 features
compact shoulder looks with fewer voids
and an optimized array of biting
elements improving shoulder to Road
contact and enhancing lateral grip with
it plus the features like sharp jamet
edges and interlocking in Grove notches
further boost this traction but what
about the steering responsiveness why is
that better on the K3 compared to the
dur track RT well to understand that you
need to consider the three phases of
cornering so there's this initial entry
phase which involves downshifting
possibly and slowing down as the vehicle
approaches the turn so needless to say
it really depends on the tires breaking
abilities then comes the mid cornering
and here the focus is on maintaining a
consistent Arc balancing power and
steering so tires need to have a great
Under and Over steering balance here
then comes the exiting phase here as the
vehicle goes out of the corner its
ability to straighten back up is checked
and this is also called the on center
field of the tire now the BF Goodridge
K3 exhibits a tendency to under steer on
Entry but it still provides a more
satisfactory mid Corner resistance and
feedback plus it also maintains a more
solid on center field like I just talked
about where the steering remains firm
and responsive as the tire straightens
from the turn uring efficient handling
without any kind of weakness like
observed in the dura track ATI Tire when
comparing the performance in wet
conditions relies on the efficient
evacuation of water primarily
facilitated by SES and grooves on the
threat now grooves play a pivotal role
in displacing the the majority of the
water while Sipes which are small slits
in the thread help absorb any residual
moisture as they press against the wet
Road surface and this is where the
goodear dur track ATI shines although
this tire May slightly lag in terms of
steering responsiveness compared to the
K3 mainly because of its slightly
heavier weight it still ends up getting
more scores in overall vet performance
meaning it showcase less slippage and
offers greater vet breaking grip so why
is that well this is due to its more
efficient 3D interlocking SES and a
relatively softer rubber composition for
the most part both of these features
combined with wider thread voids allow
the dur TR RT to expel more water out in
all directions compared to the
K3 the performance of a tire in snow
hinges on its capacity to maintain
forward momentum navigate cor nerses and
respond on to braking across various
surfaces now here both tires with three
Peak Mountain snowflake ratings provide
superb performance and have much better
traction values over their predecessors
yet testing both these tires side by
side puts goodier dur track RT in a kind
of a better spot so the tire stands out
primarily due to the goodier Tractive
Groove technology this technology is
refered to the secondary thread pattern
or place biters at the base of the tire
grooves and it enhances snow traction by
actually picking up snow particles to
create snow to snow contact and of
course since snow sticks better on snow
this kind of contact is highly needed
furthermore the durat track ATI comes
with a more effective thread Edge design
featuring aggressive scooping lugs that
excel in deeper snow especially in terms
of acceleration basically the shoulder
and sidewall lugs act like shovels
pushing snow backwards and propelling
the vehicle forward the dur track RT
also incorporates a more sophisticated
siping structure that merges linear and
wave like cyes in the center with
aggressive interlocking structures on
the shoulders so you get better
performance on packed up snow with this
tire as well compared to the BF gridge
K3 off-road things get very interesting
where the goodar durat TR R delivers
Superior performance on softer Sandy and
muddy trains while the K3 excels on
rocks basically Rocky trains demand a
tire with great multi-directional grip
and robust side walls and the BF
Goodridge K3 stands out here offering
better traction with durable angled
sidewall lugs and Central interlocking
hook shaped blocks both of them together
enhance grip from all directions meaning
you get a better combination of lateral
and circumferential traction with K3 but
yes the tire lacks a little behind on
softer trains I mean unlike the ko3 the
durat track RTI offers wider
circumferential Rings separating Central
blocks from the shoulders which provide
Superior mud traction with better mud
clearing properties Additionally the
tire with extractive Groove technology
break down the mud particles so they are
evacuated more effec effectively in
comparison plus the Wrangler durat track
a features a more optimized sidewall LS
that spread out more efficiently under
reduced air pressure providing better
control and stability on Sandy Dunes so
overall it's safe to say that when it
comes to off-road performance the
Goodyear durat track RT has the overall
upper hand compared to the BF gridge
K3 so there you have it what do you guys
think do let me know in the comments
below and please don't forget to hit
that like button and subscribe see you
next time
関連動画をさらに表示
3 Scientific Experiments to Settle This | Wide vs Narrow Off-Road Tires
BMW R 1300 GS VS R 1250 GS, LA SFIDA! Velocità, accelerazione, peso, consumi: tutta la VERITA'!
Toyo MT vs BFG KM3 ✔Everything You Need to Know... in 4K
KIA K3 Hatchback - Igual de bueno que el sedán pero con más onda 😎 | Reseña
En VERDAD Mejora La Tracción una Llanta 🛞 All Terrain? Usamos un Dinamometro!
Top 10 Best All-Terrain Tires 2024 [don’t buy one before watching this]
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)