I'm STILL right about Attack on Titan

Summary

In this passionate monologue, the creator reflects on their long-standing analysis of *Attack on Titan*, defending their early theory that Isayama subtly sabotaged the ending by identifying with Eren Jaeger. They explore how Eren evolved from a potential villain into a protagonist committing mass atrocities, highlighting Isayama's struggle to portray him as truly detestable. The speaker emphasizes their credibility and expertise in media analysis, citing years of study and teaching experience, and underscores their frustration at being repeatedly proven correct while often dismissed. Ultimately, the video blends personal insight, media critique, and an impassioned defense of analytical foresight.

Takeaways

• 🎬 The speaker is revisiting an older video they made about Attack on Titan, emphasizing the importance of their previous analysis.
• 📝 They argue that their original theory—that Isayama saw himself in Eren Yeager and thus altered the ending—was largely correct.
• 💡 The speaker explains that Isayama admitted Eren became a protagonist who committed mass slaughter, aligning with the speaker's earlier observations.
• 🕰️ The theory was formed years ago, combining the speaker's desire for narrative twists and their own youthful immaturity.
• 🤔 Eren’s character development is highlighted as someone who commits harm not out of circumstance but from personal desire.
• ❤️ Isayama struggled to fully portray Eren as detestable, creating a sense of closeness and sympathy that affects the story’s conclusion.
• 📚 The speaker defends their media analysis credentials, citing formal education and experience, and criticizes skeptics of their insight.
• ⚖️ The video contrasts revealing a villain as pathetic versus making their actions seem justified, showing the complexity of Eren's portrayal.
• 💥 The manga's ending is discussed, pointing out controversial lines where other characters acknowledge Eren’s mass murder without condemnation.
• ⏳ The speaker expresses frustration that their accurate predictions and analyses are often only validated years later rather than in real time.

Q & A

What is the speaker doing at the beginning of the transcript?

The speaker is preparing for a side quest, adjusting the camera, and requesting music to play, indicating they are setting up for a video or livestream segment.

What was the main topic of the video the speaker made a couple of years ago?

The speaker made a video analyzing 'Attack on Titan,' focusing on the character Aaron Yeager and the intention behind the series' ending.

What theory did the speaker propose about Isayama and Aaron Yeager?

The speaker theorized that Isayama saw himself in Aaron Yeager and therefore did not fully commit to making Aaron a completely evil villain, leading to a nuanced portrayal of the character.

How does the speaker describe their media analysis credentials?

The speaker emphasizes their qualifications, mentioning they have multiple degrees and experience teaching English, highlighting that they understand media analysis better than many popular YouTubers.

What does Isayama himself say about Aaron's character?

Isayama admitted that Aaron became a protagonist who committed mass slaughter, and he struggled to depict him as fully detestable, creating a sense of closeness and sympathy for the character.

Why did the speaker feel their analysis was validated?

The speaker feels validated because their prediction about Isayama's approach to Aaron's character was later confirmed by statements from Isayama, showing their analysis was accurate years in advance.

What is the speaker's opinion on how Aaron's actions were presented in the manga ending?

The speaker criticizes the manga for not fully establishing Aaron as a villain, noting that instead of condemning him, the ending made some characters seemingly thankful for his actions, which they consider a problematic portrayal.

How does the speaker differentiate between revealing a villain as a loser and making their actions justified?

The speaker notes that it's one thing to portray a villain as pathetic, but another to make their actions seem sensible or justified, which they feel Isayama attempted with Aaron.

What personal reflection does the speaker include about their early analysis?

They acknowledge that part of their initial theory stemmed from their own immaturity in their early 20s, which influenced their narrative interpretation of Aaron's character.

Why does the speaker emphasize their repeated accuracy in media analysis?

The speaker stresses that they have predicted multiple media outcomes correctly years in advance and expresses frustration that people often ignore their insights until reality proves them right.